隨著全球氣候變遷問題的加劇，各國紛紛制定相應的措施以降低溫室氣體排放。台灣作為一個致力於環境永續發展的國家，於2022年3月提出2050年實現凈零碳排放的路徑及策略。自然碳匯之一的海洋碳匯，係十二項關鍵戰略之一，對於實現碳中和的目標有著關鍵性的影響。濱海藍碳係近年來新興的研究議題，民眾對於濱海藍碳生態系認知調查之相關性研究卻非常缺乏，急需更多的基本學術研究。此外，個人對於環境的認識，與其環境態度是有關係的。因此，本研究主要目的為探討民眾對於濱海藍碳生態系的認知以及民眾海洋環境態度，影響其認知的背景變項，以及民眾濱海藍碳生態系認知與海洋環境態度之間的關係。本研究採用問卷調查法，於2023年6月3日至6月16日透過網路平台survey cake進行發放，回收問卷共計495份，經剔除得有效問卷429份，回收率為86.67%。回收問卷以SPSS軟體進行分析，以下為本研究結果：
回收樣本以女性居多，年齡20～29歲之間，職業多為學生，月收入3萬以下居多，受教育程度以大專院校為主，主要居住城市為北部地區。民眾濱海藍碳生態系認知平均為3.35，介於中間值，表示民眾對濱海藍碳生態系有相當的了解但仍有進步的空間。民眾的背景變項「居住地區」、「是否參與海洋保育相關活動」和「是否曾參訪過台灣濱海藍碳生態系相關景點」在濱海藍碳生態系的認知上，會有顯著的差異情形。民眾在海洋環境態度的平均得分為4.23，代表民眾對於海洋環境保護態度介於「同意」和「非常同意」間。整體濱海藍碳生態系認知與海洋環境態度是低度正相關(r=0.248)。根據前述研究結果提出管理建議：加強推廣海洋相關的環境教育、加強推廣海洋保育相關活動、加強推廣濱海藍碳生態系休閒遊憩活動以及加強濱海藍碳生態系相關之基礎研究。

This research focuses on Taiwan's commitment to combat global climate change by aiming to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, unveiling a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes carbon sinks, including coastal blue carbon ecosystems, among twelve key initiatives. Despite their importance, there is a limited number of studies addressing public awareness of these ecosystems, underscoring the need for foundational academic research.
To address this gap, a questionnaire survey was conducted from June 3, 2023, to June 16, 2023, using the online platform Survey Cake to assess how the Taiwanese public perceives blue carbon ecosystems and their marine environmental attitudes. A total of 495 questionnaires were distributed, and 429 valid responses were obtained, resulting in a response rate of 86.67%. The collected samples were predominantly female, aged between 20 and 29 years, with many students, and a majority reporting a monthly income of less than 30,000 TWD. The educational background was primarily at the college level, and most respondents resided in the northern region of Taiwan. Findings reveal an average perception score of 3.35, indicating a moderate level of understanding with potential for enhancement. Factors influencing perceptions include place of residence, participation in marine conservation activities, and visits to blue carbon ecosystem-related attractions. Encouragingly, the research highlights a positive marine environmental attitude score of 4.23 among the Taiwanese public. Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between public perception of blue carbon ecosystems and their marine environmental attitudes, suggesting opportunities to enhance environmental awareness through tailored educational campaigns and conservation endeavors.
These insights are relevant to policymakers and governmental authorities, offering guidance for harnessing the potential of blue carbon ecosystems and fostering greater public engagement and comprehension in pursuit of sustainable environmental goals.

中文部分
1.王經文、黃盟元、林幸助、李麗華、薛美莉、陳忠義、楊嘉棟（2022），2050淨零碳排下臺灣國公有林碳權的可能解方——森林FSC^TM+企業ESG，林業研究專訊， Vol.29 No. 5 。
2.林幸助（2022），臺灣沿海重要碳匯生態系統調查與評估計畫，海洋委員會海洋保育署。
3.劉少倫（2018），海洋中默默耕耘的藍碳大象：大型海藻生態系，MiTalkzine 2018 Nov。
4.張素美（2015），南韓碳排放交易制度分析，工業技術研究院。
5.林韋廷、黃莉婷、王婷虹（2023），日本《GX基本方針》評析，工業技術研究院。
英文部分
1.Adam, P. Saltmarsh Ecology. 335–355 (1990) doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565328.007.
2.AGEDI , The Abu Dhabi Blue Carbon Demonstration Project(2013).
3.AGEDI, Building Blue Carbon Projects - An Introductory Guide(2014).
4.Agresti, A. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences (5th ed.). (2018).
5.Alongi, D. M. Carbon Cycling and Storage in Mangrove Forests. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 6, 195–219 (2014).
6.Alongi, D. M. Mangroves. Encyclopedia of Estuaries. Encycl. Earth Sci. Ser. 393–404 (2015) doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8801-4_3.
7.Alongi, D. M. Mangrove forests: Resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar., Coast. Shelf Sci. 76, 1–13 (2008).
8.Barbier, E., Sally, H., Chris, K., Evamaria, K., Adrian, S., Brian, S. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).
9.Beck, M. W., Heck, K. L., Able, K. W., Childers, D. L., Eggleston, D. B., Gillanders, B. M. et al. The Identification, Conservation, and Management of Estuarine and Marine Nurseries for Fish and Invertebrates. BioScience 51, 633–641 (2001).
10.Berger, I. E. The Demographics of Recycling and the Structure of Environmental Behavior. Environ. Behav. 29, 515–531 (1997).
11.Brander, L. M., Wagtendonk, A. J., Hussain, S. S., McVittie, A. et al. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: A meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 62–69 (2012).
12.Breckler, S. J. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47, 1191–1205 (1984).
13,Bunting, P., Rosenqvist, A., Hilarides, L., Lucas, R.M., Thomas, N., Tadono, T., Worthington, T.A. et al. Global Mangrove Extent Change 1996–2020: Global Mangrove Watch Version 3.0. Remote Sens. 14, 3657 (2022).
14.Chen, C. L. & Tsai, C. H. Marine environmental awareness among university students in Taiwan: a potential signal for sustainability of the oceans. Environ. Educ. Res. 22, 958–977 (2016).
15.Chmura, G. L., Anisfeld, S. C., Cahoon, D. R. & Lynch, J. C. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17 (2003).
16.Chung, S. S. & Poon, C. S. A Comparison of Waste Reduction Practices and the New Environmental Paradigm in Four Southern Chinese Areas. Environ. Manag. 26, 195–206 (2000).
17.Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. (1988).
18.Connor, R. F., Chmura, G. L. & Beecher, C. B. Carbon accumulation in bay of fundy salt marshes: Implications for restoration of reclaimed marshes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 943–954 (2001).
19.Corral-Verdugo, V. & Armendáriz, L. I. The “New Environmental Paradigm” in a Mexican Community. J. Environ. Educ. 31, 25–31 (2010).
20,Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).
21,Daneshvary, N., Daneshvary, R. & Schwer, R. K. Solid-Waste Recycling Behavior and Support for Curbside Textile Recycling.
Environ. Behav. 30(2), 144–161 (1998).
22,Donato, D., Kauffman, J., Murdiyarso, D. et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 4, 293–297 (2011). http://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123
23.Duarte, C. M. & Chiscano, C. L. Seagrass biomass and production: a reassessment. Aquat. Bot. 65, 159–174 (1999).
24.Duarte, C., Losada, I., Hendriks, I. et al. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 961–968 (2013).
25.Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J. & Caraco, N. Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 2, 1–8 (2005).
26.Dunlap, R. E. & Liere, K. D. V. The “New Environmental Paradigm.” J. Environ. Educ. 9, 10–19 (1978).
27.Farnsworth, E. J. and & Elliaon, A. M. The global conservation status of mangroves. Ambio 26, No. 6, 328-334 (1997).
28.Gayo, L. Local community perception on the State Governance of ma.groves in Western Indian coast of Kinondoni and Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 39, e02287 (2022).
29.Gedan, K. B., Kirwan, M. L., Wolanski, E., Barbier, E. B. & Silliman, B. R. The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Clim. Chang. 106, 7–29 (2011).
30.Giri, C., Ochieng, E. O., Tieszen, L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T.R. et al. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 154–159 (2010).
31.Gordon, R. A. Regression Analysis for the Social Sciences. 417–442 (2015) doi:10.4324/9781315748788-18.
32.Heck, K. L., Carruthers, T., Duarte, C. et al. Trophic Transfers from Seagrass Meadows Subsidize Diverse Marine and Terrestrial Consumers. Ecosystems 11, 1198–1210 (2008).
33.IPCC , Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate(2019).
34.Kim, J.-H., Nam, J. & Yoo, S.-H. Public perceptions of blue carbon in South Korea: Findings from a choice experiment. Mar. Polic. 144, 105236 (2022).
35.Knoot, T. G. S. Clayton and G. Myers: Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. Landsc. Ecol. 26, 297–299 (2011).
36.Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. WWF Germany, 1-23.
37.Krause-Jensen D., Lavery P, Serrano O., Marba N., Masque P., Duarte C.M. Sequestration of macroalgal carbon: the elephant in the blue carbon room. Biology Letters 14: 20180236 (2018)
38.Laffoley, D. & Grimsditch, G. The Management of Natural Coastal Carbon Sinks. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. 53pp (2009)
39.Lukman, K. M., Uchiyama, Y., Quevedo, J. M. D. & Kohsaka, R. Local awareness as an instrument for management and conservation of seagrass ecosystem: Case of Berau Regency, Indonesia. Ocean Coast. Manag. 203, 105451 (2021).
40.Macreadie, P. I. et al., Anton, A., Raven, J.A. et al. The future of Blue Carbon science. Nat. Commun. 10, 3998 (2019).
41.Mateo, M. A., Cebrián, J., Dunton, K. & Mutchler, T. et al. Carbon Flux in Seagrass Ecosystem in: Larkum,A. W. D. et al.(Ed.) Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation.159–192 (2006) doi:10.1007/1-4020-2983-7_7.
42.Mcleod, E., Chmura, G., Bouillon, S., Salm, R., Bjork, M., Duarte, C. et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO_2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 552–560 (2011).
43.Mcowen, C. J., Weatherdon, L., Bochove, J.-W., Sullivan, E., Blyth, S. et al. A global map of saltmarshes. Biodivers. Data J. 5, e11764 (2017).
44.Milfont, T. L. The Psychology of Environmental Attitudes: Conceptual and Empirical Insights from New Zealand. Ecopsychology 4, 269–276 (2012).
45.Naidoo, G. The mangroves of Africa: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 190, 114859 (2023).
46.Pauly, D., Alder, J., Bennett, E., Christensen V., Tyedmers, P., Watson, R. The Future for Fisheries. Science 302, 1359–1361 (2003).
47.PEMSEA , Practical Actions for Advancing Blue Carbon Initiatives(2017).
48.Prance, G. T. & Tomlinson, P. B. The Botany of Mangroves. Brittonia 39, 10 (1987).
49.Quevedo, J. M., Uchiyama, Y. & Kohsaka, R. Perceptions of the seagrass ecosystems for the local communities of Eastern Samar, Philippines: Preliminary results and prospects of blue carbon services. Ocean Coast. Manag. 191, 105181 (2020).
50.Rahman, M. & Asmawi, M. Z. Local Residents’ Awareness towards the Issue of Mangrove Degradation in Kuala Selangor, Malaysia. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 222, 659–667 (2016).
51.Schultz, P. W. The Structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J. Environ. Psychol. 21, 327–339 (2001).
52.Short, F., Carruthers, T., Dennison, W. & Waycott, M. Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 350, 3–20 (2007).
53.Tonin, S. & Lucaroni, G. Understanding social knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards marine biodiversity: The case of tegnùe in Italy. Ocean Coast. Manag. 140, 68–78 (2017).
54.Tarrant, M. A. & Cordell, H. K. Amenity Values of Public and Private Forests: Examining the Value–Attitude Relationship. Environ. Manag. 30, 692–703 (2002).
55.Teal, J. M. Chapman, V. J. [Ed.] 1977. Wet coastal ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam and New York. xii + 428 p. $49.95. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23, 1086 (1978).
56.Tran, K. C. Public perception of development issues: Public awareness can contribute to sustainable development of a small island. Ocean Coast. Manag. 49, 367–383 (2006).
57.Unsworth, R., Leon, P.S., Garrand, S.L., Jompa, J., Smith, D.J., & Bell, J.H. High connectivity of Indo-Pacific seagrass fish assemblages with mangrove and coral reef habitats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 353, 213–224 (2008).
58.Wang, Q., Niu, G., Gan, X.Green returns to educations: Does education affect pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors in China? PLoS One.1392):e0263383 (2022).
59.Watson, R., Coles, R. & Long, W. L. Simulation estimates of annual yield and landed value for commercial penaeid prawns from a tropical seagrass habitat, Northern Queensland, Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 44, 211 (1993).
60.Woodroffe, C. D. Coasts: Form, Process and Evolution. (2002) doi:10.1017/cbo9781316036518.
61.Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C. et al. Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006).
62.Wylie, L., Sutton-Grier, A. E. & Moore, A. Keys to successful blue carbon projects: Lessons learned from global case studies. Mar. Polic. 65, 76–84 (2016). 
網絡部分
1.國家發展委員會（2022），台灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明，https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76 下載日期：2023年4月8日
2.行政院環境保護署（2021），110年度我國燃料燃燒二氧化碳排放統計與分析https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/ SubMenu.aspx?menu_id=114 下載日期：2023年5月13日
3.行政院農業委員會（2022），台灣2050凈零轉型自然碳匯關鍵戰略行動計畫，https://www.climatetalks.tw/_files/ugd/966d2a_8e4b48edaedb4ae2b6641ee8b9c22c08.pdf 下載日期：2023年3月8日
4.內政部（2022），111年度第2期各縣市自然及人工海岸線比例一覽表，https://www.nlma.gov.tw/最新消息/業務新訊/14251-自然海岸及人工海岸線長度.html下載日期：2023年7月10日
5.內政部國家公園署海洋國家公園管理處 ，東沙環礁國家公園簡介，https://www.marine.gov.tw/dongsha/zh-tw/intro 上網檢視日期：2023 年10月17日
6.海洋委員會（2023），海洋碳匯能力比森林更強!從紅樹林出發海委會積極研擬「藍碳方法學」，https://www.oac.gov.tw/ch/home.jspid=63&parentpath=0,6&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202310110002 上網檢視日期：2023年10月15日
7.風險社會與政策研究中心（2019），COP 25會議觀察：如何在2020年成為NDC領頭羊，https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/climate-change/1348-ndc-1081227.html 上網檢視日期：2023年3月2日
8.全國法規資料庫（2023），氣候變遷因應法，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0020098 下載日期：2023年3月5日
9.交通部觀光署-觀光資訊網（2021）,淡水紅樹林自然保留區，https://www.taiwan.net.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0001016&id=10597 上網檢視時間：2023年10月1日
10.內政部國家公園署台江國家公園管理處（2023），台江濕地學校，https://www.tjnp.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=394 上網檢視時間：2023年10月2日
11.環境部氣候變遷署（2023），碳費費率研議中，不應以此為由哄抬產品價格，https://enews.moenv.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/b612cd46-0d6d-4595-b0e8-8809700d830a 上網檢視時間：2023年11月10日
12,Aju Korea Daily(2022), Kia works with government to increase blue carbon in coastal lands, https://www.ajudaily.com/view/20221129100121427 上網檢視時間：2023年3月9日
13.Congress (2022), S.4355-Clean Competiton Act, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4355/text 上網檢視時間：2023年1月29日
14.European Commission, Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism,
https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en 上網檢視時間：2023年3月1日
15.Sandunie Liyanagamage (2022), Duke to the UNFCCC , How blue was COP27?, https://sites.duke.edu/duketotheunfccc/2022/11/27/how-blue-was-cop27/ 上網檢視時間：2023年1月12日
16.International Atomic Energy Agency(2022), IAEA COP27 Event Focuses on Blue Carbon as a Nature-Based Climate Solution, https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-cop27-event-focuses-on-blue-carbon-as-a-nature-based-climate-solution 上網檢視時間：2023年1月19日
17.National Ocean Service, What is blue carbon? , https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/bluecarbon.html 上網檢視日期：2023年3月15日
18.Net Zero Tracker (2023), Global Net Zero Numbers, https://zerotracker. net/ 上網檢視日期：2023年4月21日
19.Seagrass-watch, What is seagrass? , https://www.seagrasswatch.org/sea
grass/ 上網檢視日期：2023年4月6日
20.The Ocean Foundation, https://oceanfdn.org/ 上網檢視日期：2023年4月6日
21.United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2015). The Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement 上網檢視日期：2023年1月14日
22.United Nations Environment Programme, (2009). Blue carbon: the role of healthy oceans in binding carbon. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/7772. 下載日期：2023年3月18日
23.Urban Agenda Platform. Yokohama blue carbon project. https://www.urbanagendaplatform.org/best-practice/yokohama-blue-carbon-project上網檢視日期：2023年2月27日