| 研究生: |
楊人翰 Yang, Jen-Han |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
區域海洋空間規劃實踐框架-以臺南為例 The Practice of Regional Marine Spatial Planning Framework – A Case Study in Tainan |
| 指導教授: |
蕭士俊
Hsiao, Shih-Chun 張懿 Chang, Yi |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 海洋科技與事務研究所 Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 86 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 浮筏式蚵棚 、海洋空間規劃 、漁業權 、無線射頻系統 、地理資訊系統 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Oyster Farming, Marine spatial planning (MSP), Fishing right, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Geographic information system (GIS) |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:102 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
臺灣西南海域擁有眾多重要的海洋產業,其對當地區域經濟發展起著重要的作用。然而,沿海地區的快速發展導致海洋空間分配與利用的競爭,從而增加海洋空間競合的發生。為解決海洋空間競合之問題,本研究採用聯合國教科文組織提出之海洋空間規劃步驟,協助地方政府推動漁業權管理,確保沿岸海域漁業資源之合理利用,亦降低不同漁業間之衝擊與競合。本研究以臺南市浮筏式牡蠣養殖漁業權建立為例,針對蚵棚管理問題,利用無線射頻辨識技術(Radio Frequency Identification, RFID)建立漁業設施監控系統,透過蚵棚實名監控系統界定現有牡蠣養殖區之海域面積及蚵棚數量。此外,利用地理資訊系統(Geographic Information Systems, GIS) 套疊不同使用目的之海域使用圖資,顯示臺南海域使用者時空分佈與競合視覺化分析,以界定臺南市浮筏式牡蠣養殖漁業權建議劃設範圍。為確立區劃漁業權使用範圍以及推廣漁業權制度,本研究協助臺南市政府啟動區劃漁業權劃設範圍協商會議,蒐集與分析各海域使用單位對牡蠣養殖漁業管理之爭論點,並逐步解決海域使用競合已達各產業共存之目的。最後根據協商會議結果制定最佳漁業權劃設、管理策略及臺南沿近岸海洋空間規劃圖,以建立區劃漁業權制度,促進漁業管理之制度化與透明化使管理規劃更臻完善。此外,本研究以區劃漁業權推動為例,研擬適於我國之區域型海洋空間規劃架構並提供實例示範,以引領海洋空間規劃發展,對於提升臺灣海洋空間規劃的科學性和可行性具有重要意義。
The southwestern waters of Taiwan are crucial for various marine industries, making a significant contribution to local and regional economic development. However, rapid coastal development has intensified competition for marine space, escalating spatial conflicts. This study utilizes UNESCO's marine spatial planning guidelines to assist local governments in managing fisheries rights, ensuring the rational use of coastal marine resources, and minimizing conflicts among different fisheries. Focusing on Tainan City's raft-based oyster farming, the study addresses oyster farm management issues by utilizing Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology to establish a monitoring system for fisheries facilities. A monitoring system for oyster farms identifies sea areas and the number of farms within designated zones. Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) overlay maps of sea area usage for various purposes allow for the visual analysis of the temporal and spatial distribution and conflicts among users in Tainan waters. The study aims to define the recommended range for establishing fisheries rights for raft-based oyster farming in Tainan City and explores optimal management strategies for these operations. To implement demarcated fisheries rights and promote the fisheries rights system, the study assists the Tainan City government in initiating consultation meetings. These meetings gather and analyze disputes from various sea area usage units regarding oyster farming management, gradually resolving conflicts to achieve industry coexistence. Based on the consultation outcomes, the study formulates the best fisheries rights demarcation and management strategies, developing a spatial planning map for Tainan's nearshore waters. The ultimate goal is to establish a demarcated fisheries rights system, promoting institutionalization and transparency in fisheries management, thereby enhancing overall management planning.
中文文獻
國立成功大學. (2019). 通訊技術應用於西南沿海海域空間衝突及漁業廢棄物監測 (PG10803-0239)。海洋委員會委託研究。擷取自 https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=12887084
國立成功大學. (2020a). AI在海洋產業管理應用及預警系統建立研究[個案研究] (PG10909-0036)。海洋委員會委託研究。擷取自 https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=13600437
國立中山大學. (2020). 109年臺南市浮筏式牡蠣養殖運用科技管理及漁業權範圍量測示範計畫。臺南市政府委託研究。
國立中山大學. (2021a). 浮筏式蚵棚結合自動監測系統納入漁業權管理計畫。臺南市政府委託研究。
國立中山大學. (2021b). 110年浮筏式蚵棚監測與流失預警管理系統開發計畫委託專業服務 (110GA039C1)。嘉義縣政府委託研究。擷取自 https://www.oca.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=210&parentpath=0,81&mcustomize=research_view.jsp&dataserno=202203070024
國立中山大學. (2022). 111年臺南市浮筏式牡蠣養殖區劃漁業權納管示範計畫。臺南市政府委託研究。
張維音. (2017). 應用GIS空間分析估算X-band雷達回波影像內的浮筏式蚵棚數量 (碩士論文)。國立成功大學海洋科技與事務研究所。
臺南市政府農業局. (2022). 臺南近海漁業概況。擷取自 https://fishingharbor.tainan.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=5509
鄭永裕. (2009). 3S技術於臺灣海域區劃漁業權漁業規劃與管理應用之研究 (碩士論文)。國立中山大學海洋環境及工程研究所。
陳靜茹、張引. (2017). 應用無人機管理臺南外海浮式蚵棚之研究。第39屆海洋工程研討會論文集,489-493。
英文文獻
Agardy, T. (2010). Ocean zoning: Making marine management more effective. London: Earthscan.
Agardy, T., Christie, P., & Nixon, E. (2012). Marine spatial planning in the context of the convention on biological diversity. CBD Technical Series, 68.
Ahmed, S. (2016). Ecological consequences of oysters culture. Journal of Fisheries and Livestock Production, 4, 198. https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-2608.1000198
An, K. (2016). E-Navigation services for non-SOLAS ships. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 4, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enavi.2016.06.002
Bates, A. W. (2017). Revisiting approaches to marine spatial planning: Perspectives on and implications for the United States. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 46(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2017.19
Chen, C. K., Chang, K. C., & Shih, M. Z. (2010). Application of FORMOSAT-2 imagery on estimating the number of oyster scaffolding. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 15(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.6574/JPRS.2010.15(2).3
Chang, Y., & Lin, B.-H. (2016). Improving marine spatial planning by using an incremental amendment strategy: The case of Anping, Taiwan. Marine Policy, 68, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.004
Day, J. C. (2002). Zoning—lessons from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Ocean & Coastal Management, 45(2-3), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00052-2
Day, J. C. (2008). The need and practice of monitoring, evaluating and adapting marine planning and management—lessons from the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Policy, 32(5), 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.023
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dewali, S., Sharma, N., Melkani, D., Arya, M., Kathayat, N., Panda, A. K., & Bisht, S. S. (2023). Aquaculture: Contributions to global food security. In S. Ghosh, A. Kumari Panda, C. Jung, & S. S. Bisht (Eds.), Emerging solutions in sustainable food and nutrition security (pp. 101-117). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40908-0_6
Douvere, F. (2008). The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32(5), 762–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021
Douvere, F., & Maes, F. (2010). The contribution of marine spatial planning to implementing integrated coastal zone management. In D. Green (Ed.), Coastal zone management (pp. 13–30). Thomas Telford.
Ehler, C. (2014). A guide to evaluating marine spatial plans. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. Paris: UNESCO. IOC Manual & Guides No. 70.
Ehler, C., & Douvere, F. (2009). Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme, Paris: UNESCO. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
European Commission. (2014). Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Official Journal of the European Union.
Esri. (2019). What is image classification?—ArcGIS Help | Documentation. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/spatial-analyst/image-classification/what-is-image-classification-.htm
Fischer, M. M., & Nijkamp, P. (1992). Geographic information systems and spatial analysis. Annals of Regional Science, 26(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581477
Ferreira, A., Seixas, S., & Marques, J. C. (2015). Bottom-up management approach to coastal marine protected areas in Portugal. Ocean & Coastal Management, 118, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.008
Fisher, R. J. (1982). Social psychology: An applied approach. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Fisher, R. J. (2004). The problem-solving workshop as a method of research. International Negotiation, 9(3), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1163/1571806053498733
Fishery Agency. (2022). Annual fisheries statistics report 2022. Council of Agriculture, Taipei, Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/PublicationsFishYear/
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Gaymer, C. F., Stadel, A. V., Ban, N. C., Cárcamo, P. F., Ierna, J., & Lieberknecht, L. M. (2014). Merging top-down and bottom-up approaches in marine protected areas planning: Experiences from around the globe. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 24(S2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2508
Gilliland, P. M., & Laffoley, D. (2008). Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32(5), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.022
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
Gimpel, A., Stelzenmuller, V., Topsch, S., Galparsoro, I., Gubbins, M., Miller, D., & Watret, R. (2018). A GIS-based tool for an integrated assessment of spatial planning trade-offs with aquaculture. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.133
Gobler, C. J., Doall, M. H., Peterson, B. J., Young, C. S., DeLaney, F., Wallace, R. B., ... Kulp, R. E. (2022). Rebuilding a collapsed bivalve population, restoring seagrass meadows, and eradicating harmful algal blooms in a temperate lagoon using spawner sanctuaries. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.911731
Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2011). Conducting an in-depth interview. FCS6012, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences Series, University of Florida, 1-3.
Hsiao, S. T., Chuang, S. C., Chen, K. S., Ho, P. H., Wu, C. L., & Chen, C. A. (2016). DNA barcoding reveals that the common cupped oyster in Taiwan is the Portuguese oyster Crassostrea angulata (Ostreoida; Ostreidae), not C. gigas. Scientific Reports, 6, 34057. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34057
Huang, S.-C., Chang, Y., & Chang, S.-K. (2024). From regional effectiveness evaluation and community engagement toward effective marine protected areas. Ocean & Coastal Management, 251, 107075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107075
International Maritime Organization. (2009). Strategy for the development and implementation of e-navigation. Retrieved from https://docs.imo.org/
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87-88. doi:10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Johnsen, G., Volent, Z., Sakshaug, E., Sigernes, F., Pettersson, L. H., & Kovacs, K. (2009). Remote sensing in the Barents Sea. In E. Sakshaug, G. Johnsen, & K. Kovacs (Eds.), Ecosystem Barents Sea (pp. 630). Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.
Kao, J. C. (2012). Sources for beach litter in Chijin and its implications on management policy (Master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University.
Kratzenberg, W. (2016). Traceability in manufacturing: RFID and barcode technology. EE Publishers.
Kelly, C., Gray, L., Shucksmith, R., & Tweddle, J. F. (2014). Review and evaluation of marine spatial planning in the Shetland Islands. Marine Policy, 46, 152–160. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.017
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.
Liu, T.-K., Chen, Y.-S., & Chen, Y.-T. (2019). Utilization of vessel automatic identification system (AIS) to estimate the emission of air pollutant from merchant vessels in the port of Kaohsiung. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 19(10), 2341-2351. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2019.07.0355
Lin, W. J., & Huang, Y. X. (2014). Automatic recognition of oyster racks in the aerial image. Paper presented at the Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Singapore.
Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. (2014). Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Liu, T. K., Kao, J. C., & Chen, P. (2015). Tragedy of the unwanted commons: Governing the marine debris in Taiwan's oyster farming. Marine Policy, 53, 123-130. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.001
Le Tissier, M. D. A., & Hills, J. M. (2010). Marine spatial planning in practice – Transitioning towards ecosystem-based management: Findings and lessons from the Irish Sea Pilot. Marine Policy, 34(5), 1040-1050. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.022
Le Tixerant, M., Le Guyader, D., Gourmelon, F., & Queffelec, B. (2018). How can automatic identification system (AIS) data be used for maritime spatial planning? Ocean & Coastal Management, 166, 18-30. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.05.005
Maritime New Zealand. (2018). Marine farm guidelines: Navigational safety. Retrieved from https://www.maritimenz.govt.nz/commercial/ports-and-harbou
Maurel, P., Bots, P., Crochet, D., Felter, M., Rey Valette, H., Roussillon, J. P., Taillade, J. J., & Van Duijn, H. (2007). Action research in a participatory spatial planning process. The SCOT de Thau (France). Territorial Intelligence and Governance Conference, Huelva (Spain), 24-27 October, vol. 2007, p. 8.
Maguire, B., Potts, J., & Fletcher, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in the marine planning process—Stakeholder analysis within the Solent, United Kingdom. Marine Policy, 36(1), 246–257. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.05.012
Nation Audit Office. (2015). Counseling program of oyster farming industry at shallows of the sea in Tainan, Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.audit.gov.tw/files/15-1000-2240,c158-1.php
Newton, A., & Elliott, M. (2016). A typology of stakeholders and guidelines for engagement in transdisciplinary, participatory processes. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3. doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00230
O’Brien, R. (2001). An overview of the methodological approach of action research. In R. Richardson (Ed.), Theory and practice of action research. João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba.
Olsen, E., Fluharty, D., Hoel, A. H., Hostens, K., Maes, F., & Pecceu, E. (2014). Integration at the round table: Marine spatial planning in multi-stakeholder settings. PLoS One, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109964
O’Mahony, C., Gault, J., Cummins, V., Köpke, K., & O’Suilleabhain, D. (2009). Assessment of recreation activity and its application to integrated management and spatial planning for Cork Harbour, Ireland. Marine Policy, 33(6), 930–937. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.010
Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32(5), 816–822. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017
Ruesink, J. L., Lenihan, H. S., Trimble, A. C., Heiman, K. W., Micheli, F., Byers, J. E., & Kay, M. C. (2005). Introduction of non-native oysters: Ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36(1), 643-689. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152638
Satellite Imaging Corporation. (2017). SPOT-7 satellite sensor. Retrieved 22 January 2021, from https://www.satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/SPOT-7/
Susman, G. I. (1983). Action research: A sociotechnical systems perspective. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research (pp. 95-113). London: Sage Publications.
Shucksmith, R., Gray, L., Kelly, C., & Tweddle, J. F. (2014). Regional marine spatial planning – The data collection and mapping process. Marine Policy, 50, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.05.012
Sievanen, L., Leslie, H. M., Wondolleck, J. M., Yaffee, S. L., McLeod, K. L., & Campbell, L. M. (2011). Linking top-down and bottom-up processes through the new U.S. National Ocean Policy. Conservation Letters, 4(4), 298–303. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00178.x
Smythe, T. C., & McCann, J. (2018). Lessons learned in marine governance: Case studies of marine spatial planning practice in the U.S. Marine Policy, 94, 227–237. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.019
Sayce, K., Shuman, C., Connor, D., Reisewitz, A., Pope, E., Miller-Henson, M., Poncelet, E., Monié, D., & Owens, B. (2013). Beyond traditional stakeholder engagement: Public participation roles in California’s statewide Marine Protected Area planning process. Ocean & Coastal Management, 74, 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.06.012
Stelzenmüller, V., Lee, J., South, A., Foden, J., & Rogers, S. I. (2013). Practical tools to support marine spatial planning: A review and some prototype tools. Marine Policy, 38, 214–227. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.038
Twomey, S., & O’Mahony, C. (2019). Stakeholder processes in marine spatial planning: Ambitions and realities from the European Atlantic experience.
Tuda, A. O., Stevens, T. F., & Rodwell, L. D. (2014). Resolving coastal conflicts using marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 133, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.029
UNESCO-IOC. (2017). Marine spatial planning for a sustainable ocean economy. IOC Technical Series No. 127.
UNESCO-IOC. (2020). Marine spatial planning programme - Status of MSP. Retrieved from http://msp.ioc-unesco.org/world-applications/status_of_msp/
Wu, Y.-H. (2008). Study on the development of oyster culture: An example of oyster culture region in Tainan city (Master’s thesis). National Sun Yat-sen University.
Wan, J. (2016). Application of unmanned aerial vehicle images to oyster shed identification and disaster assessment (Master’s thesis). National Chung Hsing University.
Yang, J.-H., Yu, L.-L., Liu, C.-T., Chang, Y., Yang, J.-Y., Hsu, T.-Y., & Hsiao, S.-C. (2022). Monitoring coastal aquaculture devices in Taiwan with the radio frequency identification combination system. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 59(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2021.2016241
校內:2029-04-10公開