簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳宜伶
Chen, Yi-Ling
論文名稱: 電腦自我效能、主觀規範與信任對網路購物意願之影響-科技接受模式與理性行為觀點
The Impact of Computer Self-efficacy, Subjective Norms and Trust on Purchase Intention of On-line Shopping-Perspectives of Technology Acceptance Model and Reasoned Action Theory
指導教授: 蔡明田
Tsai, Ming-Tien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 76
中文關鍵詞: 網路購物科技接受模型理性行為理論電腦自我效能信任主觀規範
外文關鍵詞: Online Shopping, Technology Acceptance Model, Reasoned Action Theory, Computer Self-efficacy, Trust, Subjective Norms
相關次數: 點閱:130下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著資訊科技日益月新與網路通訊應用的普及化,線上購物市場逐漸興盛與蓬勃發展,其快速便利、成本低廉、以全球為市場的優勢,更可以滿足顧客的需求,使得電子商務的重要性日益增加,且成為另一個新興行銷通路。
    過去研究指出,顧客是否願意在網路上消費產品,主要是受到網路購物知覺有用性與易用性影響。本研究除了探討知覺有用性與易用性外,並將信任、主觀規範、電腦自我效能是否會影響顧客的網路購物行為一併考量。
    本研究以有網路購物經驗的消費者為研究對象,共發放250份問卷,有效回收樣本211份,有效回收率為84.4%。本文使用線性結構方程模式來探討顧客網路購物行為。研究結果顯示:一、知覺有用性、信任、主觀規範對購買意願皆會產生正向影響。二、電腦自我效能對購買意願會產生正向影響。三、主觀規範與信任皆會對知覺有用以及易用產生正向影響。

    Due to the rapid development of information technology and the internet, the internet businesses keeps increasing day by day. With advantages of convenience, quickness, low cost ,and easy connections with people around the world, the internet has played a much more important role since ever and, therefore, become an alternative to global marketing.

    According to the past research, the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use to websites would have impact on willingness of consumers to shop via the internet. In addition, this paper incorporates the concept of trust, subjective norms, and computer self-efficacy with our research framework to investigate consumer behaviors over the online-shopping..

    The research subjects are consumers who have on-line shopping experiences. In total, 250 questionnaires were delivered ,and 211 effective questionnaires were returned with effective response rate of 84.4%. In this study, Structural Equation Model is applied to examine the hypothesis. The major findings of this study are stated as below.

    First, the result shows that perceived usefulness, trust, and subjective norms have significant and positive effects on the purchase intention. Second, computer self-efficacy has positive effects on perceived usefulness. Third, both of trust and subjective norms have positive effects on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.

    摘要..............................................I Abstract.........................................II 誌謝.............................................III 目錄.............................................IV 表目錄............................................VI 圖目錄...........................................VII 第一章 緒論.........................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機.................................1 第二節 研究目的......................................3 第三節 研究流程......................................4 第四節 論文結構......................................5 第二章 文獻探討......................................6 第一節 網路購物......................................6 第二節 理性行為理論...................................8 第三節 科技接受模式 ..................................11 第四節 電腦自我效能..................................16 第五節 信任.........................................20 第六節 購買意願......................................24 第七節 本研究各構面間關係探討..........................26 第三章 研究設計與研究方法.............................29 第一節 研究架構與假設................................29 第二節 變數操作性定義與衡量...........................30 第三節 抽樣方法.....................................34 第四節 資料分析方法 .................................35 第四章 研究結果與分析................................39 第一節 樣本結構分析 ..................................39 第二節 各構面敘述統計分析.............................43 第三節 因素分析與信度分析.............................47 第四節 結構方程模式分析...............................51 第五章結論與建議.....................................58 第一節 研究結論......................................58 第二節 實務意涵......................................61 第三節 研究限制與建議.................................63 參考文獻............................................64 附錄:問卷 ...........................................73 表2-1電腦自我效能相關研究..............................19 表2-2信任定義彙整.....................................22 表3-1認知有用性之題項表................................30 表3-2認知易用性之題項表................................31 表3-3電腦自我效能之題項表..............................31 表3-4主觀規範之題項表..................................32 表3-5信任之題項表.....................................32 表3-6購買意願之題項表..................................33 表3-7線性結構關係常用指標...............................37 表4-1性別之次數分配表..................................39 表4-2年齡之次數分配表..................................39 表4-3教育程度之次數分配表...............................40 表4-4職業之次數分配表..................................40 表4-5每月可支配所得之次數分配表..........................41 表4-6平均一天使用網路時間之次數分配表.....................41 表4-7過去一個月內,在網路進行購物次數之次數分配表...........42 表4-8知覺有用構面之敘述統計量...........................43 表4-9知覺易用構面之敘述統計量...........................44 表4-10電腦自我效能構面之敘述統計量.......................44 表4-11主觀規範構面之敘述統計量..........................45 表4-12信任構面之敘述統計量.............................45 表4-13使用意圖之敘述統計量.............................46 表4-14 KMO值與Bartlett球形檢定表......................47 表4-15因素分析與信度分析表.............................47 表4-15因素分析與信度分析表(續).........................48 表4-16電腦自我效能構面之驗證性因素分析...................51 表4-17知覺有用構面之驗證性因素分析......................51 表4-18知覺易用構面之驗證性因素分析......................52 表4-19主觀規範構面之驗證性因素分析......................52 表4-20信任構面之驗證性因素分析.........................53 表4-21購買意願構面之驗證性因素分析......................53 表4-22整體模式適配度統計量表...........................54 表4-23假設路徑之關係與檢定結果.........................55 表5-1實證結果彙整....................................58 圖1-1研究流程.........................................4 圖2-1理性行為理論(TRA).................................9 圖2-2科技接受模式(TAM)................................12 圖3-1研究架構.........................................29 圖4-1本研究整體結構模式.................................54

    1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A. (1992), Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247
    2. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction of Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
    3. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. NJ:Prentice-Hall,Inc.
    4. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A. & Wood, S. (1997), Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 38-53.
    5. Ba, S.& Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of The Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243-268.
    6. Bandura, A. (1977).Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,84(2), 191-215,
    7. Bandura, A. (1986) .Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    8. Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211-241.
    9. Blackwell, Miniard, and Engel. (2001). Consumer Behavior, 9th Ed, Harcourt, Inc
    10. Bomil, S. & Ingoo, H. (2002). Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1, 247–263
    11. Bruner II, G.C., Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 553-558.
    12. Cale, E., & Eriksen, S. (1994). Factors affecting the implementation outcome of a mainframe software package: a longitudinal study. Information & Management, 36(3), 165-175.
    13. Chaudhuri, Arjun, & Morris B. Holbrook. (2002). Product Class effects on Brand Commitment and Brand Outcomes: The role of Brand Trust and Brand Affect. Journal of Brand Management, 33-58.
    14. Chen,L., Gillenson, M.L., Sherrell,D.L.(2002).Enticing online consumer: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705-719.
    15. Cho, V. (2006). A study of the roles of trusts and risks in information-oriented online legal services using an integrated model. Information & Management, 43(4), 502-520.
    16. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins C. A. (1995a).Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skill. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143.
    17. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins C. A. (1995b). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
    18. Coulter, K. S. & Coulter, R. A. (2002). Determinants of Trust in a Service Provider: The Moderating Role of Length of Relationship. The Journal of Service Marketing, 16(1), 35-50.
    19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
    20. Doney, P. M. & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
    21. Donthu, N. & Garcia, A. (1999). The internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(3), 52-58.
    22. Doolin, B., Dillon, S., Thompson, F. & Corner J. L. (2005). Perceived risk, the internet shopping experience and online purchasing behavior: A New Zealand perspective. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(2), 66-88.
    23. Dorsch , M. J. , Swanson, S.R. & Kelly, S. W.(1998). The Role of Relationship Quality in the Stratification of Vendors as Perceived by Customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 128-142.
    24. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D.& Miniard, P.W. (1995). Consumer Behavior. The Dryden Press
    25. Forsythe, S. M. & Shi, B. (2003). Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 867-875.
    26. Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of Long-Team Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.
    27. Garbarino, E. & Johnson, M. S. (1999).The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relations. Journal of marketing, 63, 70-87.
    28. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737.
    29. Gefen, D. & Straub, D.W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(8), 1-28.
    30. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 1054-1057.
    31. Gefen, David, Elenk Karahanna & Demar, W. Straub (2003).Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
    32. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472-485.
    33. Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
    34. Hano, H. & Tibert, V. (2004). Online Store Image: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Measurement. Information and Management, 41, 609-617.
    35. Hasan, B. (2006)Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance. Information & Management, 43(5), 565-571
    36. Heijden, H., Verhagen, T & Creemers, M. (2003). Understanding Online Purchase Intention: Contributions from Technology and Trust Perspectives. Journal of Information Systems, 12, 41-48.
    37. Hellenbeck, J. R., & Brief, A. P. (1987). The effects on individual differences and goal origin on goal setting and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 392-414.
    38. Henry, J. W. & Stone, R. W. (1994). A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3), 21-33.
    39. Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68.
    40. Hollenbeck, J. R. , O’Leary, A. M. , Klein ,H. J. & Patrick, M. W.(1989). Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 951-956.
    41. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. & Davis G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of Microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114.
    42. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997).Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-302.
    43. Kai, H. L. (2004). Is Ecommerce Boundary-less? Effects of Individualism-Collectivism and Uncertainty Avoidance on Internet Shopping. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 547-559.
    44. Kanfer, D. J. & Ackerman, P. L.(1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-689.
    45. Karahanna, Elena & Detmar, W. S. (1999). The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-Use. Information and Management, 35(4), 237-250.
    46. Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K. & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, (17), 54-65
    47. Lee, M. K. O. & Turban, E. (2001). A Trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
    48. Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001).A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
    49. Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
    50. Leo, R. V. (2004). Predicting Consumer Intention to Use On-Line Shopping: The Case for an Augmented Technology Acceptance Model. Information and management, 41, 747-762.
    51. Lewicki, R. J. & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships, Trust in Organizations: Frontier of Theory and Research, Sage Publication, CA.
    52. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C. & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241-251.
    53. Locke,E. A.& Latham, G. P.(1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    54. Luarn, P. & Lin, H. H (2004). Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Banking. Computers in Hunan Behavior, 21(6), 873-891
    55. M.K.O. Lee, E. (2001). Turban, A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6 (1), 75–91.
    56. Marakas, M. M., Yi, M. Y. & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework of research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
    57. Martocchio, J. J. & Dulebohn, J. (1994). Performance feedback effects in training: The role of perceived controllability. Personnel Psychology, 47(2), 357-373.
    58. Moon, J.W.& Kim, Y.G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context, Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
    59. Moorman, R. C. , Zaltman, G. & Deshpande, R. (1992).Relationship Between Providers and Users of Marketing Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations.Journal of Marketing Research, 29(2), 314-329.
    60. Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
    61. Morris M.G. & A. Dillon. (1997). How User Perceptions Influence Software Use. IEEE Software, 144, 58-65.
    62. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & L. L. Berry. (1996). Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, 67, 421-451.
    63. Pavlou, P. A. & M. Fygenson. (2006). Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of The Theory of Planned Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115-143.
    64. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce:Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
    65. Reichheld, F. F. & Scheftet, P. (2000). E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105-113.
    66. Roussean, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. & Camerer C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
    67. Schurr, P. H. & Ozanne, J. L. (1985). Influences on Exchange Process: Buyer’s Preconceptions of a Seller’s Trust Worthiness and Bargaining Toughness.. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 939-953.
    68. Singh, J. & D. Sirdeshmukh. (2000). Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science,
    128 (1), 150-167.
    69. Smith, R. & Swinyard, W. (1982). Information response models: An integrated approach. Journal of Marketing, 46, 81-93.
    70. Taylor, S. & Todd, P.A. (1995). Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience.MIS Quarterly, 561-570.
    71. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Information Systems Research, 46(2), 184-204.
    72. Vijayasarathy, L.R. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: The case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 41(6), 747-762.
    73. Walter, A., Muller, T. A., Helfert, G.& Ritter, T. (2003). Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 159-169.
    74. Hsu, T. & Wang, H. F. (2003), Effects of Gender, GPA, Computer Self-Efficacy, and learning Motivation on the Collaborative E-Learning Participation. Government, Healthcare & Higher Education, Phenoix, Arizona, 241-248.
    75. Warrington, T. B., Abgrab, N. J. & Caldwell H.M.(2000), Building Trust to Develop Competitive Advantage in E-Business Relationships. Competitiveness Review, 10 (2), 160-168.
    76. Wood, R. & Bandura, A. (1989a). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415.
    77. Wood, R. & Bandura, A (1989b). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
    78. Wu, J.H.& Wang, S.C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719-729.
    1. 吳亞馨、朱素玥、方文昌(2008),「網路購物信任與科技接受模式之實證研究」,資訊管理學報,第十五卷第一期,頁123-152。
    2. 吳明隆(2007),結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用,初版,台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    3. 吳萬益(2005),企業研究方法,第二版,台北:華泰書局。
    4. 邱顯貴、楊亨利(2005),「線上購物經營者與消費者在網站信任方面認知落差之探討」,資訊社會研究,第九卷,頁125-154。
    5. 苗裴明(1998),「影響使用者接受企業內網路資訊系統之因素-以TPB模式探討」,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文
    6. 蔡宗宏、池文海、許瑋麟(2007),「運用TAM模式探討個人動機與社會系絡影響使用者接受知識管理系統之因素-以高科技公司為例」,電子商務研究,第五卷第一期,頁81-108。
    7. 鍾育明(2004),「信任機制對於網路交易意圖影響之研究」,國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文。

    下載圖示 校內:2020-12-31公開
    校外:2020-12-31公開
    QR CODE