簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭文彥
Kuo, Wen-Yen
論文名稱: 以全球性觀點評估公部門貪腐現象對公司價值及財務績效的影響
Evaluating the Effects of Public Corruption on Firms’ Value and Financial Performances: A Global Perspective
指導教授: 王明隆
Wang, Ming-Long
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 64
中文關鍵詞: 貪腐產業多角化公司價值財務績效
外文關鍵詞: corruption, industrial diversification, firm value, financial performances
相關次數: 點閱:77下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   本篇研究主要探討公部門貪腐對於公司價值及財務績效的影響。本研究包含美洲、歐洲、非洲、澳洲及亞洲等49個國家在2000年至2008年的全球資料。我們利用Berger and Ofek (1995)年所提出的超額價值作為衡量公司價值的指標,並利用ROA及ROE作為衡量公司財務績效的指標。研究目的在於了解各國公部門貪腐程度是否會對公司(私部門)的價值及財務績效造成影響。
      針對公司價值及財務績效的影響因子,過去學者往往針對多角化及其他因子加以探討。近十年來,學術上指出貪腐對國家經濟成長、投資及生產效率等具有負面的影響 (Leite and Weidmann 1999, Lambsdorff 2003)。因此,我們試圖討論貪腐是否對公司價值及財務績效也會有負面影響。模型當中,我們除了考慮貪腐的影響,同時我們也納入多角化及其他控制變數,並針對全球性的資料加以分析。研究結果指出,貪腐確實會對非國際化公司有價值減損現象,並且也發現在具有產業多角化的公司,貪腐對公司價值所造成的負面影響更大。另外,我們也發現貪腐對於公司的財務績效具有負面效果,這些結論大致上合乎我們的預期。

    This paper examines the effects of public corruption on firms’ value and financial performances on global samples. We use global data from 49 countries including America, Europe, Africa, Australia, and Asia for the period between 2000 and 2008. We use excess value which was developed by Berger and Ofek (1995) as a measure of firms’ value. Likewise, we utilize ROA and ROE as measures of firm’s financial performances. Our major goal is to investigate whether public corruption, a macro-environmental factor, will exert influences on private firms’ value and financial performances.
    When it comes to studies on factors influencing firms’ value and financial performances, previous scholars often take diversification and other factors into consideration. In the past ten years, evidences show that corruption exerts a negative impact on the economic growth of a country, investment, productivity and so forth (Leite and Weidmann 1999, Lambsdorff 2003). Therefore, we try to investigate whether corruption has negative impacts on firms’ value and financial performances. In our model, not only do we consider the impacts of corruption, but we also include diversification effects and other control variables. Evidences show that public corruption has significantly value-reducing impacts on domestic firms. Meanwhile, we observe that the value-reducing effect from corruption would be greater on industrially diversified companies. Moreover, we also find a negative relationship between public corruption and firms’ financial performances. Those conclusions, in general, correspond to our anticipations.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Motivations and Background 1 1.2 Research objective 3 1.3 Research importance 4 1.4 Research framework 5 Chapter 2 Literature review and hypothesis development 7 2.1 Prior studies on the effects of public corruption 7 2.2 Prior studies related to firms’ value and financial performances 11 2.2.1 Industrial diversification 11 2.2.2 International diversification 12 2.2.3 Board size 13 2.2.4 Ownership concentration 14 2.2.5 Equity-based compensation 15 2.2.6 Corruption level 16 2.3 Hypothesis development 17 Chapter 3 Data and methodology 19 3.1 Data source 19 3.1.1 Measurement of public corruption- Corruption Perception Index (CPI) 21 3.2 Measurements of firms’ value and financial performances 24 3.2.1 Excess value (EV) methodology 24 3.2.2 ROE, ROA methodology 26 3.3 Control variables selection 27 3.4 Empirical model 29 Chapter 4 Empirical results 33 4.1 Summary statistics 33 4.2 Cross section results with corruption and firms’ value 35 4.3 Cross section results with corruption and firms’ financial performances 40 4.4 Interaction effects of corruption and industrial diversification 47 4.4.1 Interaction effects of corruption and diversification on firms’ value 47 4.4.2 Interaction effects of corruption and diversification on firms’ financial performances 50 Chapter 5 Research conclusions and suggestions 57 Reference 59

    1. Aymo Brunetti, Gregory Kisunko, and Beatrice Weder (1997). “Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector.” World Bank Economic Review, Volume 12, Number 3, pp. 353-384.
    2. Antoinnete Schoar (2002). "Effects of corporate diversification on productivity." Journal of Finance, pp. 2379-2403.
    3. Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny (1986). “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” J. Politic Economy 94, 3, pp.461– 488.
    4. Andrew Wedeman (1997). “Looters, rent-scrapers, and dividend-collectors: Corruption and growth in Zaïre, south Korea, and the Philippines.” Journal of developing areas, summer 1997, pp.457-478.
    5. Alejandro Gaviria (2002). ” Assessing the effects of corruption and crime on firm performance: evidence from Latin America.” Emerging Markets Review Volume 3, Issue 3, 1 September 2002, pp. 245-268.
    6. Benjamin E. Hermalin and Michael S. Weisbach (1991). “The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance.” Financial Management, pp.101– 112.
    7. Carlos A. Leite and Jens Weidmann (1999). “Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth.” IMF Working Paper No. 99/85.
    8. Christos Pantzalis, Jung Chul Park, Ninon Sutton (2008). “Corruption and valuation of multinational corporations.” Journal of Empirical Finance Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 387-417.
    9. Charles P. Himmelberg, R. Glenn Hubbard, and Darius Palia (1999). “Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership structure and performance.” Journal of Financial Economics 53, pp. 353–384.
    10. Claudio Loderer and Kenneth Martin (1997). “Executive stock ownership and performance.” Journal of Financial Economics 45, pp. 223–255.
    11. Christos Pantzalis, Jung Chul Park , Ninon Sutton (2008). “Corruption and valuation of multinational corporations.” Journal of Empirical Finance 15, pp.387-417.
    12. Carl R. Chen, Weiyu Guo and Vivek Mande (2003). “Managerial ownership and firm valuation: Evidence from Japanese firms.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 11, pp.267–283.
    13. David J. Gould and Jose A. Amaro-Reyes (1983). “The Effects of Corruption on Administrative Performance- illustrations from Developing Countries.” World Bank working paper Number 580.
    14. David Yermack (1996). “Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors.” Journal of Financial Economics Volume 40, Issue 2, pp. 185-211.
    15. David S. Scharfstein, and Jeremy C. Stein (2000). "The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment." Journal of Finance, pp. 2537-2564.
    16. Frank R. Lichtenberg and George M. Pushner (1994). “Ownership structure and corporate performance in Japan.” Japan and the World Economy Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. 239-261.
    17. Guido Bolliger (2004). “The characteristics of individual analysts’ forecasts in Europe.” Journal of Banking &Finance 28(9), pp. 2283-2309.
    18. Harold Demsetz (1983). “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm.” The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 26.
    19. Harold Demsetz and Belen Villalonga (2001). “Ownership structure and corporate performance.” Journal of Corporate Finance 7, pp. 209– 233.
    20. Hamid Mehran (1995). “Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, pp.163-184.
    21. Inna Cábelková (2001). “Perceptions of Corruption in Ukraine: Are they correct?” CERGE-EI, working paper pp.176.
    22. Jeremy C. Stein (1997). "Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources." Journal of Finance, pp. 111-133.
    23. John S. Earle and Saul Estrin (1996). “Privatization versus Competition: Changing Enterprise Behavior in Russia.” London School of Economics, Center for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper pp.316
    24. Joao Gomes and Dmitry Livdan (2004). “Optimal diversification: Reconciling theory and evidence.” Journal of Finance, pp. 507-535.
    25. Johann Graf Lambsdorff (2003). “How Corruption Affects Productivity.” KYKLOS, Vol. 56-2003-Fasc. 4, pp. 457-474.
    26. J. Edgardo Campos, Donald Lien, and Sanjay Pradhan (1999). “The Impact of Corruption on Investment: Predictability Matters.” World Development Volume 27, Issue 6, pp. 1059-1067
    27. Jose Manuel Campa and Simi Kedia (2002). “Explaining the Diversification Discount.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 1731-1762.
    28. John McArthur and Francis Teal (2002). “Corruption and Firm Performance in Africa.” Centre for the Study of African Economies Department of Economics
    29. John J. McConnell and Henri Servaes (1990). “Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value.” Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2), pp. 595– 612.
    30. Juan Santalo, and Manuel Becerra (2008). "Competition from specialized firms and the diversification-performance linkage." The Journal of Finance 63(2), pp. 851-883.
    31. Karl Lins and Herni Servaes (1999). "International evidence on the value of corporate diversification." Journal of Finance, pp. 2215-2239
    32. Larry H.P. Lang and Rene M. Stulz (1994). "Tobin's q, corporate diversification, and firm performance." Journal of political economy 102(6): 1248.
    33. Larry Fauver, Joel F. Houston and Andy Naranjo (2004). "Cross-country evidence on the value of corporate industrial and international diversification." Journal of Corporate Finance 10(5), pp. 729-752.
    34. Luigi Zingales (1995). “What Determines the Value of Corporate Votes?” Quart. J. Econom. 110, 4, pp.1047–1073.
    35. Marlene A. Plumlee (2003). “The effect of information complexity on analysts’ use of that information.” Accounting Review 78(1), pp. 275-296.
    36. Myeong-Hyeon Cho (1998). “Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 47 (1), 103– 121.
    37. Milton Harris and Artur Raviv (1996). “The capital budgeting process: Incentives and information.” Journal of Finance, pp. 1139-1174.
    38. Michael C. Jensen (1986). “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.” The American Economic Review, pp. 323-329.
    39. Margaret Meyer, Paul Milgrom, and John Roberts (1992). “Organizational prospects, influence costs, and ownership changes.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 1(1), pp. 9-35.
    40. Michael C. Jensen and Kevin J. Murphy (1990). ” Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, no. 2.
    41. Paolo Mauro (1995). “Corruption and Growth. “ The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 110, No. 3 (Aug., 1995), pp. 681-712.
    42. Patrick M. Emerson (2006). “Corruption, competition and democracy.” Journal of Development Economics Volume 81, Issue 1, pp. 193-212
    43. Philip G. Berger and Eli Ofek (1995). "Diversification's effect on firm value." Journal of Financial Economics 37(1), pp. 39-65.
    44. Rahul Kochhar and Michael A. Hitt (1998). “Linking Corporate Strategy to Capital Structure: Diversification Strategy, Type and Source of Financing.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 601-610
    45. Robert M. Grant (1987). “Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies.” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 79-89.
    46. Renem. Stulz (1990). “Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies.” Journal of Financial Economics 26(1), pp. 3-27.
    47. Robert Gertner, Eric Powers, and David Scharfstein (1994). “Internal versus external capital markets.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics: 1211-1230.
    48. Randall Morck, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny (1988). “Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 20, pp. 293– 315.
    49. Raghuram Rajan, Henri Servaes, and Luigi Zinglas (2000). “The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment.” Journal of Finance, pp.35-80.
    50. Sayan Chatterjee and Birger Wernerfelt (1991). “The Link between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, pp.33-48.
    51. Stijn Claessens and Simeon Djankov (1999). “Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic.” Journal of Comparative Economics Volume 27, Issue 3, pp. 498-513.
    52. Stephen Tallman and Jiatao Li (1996). “Effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms.” Academy of Management Journal volume 39, No.1, pp. 179-196.
    53. Takato Hiraki, Hideaki Inoue, Fumiaki Kuroki, and Hiroyuki Masuda (2003). “Corporate governance and firm value in Japan: Evidence from 1985 to 1998.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 11, pp.239–265.
    54. Theodore Eisenberg, Stefan Sundgren, and Martin T. Wells (1998). “Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms.” Journal of Financial Economics Volume 48, Issue 1, pp. 35-54.
    55. Vito Tanzi (1998). “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures.” Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund volume 45, No. 4.
    56. Yakov Amihud and Baruch Lev (1981). "Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers." The Bell Journal of Economics, pp. 605-617.
    57. Y.T. Mak and Yuanto Kusnadi (2005). “Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal Volume 13, Issue 3, pp. 301-318.
    58. Zhilan Chen, Yan-Leung Cheung, Aris Stouraitis and Anita W.S. Wong (2005). “Ownership concentration, firm performance, and dividend policy in Hong Kong.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal Volume 13, Issue 4, pp. 431-449.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2020-01-01公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE