| 研究生: |
鄭雅靜 Chen, Ya-Ching |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以理性行為理論探討互惠關係、互賴關係及主管支持對補教業知識分享意圖的影響 Influence of Anticipated Reciprocal Relationships , Interdependence and Competent Support on knowledge Sharing Intentions : Based on the Theory of Reasoned Action |
| 指導教授: |
蔡明田
Tasi, Ming-Tien |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 經營管理碩士學位學程(AMBA) Advanced Master of Business Administration (AMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 68 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 理性行為理論 、知識分享 、互惠關係 、互賴關係 、主管支持 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Theory of Reasoned Action, TRA, Knowledge sharing, Anticipated reciprocal relationship, Interdependence, Competent support |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:92 下載:8 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
Wang,S. & Noe, R. A.(2010)指出,知識是一種重要的組織資源,在這競爭激烈動態的經濟體中,提供持續性的競爭優勢。然而知識常存在於個體當中,藉由人際互動傳遞知識,才能為企業組織創造利潤和新價值,因此知識分享益顯重要。但在實務知識管理推動上,補教業成員反而會先擔心貢獻的知識會先降低本身在補教業中的重要性,因而消極的不配合,導致知識管理系統成效不彰。
知識管理的目標是要把個人的知識轉換成組織的知識以及如何讓補教業成員願意分享知識,並且善用補教業成員的知識加以管理,創造其價值。知識管理的目的不僅在創造知識,更是要讓新知識擴散至組織的各部分中,讓補教業組織成員共同分享新知識。而本研究目的則是探討如何使補教業成員願意進行知識分享,其支持或抑制個人知識分享行為的因素。
本研究以理性行為為理論架構,探討互惠關係、互賴關係、主管支持對補教業成員知識分享意圖的影響。實證資料透過台灣北中南部補教業者隨機抽様問卷調查的方式,共發放295份問卷,實際回收290份,有效問卷280份,並以SPSS及AMOS統計應用軟體驗證本研究假說。
研究結果顯示,知識分享態度與知識分享主觀規範會影響到個人知識分享意圖。互惠關係、互賴關係、主管支持對於知識分享態度有顯著影響。此外,知識分享態度與知識分享主觀規範具有中介效果。
Wang, S.& Noe, R. A.(2010) point out that knowledge is a critical organizational resource that provides a sustainable competitive advantage in a competitive and dynamic economy.But knowledge exists among individuals.Knowledge is often transmitted through social interaction,which could create profits and new values for enterprise organizations.Knowledge sharing and transmission gradually becomes important in enterprise organications. However, in practice, KM systems efficiency is not as expected because employees are afraid of he might be replaces once he shares his knowledge.
The main objective of knowledge management is to turn individual knowledge into organization knowledge and what makes organizational members willing to share their knowledge and create value through the use of collective knowledge from organization members. Knowledge management is not simply creating knowledge ,but also having the newest knowledge spread throughout the organization and creating the maximum benefit for all members within the organization. The aim of this study is to develop an understanding of the factors supporting or inhibiting individuals’ knowledge sharing intentions.
This research employ the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) as theoretical framework and augment it with anticipated reciprocal relationship , interdependence , and competent support that are believed to influence individuals’ knowledge sharing intentions with samples in Taiwan Cram School Industry. 280 questionmaires are sufficient as the result and the data are analyzed with statistical software, such as SPSS and AMOS.
Through survey, this study confirms the hypothesis that attitudes toward and subjective norms with regard to knowledge sharing affect individuals’ intentions to share knowledge. Anticipated reciprocal relationship , interdependence and competent support affect individuals’ attitudes toward knowledge sharing. Additionally, there are mediating effects of attitude toward knowledge sharing and subjective norm about knowledge sharing.
一、中文文獻
1.林東清 (2003),知識管理knowledge Management,台北:智勝文化,勤業管理顧問。
2.吳萬益 (2005),「企業研究方法」,第二版,台北:華秦書局。
3.陳順宇 (2005),多變量分析(四版):華泰書局。
4.吳明隆 (2007),「結構方程模式;Amos的操作與應用」,初版,台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
5.吳明隆 (2007),「SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計」,台北縣:加樺國際有限公司。
二、英文文獻
1.Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Kuhl
& J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior, pp.11-39.
Heidelberg: Springer.
2.Ajzen, I.(1988). Attitudes, Personality & Behavior. Milton-Keynes, England: Open
University Press & Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
3.Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and
the Theory of Planned Behavoir. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32:
665-683.
4.Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E., 2001, Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge
Management System: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issue, MIS Quarterly,
vol. 25, pp. 51-90.
5.Anderson, P., Finkelstein, S., Quinn J.B. (1996). Managing Professional intellect:
Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 42-53.
6.Arthur Andersen Business Consulting(1999), Zukai Knowledge Management[M],
1999, Tokyo: Toyo Keizai.
7.Badaracco,J.L. (1991). The Knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic
alliances. Boston, Mass : Harvard Business School Press.
8.Blau,P. M.(1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley. 9.Bock,G.W.,Zumd,R.W.,Kim,Y.G.,& Lee,J.N.(2005).Behavioral intention
formation in knowledge sharing:examining the roles of extrinsic motivators,social-psychological forces,and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly,29(1):87-112.
10,Chow,W.S.& Chan, L.S.(2008).Social network,social trust and shared goals in
organizational knowledge sharing.Infromation and Management,45:458-465.
11.Chua, A. (2003). Knowledge sharing : a game people play, Aslib Proceedings. New
Information Perspectives, 55(3): 117-129.
12.Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgade, J.F. (2006). Determinants of individual
engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 16(2): 720-35.
13.Cabrera, E. F. & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering Knowledge Sharing through People
Management Practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management,16(2): 720-735.
14.Davenport, T. H. , & Pursak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How organizations
Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School.
15.Dong, G., Liem, C.G.,& Grossman,M.(2010).Knowledge-sharing intention in
vietnamese organizations.The journal of information and knowledge management systems,40(3):262-276.
16.Drucker Peter F, Post-Capitalist Society, NY: Harper Business ,1993.
17.Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. 1986. Perceive
organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3): 500-507.
18.Fathi,N.M.,Eze,U.C.,& Gan Goh,G.G.(2010).Key Determinants fo Knowledge
Sharing in an Electronics Manufacturing Firm in Malaysia, The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems.Rivised 08/01/2011.
19.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An
Introduction to Theory and Research. MA: Wesley.
20.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I.(1980). Understanding Atitude and Predicting Social
Behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
21.Gibbert, M.,& Krause, H.(2002).Practice Exchange in a Best Practice Marketplace,
Knowledge Management Case Book: Siements Best Practices. Davenport T.H. &
Probst G.J.B (Eds), Publicis Corporate Publishing, Eriangen.Germany,
pp.89-105.
22.Garrett, S. & Caldwell, B. (2002). Describing Functional Requirements for Knowledge
Sharing Communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(5): 359-364.
23.Hall, H. (2001). Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets.
Journal of Infromaton Science, 27(3).139-146.
24.Huang, Q., Davison, R. M., & Gu, J.(2008).Impact of personal and cultural factors on
knowledge sharing in China.Asia Pacific Manage, 25:451-471.
25.Jarvenpaa, S.L. & Staples, D.S. (2000),“The Use of Collaborative Electronic Media for
Information Sharing : An Exploratory Study of Determinants” Journal of Strategic
Information Systems , (9), 129-154.
26.Kottke, J.L. & Sharafinski, C.E. 1988. Measuring perceived supervisory and
organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48 : 1075-1080.
27.Lin,H. F.(2007).Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge
sharing intention.Journal of information Science, 33(2):135-149.
28.Mei. Y. M., Lee, S. T., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2004). Foumulating a communication
stategy for effective Knowledge sharing. Journal of Information Science.
30(1):12-22
29.Nonaka, I., & Konno,N. (1998).The Concept of ‘Ba’ : Building a Foundation for
Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3):40-54.
30.Nonaka,I., & Takeuchi,H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York :
Oxford University Press.
31.Renzl, Brigit.(2008).Trust in management and knowledge sharing: the mediating effects of fear and 32.knowledge documentation. Omega, 36,206-220.
33.Senge, Peter (1998). “Sharing Knowledge”, Executvie Excellent, Vol.15,
No.6.pp.11-12.
34.Shumaker,S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing
conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Izzues, 40(4):11-36.
35.Tapscott,D.& Williams,A.D.(2006).Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration
Changes Everything. Penguin Group,New York,NY.
36.Tohidinia,Z.,& Mosakhani,M.(2010).Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors.
Industrial Management & Data Systems,110(4):611-631.
37.Wang, S. & Noe, R. A. (2010) .Knowledge sharing in is personal: organizational behavior’s perspec.
Journal of Computer Information System,2011(Summer)
38.Wijnhoven.F. (1998),” Knowledge Logistic in Business Contexts: Analyzing and
Doagnosing Knowledge Sharing by Logistics Concepts,” Knowledge and
Porcess Management. 5, pp.143-157.
39.Winograd, T. (1994), “ Categories, Disciplines, and Social Coordination”, Journal of
Computer-Supported Cooperative Work,2 191-197.