簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 易涵
Putra, Ilham Ramadhan
論文名稱: 藉由改質PEDOT:PSS 提升導電率應用於太陽能電池之研究
Study of PEDOT:PSS with Increased Electrical Conductivity and Its Application in Solar Cells
指導教授: 陳嘉勻
Chen, Chia-Yun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 尖端材料國際碩士學位學程
International Curriculum for Advanced Materials Program
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 74
中文關鍵詞: PEDOT:PSS導電率表面活性劑混和型太陽能電池效率
外文關鍵詞: PEDOT:PSS, conductivity, ethylene glycol, surfactant, hybrid solar cells, efficiency
相關次數: 點閱:66下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 以低成本、可在低溫下合成的濕式化學方法來製作可有效利用綠色能源的光伏元件,例如混和型太陽能電池為現今具潛力的研究之一。本研究以導電高分子材料poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate)(PEDOT:PSS)與n型矽奈米線複合並將其應用於太陽能電池,由於材料本身性質,其形成之異質結構以及異質接面在元件應用方面具一定優勢。然而,PEDOT:PSS本身具有非常低之導電率,約為0.2至10 S/cm,如何提升PEDOT:PSS之導電率以增進太陽能電池之效率為本研究之主要課題。因此,本實驗以表面處理法與混摻法改質PEDOT:PSS。第一階段以乙二醇(ethylene glycol)作為添加劑,結果可得到在添加7wt%乙二醇的PEDOT:PSS具有最佳的導電率,其導電率為938 S/cm。接著將此樣品在攝氏90度下進行熱攪拌之處理,可將導電率提升至1228 S/cm。改質後之PEDOT 具優異的光學性質以及電性,且將其應用於太陽能電池後可使效率提升至12.42%。

    A potential alternative photovoltaics device, hybrid solar cells (HSC), is getting more interest due to inexpensive routes in low-temperature conditions, convenience wet methods, and sounds efficient to provide clean energy from incoming light. Generally, the arrangement of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) organics and n-type crystalline silicon nanowires (SiNWs) were proposed as the option in junction structures by considering the superiorities reliability and both materials advantage properties. However, tune up the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS is essential to improve arranged cells due to low-conductivity nature bring about 0.2-10 S/cm. The improvement of PEDOT:PSS electrical character is achieved by co-solvent mixing and hot-stirring treatment. Pristine PEDOT:PSS conductivity is optimized to more than 102 orders achieving 938 S/cm with 7 wt% ethylene glycol (EG)-0.1 wt% Zonyl FS300 surfactant composition. Achieved value can be further elevated up to 1228 S/cm by additional hot-stirring treatment at 90°C. Tremendous electrical and optical aspects with preferable treatments offer several advantages in fabricated cells including performance and elevated efficiency of 12.42%.

    摘要 (iii) Abstract (iv) Acknowledgement (v) Table of Contents (vi) List of Figures (viii) List of Tables (xi) Chapter 1 Introduction (1) 1.1. Overview (1) 1.2. Motivation (2) 1.3. Research Objectives (3) Chapter 2 Theoretical Background and Literature Review (4) 2.1. As-Prepared (Pristine) PEDOT:PSS (4) 2.2. Conductivity Enhancement Approaches Improving PEDOT:PSS (7) Chapter 3 Experimental Details (10) 3.1. Materials, Appliances, and Instrumentation (10) 3.2. Sample Preparation (13) 3.2.1. Co-Solvent Addition Experiment (13) 3.2.2. Hot-Stirring Experiment (15) 3.4. Characterization Tools (17) 3.4.1. Four-Point Probe Analyzer (17) 3.4.2. Hall-Effect Analyzer (18) 3.4.3. UV-Vis Instrument (18) 3.4.4. Contact Angle Measurement (18) 3.4.5. Ellipsometry (18) 3.4.6. Ultrahigh Resolution Scanning Electron Microscope (UHRFE-SEM) (18) 3.4.7. Raman Spectroscopy (19) 3.4.8. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) (19) 3.4.9. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (19) 3.4.10. Solar Cell Efficiency (19) Chapter 4 Results and Discussion (21) 4.1. Co-Solvent Addition in PEDOT:PSS Pristine (21) 4.1.1. Optical Properties and Electrical Conductivity Analysis (21) 4.1.2. Structural, Morphological, and Chemical Surface Properties of PEDOT:PSS (26) 4.1.3 Application EG-treated PEDOT:PSS in Silicon Nanowires Hybrid Solar Cells (35) 4.2. Influence of Hot-Stirring Treatments on 7 wt%-Ethylene Glycol (EG) Added PEDOT:PSS (38) 4.2.1. Optical and Electrical Properties Analysis of EG7-Hot Stirred Samples (38) 4.2.2. Chemical, Structural, and Morphological Properties Analysis (42) 4.2.3. Prospective Application of Hot-Stirred PEDOT:PSS/EG7 Thin-Film (50) Chapter 5 Conclusion (54) Chapter 6 Future Work (55) References (56)

    [1] A. Polman, M. Knight, E. C. Garnett, B. Ehrler, and W. C. Sinke, “Photovoltaic materials: Present efficiencies and future challenges,” Science (80-. )., vol. 352, no. 6283, 2016.

    [2] H. J. Syu, S. C. Shiu, and C. F. Lin, “Silicon nanowire/organic hybrid solar cell with efficiency of 8.40%,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 98, pp. 267–272, 2012.

    [3] E. Garnett and P. Yang, “Light trapping in silicon nanowire solar cells,” Nano Lett., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1082–1087, 2010.
    [4] J. Ouyang, “‘secondary doping’ methods to significantly enhance the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS for its application as transparent electrode of optoelectronic devices,” Displays, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 423–436, 2013.

    [5] K. Lim et al., “The enhancement of electrical and optical properties of PEDOT:PSS using one-step dynamic etching for flexible application,” Org. Electron., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1849–1855, 2014.

    [6] J. Y. Kim, J. H. Jung, D. E. Lee, and J. Joo, “Enhancement of electrical conductivity of poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-styrenesulfonate) by a change of solvents,” Synth. Met., vol. 126, no. 2–3, pp. 311–316, 2002.

    [7] Y. Xia and J. Ouyang, “PEDOT:PSS films with significantly enhanced conductivities induced by preferential solvation with cosolvents and their application in polymer photovoltaic cells,” J. Mater. Chem., vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 4927–4936, 2011.

    [8] D. Alemu Mengistie, P. C. Wang, and C. W. Chu, “Effect of molecular weight of additives on the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS and efficiency for ITO-free organic solar cells,” J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 1, no. 34, pp. 9907–9915, 2013.
    [9] G.-H. Kim, L. Shao, K. Zhang, and K. P. Pipe, “Engineered doping of organic semiconductors for enhanced thermoelectric efficiency,” Nat. Mater., vol. 12, 2013.

    [10] W. Wichiansee and A. Sirivat, “Electrorheological properties of poly(dimethylsiloxane) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxy thiophene)/poly(stylene sulfonic acid)/ethylene glycol blends,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 29, pp. 78–84, 2008.

    [11] J. P. Thomas and K. T. Leung, “Defect-minimized PEDOT:PSS/planar-si solar cell with very high efficiency,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 24, no. 31, pp. 4978–4985, 2014.

    [12] L. Ouyang, C. Musumeci, M. J. Jafari, T. Ederth, and O. Inganäs, “Imaging the Phase Separation between PEDOT and Polyelectrolytes during Processing of Highly Conductive PEDOT:PSS Films,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 7, no. 35, pp. 19764–19773, 2015.

    [13] J. Zhou et al., “The temperature-dependent microstructure of PEDOT/PSS films: Insights from morphological, mechanical and electrical analyses,” J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 2, no. 46, pp. 9903–9910, 2014.

    [14] L. Groenendaal, F. Jonas, D. Freitag, H. Pielartzik, and J. R. Reynolds, “Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and its derivatives: past, present, and future,” Adv. Mater., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 481–494, 2000.

    [15] S. Kirchmeyer and K. Reuter, “Scientific importance, properties and growing applications of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene),” J. Mater. Chem., vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 2077–2088, 2005.

    [16] H. J. Ahonen, J. Lukkari, and J. Kankare, “n- and p-doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Two electronically conducting states of the polymer,” Macromolecules, vol. 33, no. 18, pp. 6787–6793, 2000.

    [17] S. Ghosh and O. Inganäs, “Self-assembly of a conducting polymer nanostructure by physical crosslinking: applications to conducting blends and modified electrodes,” Synth. Met., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 413–416, 1999.

    [18] J. Ouyang, “‘secondary doping’ methods to significantly enhance the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS for its application as transparent electrode of optoelectronic devices,” Displays, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 423–436, 2013.

    [19] U. Lang, E. Muller, N. Naujoks, and J. Dual, “Microscopical investigations of PEDOT:PSS thin films,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1215–1220, 2009.

    [20] H. Shi, C. Liu, Q. Jiang, and J. Xu, “Effective Approaches to Improve the Electrical Conductivity of PEDOT:PSS: A Review,” Adv. Electron. Mater., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2015.

    [21] H. Yue, Y. Zhao, X. Ma, and J. Gong, “Chemical Society Reviews CRITICAL REVIEW Ethylene glycol: properties, synthesis, and applications,” This J. is Cite this Chem. Soc. Rev, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 4218–4244, 2012.

    [22] J. Ouyang, Q. Xu, C. W. Chu, Y. Yang, G. Li, and J. Shinar, “On the mechanism of conductivity enhancement in poly(3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) film through solvent treatment,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 45, no. 25, pp. 8443–8450, 2004.

    [23] X. Crispin et al., “Article The Origin of the High Conductivity of ( PEDOT − PSS ) Plastic Electrodes The Origin of the High Conductivity of,” Chem. Mater., vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 4354–4360, 2006.

    [24] M. Vosgueritchian, D. J. Lipomi, and Z. Bao, “Highly conductive and transparent PEDOT:PSS films with a fluorosurfactant for stretchable and flexible transparent electrodes,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 421–428, 2012.

    [25] S. S. Kalagi and P. S. Patil, “Secondary electrochemical doping level effects on polaron and bipolaron bands evolution and interband transition energy from absorbance spectra of PEDOT: PSS thin films,” Synth. Met., vol. 220, pp. 661–666, Oct. 2016.

    [26] J. P. Thomas, L. Zhao, D. McGillivray, and K. T. Leung, “High-efficiency hybrid solar cells by nanostructural modification in PEDOT:PSS with co-solvent addition,” J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 2, no. 7, p. 2383, 2014.

    [27] S. Garreau, G. Louarn, J. P. Buisson, G. Froyer, and S. Lefrant, “In situ spectroelectrochemical Raman studies of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDT),” Macromolecules, vol. 32, no. 20, pp. 6807–6812, 1999.

    [28] R. Chen et al., “Sequential Solution Polymerization of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)Using V2O5 as Oxidant for Flexible Touch Sensors,” iScience, vol. 12, pp. 66–75, Feb. 2019.

    [29] S. Garreau, J. L. Duvail, and G. Louarn, “Spectroelectrochemical studies of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) in aqueous medium,” 2001.

    [30] I. Lindgren, “Chemical shifts in X-ray and photo-electron spectroscopy: A historical review,” in Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 2004, vol. 137–140, no. SPEC. ISS., pp. 59–71.

    [31] X. Crispin et al., “Stability of Poly ( 3 , 4-ethylene dioxythiophene )– Poly ( styrene sulfonate ): A Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 41, no. 21, pp. 2561–2583, 2003.

    [32] U. Rau, “Reciprocity relation between photovoltaic quantum efficiency and electroluminescent emission of solar cells,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 76, no. 8, 2007.

    [33] B. Friedel et al., “Effects of layer thickness and annealing of PEDOT:PSS layers in organic photodetectors,” Macromolecules, vol. 42, no. 17, pp. 6741–6747, 2009.

    [34] S. Kaviani, M. Mohammadi Ghaleni, E. Tavakoli, and S. Nejati, “Electroactive and Conformal Coatings of Oxidative Chemical Vapor Deposition Polymers for Oxygen Electroreduction,” ACS Appl. Polym. Mater., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 552–560, 2019.

    [35] A. A. Farah, S. A. Rutledge, A. Schaarschmidt, R. Lai, J. P. Freedman, and A. S. Helmy, “Conductivity enhancement of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) films post-spincasting ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN,” J. Appl. Phys, vol. 112, p. 113709, 2012.

    [36] B. Xu et al., “Functional solid additive modified PEDOT:PSS as an anode buffer layer for enhanced photovoltaic performance and stability in polymer solar cells OPEN,” Nat. Publ. Gr., 2017.

    [37] D. Alemu, H.-Y. Wei, K.-C. Ho, and C.-W. Chu, “Highly conductive PEDOT:PSS electrode by simple film treatment with methanol for ITO-free polymer solar cells,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 5, no. 11, p. 9662, 2012.

    [38] C. M. Palumbiny, F. Liu, T. P. Russell, A. Hexemer, C. Wang, and P. Müller-Buschbaum, “The crystallization of PEDOT:PSS polymeric electrodes probed in situ during printing,” Adv. Mater., vol. 27, no. 22, pp. 3391–3397, 2015.

    [39] W. W. Chiu, J. Travaš-Sejdić, R. P. Cooney, and G. A. Bowmaker, “Studies of dopant effects in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) using Raman spectroscopy,” J. Raman Spectrosc., vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1354–1361, 2006.

    [40] Q. Li, J. Yang, S. Chen, J. Zou, W. Xie, and X. Zeng, “Highly Conductive PEDOT:PSS Transparent Hole Transporting Layer with Solvent Treatment for High Performance Silicon/Organic Hybrid Solar Cells,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., vol. 12, 2017.

    [41] K. M. Reza et al., “Tailored PEDOT:PSS hole transport layer for higher performance in perovskite solar cells: Enhancement of electrical and optical properties with improved morphology,” J. Energy Chem., vol. 44, pp. 41–50, May 2020.

    [42] A. Schaarschmidt, A. A. Farah, A. Aby, and A. S. Helmy, “Influence of nonadiabatic annealing on the morphology and molecular structure of PEDOT-PSS films,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 113, no. 28, pp. 9352–9355, 2009.

    [43] B. Friedel, T. J. K. Brenner, C. R. McNeill, U. Steiner, and N. C. Greenham, “Influence of solution heating on the properties of PEDOT:PSS colloidal solutions and impact on the device performance of polymer solar cells,” Org. Electron., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1736–1745, Oct. 2011.

    [44] Z. Fan, P. Li, D. Du, and J. Ouyang, “Significantly Enhanced Thermoelectric Properties of PEDOT:PSS Films through Sequential Post-Treatments with Common Acids and Bases,” Adv. Energy Mater., vol. 7, no. 8, 2017.

    [45] J. P. Thomas and K. T. Leung, “Mixed co-solvent engineering of PEDOT:PSS to enhance its conductivity and hybrid solar cell properties,” J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 4, no. 44, pp. 17537–17542, 2016.

    [46] Y. H. Kim, C. Sachse, M. L. MacHala, C. May, L. Müller-Meskamp, and K. Leo, “Highly conductive PEDOT:PSS electrode with optimized solvent and thermal post-treatment for ITO-free organic solar cells,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1076–1081, 2011.

    [47] T. Lei et al., “Bendable and foldable flexible organic solar cells based on Ag nanowire films with 10.30% efficiency,” J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 3737–3744, 2019.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2025-01-31公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE