簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李志鴻
Li, Chih-Hong
論文名稱: 再生改質瀝青混凝土之工程性質
Engineering Properties of Recycled Modified Asphalt Concrete (RMAC)
指導教授: 陳建旭
Chen, Jian-Shiuh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 173
中文關鍵詞: 改質瀝青混凝土回收料(RMAP)再生劑粒料間孔隙(V.M.A.)冒油黑石頭
外文關鍵詞: Reclaimed Modified Asphalt Pavement (RMAP), Rejuvenators, Voids in Mineral Aggregate (V.M.A.), Bleeding, Black Rock
相關次數: 點閱:106下載:19
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 回收瀝青混凝土(RAP),具有永績發展的潛在效果,而國內現今少有改質瀝青混凝土回收料(RMAP)之研究。本研究使用RMAP之回收瀝青60℃黏度約為37,050 Poise,RAP之回收瀝青60℃黏度約為45,000 Poise,新鮮瀝青為AC-20,軟化劑為AC-10,再生劑為RA-5,且選擇新鮮瀝青AC-20之密級配瀝青混凝土作為對照組。回收料添加比例為10~100%,目標黏度依還原劑和回收料添加比例有所不同,配比設計採用相同的瀝青用量並盡量使級配曲線相近以進行工程性質與體積性質的比較。透過穩定值、流度值、間接張力、回彈模數試驗、滯留強度試驗和老化前後之Cantabro磨耗驗等試驗,評估對再生瀝青混凝土(RAC)和再生改質瀝青混凝土(RMAC)之影響。除了流度值,RMAC和RAC工程性質皆符合規範要求,且顯示回收料硬化存果仍在;RMAC與RAC之Cantabro磨耗率有顯著差異,試體短期老化與長期老化後之Cantabro磨耗率則無明顯差異。添加再生劑RA-5時,RMAC與RAC之V.M.A.隨著回收料比例增加而下降;但添加軟化劑時,RAC在高回收料添加比例情況下,由於孔隙率增大造成V.M.A.上升,而RMAC仍能控制在4%孔隙率,RMAC於回收料添加量少於60%時,由工程性質與體積性質結果來看,具用於鋪面之可行性。受黑石頭程度的影響,使用再生劑和高回收料添加比例60%~80%情況下,試體表面產生冒油和油斑。

    There are few domestic studies of Reclaimed Modified Asphalt Pavement (RMAP) now. In this study, AC-20 and AC-10 were respectively used as virgin asphalt and softening agent. RA-5 was used as rejuvenating agent. In order to compare engineering and volumetric properties for different mix designs, asphalt content and grading curve of mix designs were adjusted to the same as much as possible. In this study, conducting Marshall test of stability, flow, indirect tension, resilient modulus, residual strength and Cantabro test with mixture conditioning to evaluate virgin asphalt concrete, Recycled Asphalt Concrete (RAC) and Recycled Modified Asphalt Concrete (RMAC). In addition to flow value, engineering properties of RMAC and RAC were all in compliance with specification requirements, and reclaimed materials still obviously had hardening effect. RAC and RMAC had significant differences in Cantabro test, but there were no significant differences between short-term aging and long-term aging. When adding rejuvenating agent RA-5, V.M.A. of RAC and RMAC would decline with the increase of the proportion of reclaimed materials;but when adding the softening agent, V.M.A of RAC in a high proportion of reclaimed material would rise due to porosity increasing, and RMAC would still control the porosity of 4%. From the results of engineering and volumetric properties, it is feasible to use RMAP in asphalt pavement when proportion of reclaimed materials are less than 60%. Because of the effect of black rock, the surface of specimens would generate binder spots and bleeding.

    摘要 I 英文延伸摘要 II 誌謝 VI 目錄 VII 表目錄 XII 圖目錄 XIV 第一章 緒論 1.1 前言 1-1 1.2 研究動機 1-2 1.3 研究目的 1-2 1.4 研究範圍 1-3 第二章 文獻回顧 2.1 改質瀝青與改質劑 2-1 2.1.1 苯乙烯-丁二烯-苯乙烯(SBS) 2-1 2.2 瀝青老化 2-3 2.2.1 SBS改質瀝青老化 2-4 2.3 瀝青還原劑 2-5 2.3.1 再生劑規範 2-7 2.4 改質瀝青萃取和回收 2-10 2.5 瀝青混凝土回收料的特性 2-11 2.5.1 瀝青混凝土回收料的黏結料性質 2-11 2.5.2 「再使用」黏結料 2-12 2.5.3 粒料聚集現象 2-13 2.5.4 瀝青混凝土回收料的黑石頭行為與混合程度 2-15 2.6 再生瀝青混凝土的特性 2-18 2.6.1 再生瀝青混凝土的抗車轍性能 2-18 2.6.2 再生瀝青混凝土的抗疲勞裂縫性能 2-19 2.6.3 再生瀝青混凝土的抗水侵害性能 2-20 2.6.4 再生瀝青混凝土的抵抗粒料飛散性 2-21 2.7 再生劑擴散與分佈 2-22 2.7.1 再生瀝青混凝土之擴散理論 2-23 2.8 瀝青混凝土回收料的變異性 2-24 2.9 再生瀝青混凝土的經濟效益 2-25 第三章 研究計畫 3.1研究方法與流程架構 3-1 3.2 實驗材料 3-3 3.2.1 瀝青混凝土回收材料來源 3-3 3.2.2 新鮮瀝青和還原劑 3-4 3.3回收瀝青萃取試驗 3-4 3.4瀝青膠泥黏度試驗 3-5 3.5 再生瀝青混凝土配合設計流程. 3-6 3.5.1 回收料與新鮮粒料級配曲線 3-7 3.5.2 實驗室之RAP配料(batching)和處理 3-9 3.5.3 決定新鮮黏結料的用量 3-11 3.5.4還原劑添加量 3-14 3.5.5 再生瀝青混凝土馬歇爾試體製作程序 3-20 3.5.6瀝青混凝土回收料比重 3-21 3.6 再生瀝青混凝土工程性質 3-22 3.6.1 穩定值、流度值試驗 3-22 3.6.2 回彈模數試驗 3-23 3.6.3 間接張力試驗 3-25 3.6.4 滯留強度指數試驗 3-26 3.6.5 黑石頭現象與影像分析 3-27 第四章 試驗結果與討論 4.1 回收料特性與配比設計 4-1 4.1.1 回收料之老化瀝青 4-3 4.1.2 回收料之粒料 4-5 4.1.3 新鮮材料物性試驗 4-8 4.1.4 瀝青黏度混拌圖(Blending Chart) 4-11 4.1.5 決定還原劑用量 4-14 4.1.6再生瀝青混凝土之級配曲線 4-17 4.1.7 配比試驗結果 4-19 4.2實驗室混合料之工程性質結果 4-22 4.2.1馬歇爾穩定值 4-23 4.2.2 馬歇爾流度值 4-25 4.2.3 間接張力(ITS) 4-27 4.2.4滯留強度指數 4-29 4.2.5 回彈模數值(MR) 4-31 4.2.6試體老化前後之Cantabro磨耗試驗 4-33 4.3黑石頭現象 4-45 4.4孔隙率與回收料添加比例關係 4-50 4.4.1 V.M.A.與回收料添加比例關係 4-50 4.4.2 V.F.A.與回收料添加比例關係 4-61 4.5改質瀝青萃取 4-64 4.5.1蕭氏萃取法 4-64 第五章 結論與建議 5.1結論 5-1 5.2建議 5-3 參考文獻 參-1 附錄 附-1

    蔡攀鰲(2002),「再生瀝青混凝土拌合廠審查認可基準」,再生瀝青混凝土實務講習,中華鋪面工程學會,台南,第1-19頁。
    中華鋪面工程學會 (2004),「近代新瀝青混凝土路面材料及產製鋪設技術」,桃園。
    褚宗諄(2013),「還原劑添加於回收料之瀝青混凝土工程性質」,國 立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,台南。
    吳志華 (2015),「實驗室和廠拌再生瀝青混凝土之工程性質與初期績效」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所論文,台南。
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2003). Classifying Hot Mix Recycling Agents, AASHTO R14-88.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2004). Standard Practice for Classifying Hot-Mix Recycling Agents, ASTM D4552-92.
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2013). Standard Specification for Superpave Volumetric Mix Design, AASHTO M323.
    Asphalt Institute (2014). Asphalt Mix Design Methods, MS-2, Seventh Edition, Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY.
    Airey, G. (2002). “Rheological Evaluation of Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Polymer Modified Bitumens,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.16(8), pp.473-487.
    Al-Qadi, I.L., Carpenter, S.H., Roberts, G., Ozer, H., Auragzeb, Q., Elsefi, M., and Trepainer, J. (2009). “Determination of Usable Residual Asphalt Binder in RAP,” Research Report ICT-09-031, Illinois Center for Transportation.
    Becker, Y., Mendez, M. P., and Rodriguez, Y. (2001). “Polymer Modified Asphalt,” Vision Tecnologica, Vol.9(1), pp.39-50.
    Bressi, S., Cavalli , M. C., Partl , M. N., Tebaldi, G., Dumont, A. G., and Poulikakos , L. D. (2015). “Particle Clustering Phenomena in Hot Asphalt Mixtures with High Content of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.100, pp.207-217.
    Collins, J. H., Bouldin, M. G., Gelles, R., and Berker, A. (1991). “Improved Performance of Paving Asphalt by Polymer Modification,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol.60, pp.43-79.

    Chen, J. S., Chen S. F., Liao M. C., and Huang S. W. (2015). “Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Blends of Recycling Agents Mixed with Aged Binders,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol.27(2), pp.04014143(1-6).
    Daniel, J., and Lachance, A. (2005). “Mechanistic and Volumetric Properties of Asphalt Mixtures with Recycled Asphalt Pavement,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.1929, pp.28-36.
    Doyle, J. D., and Howard, I. L. (2016). “Characterization of Dense-Graded Asphalt With the Cantabro Test,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, ASTM, Vol.44(1), pp. 77-88.
    European standards (2005). Guidance on determination of soluble binder content of mixtures with polymer-modified binders, EN 12697-1, Annex D.
    Huang, B., Shu, X., and Vukosavljevic, D. (2011). “Laboratory Investigation of Cracking Resistance ofHot-Mix Asphalt Field Mixtures ContainingScreened Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol.23(11), pp.1535-1543.
    Karlsson, R., and Isacsson, U. (2003). “Application of FTIR-ATR to Characterization of Bitumen Rejuvenator Diffusion,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol.15(2), pp.156-157.
    Karlsson, R., and Isacsson, U. (2006). “Material-Related Aspects of Asphalt Recycling: State-of-the-art,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol.18, pp.81-92.
    Liu, Z., Xuan, M., Zhao Z., Cong Y., and Liao K. (2003). ” A Study of the Compatibility Between Asphalt and SBS,” Petroleum Science and Technology, Vol.21(7-8), pp.1317-1325.
    Lee, J. C., Edil, T. B., Tinjum, J. M., and Benson, C. H. (2010). “Quantitative Assessment of Environmental and Economic Benefits of Recycled Materials in Highway Construction,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.2158, pp.138-142.
    Liu, G., Leegwater G., Nielsen E., Komacka J., Martin van de Ven. (2013). “Evaluating the Rheological Properties of PMB-Containing RA Binders From Surface-Layer Asphalt Mixtures to Be Recycled,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.49, pp.8-14.
    Leegwater, G., Komačka, J., Liu, G., Nielsen, E., and Remišova, E. (2014). “Technical Performance and Benefits of Recycling of Reclaimed asphalt Containing Polymer Modified Binder into Premium Surface Layers,” Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment, Paris.

    McDaniel, R., and Anderson, R. M. (2001). Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave Mix Design Method:Technician's Manual, NCHRP Report 452, National Reaearch Council, Washinton, D.C.
    Mohammad, L. N., Daly, W. H., Negulescu, I. I., Wu, Z., and Daranga, C. (2004). Investigation of the Use of Recycled Polymer-Modified Asphalt in Asphaltic Concrete Pavements, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA/LA04/391, Washington, DC.
    Maupin, G.W., Diefenderfer, S. D., and Gillespie, J.S. (2009). “Virginia's Higher Specification for Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Performance and Economic Evaluation,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.2126, pp.142-150.
    Miró, R., Valdés. G., Martínez A., Segura P. and Rodriguez C. (2011). “Evaluation of High Modulus Mixture Behaviour with High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Percentages for Sustainable Road Construction,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.25, pp.3854-3862.

    Mogawer, W.S., Austerman, A., Roque, R., Underwood, S., Mohammad, L., and Zou, J. (2015). “Ageing and Rejuvenators: Evaluating Their Impact on High RAP Mixtures Fatigue Cracking Characteristics Using Advanced Mechanistic Models and Testing Methods,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol.16(2), pp.1-28.
    Ma, T., Huang, X., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2015). “Evaluation of the Diffusion and Distribution of the Rejuvenator for Hot Asphalt Recycling,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.98, pp.530-536.
    Nash, T., G. A. Sholar, G. C. Page and J. A. Musselman (2012). “Evaluation of Asphalt Mixture with High Percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Florida,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2294, pp.16-25.
    Ongel, A., and Hugener, M. (2015). “Impact of Rejuvenators on Aging Properties of Bitumen,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.94, pp.467-474.
    Polacco, G., Berlincioni, S., Biondi, D., Stastna, J., and Zanzotto, L. (2005). “Asphalt Modification with Different Polyethylene-Based Polymers,” European Polymer Journal, Vol.41(12), pp.2831-2844.

    Poulikakos, Lily D., dos Santos, S., Lee, J. and Partl, M. N. (2014). “Moisture Susceptibility of Recycled Asphalt Concrete: A Multi-scale Approach,” Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
    Rahman, F. and Hossain, M. (2014). Review and Analysis of Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device Test Data, Kansas Department of Transportation, # 01516545, Alexandria.
    Sondag, M. S., Chadbourn, B. A. and Drescher, A. (2002). Investigation of Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Mixtures, Final Report, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Twin City.
    Shen, J., Amirkhanian, S. and Miller, J. (2007) “Effects of Rejuvenating Agents on Superpave Mixtures Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol.21, pp.376-384.
    Sengoz, B., Topal, A., and Isikyakar, G. (2009). “Morphology and Image Analysis of Polymer Modified Bitumens,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.23(5), pp.1986-1992.
    Shirodkar, P., Mehta, Y., Nolan, A., Sonpala, K., Norton, A., Tomlinson, C., Dubois, E., Sullivan, P., and Sauber, R. (2011). ” A Study to Determine The Degree of Partial Blending of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Binder for High RAP Hot Mix Asphalt,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.25(1), pp.150-155.
    Shirodkar, P., Mehta, Y., Nolan, A., Dubois, E., Reger, D., and McCarthy, L. (2013). ” Development of Blending Chart for Different Degrees of Blending of RAP Binder and Virgin Binder,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.73, pp.156-161.
    Solanki, P., Zaman, M., Adje, D. and Hossain, Z. (2013). “Field Construction and Mechanistic Performance of Hot Mix Asphalt Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement,” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol.6, pp.403-413.
    Sun, L., Wang Y., and Zhang, Y. (2014). “Aging Mechanism and Effective Recycling Ratio of SBS Modified Asphalt,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.70, pp.26-35.
    Stimilli A., Virgili A., and Canestrari F. (2015). “New Method to Estimate the “Re-Activated” Binder Amount in Recycled Hot-Mix Asphalt,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol.16(1), pp.442-459.
    Tuffour, Y. A., and Ishai, I. (1990). “The Diffusion Model and Asphalt Age-Hardening,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 59, pp. 73-92.

    Watson, D.E., Vargas-Nordcbeck, A., Moore, J., Jared, D., and Wu, P. (2008). ” Evaluation of the Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol.2051, pp.64-70.
    Wang, Y., Sun L., and Qin, Y. (2015). “Aging Mechanism of SBS Modified Asphalt Based on Chemical Reaction Kinetics,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol.91, pp.47-56.
    Yu, J., Zeng, X., Wu, S., Wang, L., and Liu, G. (2007). “Preparation and Properties of Montmorillonite Modified Asphalts,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol.447(1-2), pp.233–238.
    Yan, Y., Cocconcelli, C., Roque, R., Nash, T., Zou, J., Hernando, D., and Lopp, G. (2015). “Performance Evaluation of Alternative Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binders,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol.16, pp.389-403.
    Zaumanis, M. and Mallick, R. B. (2013). “Finite Element Modeling of Rejuvenator Diffusion in RAP Binder Film – Simulation of Plant Mixing Process,” Multi-Scale Modeling and Characterization of Infrastructure Materials, Vol.8, pp.407–419.
    Zaumanis, M. and Mallick, R. B. (2015). “Review of Very High-Content Reclaimed Asphalt Use in Plant-Produced Pavements: State of the Art,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 16, pp.39-55.

    下載圖示 校內:2021-08-01公開
    校外:2021-08-01公開
    QR CODE