簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 傅秀娟
Fu, Hsiu-Chuan
論文名稱: 策略領導能力對智慧資本影響之研究─以上市高科技企業為實證
Empirical Research of Effect of Strategic Leadership Capability on Intellectual Capital- High Tech Company Listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange
指導教授: 溫敏杰
Wen, Miin-Jye
吳宗正
Wu, Chung-Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 126
中文關鍵詞: 關係資本結構資本人力資本策略領導能力智慧資本
外文關鍵詞: Relational Capital., Structural Capital, Human Capital, Strategic Leadership Capability, Intellectual Capital
相關次數: 點閱:138下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   隨著全球化、科技變遷、競爭激烈與強調知識經濟環境的到來,如何運用策略領導能力以鼓勵、支持和竭盡所能引導員工發揮其知識與能力,甚而蓄積成為公司的資產,則是一個重要的課題。而近年來,傳統財務報表或有形資產作為衡量公司的價值已漸漸式微,進而對公司價值的評斷是以組織的核心競爭能力、專業知識、創新的觀念和經驗豐富的經營團隊等之資產結構方式。而其中所隱藏包含無形資產及知識創造的價值,就是智慧資本(Intellectual Capital)。高科技企業屬於知識密集科技導向的產業,它可以帶動國家經濟快速的成長,是目前我國經濟發展及產業升級的主導力量。因此,本研究主要的目的乃針對高科技企業,探討策略領導能力對智慧資本影響的程度及互動的關係。
      本研究以天下雜誌2002年1000大製造業中上市高科技企業為研究對象,採用郵寄問卷法,邀請高科技企業中高階主管為訪問者,總計回收168份有效樣本,以實證研究策略領導能力對智慧資本之影響,所收集資料是透過SPSS及STATISTICA軟體來完成各項資料統計分析工作,主要運用的方法有敘述統計、因素分析、典型相關分析、集群分析、變異數分析、Duncan檢定、K-W檢定、Mann-Whitney U檢定及卡方獨立性檢定。
      本研究結果發現:(一)當策略領導能力趨向激勵與整合能力時與人力資本中之知識傳承水準具有高度正相關,與團隊合作水準具有中度正相關,與結構資本中組織結構調整能力具有高度正相關,與關係資本中的合作夥伴導向具有高度正相關;(二)當策略領導能力若是傾向前瞻領導能力者僅對人力資本下知識傳承水準具有中度的正相關;(三)人力資本中知識傳承水準與結構資本中組織結構調整能力呈高度正相關;人力資本中專業技能水準與結構資本中智慧財產取得能力呈高度正相關;人力資本中知識傳承水準與關係資本中合作夥伴導向呈高度正相關;結構資本中智慧財產取得能力與關係資本中顧客經營導向呈中度正相關;(四)企業高階主管若能發展全方位的策略領導風格時對智慧資本都有正向的蓄積效果;而激勵整合群的策略導能力又相較前瞻領導群的策略領導能力好;(五)不同策略領導群之高階主管的領導策略並不會受公司成立的年數、公司資本額的大小及公司員工人數多寡而有不同。

      Following the globalization, changes of technology and focus on knowledge-based economy, using strategic leadership capability to encourage and guide employees to fulfill their knowledge and abilities on jobs, and further become asset of companies, has become an important issue. Recent years, the way to value a company by financial statements and assets has been changed into value by organization core-competency, know-how, innovative concept and experienced work team. Invisible assets and value created by knowledge, so-called intellectual capital, are also included. High-tech industries, the main power bring Taiwan to economy development and upgrading industries, belong to know-how intensive industries and lead nation economy to speedy development. Therefore, this research is to discuss how strategic leadership capability affects intellectual capital and how the both interact.
      This research takes high-tech companies from the biggest 1000 manufacturers on magazine as the participants, and invites mid to high ranking managers to be interviewee. 168 valid samplings are analyzed by SPSS and STAISTICA software, such as descriptive statistics, Factor analysis, Canonical Correlation analysis, Cluster analysis, ANOVA, Duncan’s test, K-W test, Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-squared test.
      The results discover that 1) when strategic leadership capability tends to encouragement and integration, the relationship with know-how descending of human capital is highly positive, with team work is middle positive, with organization structure arrangement ability is highly positive, and with co-worker of relation capital is highly positive. 2) when strategic leadership tends to foresight leadership capability, the relationship only shows middle positive to know-how descending of human capital. 3) know-how descending of human capital shows highly positive relationship with organization arrangement ability of structural capital; know-how level of human capital and intellectual property right of structural capital shows highly positive; know-how descending of human capital and co-worker of relation capital are highly related; intellectual property right of structural capital and customer-focus of relation capital shows middle related. 4) high-ranking managers will help intellectual capital get improvement when they develop well-round strategic leading style, and the strategic leadership capability of encouragement and integration shows better result than foresight leadership capability. 5) the leading style of high-ranking managers from different strategic leadership does not affected by company capital, years and number of employees.

    摘要...........................................................Ⅰ 誌謝...........................................................Ⅳ 目錄...........................................................Ⅴ 表目錄.........................................................Ⅶ 圖目錄.........................................................Ⅹ 第一章 緒論.........................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機.........................................1 第二節 研究目的...............................................4 第三節 研究範圍...............................................4 第四節 研究流程...............................................5 第二章 文獻探討.....................................7 第一節 策略領導能力...........................................7 第二節 智慧資本..............................................16 第三章 研究方法....................................38 第一節 研究架構..............................................38 第二節 變項之操作型定義與衡量................................39 第三節 資料收集..............................................40 第四節 資料分析方法..........................................42 第四章 資料分析....................................46 第一節 信效度分析............................................46 第二節 受訪者基本資料........................................48 第三節 各構面之敘述統計......................................51 第四節 因素分析..............................................57 第五節 典型相關分析..........................................64 第六節 集群分析..............................................77 第七節 差異分析..............................................81 第五章 結論與建議..................................86 第一節 結論..................................................86 第二節 對實務界的建議........................................91 第三節 對後續研究之建議......................................93 第四節 研究限制..............................................94 參考文獻......................................................95 附錄A:智慧資本衡量指標......................................100 附錄B:分項對總項信度........................................112 附錄C:分項對總項相關係數....................................116 附錄D:不同策略領導能力群之公司別明細........................120 附錄E:本研究之問卷..........................................121

    一、中文部分
    1.李青芬、李維婷、趙慕芬 譯(2000),「組織行為學」,Stephen. P. Robbins 原著,六版,華泰書局。
    2.杜敏綺(2002),「企業文化對智慧資本蓄積之關係性研究」,成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
    3.林大容 譯(1999),「智慧資本:如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值」,Leif Edvinsson & Michael S. Malone 原著,臉譜出版社。
    4.林宜萱 譯(2003),「策略領導實戰指南:擬定並執行完備策略,提升企業永續競爭力」,Mike Freedman & Benjamin B. Tregoe 原著,美商麥格羅、希爾國際股份有限公司 台灣分公司。
    5.吳安妮(2003),「平衡計分卡之精隨、範疇及整合」,會計研究月刊,212期,78-92頁。
    6.周建宏(2001),「台灣IC設計產業智慧資本之探討」,文化大學會計所碩士論文。
    7.許士軍(2001),「管理學」,東華書局。
    8.陳玉玲(1999),「組織內人力資本的蓄積-智慧資本管理的觀點」,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    9.陳美純(2001),「資訊科技投資與智慧資本對企業績效影響之研究」,中央大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
    10.陳順宇(2000),「多變量分析」,二版,華泰書局。
    11.陳順宇、鄭碧娥(1998),「統計學」,三版,華泰書局。
    12.黃宛華(1999),「資訊服務業智慧資本之研究」,政治大學科技管理所碩士論文。
    13.董碧玟(2001),「智慧資本之衡量-以國內資訊電子產業為例」,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    14.蔡進雄(2000),「國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究」,國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文。

    15.賴春田(2001),「企業價值報告趨勢預測」,資誠企業管理顧問股份有限公司。
    16.鍾惠珍(2002),「淺談智慧資本之管理、評價與發展」,會計研究月刊,204 期,43-56頁。
    二、英文部分
    1.Bass, B. M. ( 1985 ), Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations , New York: Free Press.
    2.Bassi, L. J. and Van Buren, M. E. (1999),“Valuing investment in intellectual capital,”International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.18, pp. 414-432.
    3.Boulton, R. E. S., Libert, B. D. and Samek, S. M. (2000), Cracking the value code: How successful businesses are creating wealth in the new economy, Arthur Andersen Publishing Company.
    4.Brooking, A. (1996), Intellectual capital, International Thomson Business Press, London.
    5.Burns, J. H. (1978), Leadership, New York: Harper&Row.
    6.Durbin, A. J. (2001), Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills, Third Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company.
    7.Dzinkowski, R. (1999),“Mining intellectual capital,”Strategic Finance, Vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 42-46.
    8.Dzinkowski, R. (2000),“The value of intellectual capital,”The Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 3-4.
    9.Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M. S. (1997), Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots, USA: Happer Collins.
    10.Edvinsson, L. and Sullivan, P. (1996),“Developing a Model for Managing Intellectual Capital,”European Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 356-364.
    11.Fiedler, F. E. (1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    12.Freedman, M. and Tregoe, B. B. (2003), The Art and Discipline of Strategic Leadership, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    13.Guieford, J. P. (1965), Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    14.Guthrie, J. (2001),“The management, measurement and the reporting of intellectual capital,”Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 2, No.1, pp. 27-41.
    15.Harrison, J .S. (2003), Strategic Management of Resources & Relationships, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    16.Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1969), “Life Cycel Theory of Leadership,”Training and Development Journal, Vol. 23, PP. 26-34.
    17.Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. and Hoskisson, R. E. (2001), Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization (Concept), South-Western College Publishing.
    18.House, R. J. and Aditya, R. N. (1997),“The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis ?”Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 445.
    19.House, R. J. (1971),“A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness,”Administrative Science Quarterly, September, Vol. 16, pp. 321-338.
    20.Hubert, S. (1996),“Tacit knowledge: The key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital,”Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 10-14.
    21.Johnson, W. H. A. (1999),“An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital : measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm,”International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.18, No. 5/6/7/8, pp. 562-575.
    22.Kaiser, H. F. (1970),“A Second Generation Little Jiffy,”Psychometrika, December, Vol. 35, pp. 401-415.
    23.Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992),“The balanced scorecard-Measures that drive performance,”Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 71-79.
    24.Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996),“Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system,”Harvard Business Review, January/February, Vol. 74, pp. 75-85.
    25.Kerlinger, Fred N. (1986), Foundations of Behavioral Research, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    26.Kotter, J. P. (1990), A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs form Management, New York: Free Press.
    27.Lynn, B. E. (1998),“Performance evaluation in the new economy: bringing the measurement and evaluation of intellectual capital into the management planning and control system,”International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 16, No. 1/2/3, pp. 162-176.
    28.Lynn, B. E. (1999),“Culture and intellectual capital management: a key factor in successful ICM implementation,”International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5/6/7/8, pp. 591-603.
    29.Marti, J. M. V. (2000),“ICBS Intellectual Capital Benchmarking Systems,”International Journal of Technology Management, pp. 799-818.
    30.McElroy, M.W. (2002),“Social Innovation Capital,”Journal of Intellectual Capital, pp. 30-39.
    31.Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    32.Rennie, M. (1999),“Accounting for knowledge assets: Do we need a new financial statement?,”International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5/6/7/8, pp. 648-659.
    33.Robbins, S. P. (2000), Organization Behavior, Prentice Hall International Inc.
    34.Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. and Edvinsson, L. (1997), Intellectual Capital: Navigation in the new business landscape, New York: New York University Press.
    35.Stewart, T. A. (1991),“Brainpower,”Fortune, June, pp. 44-60.
    36.Stewart, T. A. (1997), Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations, Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
    37.Stogdill, R. M. and Coons, A. E. (1957), Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Research Monograph No.88. (Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research).
    38.Sveiby, K. E. (1997), The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    39.Ulrich, D. (1998),“Intellectual capital = competence × commitment,”Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 15-26.
    40.Van Buren, M. E. (1999),“A yardstick for knowledge management,”Training and Development, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 71-77.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2004-06-30公開
    QR CODE