簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張晁嘉
Chang, Chao-Chia
論文名稱: 透過藝術行動主義探討推廣當地居民對空氣污染的內在意識:台灣大林蒲案例研究
Exploring the Promotion of Local Residents' Awareness through Art Activism on Air Pollution: A Case Study of Dalinpu, Taiwan
指導教授: 陳明惠
Turner, Ming
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所
Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 143
中文關鍵詞: 藝術行動主義社區參與空氣污染
外文關鍵詞: artivism, community participation, air pollution
相關次數: 點閱:54下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 我們目前生活在一個充滿許多環境、社會和政治議題的世界之中。眾多問題都得以藉由抗議行動而反映民意。不過,對於大自然而言,作為一個無法為自己發聲的沈默受害者,大自然需要得到更多的關注。從二十世紀1960年代環境運動,倡議者們尋求各種方式藉以喚醒公眾對於環境問題的意識。自那時起,各種不同的嘗試都作為倡導之用途。而今日其中一種最為顯著的方式便是透過藝術。通過藝術在觀眾中觸發的情感的連結,藝術行動主義崛起。
    藉由歸納整理出一個階段圖表來顯示藝術對於當地居民的意識提升,並且是如何逐漸影響當地社區和居民,本論文的研究者將這個階段圖表應用到台灣高雄市大林蒲的一個受空氣污染影響甚深的案例研究中,以驗證這個階段圖表的正確性,並了解大林蒲案例研究的潛在發展可能性。
    本論文呈現了自2012年起至2023年在台灣高雄市大林蒲的一系列藝術計劃。大林蒲主要的環境議題是空氣污染。在收集各項數據(如大林蒲的歷史背景、和大林蒲藝術計畫的藝術家以及當地居民進行訪談)之後,本論文的筆者藉由探討藝術作為空污議題的倡導媒介,並整合了相關藝術家以及大林蒲居民的觀點,替藝術在大林蒲實際的影響做意見統整。儘管大林蒲即將進行遷村,藝術家與部分居民仍持續不懈努力地為大林蒲發聲。

    We are currently living in a world with endless environmental, social, and political issues. Many of these issues are reacting through protests. For nature, a silent victim who cannot speak for themselves need more of our attention. From the starting age of the environmental movement in the 1960s, the advocators have sought a variety of ways to awaken the general public's awareness of environmental issues. Since then, different attempts have been used as an advocacy. One of the most significant ways today is through art. While the emotional qualities that art can trigger among its spectators, artivism rose.

    Through generalizing a phase of how artivism and gradually affects the local community and the residents themselves, the researcher of this thesis applies the phase to a case study in Dalinpu, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, an area that suffers from air pollution, to verify the phase's correctness and see the case study's potential.

    The thesis presents a series of artistic projects in Dalinpu, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, from 2012 to 2023. The major environmental issue in Dalinpu is air pollution. Through collecting all the data, such as the historical background of Dalinpu and interviews with the activist artists who created art to protest for Dalinpu and Dalinpu residents through in-depth interviews, the author of this thesis explores art as a medium for advocating air pollution issues, integrating perspectives from relevant artists and residents of Dalinpu. The study consolidates opinions on the practical impact of art in Dalinpu. Despite the impending relocation of Dalinpu, artists and some residents continue their relentless efforts to voice their concerns for Dalinpu.

    Abstract I 中文摘要 II Acknowledge III Table of Content IV List of Figures and Table VII Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.1.1 The Value and Transformation of Art 1 1.2 Research Motivations 2 1.2.1 Academic Motivation 2 1.2.1.1 Artivism 2 1.2.1.2 The Usage of Artivism on Air Pollution 3 1.2.2 Personal Motivation 6 1.3 Research Objectives 8 1.4 Research Questions 9 1.5 Terminology 10 Chapter 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 12 Introduction 12 2.1 The Correlation between Art, Artivism, and Artists 13 2.1.1 The Definition of Artivism 13 2.1.2 The Function of Artivism 15 2.2 Role of Artists in the Development of Community Participation 17 2.2.1 The Concept of Community Participation 17 2.2.2 Artivism and Community Participation 18 2.2.3 The Explanation of Each Phase of Artivism Impacts the Local Community 18 2.3 Evaluation of Promoting Certain Issue through Artivism among Local Residents 24 2.3.1 Current Situation of Art within Community Assembled by Artists 24 2.3.2 An Overview of Artivism's Effect in the Long Term 28 Chapter 3. METHODOLOGY 31 3.1 Research Framework 31 3.2 Research Method 32 3.2.1 Scoping Review 32 3.2.2 Thematic qualitative analysis 33 3.2.3 Case Study Method 33 3.2.3.1 Selected Criteria 34 3.3 Research Plan 34 3.4 Data Collection 35 3.4.1 Case Background 36 3.4.2 Interview Structure 52 3.4.2.1 List of Interview Participants 52 3.4.2.2 Interview Questions 53 3.4.3 Research Time Line 55 Chapter 4. RESULTS AND FINDINGS 56 4.1 Introduction 56 4.2 Summary of the In-depth Interviews 56 4.2.1 Artists' In-depth Interview Summary 57 4.2.2 Residents' In-depth Interview Summary 62 4.3 Overview Findings of the In-depth Interviews 68 Chapter 5. CONCLUSION 75 5.1 Introduction 75 5.2 Optimizing the Art Phase of Artivism Chart 75 5.3 Conclusion 79 Reference 80 Appendix 85

    2012大林蒲國際公害攝影大賞. (2012). In: 金煙囪文化協進會.
    3490+藝術社宅鄰距離 社宅國家隊首發藝術滾動社會住宅,擘畫永續經營架構. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.hurc.org.tw/hurc/docDetail?uid=17&pid=10&doc_id=583
    小港區行政區域圖. Retrieved from https://dalinpu.kcg.gov.tw/DRP/web_page/page7.jsp
    王若璇. (2012). 照見日常的藝術體驗:樹梅坑溪環境藝術行動. Retrieved from https://mag.ncafroc.org.tw/article_detail.html?id=297ef722723767c201723adcbba30004
    竹圍工作室. (2011). 樹梅坑溪子計畫01 樹梅坑溪早餐會. In.
    何郁琦. (2020). 《 向南行:2019大林蒲駐村發表 》. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/848985691815548/posts/pfbid02tgCqJ9k37XSSZgApXEv7pJF2bKHbCXbm1cRU86aAYvhv8GAgXK8a7b1FMWPyy3h5l/
    何郁琦 (Writer). (2022). {何郁琦, 2022 #119}. In.
    何郁琦. (2024, March twentieth) /Interviewer: 張晁嘉.
    吳瑪悧. (2013) (藝術)對話與(行動)兌話 —— 與吳瑪悧的一小時午餐會/Interviewer: 吳牧青.
    李育琴. (2016). 一碗肉燥飯承裝全台土地污染 「環南道」邀民眾品嚐環境哀愁. Retrieved from https://e-info.org.tw/node/115584
    林宏聰. (2016). 學生發起環南道行動 請鄉親用土汙碗吃滷肉飯. Retrieved from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20160524005619-260402?chdtv
    林奐成、蔡佩蓉、游昊耘、洪欣慈、蘇韋豪、邱庭瑋、魏君祐、于以琳、周融聖 (Producer). (2023). 霾葬大林蒲. Retrieved from https://vip.udn.com/newmedia/2023/dalinpo/
    林靖傑. (2017). 影像作為抗爭的武器—林泰州《我身體就是空污監測站》. Retrieved from https://talks.taishinart.org.tw/juries/ljj/2017101401
    非池中藝術網. (2013). 吳瑪悧:流入樹梅坑的藝術之溪【台新藝術獎系列報導】. Retrieved from https://artemperor.tw/focus/200
    柯宗緯. (2018). 大林蒲西南瘋音樂祭嗨翻 為在地發聲. 中時. Retrieved from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20180303002834-263301?chdtv
    柯宗緯. (2020). 新故鄉動員》令西南瘋響起 盼大林蒲空汙退散. 中國時報. Retrieved from https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20201102000470-260114?chdtv
    洪臣宏、王榮祥. (2016). 400年來第一場,大林蒲「西南瘋」音樂祭今天登場. 自由時報. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1608389
    洪秀菊. (2024, April thirtieth) /Interviewer: 張晁嘉.
    倪祥 (Writer). (2012a). 2012大林蒲國際公害攝影大賞. In.
    倪祥. (2012b). 「霓想」的南星計畫. Retrieved from https://archive.ncafroc.org.tw/result?id=bef284e960214590a918e4962565da1a. https://archive.ncafroc.org.tw/result?id=bef284e960214590a918e4962565da1a
    倪祥. (2024, April second) /Interviewer: 張晁嘉.
    翁鈺清. (2015). 〈為起孤城一座大林蒲〉. 台大意識報高雄特刊. Retrieved from https://www.peopo.org/news/272663
    高雄市立美術館. (2023). 盪-吳瑪悧個展. Retrieved from https://www.kmfa.gov.tw/ExhibitionDetailC001100.aspx?Cond=af5cd94f-f379-4012-bd0e-a2b5b9130715
    國立台灣歷史博物館. (2021). 離人.離島:臺灣離島的多重變貌. Retrieved from https://www.nmth.gov.tw/News_Content2.aspx?n=4105&s=139804
    張十七. (2014). 多彩戲謔的倪祥,看見大林蒲. Retrieved from http://commagazine.twmedia.org/?p=2625
    張明寮. (1982). 《清河啟元公 家譜》. In: 高雄:高雄市小港區大林蒲張問公祭祀公業管理委
    員會.
    陳玉西. (2024, April twenty-sixth) /Interviewer: 張晁嘉.
    傅遠政. (2017, October 7). 環境抗爭的藝術實踐 ── 林泰州「我身體就是空汙監測站」影像個展. Retrieved from https://mag.ncafroc.org.tw/article_detail.html?id=297ef7227039739d01707a38c1810029
    馮馨. (2022). 藝術家訪談-倪祥. Retrieved from https://www.taishinart.org.tw/art-award-year-detail/2022/642
    黃旭磊. (2017). 「西南瘋音樂祭」 大林蒲居民用音樂吶喊反空污. 自由時報. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1986409
    楊玉姿. (2018). 日治時期大林蒲之研究. 高雄文獻, 8(3), 74-115.
    經濟部工業局. (1975). 〈高雄臨海工業區開發計畫實地查證報告〉.
    漳玨賢. (2022). 駐地五百天(一):共域戰術鋪出社宅公共藝術. Retrieved from https://eyesonplace.net/2022/11/16/21988/
    (2020). 被煙囪包圍的城鎮,大林蒲還有明天? [Retrieved from https://open.spotify.com/episode/3v1wx2wTXTT52moFHlPW7L
    蔡佩桂. (2020). 向南集結:《向南行:2019大林蒲駐村發表》. Retrieved from https://talks.taishinart.org.tw/juries/tpk/2020042802#_ftn3
    蕭明光. (March 2, 2019). In.
    環南道. (2020). 向南行:2019大林蒲駐村發表. In.
    謝孟宓. (2010). 高雄市小港區大林蒲閩南話的音系及其相關問題. [The Phonological System and Other Related Issues of the Southern-Min Dialect in the Dàlínpú Xiaogang District in Gaoxióng City]. 臺灣語文研究, 5(2), 121-138. doi:10.6710/jtll.201009_5(2).0007
    謝律丞 (Writer). (2020). 影評】大林蒲之戀|西南瘋:一場居民為了生存向政府柔性抗議的音樂祭|深度解析|波特說電影. In.
    謝傲霜、謝至德. (2012). 新春糊士托・菜園藝術快樂抗爭.
    Activism. (n.d.).
    Activist Art Now? (2007). Art on Paper, 11(3), 52-59. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24556096
    Air Pollution | World Helath Organization. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1
    Art as Environment: A Cultural Action at the Plum Tree Creek. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://bambooculture.com/en/project/2004
    Barndt, D. (2006). Wild Fire: Art as Activism: Sumach Press.
    Beardsley, M. C. (1981). Aesthetics, Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism: Hackett Publishing Company.
    Becker, C. (1994). The Subversive Imagination: Artists, Society, and Responsibility: Routledge.
    Beijing’s thick-as-a-brick smog inspires art project. (2015). Modern Healthcare, 45(50), 0036-0036. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=111802502&site=ehost-live
    Berman, K. (2007). The Role of the Visual Arts in Social Change in South Africa. The International Journal of the Arts in Society: Annual Review, 1, 123-136. doi:10.18848/1833-1866/CGP/v01i05/35263
    Berry, L. H., Koski, J., Verkuijl, C., Strambo, C., & Piggot, G. (2019). Making space
    how public participation shapes environmental decision-making. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep22993
    Beuys, J. (1973). Every human being is an artist. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8643727-every-human-being-is-an-artist-a-freedom-being-called
    Blackmore, L. (2022). Cultivating Ongoingness Through Site-Specific Arts Research and Public Engagement. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies (13569325), 31(1), 159-176. doi:10.1080/13569325.2022.2057455
    Brennan, J. (2019). Public Art and the Art of Public Participation. National Civic Review, 108(3), 34-44. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.32543/naticivirevi.108.3.0034
    Bullot, N. J. (2014). The Functions of Environmental Art. Leonardo, 47(5), 511-512. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43832972
    Cerezo, J. A. L., & García, M. G. (1996). Lay Knowledge and Public Participation in Technological and Environmental Policy. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 2(1), 36-48.
    Cohen-Cruz, J. (2002). An Introduction to Community Art and Activism. CAN Reading Room. . Retrieved from http://www.communityarts.net/readingroom/archivefiles/2002/02/an_introduction.php
    Community. (n.d.).
    Cook, K. (2020). WHEN ART LIVES AS CULTURE. In C. Henseler (Ed.), Extraordinary Partnerships (pp. 37-50): Lever Press.
    Deck, K. (2020). Enviro-Envision: Visualizing Climate Change through Art. Leonardo, 53(5), iii-40. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=vth&AN=146328529&site=ehost-live
    Doherty, J. (2023). Democracy and the Arts. National Civic Review, 112(2), 65-70. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/48736880
    Duncombe, S. (2016). Does it Work? The Æffect of Activist Art. Social Research, 83(1), 115-134. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=poh&AN=116749293&site=ehost-live
    Duncombe, S., & Lambert, S. (2021). The Art of Activism: Your All-purpose Guide to Making the Impossible Possible: OR Books, LLC.
    Fu-Xian, H. (2016). 2016大林蒲西南瘋宣傳海報. In.
    Fu-Xian, H. (Feburary 28, 2019). In.
    Galafassi, D., Kagan, S., Milkoreit, M., Heras, M., Bilodeau, C., Bourke, S. J., . . . Tàbara, J. D. (2018). ‘Raising the temperature’: the arts on a warming planet. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 71-79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.010
    Green, G. (1999). New Genre Public Art Education. Art Journal, 58(1), 80-83. doi:10.2307/777886
    Grodach, C. (2010). Art spaces, public space, and the link to community development. Community Development Journal, 45(4), 474-493. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44258225
    Hendahl, K., Aguirre, G., & Magnusson, E. (2011). Interactive art in the suburbs: Art projects that increase involvement from the community. Journal of Arts & Communities, 3(2), 135-149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac.3.2.135_1
    Hernández, F. H. (2008). La investigación basada en las artes. Propuestas para repensar la investigación en educación. Educatio Siglo XXI, 26, 85–118. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/educatio/article/view/46641
    Holmes, B. (2009 ). The Affectivist Manifesto. Artistic Critique in the Twenty-First Century. Public, 0(39). Retrieved from https://public.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/public/article/view/30386
    IQAir. (2023, November 25). Live most polluted major city ranking. Retrieved from https://www.iqair.com/world-air-quality-ranking
    Jaki, S. C. (March 4, 2018). In.
    Johnson, T., & Fürst, K. (2022). Praying for Blue Skies: Artistic Representations of Air Pollution in China. Modern China, 48(1), 73-104. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoah&AN=54662669&site=ehost-live
    Knecht, G. B. (2007). WATER WORKS. Smithsonian, 38, 10-12. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=26888774&site=ehost-live
    Kwon, M. (2004). One Place after Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity: MIT Press.
    Lanzl, C. (2020). TOWARD A NEW PARADIGM
    Public Art and Placemaking in the Twenty-First Century. In C. Henseler (Ed.), Extraordinary Partnerships (pp. 51-72): Lever Press.
    Lippard, L. R. (1984). Activating Activist Art. Circa(17), 11-17. doi:10.2307/25556892
    Lippard, L. R. (1999). Too political? Forget it. . In P. Yenawine, M. Weems, & B. Wallis (Eds.), Art Matters: How the Culture Wars Changed America: NYU Press.
    Lum, K. (2020). Contemporary Art Within and Without Institutions, 2005. In Everything is Relevant (pp. 144-147): Concordia University Press.
    MacLeod, H. (2006). Activism Sparks Wildfire. Alternatives Journal (AJ) - Canada's Environmental Voice, 32(4/5), 42-43. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=23737813&site=ehost-live
    Meskell-Brocken, S. (2020). First, second and third Exploring Soja’s Thirdspace theory in relation to everyday arts and culture for young people. In T. Ashley & A. Weedon (Eds.), Developing a Sense of Place (pp. 240-254): UCL Press.
    Qin, L. (2014). A prayer for clear air. Retrieved from https://chinadialogue.net/en/cities/6769-a-prayer-for-clear-air/
    Ricketts, A. (2006). Theatre of protest: The magnifying effects of theatre in direct action. Journal of Australian Studies, 30(89), 75-87. doi:10.1080/14443050609388094
    Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences: Teachers College Press.
    Sontag, S. (2004). Regarding the Pain of Others: Picador.
    Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research: SAGE Publications.
    Stecker, R. (2012). Artistic Value Defended. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 70(4), 355-362. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43496530
    Truax, H. (1991). Green fades to blues. Environmental Action, 23(1), 19. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=9108261872&site=ehost-live
    van Maanen, H. (2009). What Philosophers Say that the Arts Do. In How to Study Art Worlds (pp. 149-202): Amsterdam University Press.
    Vella, M. G. (2023). Art activism: Art of dissent. International Journal of Education through Art, 19(1), 11-27. doi:10.1386/eta_00115_1
    Wahlberg, S. (1998). Samhällsarbete: strategier för ett radikalt och humanistiskt socialt arbete: Norstedts juridik.
    Wilcox, E. (2009). An Investigation of the Intersection between Art and Activism. Western Kentucky University, Mahurin Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1280&context=stu_hon_theses (Paper 275)

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE