本研究的目的是探討組織架構、高階管理層、創業資源可得性、創業人格特質、風險意識等因素對內部創業意向影響等構面之間是否存在顯著的影響關係。本研究之組織架構構面是參考Burgelman (1984), Dess,Lumpkin & McGee(1999), Khandwalla(1977)等人所提出一個發展內部創業的組織，應具備組織內的鼓勵創新、彈性的組織架構、充分授權及賦予所需的資源等因素。高階管理層構面是參考Pinchot(1985), Shane and Venkanman(1992), Burch(1986)等人所提出的高階管理層的支持對於內部資源的獲取及協調有顯著影響。創業資源可得性構面則是參考Hisrich & Peters(1986), Pinchot(1985)所提出的企業能提供給創業家四項重要的資源:行銷力量、科技基礎、實驗工廠與支援生產以及資金。創業人格特質構面則是參考Pinchot(1985)所提出的內部創業員工最需具備的能力為遠視力及行動力。風險意識構面則是參考Robert L. Simons（1999）, Covin & Slevin(1991)所提出的風險的種類有營運風險（Operation Risk）、財務資產風險（Asset Impairment Risk）、競爭風險（Competitive Risk）及信用、商譽風險（Franchise Risk）。

本研究問卷所得之資料，將使用SPSS 17版本之套裝統計軟體進行樣本結構的統計分析，所採用方法包括:敘述性統計(Descriptive Statistics)、信度分析（Reliability）、效度分析(Validity)、因素分析(Factor Analysis)及多元迴歸分析等，來進行資料分析與研究模式驗證適切性。

本研究以發放電子問卷形式進行研究，實際回收312份問卷，未見需剔除之無效問卷；有效回收率為100%。本研究發現:
H1: 組織架構對創業資源可得性有顯著的影響。
H2: 高階管理層對創業資源可得性有顯著的影響。
H3: 創業資源可得性對內部創業意向有顯著的影響。
H4: 創業人格特質對內部創業意向有顯著的影響。
H5: 風險意識對內部創業意向有顯著的影響。

最後，本研究根據上述之研究發現提出結論與建議，以作為企業管理實務和後續研究的參考。

The purpose of this study is to explore whether there is a significant impact relationship between organizational structure, high-level management, availability of entrepreneurial resources, entrepreneurial personality traits, risk awareness and other factors on the intrapreneurship intention. The organizational structure of this study is an organization that develops internal entrepreneurship by Burgelman (1984), Dess, Lumpkin & McGee (1999), Khandwalla (1977), etc., and should have an organizational structure that encourages innovation and flexibility within the organization. Factors such as full authorization and the resources required. The top management structure is based on the top management support proposed by Pinchot (1985), Shane and Venkanman (1992), Burch (1986) and others, which has a significant impact on the acquisition and coordination of internal resources. The availability of entrepreneurial resources is based on the reference of Hisrich & Peters (1986), Pinchot (1985) can provide entrepreneurs with four important resources: marketing power, technology base, experimental factories and support production and capital. The entrepreneurial personality trait structure is based on the ability of the internal entrepreneurs proposed by Pinchot (1985) to have the most vision and mobility. The risk-aware facet refers to the types of risks proposed by Robert L. Simons (1999) and Covin & Slevin (1991): Operation Risk, Asset Impairment Risk, Competitive Risk, and Franchise Risk.
The data obtained from this research questionnaire will be statistically analyzed using the SPSS 17 version of the statistical software. The methods used include: Descriptive Statistics, Reliability, Validity, Factor Analysis, and Multiple Regression Analysis for data analysis and research models. Verify the appropriateness.

In this study, the study was conducted in the form of an electronic questionnaire. 312 questionnaires were actually collected, and no invalid questionnaires were needed. The effective recovery rate was 100%. This study found that:
H1: The organizational structure has a significant impact on the availability of entrepreneurial resources.
H2: Top management has a significant impact on the availability of entrepreneurial
resources.
H3: The availability of entrepreneurial resources has a significant impact on intrapreneurship intentions.
H4: Entrepreneurial personality traits have a significant impact on intrapreneurship intentions.
H5: Risk awareness has a significant impact on intrapreneurship intentions.

Finally, based on the above research findings, this study proposes findings and recommendations as a reference for business management practices and follow-up research.

一、中文文獻：

1.中華徵信 (2003) 台灣集團企業研究，2002。
2.呂良添(1998)，創業導向、管理實務、人際網絡與組織績效關係之研究，中
央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
3.李秋湄譯(2000)，John L. Nesheim，「非常競爭優勢」，天下雜誌。
4.林文彬(2003)，先進企業未來六大趨勢全球化與知識經濟下企業因應之道，中
華經濟研究院。
5.吳萬益(1996)，「集團企業組織文化、決策模式與經營策略之研究－中美日德
韓墨主要集團企業運作模式之實證分析」， 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計
劃。
6.吳萬益、吳志正(1996)，「台美日企業在台灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略
之研究」，臺大管理論叢，第七卷，第一期，頁49-84。
7.唐順明(2001)，「環境不確定情況下策略聯盟管理對於績效影之研究」，中
山管理 評論，第九卷，第三期，頁335-372。
8.許士軍(1987)，台灣地區集團企業研究: 台灣地區集團企業與經濟發展座談
會記錄，第 7 版，台北：中華徵信所。
9.張文菁(2001)，企業特性、人力資本、產業環境以及組織績效之相關性研究。
國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
10.莊立民(2001)，組織創新量表建構之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為例，科技
管理學會九十一年度研討會。
11.張永昇(1993)，組織內部創業活動之研究，中央大學企管所碩士論文。
12.張逸民(1998)，高登第譯，「成長策略（哈佛商業評論精選）」，天下文
化。
13.黃光國(1994)，自我實現與華人社會中的價值變遷，桂冠圖書公司。
14.喬友慶、于卓民、林月雲(2001)，「國際化程度與產品差異化能力對廠商績
效之 影響 –台灣大型製造廠商之實證研究」，管理學報，第十九卷，第五
期，頁 811- 842。
15.蔡明田、張淑昭、永真、廖耀生(2001)，「企業資源與控制型態對多角化策
略與 經營績效關係的節制效果之研究」，輔仁管理評論，第八卷第二期，頁
197-222。
16.蔡明宏(1992)，「內部創業的理論基礎」，中央大學管理研討會。
17.蕭志同、金必煌、邱英雄與楊千(2001)，企業集團內部創業模式－以宏碁集
團為例，「資訊、科技與社會」學報，頁 1-16. 。
18.劉常勇(2006)，創業管理。台灣：國立中央大學EMBA演講講稿，P45。
19.熊學彥(1992)，內部創業開創事業第二春。台灣:統領雜誌。
20.許碧芬(1996)。「組織結構與跨部門衝突關係之研究－營造業之實
證分析」，台灣：國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
21.黃敏萍(2000)。「跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能－任務特殊性與社會系落之
影響」，台灣：國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
22.唐人璠(2003)，企業多角化內部創業經營策略之研究-以電信業工程部門為
例。 台灣:國立中山大學企業管理系研究所碩士論文。
23.劉常勇(2001)，『創業管理 06 講：創業家的人格特質』，中山大學企管
系。
24.莊文豊(1995)，內部創業模式之研究：以 A 公司為例。台灣:中原大學企業
管理學系碩士論文。
25.林三偉(1999)，組織內部創業影響因素與組織績效之關連性研究。台灣:開南
大 學企業與創業管理學系碩士論文。
26.陳柏凱(2005) ，創業熱情、機會辨識、創業意向與創業行為之關係－計畫行
為理論觀點。台灣: 國立中興大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。

二、英文文獻：
1.Arie de Geus.1997.「The Living Company」,Harvard Business
school Press.
2.Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of
Plannd Behavior: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
3.Badguerahanian, L., and Abetti, P.A. 1995. The rise and
fall of the Merin-Gerin Foundry business: A case study in
French corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business
Venturing 10(6):477–493.
4.Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case of intention. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
5. Bostjan Antoncic and Robert D. Hisrich.2001.Journal of Business Venturing 16(5):
495–527
6. Brindley, T. A.1990.Socio-Psychological Value in the Republic of China (Ⅱ). Asian
Thought and Society 15 (43):1-15.
7. Burgelman R.A. Spring 1984. Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship in
Established Firms.California Management Review 36(3)：154-156.
8. Covin, J.G. 1991. Entrepreneurial vs. conservative firms: A comparison of strategies
and performance.Journal of Management Studies 25(5):439–462.
9. Covin, J.G., and Slevin, D.P. 1986. The development and testing of an organizational-
level entrepreneurship scale. In R. Ronstadt et al., eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship
Research.Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
10. Covin, J.G., and Slevin, D.P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile
and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal 10(1):75–87.
11. Covin, J.G., and Slevin, D.P. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship
as firm behavior.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16(1):7–25.
12. Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T., and Covin, J.G. 1997. Entrepreneurial strategy making
and firm performance:Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic
Management Journal 18(9):677–695.
13. Drucker, P.F. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
14. Encarnation, Dennis J., Vachani, Sushil.1985. Foreign Ownership: When Hosts
Change the Rules. Harvard Business Review 63(5): 152-160
15. Fast, N.D., and Pratt S.E. 1981. Individual entrepreneurship and the large corporation.
In K.H. Vesper, ed., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson
College.
16. Gerlach, Michael L.1992. The Japanese Corporate Network: A Blockmodel Analysis.
Administrative Science Quarterly 37( 1): 105-139
17.Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B.,and Cardy, R. L.1995. Managing Human
Resources. New York：Prentice Hall International Inc.
18.Guth, W.D., and Ginsberg, A. 1990. Guest editors’ introduction: Corporate
entrepreneurship.Strategic Management Journal 11(5):5–15.
19.Hisrich, R.D., and Peters, M.P. 1984. Internal venturing in large corporations. In J.A.
Hornaday et al., eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson
College.
20. Hobson, E.L., and Morrison, R.M. 1983. How do corporate start-up ventures fare? In
J.A. Hornaday et al., eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley,MA:
Babson College.
21. Hornsby, J.S., Naffziger, D.W., Kuratko, D.F., and Montagno, R.V. 1990. Developing
an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial
environment. Strategic Management Journal 11:49–58.
22. Hornsby, J.S., Naffziger, D.W., Kuratko, D.F., and Montagno, R.V. 1993. An
interactive model of the corporate entrepreneurship process. Entrepreneurship: Theory
and Practice 17(2):29–37.
23. Kanter, R.M. 1984. The Change Masters. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
24. Kanter, R.M. 1989. When Giants Learn to Dance. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
25. Kanter, R.M., and Richardson, L. 1991. Engines of progress: Designing and running
entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies-The Enter-prize program at Ohio
Bell, 1985–1990. Journal of Business Venturing 6(3):209–229.
26. Kazanjian, R. K. and Drazin R. 1989.An Empirical Test of a Stage of Growth
Progression Model,Management Science 35(12):1489-1503.
27. Khandwalla, P.N.1977. The Design of Organizations. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich.
28.Khandwalla, P.N. 1987. Generators of pioneering-innovative management: Some
Indian evidence.Organization Studies 8(1):39–59.
29.Khanna Tarun and Palepu Krishna.1999. The Right Way to Restructure
Conglomertaes in Emerging Markets. Harvard Business Review 77(4):125-134.
30.Khanna, Tarun and Rivkin W. Jan,2001.Estimating the Performance Effects of
Business Groups in Emerging Markets. Strategic Management Journal 22(1):45-47.
31. Knight, G.A. 1997. Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm
entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing 12(3):213–225
32. Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby, J.S., Naffziger, D.W., and Montagno, R.V. 1993. Implement
entrepreneurial thinking in established organizations. SAM Advanced Management
Journal 58(1):28–33, 39.
33. Leff, Nathaniel H..1987. Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in the
Developing Countries: The Economic Groups. Economic Development and Cultural
Change 26(4):661
34. Lieberman, M. and Montgomery, D.1988.First-mover advantages. Strategic
Management Journal 9(5): 41-58.
35. Luchsinger, V., and Bagby, D.R. 1987. Entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. SAM
Advanced Management Journal 52(3):10–13.
36. Lumpkin, G.T. and Gregory G. Dess. 1996.Clarifying the Entrepreneurial
Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management
Review 21(1):135-72.
37.MacMillan, I.C., Block, Z., and Narasimha, P.N.S. 1984. Obstacles and experience in
corporate ventures. In J.A. Hornaday et al., eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship
Research. Wellesley,MA: Babson College.
38. MacMillan, I.C. 1986. Progress in research on corporate venturing. In D.L. Sexton
and R.W. Smilor,eds., The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, MA:
Ballinger Publishing Company.
39. Mascarenhas B. and A. Baveja and M. Jamil .1998. Dynamics of Core Competencies
in Leading Multinational Companies. California Management Review 40(4): 117-132.
40. Merrifield, D.B. 1993. Intrapreneurial corporate renewal. Journal of Business
Venturing 8(5):383–389.
41. Miller, D., and Friesen, P.H. 1978. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management
Science 24(9):921–933.
42. Miller, D., and Friesen, P.H. 1983. Strategy-making and environment. Strategic
Management Journal 4(4):221–235.
43. Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms.
Management Science 29(7):770–791.
44. Miller, K. D.1992.A Framework for Integrated Risk Management in International
Business. Journal of International Business Studies 23(2): 311-331
45. Peng, Mike W., and P.S. Heath.1996.The Growth of the Firm in Planned Economies
in Transition : Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice. Academy of
Management Review 21(2):492-528.
46. Peters, T.J., and Waterman R.H. 1982. In Search of Excellence. New York, NY: Harper
& Row.
47. Penrose, E.1959.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, London: Basil Blackwell.
48. Pinchot, G.1985. Intrapreneuring. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
49. Roberts, E. B. July/Aug.1980.New Ventures for corporate Growth. Harvard Business
Review.
50. Rule, E.G., and Irwin D.W. 1988. Fostering intrapreneurship: The new competitive
edge. The Journal of Business Strategy 9(3):44–47.
51. Schollhammer, H. 1981. The efficacy of internal corporate entrepreneurship strategies.
In K.H. Vesper, ed., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson
College.
52. Schollhammer, H. 1982. Internal corporate entrepreneurship. In C.A. Kent, D.L.
Sexton, and K.H. Vesper, eds., Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
53. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. Capitalism, socialism and democracy, New York.
54. Singh, Manohar, Ike Mathur, Kimberly C. Gleason and Ahmad Etebari .2001.An
Empirical Examination of The Trend and Performance Implications of Business
Diversification.The Journal of Business and Economic Studies 7(2):25-51.
55. Souder, W.E. 1981. Encouraging entrepreneurship in the large corporations. Research
Management 14(3):18–22.
56. Stevenson, H.H., and Jarillo, J.C. 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship:
Entrepreneurial management.Strategic Management Journal 11(5):17–27.
57. Stopford, J.M., and Baden-Fuller, C.W.F. 1994. Creating corporate entrepreneurship.
Strategic Management Journal 15(7):521–536.
58. Strachan, Stanley.1976. BANKING IN THE SHADOW OF THE TOWERING
INFERNO. The Bankers Magazine.159( 4):69
59. Sylvia Porter.1989 Jun 22. INDIVIDUALS STILL CAN COMPETE WITH
CORPORATIONS AND WIN.Journal Record: NOPGCIT
60. Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam.1986, Measurement of business performance in
strategy research：A comparison of approach, Academy of Management Review,
1(4):801-814
61. Vesper, K.H. 1984. Three faces of corporate entrepreneurship. In J.A.Hornaday et al.,
eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.s
62. Zahra, S.A. 1991. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship:
An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 6(4):259–285.
63. Zahra, S.A. 1993. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial
performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing 8(4):319–340.
64. Zahra, S.A., and Covin, J.C. 1995. Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing 10(1):43–58.