簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳宏惟
Chen, Hung-Wei
論文名稱: 企業人力資源、平衡計分卡、知識管理與部門績效關聯性分析-以中華電信為例
An Analysis of Business Human Resource, the Balanced Score Card, Knowledge Management and Department Performance-A Case Study for Chunghwa Telecom
指導教授: 黃國平
Hwang, Kevin. P.
沈清文
Shen, Ching-Wen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 電信管理研究所
Institute of Telecommunications Management
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 平衡計分卡部門績效知識管理人力資源管理
外文關鍵詞: Department Performance, Knowledge Management, the Balanced Scorecard, Human Resource Management
相關次數: 點閱:106下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   台灣的電信產業自1996年改革開放以來,受到政策面、科技面、供需面的衝擊,台灣電信產業變遷快速;除原先的資本、技術密集特性外,自由化的競爭環境更使得業者日趨重視優質的行銷能力與服務品質。而在經營業者不斷發展因應策略、調整企業流程之際,人力資源成為重要的基礎與關鍵成功因素,主導各項企業活動的成敗。而隨著全球化、知識經濟、網際網路、電子商務等議題之興起,難以被模仿的無形資產成為企業獲利的重要來源,並促成管理典範不斷轉移,平衡計分卡(The Balanced Scorecard; BSC)與知識管理(Knowledge Management; KM)已成為近來最受組織重視的策略性管理工具與議題。
      本研究將以中華電信公司為例,就其人力資源管理策略、知識管理活動、平衡計分卡(The Balanced Scorecard; BSC)制度,探討民營化後的中華電信公司應如何以人力資源管理與知識管理活動,配合公司其他資源,轉化為優質的行銷能力與服務品質,持續創造卓越的績效與營收。
      在回顧國內外相關文獻後,本研究發展出五十九個題項的問卷,經過信度分析後發出250份問卷,分別寄給中華電信公司之國際分公司與行動通信分公司,結果回收有效問卷為185份,回收率為74%。再經過實證資料分析後,提出結論與建議。
      經使用統計分析後,結果發現:1.平衡計分卡之人力資源管理效標對部門績效存在正向影響,其中以內部流程績效指標影響最大,顯見順暢之作業流程仍是提振績效時最具顯著影響力之因素;2.知識管理活動對部門績效存在正向影響,其中以知識創造與知識取得影響最大,顯見個案公司傾向以組織中現有之知識進行應用。3. 平衡計分卡之人力資源管理效標與知識管理活動存在正向影響。
      因此在高度變動的電信產業中,民營化後之中華電信公司應加強人力資源績效衡量,使平衡計分卡各策略行動能更緊密連結,達成策略目標;而知識管理活動方面則應加強新知識的創造與取得,以強化公司競爭力,提昇績效。

      Since the deregulation of telecommunications in 1996, Taiwan’s telecom industry changes rapidly for the impacts of policies, technology, and market supply-demand. The liberalized and competitive environment make the operators take account of marketing capability and service quality. When the operators attempt to develop fitting strategies and rebuild business process, human resource become an imperative key success factor and dominates the outcome of every corporate activity. With the trends of globalization, knowledge economy, Internet and e-commerce, intangible assets become an important source of profitability, therefore the Balanced Scorecard and Knowledge Management are extensively discussed and valued strategic management tools.
      This study will research on Chunghwa Telecom’s human resource management, knowledge management activities, and the Balanced Scorecard system, exploring how Chunghwa Telecom utilizes its human resource and knowledge management activities to transform the resources into tremendous performance and revenue.
    Based on related literatures, this study designed an questionnaire to collect information from Chunghwa Telecom’s 250 employees in Mobile Communications Group and International Group. 185 valid questionnaires resulted in an effective response rate of 74%
      The data analysis results are: 1. The HRM-related BSC Indicators lead to positive effects on department performance; 2. Knowledge management activities lead to positive effects on department performance; 3. The HRM-related BSC Indicators and Knowledge management activities are correlated.
      In the fast-changing telecommunications industry, Chunghwa Telecom should enhance its human resource management and performance measurement to link the strategic activities in the Balanced Scorecard system; as for the knowledge management activities, the knowledge creation and acquisition to enhance the corporate competitive advantage.

    摘要                         I 誌謝                        III 表目錄                        V 圖目錄                       VI 第一章 緒論                     1 1.1 研究背景與動機                  1 1.2 研究目的                     2 1.3 論文架構與研究流程                3 第二章 文獻回顧與探討                5 2.1 人力資源管理(Human Resource Management)    5 2.2 知識管理(Knowledge Management)         7 2.3 績效與績效衡量(Performance and Measurement)  14 2.4 平衡計分卡制度(The Balanced Scorecard)     21 2.5 研究構面關聯性之探討               34 2.6 個案公司現況分析                 43 第三章 研究方法                   52 3.1 研究架構與假設                  52 3.2 研究設計                     54 3.3 研究對象與資料收集方式              58 3.4 資料分析方法                   59 第四章 研究分析與討論                63 4.1 樣本屬性分析                   63 4.2 各研究變項之敘述性統計分析            65 4.3 信度分析                     69 4.4 變異數分析(ANOVA)               69 4.5 典型相關分析                   75 4.6 結構方程模式分析                 81 第五章 結論與建議                  87 5.1 結論                       87 5.2 實務上的詮釋與建議                90 5.3 研究限制與未來研究的建議             91 參考文獻                       93 附錄一 正式問卷                   99

    中文部分
    1.Kaplan, Robert S. & Norton, David P. 原著,朱道凱譯,平衡計分卡-資訊時代的策略管理工具。台北:臉譜文化。
    2.Niven, P. R. 原著,于泳泓譯(2002),平衡計分卡最佳實務。台北:商周出版。
    3.日比宗平(1987),「部門績效評估實務」,台北:臺華出版社。
    4.王世志(2002),以平衡計分卡觀點作航運業經營策略與經營績效之關聯性研究,國立海洋大學航運管理研究所碩士論文。
    5.中華電信股份有限公司九十四年度年報(2005)。
    6.艾國強(1992)「業績‧薪資‧獎金」,台北:書泉出版社。
    7.林珮琪(1998),高科技產業研究發展績效衡量之研究-平衡計分卡觀點,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    8.江玫君(2001),人力資源管理與組織績效之相關研究,嶺東技術學院,嶺東學報期刊論文。
    9.李書行(1995),務實創新的策略性績效評估,會計研究月刊第113期。
    10.宋孟霖(1997),本國積體電路製造業關鍵成功因素與績效評估制度之研究:實地研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    11.呂良添(1998),創業導向、管理實務、人際網絡與組織績效關係之研究,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    12.李長貴(1998),績效管理與績效評估,台北:華泰文化事業公司,初版。
    13.李誠(2000),全球環境變化與人力資源管理。李誠主編,人力資源管理的12堂課。台北市:天下文化。
    14.李勝雄(2004),經營策略、執行力與平衡計分卡導向經營績效之研究-以橡膠產業為例,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    15.吳萬益、林清河(2000),「企業研究方法」,華泰書局。
    16.周傳震(2000),平衡計分卡制度應用於國防科技研發機構之研究,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    17.周芸薇(2000),學習型組織評鑑量表之建立,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
    18.吳思華(2001)知識資本在台灣,台北:遠流。
    19.吳濟民(2003),知識管理策略、組織核心能耐與經營績效關係之研究,長榮大學經營管理所碩士論文
    20.姜定維、蔡巍(2002),奔跑的蜈蚣,京華出版社。
    21.徐佳銘(1993),多國籍企業之特徵與績效評估方式關係之研究:臺灣地區之實證,文化大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    22.許宏明(1995),高科技產業的教育訓練制度與組織績效之相關性研究,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    23.張火燦(1996),策略性人力資源管理。揚智文化公司。
    24.許淑君(1997),競爭策略、人力資源管理系統與組織績效之研究-以國內大型製造業為例,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    25.陳文賢(1998),兩岸三地資訊管理的學術與應用,兩岸三地中小企業經營管理與發展學術研究會論文集。
    26.陳世哲、許淑君(1999),競爭策略〜HRM系統與組織績效之研究,亞太管理評論,4卷,4期:頁413-429。
    27.許士軍(2000),關鍵資源與核心能力之基礎-知識管理的發展及系統觀,中衛簡訊。
    28.莊煥銘、吳建明、葉蔭淂(2000),「企業經營策略、知識管理策略與組織績效關係之研究」,第三屆商業現代化研討會論文集,頁448-455。
    29.陳明璋(2000),平衡計分卡在中小企業的應用,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    30.陳世彬(2001),知識管理之探究—我國政府研考部門之分析,國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    31.陳振添(2002),平衡計分卡在電信產業應用之研究-以中華電信為例,東海大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    32.陳順宇(2003),多變量分析。台北:華泰書局。
    33.黃英忠(1997),人力資源管理。台北:三民。
    34.黃俊英(1998),多變量分析第七版。華泰書局。
    35.黃家齊、顧萱萱(1999),人力資本投資與組織績效。海峽兩岸財經與商學研討會論文集:385-400。
    36.黃同圳(2000),人力資源管理策略。李誠主編,人力資源管理的12堂課。台北市:天下文化。
    37.黃國平(2005),台灣電信產業變遷中人力資源管理與因應策略分析,2005年第四屆兩岸產業發展與經營管理研討會論文集。
    38.黃國平(2005),電信人力資源與企業政策分析-以中華電信為例,第二屆服務業管理與創新學術研討會論文集。
    39.溫金豐(1998),人力資源系統構形與組織績效關係之研究-以高科技廠商為例。中山大學企業管理學所博士論文。
    40.劉平文(1993),經營分析與企業診斷-企業經營系統觀。台北:華泰書局。
    41.劉明奎(1996),人力資源部門績效指標建構之研究,東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    42.蔡正宏(1996),ISO 9000品保制度認知之研究--以服務業為例,國立中興大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    43.謝惠玉(2004),中華電信導入平衡計分卡之執行評估,東海大學公共事務在職專班碩士論文。
    44.譚大純、劉廷揚、蔡明洲(1999),「知識管理文獻之回顧與分類」,中華民國科技研討會論文集,第一集,頁623-636。
    45.譚大純、汪昭芬(2001),「知識管理之策略觀點:文獻回顧、分類與命題」,科技管理學刊,第6卷,第1期,第35-54頁。

    英文部分
    1.Alavi, M., & Leidner. D. E. (1999). Knowledge Management System: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. CAIS, 1(7), 1-37.
    2.Arthur A. & APQC. (1996). The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version.
    3.Arthur A., Business Consulting. (1999). Zukai Knowledge Management. Japan: TOKYO Keizai Inc.
    4.Birchfield, R. (2001). What It Takes To Become World Class…and Why Kiwis Fail. New Zealand Management, 48 (10), 18-27.
    5.Bird, A & Beechler, S (1994). Links Between Business Strategy And Human Resource Management Strategy In U.S.-Based Japanese Subsidiaries: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter, 23-46.
    6.Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the Nature of Organizational Effectiveness. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings (Ed.), New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    7.Capon, N., Farley, J. & Hoenig, S. (1990). Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Management Science, 36(10), 1143-1159.
    8.Carroll, S. J., & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance appraisal and development of performance in organizations. Glenview Illionis: Scott, Foresman.
    9.Carter C. & Scarbrough, H. (2001). Towards a second generation of KM? The people management challenge. Education & Training, 43, 215-224.
    10.Clarke, P. & Staunton, N. (1989). Innovation in technology and organization. London: Routledge.
    11.Corso, M. and Paolucci, E. (2001). Fostering innovation and knowledge transfer in product development through information technology. International Journal of Technology Management, 22 (1), 126-148.
    12.Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beer, M. C. (1999). Successful Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review, 43-56.
    13.Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.
    14.Delery, J. E. & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802-835.
    15.Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society, NY: Harper Business.
    16.Dyer, L. & Reeves, T. (1995). HR strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where we need to go? International Journal of human resource Management, 656-670.
    17.Eccles, R.G. & Pyburn, P. J. (1992). Creating a Comprehensive System to Measure Performance. Management Accounting, 41-44.
    18.Ernst & Young. (1997). Executive Perspectives on Knowledge in the Organization, Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation and Business Intelligence, Report.
    19.Ford, J. D. & Schellenberg, D. A.. (1982). Conceptual issues of linkage in assessment of organizational performance. Academy of Management Reviews, 7, 49-58.
    20.Fronell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981), Evaluating Structural Equations Models with Unobservables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
    21.Galbraith, C., & Schendel, D. (1983). “An Empirical Analysis of Strategy Types”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.4, 153-173.
    22.Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, Special Issue, 109-123.
    23.Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A.H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, Summer 2001, 18, 185-214.
    24.Gomez-Mejia, L., Balkin, D., & Cardy, R. (1998). Managing Human Resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    25.Guielford, J. P. (1965). Psychometric Methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    26.Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, March April, 106-116.
    27.Hult, G. T. M. (2003). An integration of thoughts on knowledge management. Decision Science, 34(2), 189-195.
    28.Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171-188.
    29.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balance Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
    30.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.
    31.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2003). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business School Press.
    32.Keats, B. W. (1988). The Vertical Construct Validity of Selected Business Economic Performance Measures. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.
    33.Kassem M.S. & Moursi M. A. (1971), “Managerial Effectiveness”, Academy of Management Journal, 381-388.
    34.Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19 (4), 699-727.
    35.Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J. & Hult, G. T. M. (2001). Logistics service quality as a segment-customized process. Journal of Marketing, 65 (4), 82-104.
    36.Nonaka, I. (1991). The Knowledge Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
    37.Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies foster Creativity and Innovation for Competitive Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
    38.O’Dell, C. & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know: Indntification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices. Califonia Management Review, 40(3), 154-173.
    39.Papows, J. (1999). Enterprise.com. Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing.
    40.Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive through people. New York: Free Press.
    41.Prajogo, D., & Sohal, A. (2004). The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance---an empirical examination. Technovation, 24 (6), 443–453.
    42.Quintas, P. (1997). Knowledge management a strategic agenda. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 385-391.
    43.Robbins, S. P. (1994). Management (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    44.Robbins, S. P. (1990), Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Application (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall.
    45.Rogers, E. W. & Wright, P. M. (1998). Measuring organizational performance in strategic human resource management: Problems, prospects, and performance information markets. Human Resource Management Review, .8(3), 311-331.
    46.Sarvary, M. (1999). Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. California Management Review, 41, 95-107.
    47.Soliman, F. & Spooner, K. (2000). Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 337-345.
    48.Stewart, T. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
    49.Talisayon, S. D. (2002). Knowledge and people. BusinessWorld, 1.
    50.Teece, D. J., G. Pisano & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
    51.Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Harvard Business School Press.
    52.Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
    53.Wortzel, R. (1979). New Life Style Determinants of Women's Food Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43 (Summer), 28-29.
    54.Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301-326.
    55.Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, Jr. W., & Lepak, D. P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 836-866.
    56.Zack, M. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. Califonia Management Review, 41(3) Spring, 125-143.
    57.Zack, M. (1999). Management codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4) Summer, 45-58.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2011-08-08公開
    校外:2026-08-08公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE