存在於企業組織成員中龐大而無形的資產--知識，是非常重要的企業競爭優勢。在組織內，員工之間分享知識的意願愈高，愈能發揮知識的價值。由此可知，知識分享是建立在人與人緊密互動的人際關係基礎上；彼此互動越密切就越能產生具深度、廣度及有效率的知識分享。而如何在台灣科技產業組織中提高員工知識分享意願，將是本研究的重點。
本研究是以國內的產業為研究對象，透過隨機抽樣的方式，以台灣的科技業為調查對象，有效回收問卷為共 260份問卷，有效回收率為 52%。並利用SPSS軟體進行敍述性統計分析、因素分析、信度分析、差異性分析與迴歸分析等研究方法，進行研究。資料分析結果發現，組織成員會因為獲得正面的正義(公平)知覺而加深組織的信任程度，進而以組織整體的目標及共同利益為一致信念，在組織中展現利他、利社會的組織公民行為，提高知識分享意願。實證分析結果發現：
一、組織正義、組織信任、組織公民行為分別對知識分享意圖有顯著影響力。
二、組織信任對知識分享意圖有顯著影響力。
三、組織公民行為對知識分享意圖有顯著影響力。
四、組織正義透過組織信任之中介效果對知識分享意圖有顯著正向的影響。
五、組織正義透過組織公民行為之中介效果對知識分享意圖有顯著正向的影響。
六、台灣科技業從業人員不同的個人屬性在組織正義、組織信任、組織公民行為及知識分享意圖等構面上無顯著差異。

Knowledge, the intangible asset held inside the members of an organization, gives the organization a competitive edge. Inside an organization, the more willingly its members share their knowledge the more valuable the knowledge becomes. Therefore, knowledge sharing is based upon the close relationship of the interaction among members. The closer the interaction, the broader, deeper and more efficient the knowledge sharing becomes. How to increase the willingness of knowledge sharing among members in high tech industry in Taiwan is the focus of this study.
Domestic industry is the study target in this research. Random questionnaires sampling from the high tech industry in Taiwan was used in the method. A total of 500 questionnaires were handed out and 260 effective ones were received back, and analysis was based on those samples. SPSS software was used in descriptive statistics analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, ANOVA and regression analysis during research. The results of data analysis show that members trust the organization more due to awareness of positive justice and share common goal of organizational targets and mutual benefits. Inside an organization, they show citizen behaviours that benefit other members and the whole organization; they have higher willingness to share knowledge. The results of the analysis show:
1.Organizational justice, organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior all have significant influence on the willingness of knowledge sharing.
2.Organizational trust has significant influence on the willingness of knowledge sharing.
3.Organizational citizenship behavior has significant influence on the willingness of knowledge sharing.
4.Through the mediating role of organizational trust, organizational justice has significant influence on the willingness of knowledge sharing.
5.Through the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior, organizational justice has significant influence on the willingness of knowledge sharing.
6.Different personal characters among technical personnel in tech industry in Taiwan have no significant influence, on aspects of organizational trust, organizational justice or organizational citizenship behaviour and the willingness of knowledge sharing.

1.王心怡(2004)國民中小學教師組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究。淡江大學/教育政策與領導研究所/碩士論文/092TKU00631004。
2.李粵強(2001)團隊績效管理導向對組織信任及組織團隊績效影響之研究。朝陽科技大學/企業管理系碩士班/碩士論文/090CYIT5121014。
3.牟鍾福(2002)國中體育教師組織正義與組織信任對組織承諾影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學/體育研究所/博士論文/090NTNU0567067。
4.林淑姬(1992)薪酬公平､程序公正與組織承諾､組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學/企業管理研究所/博士論文/080NCCU2121009。
5.林鉦棽(1996)組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究：社會交換理論之觀點。管理科學學報，13(3)，391-415。
6.林鉦棽、蕭淑月及何慧清(2005)。社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究：以信任與關係為分析切入點。人力資源管理學報，5(1)，77-110。
7.邱廷秀(2005)組織信任與服務品質之研究－以中華電信桃園營運處為例。開南管理學院/公共事務管理學系碩士班/碩士論文/094KNU00636014。
8.卓秋季(1998)代工模式與創新關聯之研究--知識管理觀點。國立政治大學/科技管理研究所/碩士論文/086NCCU0230004。
9.胡龍騰、張鐙文、楊仁鈐(2008)你，願意分享嗎？公部門組織成員知識分享行為之底蘊。東吳政治學報，26(3)，57-114。
10.吳統雄(1990)電話調查：理論與方法，pp.27-121，台北：聯經。
11.徐楊順(2001)知識分享意願.組織公平與信任關係之研究。朝陽科技大學/企業管理系碩士班/碩士論文/089CYUT0121014。
12.許道然(2002)公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學/公共行政學系/博士論文/090NCCU0055006。
13.張文華(2000)基層行政人員組織信任之研究─以台北市區公所為例。國立政治大學/公共行政學系/碩士論文/088NCCU0055022。
14.黃振忠(2007)組織正義對知識分享意願關係之研究：探討支援中心性的調節效果。靜宜大學/管理碩士在職專班/碩士論文/096PU005026012。
15.黃正雄(2006)購併後變革活動、組織正義與員工態度。人力資源管理學報，6(3)，001-021。
16.陳進江(2004)組織正義、信任與知識分享行為關係之研究─以台灣高科技產業研發部門為例。真理大學/管理科學研究所/碩士論文/092AU000457002。
17.曾雅偉(2001)組織正義與組織承諾對組織公民行為的影響。大同大學/事業經營研究所/碩士論文/089TTU00163010。
18.劉鈞慈(2000)程序公平、組織承諾、信任與組織公民行為關係之研究─以我國產物保險產業為例。銘傳大學/管理科學研究所/碩士論文/088MCU00457020。
19.廖佳君(2007)組織正義對組織承諾影響之研究－以組織信任為中介及干擾變項。國立臺南大學/教育經營與管理研究所/碩士論文/095NTNT5576007。
20.劉文卿、邵敏華(1999)建構開放性之企業知識管理系統。資訊管理學報。5(2)，55-75。
21.劉常勇(2006)劉常勇管理學習知識庫。取自http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/
22.魏美蓉(2000)企業購併中組織文化整合的重要性。中國生產力中心，531，102-104。
1.Achterbergh, J. & Vriens, D. (2002). Managing Viable Knowledge, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(3), 223-241.
2.Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
3.Andersen A. and The American Productivity and Quality Center (1996). The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version [M], Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
4.Anderson, J.C. & Narus, J.A. (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58.
5.Baba, L. M., Gluesing, J., Ratner, H., & Wanger, H. K. (2004). The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organization Behavior, 25, 547-587.
6.Badaracco, M.J. (1991) Flujos de materia en el sistema demerso-pelagico de Golfo Triste, Edo Carabobo, Venezuela. Ph.D. thesis, 91 p. Licenciatura en Biologia, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Sartenejas, Venezuela.
7.Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship.” Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
8.Berkowitz, L., Fraser, C., Treasure, F. P. & Cochran, S. (1987). Pay, equity, job gratifications, and comparisons in pay satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 544-551.
9.Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
10.Bies, R .J. ＆ Moag, J. S. (1986) Interactional justice：communication criteria of fairness,” Research on Negotiation in Organization, 1, 43-55.
11.Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
12.Cloquitt, J. A., Onlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445.
13.Constan, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400-121.
14.Constan, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1996). The kindness of strangers. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.
15.Cook, & Wall, T. (1980). New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-Fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
16.Costigan, R.D., Ilter, S.S. & Berma, J.J.(1998). A Multi-Dimensional Study of Trust in Organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 5(3), 303-315.
17.Davenpor, T.H and Prusak, L. (1998) Working Knowledge, Boston : Harvard Business School Press Dessler, Gray, 1988, “Personnel Management” (4th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, INC.
18.Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19.Drucker, P. (1994) The age of social transformation, Atlantic Monthly, 55-80.
20.Farh, J. L., Early, P. C. & Lin S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421-444.
21.Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 1, 143-160.
22.Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. NY: Free Press.
23.Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford, Blackwell.
24.Gibbert, M., & Krause, H. (2002). Practice exchange in a best practice marketplace. In knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices, T. H. Davenport and G. J. B. Probst(Eds.), Publicis Corporate Publishing, Erlangen, Germany, 89-105.
25.Graham, J. W. (1989). Organizational citizenship behavior. Construct redefinition, operationalization, and validation. Unpublished working paper. Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago.
26.Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of Sociology, 6, 1360-1380.
27.Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management, 79-103. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
29.Greenberg, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1987). Why procedural justice in organizations? Social Justice Research, 1, 127-142.
30.Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
31.Hendriks, P. (1999). Why sharing knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation of knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
32.Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary form. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
33.Kalman, M. E. (1999). The Effects of Organizational Commitment and Expected Outcomes on the Motivation to Share Discretionary Information Dilemmas and Oher Srious Gmes. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of southern California.
34.Kale P., Singh H. ＆ Perlmutter H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217-237.
35.Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations, 2nd Ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
36.Katz, J. J. (1964). Analyticity and Contradiction in Natural Language. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.) The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
37.Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. A. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making ,and the knowledge economy, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 323-338.
38.Knoke D. and Kuklinski. (1982) Network Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publication
39.Kwong, A. Y. Y., & Leung, K. (2002). A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: Importance of the relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 278-299.
40.Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships, In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, 121-145. New York: Plenum.
41.Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
42.Madhok, A. (1995), Revisiting Multinational Firm’s Tolerance For Joint Ventures: a Trust Based Approach, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 117-137.
43.Martin, C. L., & Bennett, N., (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job-satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group & Organization Management, 21, 84-104.
44.Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
45.Mauss, M. (1954). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Ian Cunnison(trans), The Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.
46.Meyer, R. (1994). Universal Optimality of Rank Constrained Matrix Approximation. In Information Systems and Data Analysis: Prospects - Foundations - Applications (H.H. Bock, W. Lenski, M.M. Richter, Eds.), Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, 4, Springer, Berlin, 335-342.
47.McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
48.McCauley, D. P. ＆ Kuhnert, K. W. (1992). A Theoretical Review and Empirical Investigation of Employee Trust in Management. Public Administration Quarterly, 265-285.
49.McDermott, R. ＆ O’Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge, Journal of Knowledge Management. 5(1), 76-85.
50.McFarlin, D. B. & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
51.McNeely, B.L. & Meglino, B.M. (1994). The Role of Dispositional and Situational Antecedents in Pro-social Organizational Behavior: An Examination of Intended Beneficiaries of Pro-social Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836-844.
52.Mishra, A. K. (1996). Farm Income Variability and the Off Farm Labor Supply of Farmers and Their Spouses. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
53.Moorman, C., Zaltman G. & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between Providers and Users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 314-28.
54.Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 20 - 38.
55.Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 7(6), 845-855.
56.Nancy, M. D. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Companies Yhrive by Sharing What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
57.Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H., (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
58.Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
59.Nonaka, I, & Konno, N. (2001) SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D. J. （ed.）, Managing Industrial Knowledge, 13-43.
60.Nooteboom B. (1996). Trust, opportunism and governance: a process and control model. Organization Studies 17, 985-1010.
61.Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in organizational behavior, 12, 43-72.
62.Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
63.Pillai, R., Williams, E. S., & Tan, J. J. (2001). Are the scales tipped in favor of procedural or distributive justice? An Investigation of the U.S., India, Germany, and Hong Kong (China). The International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(4), 312-332.
64.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
65.Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
66.Sable, C. F. (1993). Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development. Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ. : Princeton University Press, 137-165.
67.Senge, P. (1997). Sharing Knowledge. Executive Excellence, 14(11), 17-18.
68.Senge, P. (1998). Sharing knowledge. Executive Excellence, 15(6), 11-12.
69.Scholl, R. W., Cooper, E. A., & McKenna, J. F. (1987). Referent selection in deterring equity perception: Differential effects on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 617-663.
70.Shockley-Zalabak P., Ellis K., Winograd G. (2000). Organizational Trust: What It Means, Why It Matters. Organization Development Journal, 18(4), 35-47.
71.Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust /distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367-392.
72.Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational Citi-zenship Behavior: It is Nature and Antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 655-663.
73.Spek, R. V. & Spijkervet, A. (1997). Knowledge management: meaning intelligently with knowledge. Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements. New York: CRC Press.
74.Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-42.
75.Tampoe, M. (1996). Motivation knowledge worker—the challenge for the 1990sin the P.S. Myers (Ed.). Knowledge Management and Organization Design. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
76.Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
77.Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: the paradox of embedded-ness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
78.Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
79.Williams, L., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). “Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors, Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
80.Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173.
81.Yochi & Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizational a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86(2), 278-321.