| 研究生: |
翁慈璟 Wong, Tzu-Ching |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
董監事股權質押對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響 The Impact of Equity Pledge of Directors and Supervisors on the Value Relevance of Accounting Information |
| 指導教授: |
楊朝旭
Young, Chaur-Shiuh |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 31 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 董監持股質押比率 、股價 、盈餘 、淨值 、攸關性 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | the ratio of the stock-rights pledge of directors, stock price, earnings, net worth, relevance |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:77 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在於探討董監事股權質押對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響。
本實證結果顯示,隨著董監事之股權質押比率提高,使得盈餘的評價權重顯著降低。此結果表示,當董監事之股權質押比率提高,管理當局越有誘因透過盈餘操縱來影響股價,導致盈餘品質的降低,進而降低盈餘資訊的價值之攸關性。
綜言之,投資人仍重視其所投資公司是否存在著高比率之董監事股權質押的現象,隨著董監事之股權質押比率的提高,投資人越會質疑公司的盈餘品質,因而調降會計盈餘資訊之價值攸關性。故本實證結果支持公司法第197-1條之修正案,對董監事把股權質押至一定程度比例之股東,對表決權應加以限制。
This paper explores the effect of the stock-rights pledge of directors on the value relevance of accounting information.
The empirical results show that with the increase of ratio of the stock-rights pledge of directors, the evaluation weight of earnings significantly reduces. This result indicates that when ratio of the stock-rights pledge of directors increases, the administering authority will have more incentives to influence the stock price through earnings manipulation, lowering the earnings quality and thus reducing the value relevance of earnings information.
Overall speaking, for the companies they invested in, investors still laid weight on whether there is a high ratio of stock-rights pledge of directors. With the increasing of ratio of the stock-rights pledge of directors, investors will query the company's earnings quality and therefore reduce their value relevance of accounting earnings information. Therefore, the empirical results support the amendment to Article 197-1 of the Company Law. This amendment stipulates the pledging of the stock right of the directors to a certain proportion of shareholders and limit the directors’ voting power.
參考文獻
網站部分:
1. 金融監督管理委員會
http://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=2&parentpath=0
2. 台灣經濟新報社之資料庫
http://www.tej.com.tw/twsite/
3. 維基百科,自由的百科全書
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/
4. 台灣法律網
http://www.lawtw.com/
5. 法源法律網
http://www.lawbank.com.tw/
中文部分
1. 王大維,2003,公司治理相關要素與公司績效關聯性之研究─以台灣上市公司為例,淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
2. 王嘉穎,2000,我國上市公司財務危機與監理因素之關聯性研究─實質所有權之探討,台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
3. 方斯央與傅鍾仁,2002,金融風暴前後盈餘與帳面價值攸關性之研究,朝陽商管評論,第十一卷,第一期,頁 1-20。
4. 江宗哲,2008,員工認股權評價參數假設合理性與公司治理關聯性之研究,台灣大學會計學研究所未出版論文。
5. 李春旺、劉維琪與高孔廉,1989,股價行為與規模效應:台灣股票市場實證研究,管理評論,第八卷,第一期,頁 99-121。
6. 李德冠,2001,公司監理機制對於關係人交易影響之研究,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
7. 李馨蘋與莊宗憲,2007,公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究,東吳經濟商學學報,第五十七期,頁 1-27。
8. 沈仰斌與黃志仁,2001,子公司操作母公司股票:資料特性與操作行為,中國財務學刊,第九卷,第三期,頁 53-70。
9. 林宜勉與潘昭儀,1998,股利宣告內涵與 Tobin’s Q 理論,管理學報,第十五卷,第四期,頁 587-621。
10. 邱正仁、熊大中與高蘭芬,2002,財務危機與股權質押關聯性之研究,Working Paper,國立成功大學。
11. 翁淑育,2000,台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題及公司價值之研究,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
12. 范宏書、林彥廷與陳慶隆,2015,實質盈餘管理對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響,臺大管理論叢,第二十五卷,第三期,頁 163-196。
13. 高蘭芬,2002,董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響,國立成功大學會計學研究所博士論文。
14. 高蘭芬與邱正仁,2002,董監事股權質押對會計盈餘與股票報酬相關性之影響,臺大管理論叢,第十三卷,第一期,頁 127-162。
15. 陳安琳、高蘭芬、陳怡凱與陳烷鈺,2013,董監事股權質押與公司治理之研究,中山管理評論,第二十一卷,第二期,頁 299-337。
16. 陳宏姿,2001,董監事結構與企業財務績效關聯之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
17. 陳慶隆、周儀芳與王翰屏,2014,實質盈餘管理與會計資訊價值攸關性之關係-機構投資者中介角色之檢測,商管科技季刊,第十五卷,第三期,頁 279-317。
18. 陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬與李文智,2004,應用Ohlson會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性-以台灣上市公司電子業為例,臺大管理論叢,第十五卷,第二期,頁 123-142。
19. 許加昂,2000,董監質押比率與公司經營績效、融資政策、股利政策關聯性之研究,台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
20. 張雅琳,2004,我國企業獨立董事機制與經營績效之關聯性研究,大葉大學會計資訊研究所未出版碩士論文。
21. 張裕任,2008,安全性、資訊不對稱、公司治理與外資持股偏好之關聯性,國立台灣大學管理學院會計研究所博士論文。
22. 郭亦蘭,2007,公司治理與未預期盈餘之資訊效果,國立臺灣大學財務金融學系研究所碩士論文。
23. 黃劭彥、卓佳慶、邱安安與徐維廷,2013,財稅差異與財務危機之關聯性研究,會計審計論叢,第三卷,第二期,頁 1-26 。
24. 楊麗弘,1999,台灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效研究─由董監事持股質押效果論之,長庚大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
25. 楊美娥,2012,外資持股及董事持股質押比率與金控公司經營績效關聯性探討,國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所學位論文。
26. 楊麗弘,2000,台灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效研究─由董監事持股質押效果論之,長庚大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
27. 熊大中,2000,我國企業財務危機與董監股權質押關聯產之研究,國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。
28. 趙玉清,2002,董監持股質押對公司現金增資資訊內涵及財務結構關係之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
29. 蘇莞婷,2004,控制股東的質押行為與公司績效,台灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
1. Amir, E and B. Lev, 1996, Value-relevance of nonfinancial information:The wireless communications industry, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22:3-30.
2. Ball, R. and P. Brown, 1968, An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers, Journal of Accounting Research , (Autumn):159-178.
3. Ball, R., S. Kothari, and J. Hand, 1991, Security returns around earnings announcement; Extended functional fixation and security returns around earnings: A reply to Ball and Kothari, Accounting Review, 66: 718-740.
4. Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., and Landsman, W. R., 1998, Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25 (1): 1-34.
5. Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., and Landsman, W. R., 2001, The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1-3): 77-104.
6. Beaver, W. H., 1968, The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (3): 67-92.
7. Black, E. L., and White, J. J., 2003, An international comparison of income statement and balance sheet information: Germany, Japan and the U.S. European Accounting Review, 12 (1): 29-46.
8. Burgstahler, D. C., and Dichev, I. D. , 1997, Earnings, adaptation and equity value. The Accounting Review, 72 (2): 187-215.
9. Beaver, W., R. Lambert, and D. Morse, 1980, The information content of security prices, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2: 3-28.
10. Ball, R., S. Kothari, and J. Hand, 1991, Security returns around earnings announcement; Extended functional fixation and security returns around earnings: A reply to Ball and Kothari, Accounting Review, 66: 718-740.
11. Bartov, E., 1993, The timing of assets sales and earnings manipulation. The Accounting Review, 68 (4): 840-855.
12. Bushee, B., 1998,The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73 (3): 305-333.
13. Collins, D. and S. Kothari, 1989, An analysis of the intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients, Journal of Accounting and Economics, (July):143-181.
14. Collins, D. W., Maydew, E. L., and Weiss, I. S., 1997, Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1): 39-67.
15. Chen, Yehning and Hu, Shing-Yang , 2003, The Controlling hareholders’ Personal Leverage and Firm Performance, Working paper.
16. Dechow, P., 1994, Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18: 3-42.
17. Dhaliwal, D., K. Subramanyam, and R. Trezevant, 1999, Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26:43-67.
18. Dechow, P. M., and Skinner, D. J., 2000, Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14 (2): 235-250.
19. Dechow, P. M., and Sloan, R. G., 1991, Executive incentives and the horizon problem: Anempirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (1): 51-89.
20. Easton, P., T. Harris, and J. Ohlson, 1992, Aggregate accounting earnings can explain most of security returns: The case of long return intervals, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15: 119-142.
21. Francis, J., and Schipper, K., 1999, Have financial statements lost their relevance?. Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (2): 319-352.
22. Gilson, S. C., 1989, Management turnover and financial distress. Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (2): 241-262.
23. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., and Rajgopal, S., 2005, The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40 (1-3):3-73.
24. Gunny, K., 2005, What are the consequences of real earnings management?. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
25. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360.
26. Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback, 1983, Market for Corporate Control: Empirical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11:5-50.
27. Lee, Tsun-Siou and Yeh, Yin-Hua, 2004, Corporate Governance and Financial Distress: evidence from Taiwan, Corporate Governance: An International Review 12 (3):378-388.
28. Marquardt, C. A., and Wiedman, C. I., 2004, The effect of earnings management on the value relevance of accounting information. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 31 (3-4): 297-332.
29. Ohlson, J. A., 1995, Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (2): 661-687.
30. Ou, J. A., and Sepe, J. F., 2002, Analysts earnings forecasts and the roles of earnings and book value in equity valuation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29 (3-4): 287-316.
31. Pincus, M., and Rajgopal, S., 2002, The interaction of accrual management and hedging: Evidence from oil and gas firms. The Accounting Review, 77 (1): 127-160.
32. Roychowdhury, S., 2006, Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42 (3): 335-370.
33. Whelan, C., and McNamara, R., 2004, The impact of earnings management on the value- relevance of financial statement information. Working paper, Georgia College and State University, Milledgeville, GA.