企業於各個產業環境中，皆難以透過一己之力進行營運，尤其今日之變化更為快速且詭譎，故企業於組織間關係之維繫及鞏固的重要性與日俱增，且在產業變動快速的情況下，企業若僅將策略定義為長期之經營方針，則此有恐難以應對今日之環境變化。因此，本研究之目的在於透過IMP互動與網絡觀點與策略即實踐兩大學術理論之重點文獻回顧作為討論基礎，並選用質性研究方法中的個案研究法做為本研究之研究方法，在資料蒐集過程中，有鑒於本研究欲探討組織間關係的調和，因此選擇與個案企業之高階主管進行深度訪談，使本研究得以獲取初級資料，再加上多方次級資料收集及分析，試圖讓理論與實務間的互動更為緊密，並於最後的研究討論與意涵中，回答本研究於一開始提出的研究問題。

本研究在個案企業的選擇上，為求符合研究主題之組織間關係的維繫及鞏固，特別選擇一創立之今已超過四十年之老牌蛋商，並與其負責人進行多次深度訪談，暸解其在上任後所面臨的諸多問題，並探討其在此段期間如何針對自身企業所擁有之資源，進行組織間關係的調整，且透過數次的訪談，得以暸解該負責人於日常之行動實踐，進而深究策略即實踐於實務現象中的應用。

In this study, an egg company in Tainan City was used as an example to discuss how to maintain the relationship between different organizations through case studies in qualitative research. The research focused on the IMP perspective and Strategy as practice in the process of corporate stabilization. In the process of stabilization, the network's relationships have been formed by the interaction of many activities, and furthermore, it has been to consider actors and resources. In the process of research, we also have in-depth interviews many times, to use the viewpoint of Strategy as practice to observe how was the vice general manager does and then can keep the relationships with other companies. The given exploratory research we concentrate on and the problems we faced in the process of an enterprise how to keep the relationships and have good interactions with each other and the countermeasures that can be dealt with are summarized. In the future, no matter whether it is the inter-organizational relationships of a large-scale enterprise or the small and medium-sized enterprises who facing the dilemma, they can be given a partial inspection.

壹、中文文獻
朱柔若. (2000). 社會研究方法: 質化與量化取向. 台北: 揚智文化.
徐靖雯. (2017). 發展平台商業模式探索性研究：以Gogoro為例. (碩士). 國立成功大學, 臺南市.
許士軍. (1996). 定性研究在管理研究上的重要性. 中原學報, 24(2), 1-3.
陳向明. (2002). 社会科學質的硏究: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
潘育婷. (2016). 長照產業的價值創造模式之初探. 成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程 (AMBA) 學位論文, 1-97.
貳、英文文獻
Anderson, J. C., Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of marketing, 58(4), 1-15.
Balogun, J., Huff, A. S., & Johnson, P. (2003). Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 197-224.
Baraldi, E., Brennan, R., Harrison, D., Tunisini, A., & Zolkiewski, J. (2007). Strategic thinking and the IMP approach: A comparative analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 879-894.
Blankenburg, D., & Johanson, J. (1992). Managing network connections in international business. Scandinavian international business review, 1(1), 5-19.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). A social critique of the judgement of taste. Traducido del francés por R. Nice. Londres, Routledge.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Ford, D., & Håkansson, H. (2006). IMP–some things achieved: much more to do. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3/4), 248-258.
Foucault, M. (1980). Two Lectures Lecture One: 7 January 1976.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration: Univ of California Press.
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2010). Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice: Cambridge University Press.
Hakansson, H. (1982). An interaction approach. International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: an interaction approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 10-27.
Hakansson, H., Johanson, J., & Wootz, B. (1977). Influence tactics in buyer-seller relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 5, 319-332.
Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 175-196.
Håkansson, H., Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Snehota, I., & Waluszewski, A. (2009). Business in networks: John Wiley & Sons.
Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1992). A model of industrial networks.
Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian journal of management, 5(3), 187-200.
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 23-55.
Jarzabkowski, P., Kaplan, S., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2016). On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research. Strategic Organization, 14(3), 248-259.
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as practice: research directions and resources: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity‐based view. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 3-22.
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 217-237.
Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12(2), 251-273.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75): Sage.
Möller, K., & Rajala, A. (2007). Rise of strategic nets—New modes of value creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 895-908.
Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Orchestral manoeuvres in the dark: Understanding failure in organizational strategizing. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 109-139.
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management: Sage.
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic management journal, 32(13), 1369-1386.
Regnér, P. (2003). Strategy creation in the periphery: Inductive versus deductive strategy making. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 57-82.
Ritter, T. (2000). A framework for analyzing interconnectedness of relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(4), 317-326.
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of business research, 56(9), 745-755.
Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization Theory: Structures, Designs, And Applications, 3/e: Pearson Education India.
Salvato, C. (2003). The role of micro‐strategies in the engineering of firm evolution. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 83-108.
Samra‐Fredericks, D. (2003). Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction. Journal of management studies, 40(1), 141-174.
Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2014). Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: Towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1407-1421.
Snehota, I., & Hakansson, H. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks: Routledge London.
Turnbull, P., Ford, D., & Cunningham, M. (1996). Interaction, relationships and networks in business markets: an evolving perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 11(3/4), 44-62.
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long range planning, 29(5), 731-735.
Whittington, R. (2006). Learning more from failure: Practice and process. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1903-1906.
Wuehrer, G. A., & Smejkal, A. E. (2013). The knowledge domain of the academy of international business studies (AIB) conferences: a longitudinal scientometric perspective for the years 2006–2011. Scientometrics, 95(2), 541-561.
Yin. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods,(3rd) Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, California.