| 研究生: |
葉杰緯 Yeh, Jie-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
具自由間隙的彈簧–機翼系統在跨音速下的流固耦合特性 Transonic Fluid-Structure Interaction Characteristics of a Spring-Wing System with Free-Play |
| 指導教授: |
黃捷楷
Gaetano, Currao |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 航空太空工程學系 Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 66 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 氣彈性 、流固耦合 、穿音速風洞 、背景紋影 、油流 、自由間隙 、本徵正交分解 、頻率鎖定 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Aeroelasticity, Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI), Transonic wind tunnel, Background-Oriented Schlieren (BOS), Oil film, Free-play, Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD), Frequency lock-in |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:36 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自由間隙為全動式控制面常見之結構非線性來源,並可能顯著影響其跨音速氣動彈性行為。本研究以葉片彈簧拘束剛性機翼形成單一俯仰自由度的代表性全動翼模型,透過風洞實驗與數值模擬探討初始攻角與自由間隙對平衡位置、翼面扭轉響應、極限循環振盪(LCO)、震波動態及近壁面流場結構的影響。
研究結果顯示,自由間隙不僅會改變機翼平衡位置,亦會促進LCO發生。流固耦合模擬成功捕捉實驗觀察到之主要氣動彈性趨勢,且平衡位置預測誤差約為0.5°。流場觀測結果顯示,穩態響應案例以正常震波為主,而LCO案例則出現伴隨強烈震波/邊界層交互作用的λ型震波。頻譜分析發現系統存在約220 Hz與340 Hz兩種主要響應機制。進一步透過POD分析、互相關分析發現頻率鎖定現象發生在LCO案例,顯示220 Hz響應對應於預應力結構模態,而340 Hz響應則與自由間隙及環境振動有關。研究結果證實自由間隙對全動翼之平衡位置偏移、LCO起始以及流固耦合特性具有關鍵影響。
Free-play is a common source of structural nonlinearity in all-movable control surfaces and can significantly affect transonic aeroelastic behavior. This study investigates the transonic fluid–structure interaction characteristics of a representative all-movable wing, which consisting of a rigid wing restrained by a leaf spring in only pitch-DOF, through both experimental and numerical approaches. Parametric studies of the initial angle of attack and free-play level are conducted to examine their effects on equilibrium position, wing twist response, limit-cycle oscillation (LCO), shock dynamics, and near-wall flow structures.
The results show that increasing free-play not only shifts the wing equilibrium position but also promotes the onset of LCO. The FSI simulations capture the major aeroelastic trends observed in the experiments and predict the equilibrium position within approximately 0.5° of the measured value. Flow-field observations reveal standing-shock structures in steady-response cases and λ-shock structures associated with shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction in LCO cases. Spectral analysis identifies that two dominant mechanisms coexist with frequencies near 220 Hz and 340 Hz. Further POD and cross-correlation analyses indicate that the frequency lock-in occurs for the LCO cases, providing strong evidence 220 Hz response corresponds to the prestressed structural mode, while the 340 Hz response is associated with free-play and environmental vibration effects. The results demonstrate that free-play plays a critical role in the equilibrium shift, LCO onset, and fluid–structure coupling characteristics of transonic all-movable wings.
[1] D. E. Raveh and E. H. Dowell, "Frequency lock-in phenomenon for oscillating airfoils in buffeting flows," Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 89–104, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.10.001.
[2] X. Nie, G. Zheng, L. Wei, C. Huang, G. Yang, and Z. Ji, "Analysis of the transonic buffet characteristics of stationary and pitching OAT15A airfoil," Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 7149, 2024.
[3] L. Jacquin, P. Molton, S. Deck, B. Maury, and D. Soulevant, "Experimental Study of Shock Oscillation over a Transonic Supercritical Profile," AIAA Journal, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1985–1994, 2009, doi: 10.2514/1.30190.
[4] Y. Ohmichi, T. Ishida, and A. Hashimoto, "Modal Decomposition Analysis of Three-Dimensional Transonic Buffet Phenomenon on a Swept Wing," AIAA Journal, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 3938–3950, 2018, doi: 10.2514/1.J056855.
[5] M. Iovnovich and D. E. Raveh, "Numerical study of shock buffet on three-dimensional wings," AIAA Journal, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 449–463, 2015.
[6] A. Hartmann, M. Klaas, and W. Schröder, "Coupled Airfoil Heave/Pitch Oscillations at Buffet Flow," AIAA Journal, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1542–1552, 2013, doi: 10.2514/1.J051512.
[7] C. Gao et al., "Mechanism of frequency lock-in in transonic buffeting flow," Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 818, pp. 528–561, 2017, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2017.120.
[8] C. Gao and W. Zhang, "Transonic aeroelasticity: A new perspective from the fluid mode," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 113, p. 100596, 2020.
[9] D. M. Schuster, D. D. Liu, and L. J. Huttsell, "Computational Aeroelasticity: Success, Progress, Challenge," Journal of Aircraft, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 843–856, 2003, doi: 10.2514/2.6875.
[10] G. M. D. Currao, "Transonic leading-edge stall flutter: modelling, simulations and experiments," Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 984, 2024, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2024.238.
[11] T. Korthäuer, A. Accorinti, S. Scharnowski, and C. J. Kähler, "Experimental investigation of transonic buffeting, frequency lock-in and their dependence on structural characteristics," Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 122, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.103975.
[12] P. C. Chen and D. H. Lee, "Flight-loads effects on free-play induced limit cycle oscillation," in 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 14th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 7th, 1851, p. 1851.
[13] P. C. Chen, E. Ritz, and N. Lindsley, "Nonlinear Flutter Analysis for the Scaled F-35 with Horizontal-Tail Free Play," Journal of Aircraft, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 883–889, 2014, doi: 10.2514/1.C032501.
[14] E. Dowell, "Some recent advances in nonlinear aeroelasticity: fluid-structure interaction in the 21st century," in 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 18th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 12th, 2010, p. 3137.
[15] D.-H. Kim, I. Lee, T. Kim, J. Lee, and W. Moon, "Transonic/supersonic aeroelastic instability of an all movable wing with structural nonlinearity," in 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2003, p. 1412.
[16] S. He, S. Guo, W. Li, D. Yang, Y. Gu, and Z. Yang, "Nonlinear aeroelastic behavior of an airfoil with free-play in transonic flow," Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 138, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106539.
[17] M. Candon, R. Carrese, H. Ogawa, P. Marzocca, C. Mouser, and O. Levinski, "Characterization of a 3DOF aeroelastic system with freeplay and aerodynamic nonlinearities – Part II: Hilbert–Huang transform," Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 114, pp. 628–643, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.04.039.
[18] M. Candon, O. Levinski, H. Ogawa, R. Carrese, and P. Marzocca, "A nonlinear signal processing framework for rapid identification and diagnosis of structural freeplay," Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 163, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107999.
[19] G. M. D. Currao and B.-S. Jiang, "Transonic Deep-Stall of a Free-to-pitch Rigid Wing," under review, 2025.
[20] E. H. Dowell, "A modern course in aeroelasticity," MECCANICA-MILANO-, vol. 34, pp. 140–140, 1999.
[21] S. Shrivastava and P. M. Mohite, "Design and Optimization of a Composite Canard Control Surface of an Advanced Fighter Aircraft under Static Loading," Curved and Layered Structures, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1515/cls-2015-0006.
[22] K. Chung, J. Miau, and J. Yieh, "Initial operation of astrc/ncku transonic wind tunnel," in 25th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, 1994, p. 2515.
[23] B. Mercier and T. Lacassagne, "Design rules for Background Oriented Schlieren experiments with least-squares based displacement calculation," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 92, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102395.
[24] M. Raffel, H. Richard, and G. E. A. Meier, "On the applicability of background oriented optical tomography for large scale aerodynamic investigations," (in English), Experiments in Fluids, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 477–481, May 2000, doi: DOI 10.1007/s003480050408.
[25] M. Raffel, "Background-oriented schlieren (BOS) techniques," Experiments in Fluids, vol. 56, no. 3, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00348-015-1927-5.
[26] Y.-X. Huang, K.-C. Su, and K.-M. Chung, "Flow Structures in a Compressible Elliptical Cavity Flow," Aerospace, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 222, 2025.
[27] I. ANSYS, ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 2022 R1 ed. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS, Inc., 2022.
[28] I. ANSYS, Mechanical APDL Theory Reference, Release 2022 R1 ed. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS, Inc., 2022.
[29] L. Yan et al., "Dynamic constitutive models of Ti-6Al-4V based on isothermal ture stress–strain curves," Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 19, pp. 4733–4744, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.164.
[30] S. S. Rao and F. F. Yap, Mechanical vibrations, 5th edition in SI units. ed. Singapore ; London: Prentice Hall (in English), 2011, pp. xx, 1084 pages : illustrations.
[31] G. M. D. Currao and C.-W. Yeh, "Vortex Dynamics and Aeroelastic Response of a Finite Wing in Transonic Flow," under review, 2026.
[32] J. Weiss, "A tutorial on the proper orthogonal decomposition," in AIAA aviation 2019 forum, 2019, p. 3333.