簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃盈嵐
Huang, Yin-Lang
論文名稱: 地工合成材料應用於機場道面之評估
Evaluation of Geosynthetics Applied to Airport Pavements
指導教授: 陳建旭
Chen, Jian-Shiuh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系碩士在職專班
Department of Civil Engineering (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 89
中文關鍵詞: FAARFIELD敏感度分析地工合成材料模數值
外文關鍵詞: FAARFIELD, Sensitivity analysis, Geosynthetics, Modulus
相關次數: 點閱:140下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    台灣大多機場道面已屆於服務年限,大多需要整修,跑道加鋪熱拌瀝青混凝土(HMA)是整修方式之一,因考量於版塊上加鋪可能產生反射裂縫,進而加入地工合成材料,抵抗應力並延緩反射裂縫發生;以桃園國際機場為例,於剛性道面加鋪柔性鋪面,蒐集整理機場地質結構狀況,並參考民航局100年度飛機起架次數為基準,並經由美國民航局(FAA)2010年發表機場鋪面設計程式FAARFIELD進行敏感度分析,分析評估道面設計加入地工合成材料所需要加鋪厚度。
    因道面需承受較大交通載重,在現有版塊狀況無虞情況下,其加鋪厚度以28cm以上較為合適;地工合成物提高路面承載能力,材料厚度越厚則鋪設瀝青混凝土厚度會減少;另地工合成物設置位置愈接近地面時,其瀝青混凝土厚度亦會減少;地工合成物設置在瀝青混凝土中1/3~1/2範圍時,其加鋪的厚度幾乎相同;地工合成物模數值改變對加鋪厚度卻無顯著的變化。

    ABSTRACT
    Most of airport pavement have reached on service life in Taiwan, need to renovation. Runway overlay hot mix asphalt concrete (HMA) is one way of renovation. Overlay on forum maybe occur reflective cracking, so we join geosynthetics to resist stress and delay reflective cracking occurs. Taoyuan International Airport as an example, flexible pavement paving on rigid pavement. Collecting airport geological structural condition and use the number of aircraft from the aircraft as a benchmark in CAA 100 years. Use FAARFIELD to sensitivity analysis to analysis and evaluation how much thickness that add Geosynthetics synthetic materials.

    Existing slabs condition no fear, the overlay thickness of 28cm or more is better. Because the pavement is exposed to greater traffic load. Geosynthetics to improve pavement load, the thicker the material will reduce the thickness of asphalt concrete. Geosynthetics closer the ground will reduce its thickness of asphalt concrete. Geosynthetic set in asphalt concrete is 1/3 to 1/2 range, which is almost the same as the thickness of the overlay. Geosynthetics modulus value changes to the overlay thickness is not significant.

    目 錄 中文摘要 Ⅰ 中文摘要 Ⅱ 誌謝 Ⅲ 目錄 Ⅳ 表目錄 Ⅶ 圖目錄 Ⅸ 第一章 緒論 1.1 前言 1-1 1.2 研究動機 1-2 1.3 研究目的 1-2 1.4 研究範圍 1-3 第二章 文獻回顧 2.1反射裂縫的機制 2-1 2.1.1 反射裂縫形成原因 2-2 2.2減緩反射裂縫的概念和方法 2-5 2.2.1 決策樹之方法選擇 2-6 2.3 地工合成材料 2-8 2.3.1 織物或地工織物 2-9 2.3.2 地工格網 2-11 2.3.3 複合材料 2-13 2.3.4 應力或應變緩解夾層 2-14 2.4 瀝青混凝土加鋪鋪面 2-16 2.5 地工材料處理反射裂縫之實例 2-19 第三章 研究方法 3.1 研究流程 3-1 3.2 桃園國際機場 3-3 3.2.1 地理環境 3-6 3.2.2 機場道面 3-8 3.3 加勁層-地工合成物 3-11 3.3.1 地工合成材料性質 3-12 3.4 敏感度分析 3-14 3.4.1 道面結構狀況指數 3-14 3.4.2 FAARFIELD(150/5320-6)機場鋪面設計 3-15 3.4.3 未定義層 3-28 第四章 結果與討論 4.1道面加鋪厚度 4-1 4.1.1 航機資料 4-1 4.1.2 道面結構參數 4-3 4.1.3 加鋪程式運算 4-3 4.1.4 程式運算改變 4-4 4.2 加勁材料之敏感性分析 4-9 4.2.1 模數值之變更 4-9 4.2.2 位置之設置 4-11 4.2.3 飛機荷重量對加鋪之影響 4-14 4.2.4 加勁材料模數改變對加鋪之影響 4-17 4.2.5 PCC版厚度改變對加鋪之影響 4-18 第五章 結論與建議 5.1 結論 5-1 5.2 建議 5-2 參考文獻 參-1 附錄一 附-1

    參考文獻
    李英豪、周家蓓、陳建旭(2010) 「剛性機場道面整建芻議」,中國土木水利工程學會會刊,第37卷,第4期,第18~25頁,台北。
    黃文昭(2012)「地工格網於無鋪面道路加勁設計之回顧與展望」,地工技術,第134期,第47~58頁,
    臺灣桃園國際機場道面整建及助導航設施提升工程計畫先期WC滑行道等整修工程圖冊(2012),亞新工程顧問股份有限公司,圖號C-10。
    Barksdale, R. D., Brown, S. F., and Chan, F. (1989) Potential Benefit of Geosynthetics in Flexible Pavements, NCHRP Report 315, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D. C.
    Button, J. W., and Lytton, R. L. (2003) Guidelines for Using Geosynthetics with HMA Overlays to Reduce Reflective Cracking, Report 1777-P2, Project Number 0-1777, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX.
    Ellis, S.J., P.C. Langdale, and J. Cook (2002). “Performance of Techniques to Minimise Reflection Cracking and Associated Developments in Pavement Investigation for Maintenance of UK Military Airfields.” Paper presented for the 2002 Federal Aviation Administration AirportTechnology Transfer Conference.
    Kennepohl, G., and Lytton, R. L. (1984) "Pavement Reinforcement with Tensar Geogrids for Reflection Cracking Reduction", Proceedings of Paving in Cold Areas (PICA), Canada/Japan Science and Technology Consultations, pp. 863-882.

    Kennepohl, G., Kamel, N., Walls, J., and Haas, R. (1985) "Geogrid Reinforcement of Flexible Pavements: Design Basis and Field Trials" , Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 54, pp.45-75.
    Monty Wade, P.E. (2010) "Assessment of FAA HMA Overlay Procedures", Technical Report AAPTP Project 06-07, 115 West Main Street, Suite 400.
    Mukhtar, M. T. (1994). "Interlayer Stress Absorbing Composite (ISAC) for Mitigating Reflection Cracking in Asphalt Concrete Overlays," Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
    Ramsamooj, D. V., and Gabriel, J. (1998) "Airport Rehabilitation Using Asphalt Concrete/Fiberglass Composite Overlays." Second International Conference on Composites in Infrastructure, pp. 621-633.
    Sprague, C. J., Allen, S., and Tribbett, W. (1998). "Tensile Properties of Asphalt Overlay Geosynthetic Reinforcement." Journal of Transportation Research Record: Transportation Research Board No. 1611, pp. 65-69.
    Thomas, H. L. (1985). "Synthetic Fabrics and Earthworks."Research and Development, Vol.27(No. 7), pp. 66-68.
    Von Quintus, H.L., (2009) Techniques for Mitigation of Reflective Cracks- Technical Guide, AAPTP 05-04, Auburn University, Alabama.
    Von Quintus, H.L. (2009) Techniques for Mitigation of Reflective Cracks- Final Report , AAPTP 05-04,Auburn University, Alabama.
    Vuong, B., Hoque, Z., and Choi, X. (2010), “Prediction of Reflection Cracking Resistance of Reinforced Asphalts.” 24 th ARRB Conference, Victoria, Australia(on CD-ROM).
    Vyce, J. M. (1983). Reflection Cracking in Bituminous Overlays on Rigid Pavements. Report No. FHWA/NY/RR-83/109. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

    下載圖示 校內:2019-02-10公開
    校外:2019-02-10公開
    QR CODE