| 研究生: |
蔣弘毅 CHIANG, HUNG-YI |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
低碳營運關鍵成功因素之研究 A Study on the Key Success Factors of Low-Carbon Operation |
| 指導教授: |
蔡明田
Tsai, Ming-Tien |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工程管理碩士在職專班 Engineering Management Graduate Program(on-the-job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 78 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 低碳營運 、成功因素 、層級分析法(AHP) |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Low-Carbon Operation, Success Factors, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:31 下載:10 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著國際淨零排碳趨勢的快速發展,各國皆採取更有效的措施來提升減碳成效,當各個國家相繼宣布「2050淨零排放」的目標並採取具體行動時,我國也提出「台灣2050淨零轉型十二項關鍵戰略」以應對氣候變遷挑戰,現行的文獻紀錄中,因為減碳的價格昂貴及方向模糊,因此企業在低碳的營運上面是較被動的,過往的研究也較聚焦於單一個案分析,較缺乏整體性的評估,且即使參考國外相關紀錄,該部分的研究也多以政府機關為主,於企業在執行低碳營運上,關鍵的成功因素尚未明確。本研究旨在探討企業在執行低碳營運時的關鍵成功因素,並區分不同產業別,探討製造業與金融業之差異別,期盼能提供企業在規劃低碳營運時能優先實施的措施,進而提升成效。本研究首先彙整國內外相關研究,歸納出低碳營運關鍵成功因素五大構面及19項準則,再進行專家問卷分析。使用層級分析法(AHP)專家問卷分析,回收有效問卷總共38份,製造業23份,金融業15份,分析低碳營運關鍵成功因素構面及準則之相對權重。研究結果發現,在五大構面「商業」、「製造」、「環境經濟」、「政策」、「策略」的排序中,產業之間存在差異,製造業的第一排序為「商業」,金融業的第一排序為「製造」;在評估準則的排序也存在差異製造業的第一排序為「從減碳角度找出與利害關係人的共識」,次為「宣導ESG可以提升企業的競爭力」;金融業的第一排序為「開發減碳排放的製造技術」,次為「使用綠色能源來生產」。最後,本研究依分析結果,提出管理實務意涵,盼能作為企業實施低碳營運時的重要參考依據,並對後續研究提出相關研究建議。
With the rapid development of the international net-zero carbon emission trend, various countries have taken more effective measures to enhance carbon reduction outcomes. Various countries have sequentially announced their targets for "net-zero emissions by 2050" and undertaken concrete actions to achieve these objectives. Taiwan has similarly introduced the" Taiwan's 2050 Net-Zero Emissions Plan" in response to the challenges posed by climate change. In the current literature, because carbon reduction is expensive and the direction is unclear, enterprises are passive in low-carbon operations. Previous studies have focused on individual case analyses and have lacked comprehensive evaluations. Even if relevant foreign studies are referred to, the research is mostly based on government agencies. The key success factors for enterprises in implementing low-carbon operations have not yet been clarified. The purpose of this study is to identify the key success factors for enterprises in implementing low-carbon operation. Specifically, this study is to explore the distinctions between the manufacturing and financial sector. The objective is to provide enterprises with prioritized measures for the implementing low-carbon operation. The factors (5 major dimensions and 19 criteria) to the low-carbon operation were first analyzed and synthesized through extensive review of relevant literature. The valid expert questionnaires are 23 from the manufacturing sector and 15 from the financial sector. Questionnaires were analyzed by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results of the study revealed differences between sectors regarding the ranking of the five dimensions: "Business," "Manufacturing," "Environmental economy," "Policy," and "Strategy." In the manufacturing sector, "Business" was top-ranked , whereas "Manufacturing" was top-ranked in the financial sector. Additionally, variations were observed in the ranking of the evaluation criteria. In the manufacturing sector, "Finding consensus with stakeholders from the perspective of carbon reduction" was top-ranked. "Promoting ESG initiatives to bolster corporate competitiveness" was ranked second. In the financial sector, "developing manufacturing technologies to reduce carbon emissions" was top-ranked. "Utilizing green energy for production" was ranked second. Finally, based on the results of the analysis, this study proposes management practice implications. It is expected to be served as important reference for the implementing low-carbon operation. Relevant research recommendations have been put forth the subsequent studies.
中文文獻
王宇真(2024)。台灣企業減碳策略之關鍵因素,東吳大學國際經營與貿易學系碩士班,臺北市。
郭艿芃(2024)。建構ESG 績效評估模型之研究,東吳大學會計學系碩士在職專班,臺北市。
蘇蘅(2024)。企業利害關係人ESG訊息溝通與決策實驗研究:案例比較分析,國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班,臺北市。
王璿緁(2023)。減碳路徑的開始:為中小企業提供可行的減碳計畫和優先順序,國立清華大學科技管理學院高階經營管理碩士在職專班,新竹市。
袁嘉妤(2023)。臺灣碳排放交易機制議題與政策工具研析-以歐盟碳排放交易機制為借鏡,國立臺東大學公共與文化事務學系碩士在職專班,臺東縣。
陳俊諺(2023)。台灣中小企業的ESG管理活動、組織創新氣候、組織效能對永續發展目標實現的影響關係,淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班,新北市。
蔡惠玲(2023)。ESG永續趨勢下對企業經營影響之探討,義守大學管理學院管理碩士在職專班,高雄市。
鄭凱鴻(2023)。運用六標準差於碳排放改善之概念驗證,逢甲大學智能製造與工程管理碩士在職學位學程,臺中市。
孔閔玄(2022)。探討減碳議題對製造業供應鏈廠商之因應策略,中原大學企業管理學系碩士班,桃園市。
鄒松臻(2022)。製造業與服務業的ESG揭露-以問卷調查消費者偏好,國立高雄科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士班,高雄市。
盧昆南(2022)。中小企業面對全球減碳議題的營運策略:個案研究,南華大學科技學院永續綠色科技碩士學位學程,嘉義縣。
鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報,27(6),pp.5-22。
吳名翊(2024)。日本將制定2040年新的綠色轉型國家策略,臺中市永續低碳生活網,臺中市。
李宜樺(2024)。想進入歐盟市場?先過邊境碳稅這一關!歐盟CBAM與碳規範變動下的因應,PWC兩岸商務及稅務諮詢會計師,臺北市。
林瑩甄(2024)。中國大陸碳市場機制成形台商可關注發展機會與政策紅利,PWC兩岸商務及稅務諮詢會計師,臺北市。
南極碳資產管理有限公司(2024)。2024碳定價解析交碳費、採購綠電…在台灣,減一噸碳到底要花多少錢,今周刊,臺北市。
張語屏(2024)。不只歐盟CBAM美國也推清潔競爭法CCA一次看懂差異,聯合新聞網,新北市。
綠色和平氣候與能源專案小組(2024)。碳費每噸300元起徵!碳費、碳權、碳稅是什麼?一文看懂,綠色和平,臺北市。
國際減碳行動夥伴組織(2023)。全球碳市場進展-2023年度報告,國際碳行動夥伴關係International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP)。
經理人雜誌(2023)。ESG是什麼?何謂ESG?企業永續關鍵字CSR、ESG、SDGs一次學,經理人雜誌,臺北市。
國家發展委員會(2023)。2023世界地球日,一起努力邁向淨零轉型,國家發展委員會。
國發會經濟發展處(2022)。臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略,台灣經濟論衡,20(2),pp.77-80。
黃佳寗(2022)。國際淨零排碳趨勢對臺灣產業的影響:從國際減碳評比報告來觀察,經濟前瞻,201,pp.29-33。
英文文獻
Alper Ozpinar. (2023). A Hyper-Integrated Mobility as a Service (MaaS) to Gamification and Carbon Market Enterprise Architecture Framework for Sustainable Environment. Energies, 16(5), pp.2480-2510.
Aljoša Slameršak, Giorgos Kallis, & Daniel W. O’Neill. (2022). Energy requirements and carbon emissions for a low-carbon energy transition. Nature Communications, Vol. 13, pp.6932-6946.
B¨ottcher, C.F., Müller, M. (2015). Drivers, practices and outcomes of low-carbon operations: approaches of German automotive suppliers to cutting carbon emissions. Bus. Strat. Environ. 24 (6), 477–498.
D. Asioli, X. Zhou, A. Halmemies-Beauchet-Filleau, A. Vanhatalo, D.I. Givens, A. Rondoni, & A.M. Turpeinen. (2023). Consumers’ valuation for low - carbon emission and low – saturated fat butter. Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 108, pp.104859-104867.
Gamze Ozturk Danisman, & Amine Tarazi. (2022). ESG activity and bank lending during financial crises. Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 70, pp.101206-101225.
Jeng Shiun Lim, Michael Francis D. Benjamin, Yee Van Fan, & Fengqi You. (2023). Approaches towards a sustainable and low carbon emissions production. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 433, pp.139821-139823.
Kemal Cek, & Serife Eyupoglu. (2020). Does environmental, social and governance performance influence economic performance? Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 21(4), pp. 1165-1184.
Massoud Moslehpour, Man-Ling Chang, Van Kien Pham, & Alaleh Dadvari. (2022). Adopting the configurational approach to the analysis of job satisfaction in Mongolia. European Research on Management and Business Economics, Vol. 28(1), pp.100179-100188.
Miroslav Rimar, Marcel Fedak, Andrii Kulikov, Jan Kizek, & Michal Smajda. (2023). A Strategy for Reducing Carbon Emissions in A City Using A Low-Carbon Strategy-A Case Study. MM Science Journal, Vol. 13(23), pp.7070-7076.
Obafemi Olekanma, Liyanage S. Rodrigo, Douglas A. Adu, & Bruce Gahir. (2024). Small- and medium-sized enterprises' carbon footprint reduction initiatives as a catalyst for green jobs: A systematic review and comprehensive business strategy agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 33(7), pp.6125-7688.
Sang Kim, & Zhichuan(Frank)Li. (2021). Understanding the Impact of ESG Practices in Corporate Finance. Sustainability, Vol. 13(7), pp.3746-3760.
Saaty T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchic Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Violeta Díaz, Denada Ibrushi, & Jialin Zhao. (2021). Reconsidering systematic factors during the Covid-19 pandemic-The rising importance of ESG. Finance Research Letters, Vol. 38, pp.101870-101875.
Vu Minh Hieu. (2022). The moderating role of innovative organizational climate on the relationship between environmental monitoring social monitoring, governance monitoring and sustainable development goals (case of Vietnam). Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, Vol. 36(2), pp. 2111976-2112000.
Wei Zhang, Mingyang Zhang, Shaobo Wu, & Fan Liu. (2021). A complex path model for low-carbon sustainable development of enterprise based on system dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 321, pp.128934-128946.