| 研究生: |
周宇婕 Chou, Yu-Jie |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業ESG表現對員工薪酬之影響:以台灣上市公司為例 The Impact of ESG Performance on Employee Compensation: Evidence from Taiwanese Listed Companies |
| 指導教授: |
顏盟峯
Yen, Meng-Feng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 52 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | ESG表現 、非主管級員工薪酬水準 、永續發展委員會 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | ESG Performance, Non-managerial Employee Compensation, Sustainability Committee |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:23 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以台灣上市公司為主要衡量對象,擬研究2019年度至2023年度企業ESG表現與員工薪酬的關聯性,並進一步衡量企業內部永續發展委員會的存在可能產生的調節效果。此外,考量各變數對於薪酬影響可能產生的延遲效果,並進一步控制內生性問題,本研究之自變數採用落後一期數據,因而蒐集樣本期間為2018年度至2023年度。實證結果顯示,ESG表現較高之企業,其員工薪酬水準亦較高,惟影響程度有限,此外,永續發展委員會在提升前述關聯性的調節效果並不顯著。這說明依據現階段資料,尚無法推論企業得以僅透過永續發展委員會的設立提高其於市場上永續表現的評價,這可能是由於樣本數的限制,或是企業可能須加入其他方式如公司治理措施、長期永續承諾或是其他實際永續作為才能達成。
This study focuses on publicly listed companies in Taiwan and investigates the relationship between corporate ESG performance and employee compensation over the period from 2019 to 2023. Additionally, it examines the potential moderating effect of the establishment of a sustainability committee within firms. To account for the possible lagged effects of various factors on employee compensation and to address endogeneity concerns, this study employs lagged independent variables, thereby collecting data spanning from 2018 to 2023.
The empirical results indicate that firms with higher ESG performance tend to offer higher levels of employee compensation, although the magnitude of this effect is relatively limited. Moreover, the presence of a sustainability committee does not exhibit a significant moderating effect on the relationship between ESG performance and employee compensation. These findings suggest that, based on the current dataset, it is not possible to infer that the establishment of a sustainability committee alone is sufficient to enhance a firm's ESG valuation in the market. This may be attributed to sample size limitations or the possibility that companies must also adopt additional measures, such as improvements in corporate governance, long-term sustainability commitments, or other substantive sustainability initiatives, to achieve this goal.
Adeusi, A. S., Igbekoyi, O. E., & Ologun, O. V. (2019). Corporate governance mechanisms and employees' compensation. Accounting and Taxation Review, 3(2), 66–84.
Abdullah, A., Yamak, S., Korzhenitskaya, A., Rahimi, R., & McClellan, J. (2023). Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2250–2268.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435–455.
Chandrasena, S., Matthews, L., & Gerged, A. M. (2024). Does the presence of a sustainability committee strengthen the impact of ESG disclosure on tax aggressiveness? Insights from North America. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01368-z
Chemmanur, T. J., Cheng, Y., & Zhang, T. (2013). Human capital, capital structure, and employee pay: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 478–502.
Chouaibi, Y., Rossi, M., & Zouari, G. (2021). The effect of corporate social responsibility and executive compensation on implicit cost of equity: Evidence from French ESG data. Sustainability, 13(20). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011510
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131, 693–714.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Flammer, C., Hong, B., & Minor, D. (2019). Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1097–1122.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.
Grewal, J., Hauptmann, C., & Serafeim, G. (2021). Material sustainability information and stock price informativeness. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(3), 513–544.
Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press.
Liu, L. (2024). Environmental performance factors: insights from CSR-linked compensation, committees, disclosure, targets, and board composition. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2313497
Orazalin, N. (2019). Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance. The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 140–153.
Rouen, E. (2020). Rethinking measurement of pay disparity and its relation to firm performance. The Accounting Review, 95(1), 343–378.
Tron, A., Colantoni, F., Celentano, N., & Caputo, A. (2024). Delving into the influence of sustainability strategy: Exploring the influence of sustainability committees on company performance. Business, Strategy and the Environment, 34, 1551–1573.
Tumewang, Y. K., Almarayeh, T., & Alharasis, E. (2025). Sustainability committee, external assurance, and ESG performance: Empirical evidence from banking industry in emerging economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32, 2728–2745.
Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2020). Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical quantitative research findings. Journal of Management Control, 31, 333–377.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Yang, L. (2023). Compensation committee CSR-related expertise, CSR contracting quality, and performance implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 35(3), 197–223.
汪進揚、林慧茹 (2021)。薪酬公平性︰員工生產力與控制權偏離之影響,管理學報,第38卷,第2期,203-230頁。
薛敏正、葉淑玲、盧怡妏 (2022)。股權結構、公司治理與企業社會責任對員工薪酬之影響,中華會計學刊,第18卷,第2期,167-206頁。
蕭立婷 (2024)。ESG績效與員工薪酬之關聯性,中原大學會計學系碩士學位論文。
陳智忠、林群堯 (2023)。永續趨勢下的企業績效管理與高階薪酬新策略,安永聯合會計師事務所。Retrieved from https://www.ey.com/zh_tw/insights/assurance/ executive-compensation-and-sustainable-business-practices.
國家永續發展委員會https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/nsdn/about/taiwanAgenda21.
金融監督管理委員會永續金融網https://esg.fsc.gov.tw/SinglePage/Policy/.