本研究旨在探討大學學者與業界合作關係中的學者個人特質、互動過程與成果。參考文獻所探討之變數後，本研究以學者之經驗、合作動機、投入程度三大面向為主軸，了解其對於不同產學合作成果之影響，並加入影響個人間合作關係的個人套繫為調節變項，了解哪些個人特性，是台灣產學合作能否成功之關鍵因素。研究對象為服務於台灣工學院、商學院、醫學院的大學學者，共發放2031份問卷，有效回收樣本為383份。
研究結果發現，當學者為年齡較長者、男性、能取得較多來自業界的研究資金者，對於學術成果、教育成果、商業化成果皆具有顯著之正面影響。此外，建立學者個人聲譽，有助於學術成果的產出；學者具有較高教職職位、具備研究資源之獲取動機、曾獲得研究獎項、擔任管理職位的學者，則有助於教育成果的產出；若要促進商業化成果，工學院的學者有助於商業化成果的產出，在投入面則以高教職職位、獲得研究獎項之學者、研究生產力較大、擔任管理職位、具備研究資源之獲取動機，皆有助於商業化成果的產出。
而個人套繫的調節效果發現，高研究生產力的學者，較強的個人套繫，能強化學術成果與商業化成果；但是對於有業界經驗的學者而言，較強的個人套繫，則強化教育成果之負向關係。

The main objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between university researchers' characteristics and performance in university-industry cooperation. In this study, the output of university-industry cooperation are classified into three categories, academic performance, educational performance, and commercial performance. We also investigate the cooperation strength between researchers and industries. Thus, we apply social tie as a moderate variable to discuss how cooperation strength impact the model.
The data was collected from 383 researchers who are working in the universities of Taiwan. According to the results, we found that the elders, male researchers, and high research funding academicians, are significant positive characteristics to all three performances. In addition, the researchers with better academia reputation are also positively related to the academic performance. Besides, the researcher who has higher position status, stronger motivation of obtaining resource, awarded, and managerial position will positively affect the educational performance. For the third output, commercial performance, the engineering school researchers have better achievements, compared with Business and Medicine school researchers. Moreover, the commercial performance can be positively related by the characteristics as higher position status, awarded, high research production, managerial position, and stronger motivation of obtaining resource.
At the end, stronger social tie strengthens the positive relation between highly-research-producing researchers and their academic performance, and the commercial performance. However, stronger social tie strengthens negative relation between the researchers who had prior industrial experience and their educational performance.

中文部分
王明聖. (2013). 全球知識經濟排名，台灣是亞洲第一？from https://yowureport.com
李明璁. (2012)，「臺灣高等技職校院產學合作績效之研究」，國立嘉義大學碩士論文
余慧怜. (2010)，「台灣產學合作成功關鍵因素之探討-以國科會工科應用科技產學合作計畫為例」，國立臺灣科技大學碩士論文
林天柱. (2009). 蛻變，先從制度完備做起－淺談大專院校產學合作。成大產學合作，2。From http://webap.rsh.ncku.edu.tw/mag/article_view.php?mcateid=65&serno=11
陳國泰. (2011). 台灣要突破邁向知識創新經濟，產學合作是必要策略from
http://eportfolio.lib.ksu.edu.tw/~T093000020/blog?node=000100011
陳曉剛. (2013). 歐盟發布創新經濟體排名，瑞典德國丹麥創新突出。和訊。
http://news.hexun.com.tw/2013-03-29/152616186.html
黃琪婷. (2015)，「以公私部門夥伴關係理論探討產學合作的價值創造與攫取」，成功大學碩士論文
楊智傑. (2009). 「反省美國杜拜法的理論與經驗」 科技法學評論，6(1)，頁207-240。
葉仁友. (2012). 淺談世界產學合作 from
http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Laws/Others-19.htmKI
鄭昱芸. (2013). 黃輝煌產學合作模式再進化－專訪成功大學校長黃輝煌 from
http://webap.rsh.ncku.edu.tw/mag/article_view.php?cateid=4&serno=86
鄭欣維. (2014).「大專院校產學合作知識轉換能力組合、知識分享、知識創造與創新績效之相關研究」，義守大學碩士論文。
鍾啟榮. (2015)，「大學教師參與產學合作之關鍵因素分析－分析層級程序法(AHP) 之應用」，崑山科技大學碩士論文。
英文部分
Albert N. Link, Donald S. Siegel and Barry Bozeman, 2007. An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to engage in Informal University. Technology Transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 16, Number 4, pp. 641-655
Agrawal, A., 2006. Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 63–79.
Azagra-Caro, J.M., 2007. What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university–industry interaction. Technovation, 27, 704–715.
Balconi, M., Laboranti, A., 2006. University–industry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics. Research Policy, 35, 1616–1630.
Bekkers, R., Bodas Freitas, I.M., 2008. Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37, 1837–1853.
Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., Causino, N., Seashore Louis, K., 1996. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734–1739.
Boardman, P.C., Corley, E.A., 2008. University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37, 900–913.
Boardman, P.C., Ponomariov, B.L., 2009. University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29, 142–153.
Burt, R.S., 1992. Structural Holes: the Social Structure of Competition. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.
Burt, R.S., 1997a. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365.
Coleman, J., 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
Coleman, J., 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.
D’Este, P., Patel, P., 2005. University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry. In: Proceedings of 5th Triple Helix Conference, Turin, Italy, 18–21 May.
D’Este, P., Perkmann, M., 2011. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316–339.
Demsetz, H. 1991. The theory of the firm revisited. O. E. Williamson, S. G. Winter, R. H. Coase, eds. The Nature of the Firm_ Origins, Evolution, and Development. Oxford University Press, New York, 159–179.
Eom,B-Y.,Lee,K.,2010.Determinants of industry-academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: the case of Korea as a latecomerin knowledge industrialization..Research Policy, 39(5),625-639.
Feng, C., Ding, M., Sun, B., 2011. A comparison research on industry- university –research strategic alliances in countries. Asian Social Science, 7(1), 102-105.
Fleming, L., King, I.C., Juda, A., 2007. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18, 938–954.
Fox, M.F., 1995. Women and scientific careers. In: Jasanoff, S., et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 205–223.
Giuliani, E., Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., Rabellotti, R., 2010. Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy, 39, 748–761.
Granovetter, M., 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1360–1380.
Grimpe, C., Fier, H., 2010. Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 637–650.
Gulbrandsen, M., Smeby, J.-C., 2005. Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34 (6), 932–950.
Haeussler, C., Colyvas, J.A., 2011. Breaking the ivory tower: academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40, 41–54.
Hicks,D., Hamilton, K., 1999. Does university-industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Science and Technology, 16(4):74-75.
Landry, R., Amara, N., Lamari, M., 2002. Does social capital determine innovation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 681–701.
Landry, R., Amara, N., Ouimet, M., 2007. Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32 (6), 561–592.
Lee, S.-H., Peng, M. W., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship development: A real options per spective. Academy of Management Review, 32: 257-272.
Lee, Y. S., 2000. The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25 (2): 111-133.
Levin, R.C., 1988. Appropriability, R&D spending and technological performance. The American Economic Review, 78 (2), 424–428.
Lin, N., 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lin, M.-W., Bozeman, B., 2006. Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: a scientific and technical human capital explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 269–290.
Long, J.S., Fox, M.F., 1995. Scientific careers: universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21, 45–71.
Magnus Gulbrandsen, Jens-Christian Smeby, 2005. Industry Funding and University Professors’ Research Performance. Research Policy 34, 932-950
Magnus Klofsten, Dylan Jones-Evans, 2000. Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe-The Case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14,299-309
Martinelli, A., Meyer, M., von Tunzelmann, N., 2008. Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 259–283.
Merton, R.K., 1968. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159, 56–63.
Min-Wei Lin, Barry Bozeman, 2006. Researcher’s Industry Experience and Productivity in University-Industry Research Center: A “Scientific and Technical Human Capital” Explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 269-290
Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U., 1998. Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, 835–851.
Nelson, R.E., 1989. The strength of strong ties: social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377–401.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Brostrom, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., Sobrero, M., 2013. Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2):423-442.
Rost, K. 2011. The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation. Research Policy, 40: 588-604
Stephan, P., 1996. The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (3), 1199–1235.
Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., 2002. Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University . Management Science, 48(1):90-104.
Van Rijnsoever, F.J., Hessels, L.K., Vandeberg, R.L.J., 2008. A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37, 1255–1266.
Wu, F. S., 2000.University-industry research cooperation: a study of the major factors influencing performance, in APEC-STPRC The Role of Innovation Systems within APEC, Taipei: APEC-STPRC.