| 研究生: |
張敬文 Chang, Ching-Wen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
真誠領導、組織認同與組織公民行為關聯性之研究 The Relationship among Authentic Leadership, Organizational Identification and Organizational Citizenship Behavior |
| 指導教授: |
楊朝旭
Young, Chaur-Shiuh |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 62 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 真誠領導 、組織認同 、組織公民行為 、問卷調查 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Authentic Leadership, Organizational Identification, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Questionnaire Survey |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:192 下載:32 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主旨是探討真誠領導、組織認同與組織公民行為之關聯性,並以國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班研究生為問卷施測對象,透過任意抽樣進行問卷調查,總計發放250份問卷,回收237份問卷,36份無效問卷,201份有效問卷,問卷回收率為94.8%。本研究問卷資料透過IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0統計分析軟體進行描述性統計、信度分析、效度分析及迴歸分析。
最後,本研究獲得下列數點研究發現:
1.主管真誠領導對組織公民行為有顯著的正向影響。
2.主管真誠領導對員工組織認同有顯著的正向影響。
3.員工組織認同對組織公民行為有顯著的正向影響。
4.主管真誠領導會透過員工組織認同的中介效果,對組織公民行為有顯著的正向影響。
The aim purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among authentic leadership, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior. The convenience sampling was applied in this study. Meantime, we adopted a questionnaire survey, a total of 250 copies of questionnaires have been distributed randomly, 201 respondents were counted as valid, and response rate was 94.8%. Finally, the results were listed as follows: (1) The authentic leadership has significantly positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior; (2) The authentic leadership has significantly positive effect on organizational identification; (3) The organizational identification has significantly positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior; (4) The organizational identification mediates the relationship between authentic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior.
一、中文
1.王淑敏(2012),轉換型領導、組織認同與組織公民行為關係之研究:以台灣國際獅子會300-E1區為例,國立高雄大學高階經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
2.吳萬益(2015),企業研究方法,台北:華泰圖書。
3.李俊賢、黃芳銘與鍾莉容(2010),組織支持、組織認同與服務導向組織公民行為:餐旅飯店服務人員的實證,休閒事業研究,第8卷第2期,頁49-67。
4.李新民與朱芷萱(2012),真誠領導的測量與相關後果變項初探,樹德科技大學學報,第14卷第1期,頁341-366。
5.林家五、王悅縈與胡宛仙(2012),真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管忠誠之差異效果,本土心理學研究,第38期,頁205-256。
6.林鉦棽(2004),休閒旅館業從業人員的組織公正、組織信任與組織公民行為關係:社會交換理論觀點的分析,中華管理學報,第5卷第1期,頁91-112。
7.林鉦棽、賴鳳儀、黃紹慶、運蕙韶與鍾潤富(2011),組織公民行為與工作家庭衝突之關聯分析:好士兵症候群,管理學報,第28卷第1期,頁31-47。
8.邱吉鶴、李祥銘與李雅珍(2015),公營事業組織公平正義、信任關係、工作滿意與組織公民行為之關聯性:以台電公司為例,中華管理評論國際學報,第18卷第3期,頁1-25。
9.姜定宇與鄭伯壎(2003),組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻,應用心理研究,第19期,頁175-209。
10.施智婷與林鉦棽(2012),領導成員交換關係、心理契約滿足與組織公民行為理論模型驗證:資源配置與社會資本觀點,管理學報,第29卷第1期,頁1-16。
11.洪春吉與李純慧(2010),組織公平與組織公民行為關係:以金融業、營建業實證比較,臺灣銀行季刊,第61卷第4期,頁201-226。
12.梁欣光與林政安(2016),真誠領導與員工道德行為:探討道德效能的中介效果與道德認定的調節效果,人力資源管理學報,第16卷第1期,頁1-20。
13.許逢修與吳淑鈴(2015),服務業員工職場友誼對組織公民行為之影響:組織認同的中介效果,管理研究學報,第15卷第2期,頁85-119。
14.許順旺、林顯邦與張姮燕(2011),國際觀光旅館客房部門員工壓力源、組織認同與績效表現之相關研究:以調適行為為干擾變項,人力資源管理學報,第11卷第1期,頁1-25。
15.郭建志、曹常成與楊婷如(2014),真誠領導與安全效能:安全氣候知覺與安全誘因經驗之研究,勞工安全衛生研究季刊,第22卷第3期,頁235-248。
16.陳建丞(2008),員工知覺的組織支持與工作績效間的中介模型研究,管理學報,第25卷第3期,頁309-331。
17.陳彥君與沈其泰(2015),檢驗主管認同與權力距離傾向對於真誠領導與服務品質之關係的效果,人力資源管理學報,第15卷第1期,頁1-25。
18.陳嵩、陳光偉與李佩芬(2011),垂直人際信任對部屬工作績效之影響:上司家長式領導的角色,管理學報,第28卷第1期,頁1-29。
19.陳儀蓉與黃芳銘(2006),組織公民行為量表在男女員工群體上之測驗恆等性檢定,測驗學刊,第53卷第2期,頁297-325。
20.陳德富(2013),從威權領導、魅力領導到真誠領導探討華人企業組織之高科技產業高階主管之領導對部屬工作態度之影響,中華管理評論國際學報,第16卷第4期,頁1-24。
21.游靜宜(2016),環境轉換型領導與環境組織公民行為之研究:綠色組織認同、環境自我認同、情感信任的中介效果,國立屏東大學行銷與流通管理學系碩士班論文。
22.黃薰儀(2013),真誠領導、組織公民行為與員工生產力的研究:以隱性心理資本為中介作用和團隊成員交換關係為干擾變數,國立成功大學工程管理碩士在職專班論文。
23.廖國鋒與梁文彥(2011),知覺外部聲望對組織認同與組織公民行為關聯性之跨層次研究,輔仁民生學誌,第17卷第1期,頁39-63。
24.謝安田與楊新生(2011),職場友誼對組織認同之影響:以工作滿意與群體凝聚力為中介變數,人文暨社會科學期刊,第7卷第1期,頁77-90。
二、英文
1.Ariani, D. W., (2013). The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Business Administration. 4(2), 46-56.
2.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A., (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
3.Bateman, T. S, & Organ, D. W., (1983). Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship between Affect and Employee Citizenship. Academic of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
4.Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R., (2010). Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Identification, and Employee Outcomes: Testing a Simultaneous Multifoci Model. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(1), 17-26.
5.Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., Dickens, M. P., (2011). Authentic Leadership: A Review of the Literature and Research Agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145.
6.Forni, A. A., & Meulen, R., (2016). Gartner Says Worldwide Semiconductor Capital Spending to Decline 0.3 Percent in 2016. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3474517
7.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E., (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
8.Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D., (2005). Authentic Leadership and Eudaemonic Well-Being: Understanding Leader-Follower Outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
9.Katz, D., (1964). The Motivational basis of Organizational Behavior. Behavior Science, 9(2), 131-146.
10.Kesen, M., (2016). Linking Organizational Identification with Individual Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator. Journal of Yasar University, 11(41), 56-66.
11.Koning, L. F., & Kleef, G. A., (2015). How Leaders’ Emotional Displays Shape Followers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(4), 489-501.
12.Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., Sels, L., (2015). Authentic Leadership, Authentic Followship, basic Need Satisfaction, and Work Role Performance: A Cross-Level Study. Journal of Management, 41, 1677-1697.
13.Lin, C. C., & Peng, T. K., (2010). From Organizational Citizenship Behaviour to Team Performance: The Mediation of Group Cohesion and Collective Efficacy. Management and Organization Review, 6(1), 55-75.
14.Luthans, F. & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic Leadership: A Positive Developmental Approach. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
15.Mael F., & Ashforth, B. E., (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
16.Mohammad, J., Habib, F. Q., & Alias, M. A., (2011). Job Satisfaction and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour: An Empirical Study at Higher Learning Institutions. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 149-165.
17.Shen, Y., Jackson, T., Ding, C., Yuan, D., Zhao, L., Dou, Y., & Zhang, Q., (2014). Linking Perceived Organizational Support with Employee Work Outcomes in a Chinese Context: Organizational Identification as a Mediator. European Management Journal, 32(3), 406-412.
18.Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C., (1985). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
19.Tajfel, H., (1982a). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.Tajfel, H., (1982b). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
21.Valsania, S. E., Leon, K. A. M., Alonso, F. M., & Cantisano, G. T., (2012). Authentic Leadership and Its Effect on Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behaviours. Psicothema, 24(4), 561-566.
22.Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J., (2010). Psychological Processes linking Authentic Leadership to Follower Behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 901-914.
23.Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J., & Avolio, B. J., (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
24.Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E., (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
25.Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Schriesheim, C. A., Dansereau, F., (2008). Authentic Leadership and Positive Organizational Behavior: A Meso, Multi-Level Perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 693-707.