工業遺產是世界文化遺產的重要組成部分，也是世界各地文化遺產保護工作的重點。隨著城市轉型和經濟高品質發展，人們對遺產保護的關注度越來越高。很多國家在工業遺產保護的理論上已經進行了深入的討論研究，在實踐上也產出了一批非常知名的工業遺產保護案例。近年來，中國也越來越重視工業遺產的保護和再利用，並進行了一系列探索性的嘗試。儘管如此，仍有大量的工業建築遺產遭到了粗暴拆除或嚴重毀壞，其中不乏一些歷史悠久並具有社會文化價值的案例，這對歷史文化的傳承發展造成了無法挽回的影響。為了避免這種無差別的破壞行為，開展工業遺產的係統認證和評估是非常必要的。然而，現有的法規不夠嚴謹，應該考慮到各地條例的限制差異，建立廣泛適用的科學評價體系。武漢市作為遺產保護工作的重點城市，尚未建立標準的工業遺產價值評價體系，工業遺產的規劃主要是由政府的宏觀控制和開發商的商業目的為主導，這種主觀式的更新給武漢市的工業文化造成了不可逆的損失。因此，本文以武漢市為例，針對地區的實際情況，因地制宜地建立科學有效的價值評價體系，並選取現存的九處工業遺產進行綜合全面的價值評定，為之後的遺產保護和再利用的策略提供參考依據。
在理論部分，首先，本文描述了相關概念並對研究範圍進行了界定。然後，梳理了國際上關於工業遺產保護和利用的歷史沿革和相關理論研究、實踐等內容，並且著重探討了工業遺產的價值面向和評價標準。另外，本文運用了CiteSpace軟體對web of science 資料庫2016-2021年的工業遺產研究的文獻進行了文獻計量分析，提取了高頻關鍵字進行了關鍵字和共現詞的知識圖譜分析。經過知識圖譜的聚類分析，探討了工業遺產的研究熱點領域，並加入時序功能，分析出研究熱點的變化情況。 同時，還分析了研究學者和研究機構的特點。基於以上分析，總結了近年來工業遺產的研究問題並對工業遺產的未來發展趨勢提出了建議。
在實證部分，首先，本文參照記錄中國近代工業發展歷史的相關文獻資料，對武漢市的近現代工業發展的歷史脈絡和演變過程進行了梳理，總結了武漢市工業遺產的基本概況（例如，類型、分佈和年代等）。並通過實地調研和相關文獻資料，整理出了武漢市九處工業遺產的概況。然後，設置專家問卷並運用層次分析法對工業遺產的價值構成進行定量分析，從而構建出工業遺產的價值評價體系。接著，結合上述評價體系進行第二次問卷發放，利用模糊綜合評價法對本文選取的九處工業遺產進行評分，並得出等級劃分。然後，通過前文的等級劃分，分別對九處工業遺產進行簡要描述並依據價值評估得分情況分析其價值特徵分佈情況。最後，對工業遺產的保護和再利用提出相關的建議。

Industrial heritage is an important part of the world's cultural heritage, and it is also the focus of cultural heritage protection all over the world. With the urban transformation and high-quality economic development, people are paying more and more attention to heritage protection. Many countries have conducted in-depth discussions and research on the theory of industrial heritage protection, and several well-known industrial heritage protection cases have also been produced in practice. In recent years, China has also paid more and more attention to the protection and reuse of industrial heritage and has carried out a series of exploratory attempts. Nevertheless, there are still a large number of industrial architectural heritage was brutally demolished or seriously damaged, including some historic and socio-cultural values of the case, which caused an irreparable impact on the development of historical and cultural heritage. To avoid such undifferentiated destructive behavior, it is very necessary to carry out the systematic certification and evaluation of industrial heritage. However, the existing norms are not rigorous enough, the restrictions and differences of local regulations should be taken into consideration to establish a system that is wildly applicable for scientific evaluation. As an important city of urban heritage protection work, Wuhan has not yet established a standard industrial heritage value evaluation system. The planning of the industrial heritage is dominated by the government’s macro-control and the commercial purpose of the developers. This subjective type of transformation to Wuhan industrial heritage caused the irreversible loss. Therefore, this article takes Wuhan City as an example to establish a scientific and effective value evaluation system according to local conditions. Nine existing industrial heritage sites are selected for comprehensive value evaluation, which provided a reference for future heritage protection and reuse strategies.
In the theoretical part, firstly, this article describes related concepts and defines the scope of research. Then, it sorted out the historical evolution of the protection and reuse of industrial heritage in the world as well as related theoretical studies and practices. Among them, the focus was on the evaluation factors and evaluation criteria of industrial heritage. In addition, this article used the CiteSpace software to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the industrial heritage research literature in the web of science database from 2016 to 2021, extracted high-frequency keywords and analyzed the knowledge graph of keywords and co-occurring words. Through the cluster analysis of the knowledge map, the research hotspots of industrial heritage were explored, and the time series function was added to analyze the changes in the research hotspots. Based on the above analysis, this article summarized the research issues of industrial heritage in recent years and put forward suggestions for its future development trend.
In the empirical part, firstly, referring to the historical evolution of modern industrial development in China and related documents, this article sorts out the historical context and evolution of Wuhan’s modern industrial development and summarizes the basic overview of Wuhan’s industrial heritage (eg. type, distribution, age, etc.). And through field research and related literature, the overview of nine industrial heritage sites in Wuhan was compiled. Next, expert questionnaires are set up using the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process. After multiple rounds of expert opinion consultation, the value composition of industrial heritage is qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed, thereby constructing a value evaluation system for industrial heritage. Then, combined with the above-mentioned evaluation system, the second questionnaire survey was carried out using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and the nine industrial heritages selected in this paper were scored and the hierarchical classification was obtained. Finally, through hierarchical classification, relevant suggestions are made for the protection and reuse of industrial heritage.

Antman, E. M., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (2015). A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts Treatments for Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized. 02115.
Architectual Institute of Japan. (n.d.). Guidelines for Building Assessment , Preservation and Utilization Guidelines for Building Assessment , Preservation and Utilization.
AURORA, T. O. (2017). GUIDE TO PROPERTIES LISTED ON THE AURORA REGISTER OF PROPERTIES OF CULTURAL HERITAGE. 1–4.
Benckendorff, P., & Zehrer, A. (2013). A network analysis of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 43(xx), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005
Buchanan, A. (2005). Industrial Archaeology: Past, present and prospective. Industrial Archaeology Review, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1179/030907205X44321
Cercleux, A.-L., Merciu, F.-C., & Merciu, G.-L. (2012). Models of Technical and Industrial Heritage Re-Use in Romania. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 14, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.03.021
Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(SUPPL. 1), 5303–5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(July), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation : A Systematic Review of the Literature Mary M . Crossan and Marina Apaydin. September. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. January 2009.
David Throsby. (2001). ECONOMICS AND CULTURE. The Press Syndicate of the Universit of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v22i1.1035
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610650201
Feilden, B. (2003). Obituary: Freddie Charles (1912–2002). Journal of Architectural Conservation, 9(2), 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2003.10785344
Gang, S., & Changming, Y. (2013). RE-EXAMINING ON THE VALUE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE. 198–201.
Guzmán, P. C., Roders, A. R. P., & Colenbrander, B. J. F. (2017). Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools. Cities, 60, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.005
Hammersley, M. (2001). On ‘ Systematic ’ Reviews of Research Literatures : a ‘ narrative ’ response to Evans & Bene eld. 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192012009572
Hayes, M. (2019). On the origins of Alois Riegl’s conservation theory. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 58(3), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2018.1558639
ICOMOS. (2014). Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance (2013). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, 1078–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1046
Le Cobusier. (1973). The Athens Charter (p. 113). Grossman Publishers.
Li, R. Y. M., Chau, K. W., & Zeng, F. F. (2019). Ranking of risks for existing and new building works. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102863
Ma, H., Li, S., & Chan, C. S. (2018). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based assessment of the value of non-World Heritage Tulou: A case study of Pinghe County, Fujian Province. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26(January), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.01.001
Mays, N., Pope, C., & Popay, J. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. 10(July 2005), 6–20.
Mulrow, C. D. (1994). Systematic Reviews Rationale for systematic reviews. October 1994. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
Nadkarni, R. R., & Puthuvayi, B. (2020). A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 32(August), 101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814
Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. January 1976.
Nobuo, A., Subin, X., Lei, Z., & Mi, Y. (2014). The designation cｒiteｒia foｒ the industｒial heｒitage in bｒitain. 44(9), 33–36.
Raan, A. F. J. van. (2009). Measurement : Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives For Your Citations Only ? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis. Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3:1, 50-62, October 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301
Riegl, A. (1982). The modern cult of monuments its character and its origin. Oppositions, 25, 20–51.
Schmidt, F. (2015). A Constantly Evolving Research Integration Tool. Organizational Research Methods, 96–113.
TICCIH. (2003). The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage. The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage, July, 1–6.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review *. 14.
UNESCO. (1972). CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL Adopted by the General Conference at its seventeenth session English Text. november.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wai-yin, C., & Shu-yun, M. (2004). and Sustainability of China’s development. 31(November 2003), 15–31.
Wang Yiding, W. X. (2012). Research on value and principle system of preservation of Architectural Heritage.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.1.1.104.6570
Yan, T. (2013). Study on the Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Industrial Heritage in Wuhan. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 09, 90–95.
Yang, X. (Stephanie). (2017a). Industrial heritage tourism development and city image reconstruction in Chinese traditional industrial cities: a web content analysis. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2016.1236800
Yang, X. (Stephanie). (2017b). Industrial heritage tourism development and city image reconstruction in Chinese traditional industrial cities: a web content analysis. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2016.1236800
Zhang, J., Cenci, J., Becue, V., Koutra, S., & Ioakimidis, C. S. (2020). Recent evolution of research on industrial heritage in Western Europe and China based on bibliometric analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13), 5348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135348
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Contemporary British architectural heritage protection. (2007). Tongji University Press. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=f5VAHwAACAAJ
Ministry of Culture. (2016). Law on the Preservation of Cultural Assets.
Qin Hongling. (2013). On the value elements of architectural cultural heritage.
Shao Yong. (2010). French architecture, city and landscape heritage protection and value reproduction. Tongji University Press. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=8JJAQwAACAAJ
Min Lei. (2017). The practice of constructing the protection and utilization system of Wuhan's industrial heritage: taking the second batch of Wuhan's industrial heritage protection and utilization planning as an example.