| 研究生: |
阮氏明香 Thom, Nguyen Thi Minh |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
How People Actually React Over Losses in Bargaining: Experimental Evidences from Work Distribution in Ultimatum and Dictator Game How People Actually React Over Losses in Bargaining: Experimental Evidences from Work Distribution in Ultimatum and Dictator Game |
| 指導教授: |
張巍勳
Chang, Wei-Shiun |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所 Institute of International Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 89 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Ultimatum Game, Dictator Game, Altruism, Fairness, Game Theory, Punishment, Bargaining, Loss and Gain, Loss Aversion, Prospect Theory. |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:108 下載:13 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
The current study aims to report the first Ultimatum and Dictator bargaining game over the real works. Our experiment was created to avoid the impact of windfall gains. In contrast with monetary, time and real effort cannot be granted by the experimenter and imply a natural loss to all people. We expect that the intensive efforts and time required to complete the real works will evoke the selfishness from proposer, reflected by imposing more works to the receivers. Compare with Ultimatum Game over gain where fair splits are mostly observed, we want to observe if fair splits are also mostly observed in Ultimatum Game over loss using works as our experimental currency for losses. We suggest that there are five factors that might impact on subject’s splitting behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Dictatorship Bargaining Game over the loss. These are Risk Averse, Altruism, Fairness Norm, Personal Time Value, and Loss Averse. A comparison with previous studies about bargaining over gain, subjects in our experimental setting is quite altruistic toward receivers when distributing loss. Even in the most favorable conditions such Dictator Game, the proposer’s behaviors are not biased toward being totally selfish with the average offer around 62% of the total works. Our research results found that risk-averse play an important role in explaining proposer’s allocating behavior in the Ultimatum Game. The higher personal time values, the more works proposers would like to impose on receivers. Loss-averse and people justice toward fairness also found to have an influence on proposer’s offer but not statistically significant. Besides that, our findings also support the previous studies that self-reported altruism scale may not reliably predict altruistic behavior.
Herrmann, A. (2010). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. Discussion Papers 2010-20, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
Anbarcı, N., Feltovich, N., & Gürdal, M. Y. (2015). Lying about the price? Ultimatum bargaining with messages and imperfectly observed offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 346-360.
Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the rationality of altruism. Econometrica, 70(0), 737-753.
Arnaud De Bruyn, & Bolton, G. E. (2008). Estimating the influence of fairness on bargaining behavior. Management Science, 54(10), 1774-1791.
Aurora García-Gallego, N. G., Ainhoa Jaramillo-Gutiérrez (2012). Gender differences in ultimatum games: Despite rather than due to risk attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(2012), 42-49.
Austin, E. J., Gibson, G. J., Deary, I. J., & McGregor, M. J., & Dent, J. B. (1998). Individual response spread in self-report scales: Personality correlations and consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(0), 421-438.
Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H., & Jiranyakul, K. (1990). Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3(1), 25-50.
Berger, R., Rauhut, H., Prade, S., & Helbing, D. (2012). Bargaining over waiting time in ultimatum game experiments. Social Science Research, 41(2), 372-379.
Bolle, F., Kritikos, A. (1998). Self-centered inequality aversion versus reciprocity and altruism. Mimeo: Europa-Universität Viadrina.
Bolton, G. E. (1991). A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. American Economic Association, 81(5), 1096-1136.
Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2011). The strategy versus the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 375-398.
Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M., Stoycos, S. A., Cardinale, E. M., Huebner, B., & Marsh, A. A. (2016). Is costly punishment altruistic? Exploring rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game in real-world altruists. Scientific Report, 6, 18974.
Fehr, E., Gächter, S. (2002). “Do incentive contracts undermine voluntary cooperation”. Working Paper No. 34. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
Bellemare, C., Kröger, S. (2003). “On representative trust”. Working Paper. Tilburg University.
Carlsson, F., H. He, and P. Martinsson. (2013). Easy come, easy go - The role of windfall money in lab and field experiments. Experimental Economics, 16(0), 190-207.
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 817-869.
Cherry, T., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. (2002). Hardnose the Dictator. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218-1221.
Cherry, T. L. (2001). Mental accounting and other-regarding behavior: Evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 605-615.
Cox, J. C., & Sadiraj, K., Sadiraj, V. (2001). Trust, fear, reciprocity and altruism. Mimeo. University of Arizona.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The World is More Just for Me than Generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World Scale's Validity (Vol. 12).
Daniel Farrelly, E. M., Kristi White, Sarah Young. (2015). Evidence of an Alternative Currency for Altruism in Laboratory-Based Experiments. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 100-111.
David A. Kravitz, S. G. (1992). Decisions and perceptions of recipients in ultimatum bargaining game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21(1), 65-84.
de Brux, J. (2010). The Dark and Bright Sides of Renegotiation: An application to transport concession contracts. Utilities Policy, 18(2), 77-85.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral Consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522-550.
Dohmen, T., Falk, Armin, Huffman, David, Sunde, Uwe. (2010). Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability? American Economic Review, 100(3), 1238-1260.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous Dictator Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(1), 181-191.
Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2009). Time is not money. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 96-102.
Ernst Fehr, a. L. G. (2007). Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. The American Economic Review, 97(1), 298-317.
Fan, X., Miller, B. C., Park, K., Winward, B. W., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., et al. (2006). An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field Methods, 18(0), 223-244.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868.
Ferguson, E., Farrell, K., & Lawrence, C. (2008). Blood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism. Health Psychology, 27, 327-336.
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347-369.
Fredrik Carlsson, H. H., Peter Martinsson. (2010). Windfall vs. earned money in the laboratory: Do they affect the behavior of men and women differently. Working Papers in Economics 468, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1959). Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings: Blood cholesterol level, blood clotting time, incidence of arcus senilis, and clinical coronary artery disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 169(12), 1286-1296.
Girtz, R., Hill, J., & Owens, M. (2017). Risk preferences, responsibility, and self-monitoring in a Stag Hunt. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 68, 53-61.
Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311-339.
Guth W, K. H. (2003). Normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der ¨Okonomik, Jahrbuch 2: Experimente in der ¨Okonomik, Metropolis, Marburg, chap Experimentelle ¨Okonomik. Modellplatonismus in neuem Gewande, 2(315-342).
Guth, W., Kliemt, H., & Ockenfels, A. (2003). Fairness versus efficiency: An experimental study of (mutual) gift giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50(4), 465-475.
Hal R. Arkes, C. A. J., and Mark V. Pezzo, Jane Gradwohl Nash, Karen Siegel-Jacobs and Eric Stone. (1994). The psychology of windfall gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(0), 331-347.
Hardeweg, L. Menkhoff, & Waibel, H. (2013). Experimental validated survey evidence on individual risk attitudes in rural thailand. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(4), 859-888.
Hartman, J. L. (2007). The relevance of heterogeneity in a congested route network with tolls: An analysis of two experiments using actual waiting times and moetized costs. University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper. Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
Hessel Oosterbeek, R. S. a. G. V. D. K. (2003). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta analysis. Experimental Economics, 7(0), 171-188.
Kristin M. Brethel-Haurwitz, S. A. S., Elise M. Cardinale, Bryce Huebner & Abigail A. Marsh. (2016). Is costly punishment altruistic? Exploring rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game in realworld altruist. Science Report, 6(0), 1-16
Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., Hepp, J., Klein, S. A., & Zettler, I. (2015). From personality to altruistic behavior (and back): Evidence from a double-blind dictator game. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 46-50.
Julie Cloutier, P. L. D. a. H. B. (2012). Collective bargaining and perceived Fairness: Validating the conceptual structure. Industrial Relations, 67(3), 398-425.
Junyi Shen, H. T. (2013). A cash effect in ultimatum game experiments. The Journal of Social-Economics, 47(0), 94-102
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory - Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(0), 263-291.
Laury, C. A. H. a. S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentie effects. The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655.
Lizarazo, S. V. (2013). Default risk and risk averse international investors. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 317-330.
Lusk, J. L., & Hudson, M. D. (2010). Bargaining over Losses. International Game Theory Review, 12(01), 83-91.
Lutz Thieme, O. W., Ulrich Hartmann. (2014). Beyond windfall gains: The generation of losses in economic experiments. Working papers der Hochschule Koblenz.
M. Vieider, M. L., R. Bouchouicha, T. Chmura, R. Hakimov, M. Krawczyk, and P. Martinsson. (2015). Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: Evidence from 30 countries. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(3), 421-452.
McCabe, K., Hoffman, E., Keith, S., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in Bargaining Games (Vol. 7).
McGee, P., & Constantinides, S. (2013). Repeated play and gender in the ultimatum game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 42(0), 121-126.
Monika Doll, M. S., Maren Tonn. (2017). Bargaining over waiting time in gain and loss framed ultimatum games. FAU Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 15/2017.
Nancy Buchan, R. C., Eric Johnson, George Wu. (2015). Gain and loss Ultimatums. Experimental and Behavorial Economics, 13(0), 1-23.
Neumann, T., Schosser, S., & Vogt, B. (2017). Ultimatum bargaining over losses and gains - An experimental comparison. Social Science Research, 67, 49-58.
Noussair, C. N. (2015). Time as a medium of reward in three social preference experiments. Experimental Economics, 18(3), 442-456.
Ockenfels, G. E. B. A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. The American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193.
Oosterbeek, H. (2003). Cutural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta analysis. Experimental Economics, 70(0), 171-188.
Oxoby, R. J., & Spraggon, J. (2008). Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3), 703-713.
Philippe Rushton, J., Chrisjohn, R., & Cynthia Fekken, G. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale (Vol. 2).
Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68(5), 1281-1292.
Rauhut, H., & Winter, F. (2010). A sociological perspective on measuring social norms by means of strategy method experiments. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1181-1194.
Reinstein, D., & Riener, G. (2009). House money efects on charitable giving: An experiment. Discussion paper.
Robert Forsythe, J. L. H., N. E. Savin, and Martin Sefton. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347-369.
Robert J. Oxoby, K. N. M. (2004). Sequential decision and strategy vector methods in ultimatum bargaining: Evidence on the strength of other-regarding behavior. Economics Letters, 84(2004), 399-405.
Rodriguez-Lara, I. (2016). Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 130(0), 144-165
Rohan Pitchford, M. L. J. W. (2010). Holdouts in sovereign debt restructuring: A theory of negotiation in a weak contractual enviroment. NBER Working Paper No. 16632
Rosenboim, M., Shavit, T. (2012). Whose money is it anyway? Using prepaid incentives in experimental economics to create a natural environment. Experimental Economics, 15(1), 145-157.
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(0), 293-302.
Schmidt, E. F. a. K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868.
Schotter, A., & Sopher, B. (2007). Advice and behavior in intergenerational ultimatum games: An experimental approach. Games and Economic Behavior, 58(2), 365-393.
Shefrin, R. H. T. H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392.
Shen, J., & Takahashi, H. (2013). A cash effect in ultimatum game experiments. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 47, 94-102.
Stephan Schosser, J. N. T., Bodo Vogt. (2016). How does the perception of pain determine the selection between different treatments? Experimental evidence for convex utility functions over pain duration and concave utility functions over pain intensity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131(2), 174-182.
Teyssier, S. (2012). Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games. Public Choice, 151(2), 91-119.
Thomas Neumann, S. K., Ivo Windrich, Roger Berger and Bodo Vogt. (2018). How to split gains and losses? Experimental evidence of Dictator and Ultimatum games. Games, 9(4), 78.
Treibich, C. (2015a). Are survey risk aversion measurements adequate in a low income context? AMSE Working Paper 1517, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, Marseille, France.
Tversky, D. K. A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision uder risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
Van Koten, S., Ortmann, A., & Babicky, V. (2013). Fairness in risky environments: theory and evidence. Games, 4(2), 208-242.
Werner Güth, R. S. a. B. S. (1983). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 367-388
West S. A., Griffin A. S., & A., G. (2007). Social semantics: Altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20(1), 415-432.
Börjesson, M., Fosgerau, M., and Algers, S., 2012. On the income elasticity of the value of travel time. Transportation Research Part A, 46(2), 368-377.
Brownstone, David, and Kenneth A. Small, 2005. Valuing Time and Reliability: Assessing the Evidence from Road Pricing Demonstrations. Transportation Research Part A, 39(4), 279-293.