本研究從互補財廠商的觀點來探討如何因應平台業者所興起的技術變化。當生態系是以平台作為基礎的時候，平台的技術變化就可以視作為生態系整體在進化過程中的重要特徵。此時，互補財廠商是否能夠順利地跨入到新世代平台而持續進行開發互補財，將會成為生態系在進化過程中重要的課題。本研究分析在台灣IC晶片製造代工廠(A公司)的IP平台中，矽智財業者如何能夠成功跨越130奈米、110奈米、90奈米、80奈米、65奈米、55奈米、45奈米、40奈米、28奈米共9個半導體的製程世代。本研究分析19家IP業者共1,319筆IP資料，我們發現當IP具有較高的獨特性與相容性，就將會讓IP更成功地跨越到新世代半導體製程。矽智財業者對於創造IP的獨特性與IP的相容性，可以視作為是經驗積累的過程。本研究分別稱之為世代創新能力與世代轉換能力，這兩種互補財的能力將是生態系進化的重要條件。本研究補足了從互補財廠商觀點來探討生態系的進化機制，我們認為本研究中互補財廠商的世代創新能力與世代轉換能力，將會改變生態系的健全性，以及對創生性產生內生性影響。另外，本研究可以進一步補足生態系中關於世代轉換的相關討論。本研究中的世代創新能力與世代轉換能力皆是以互補財的品質作為基礎，並且有別於過去以互補財的數目來作為生態系進化的依歸。我們建議平台業者應該與高品質的互補財廠商合作來讓互補財能夠持續轉移跨入到新世代平台。另外一方面，平台業者可以持續與品質較低的互補財廠商共同來創造具有獨特性的互補財，並且也要求品質較低的互補財廠商來提高品質以及互補財的相容性。

This study explores how to respond to the technological changes arising from the platform owner from the perspective of complementors. In the platform-based ecosystem, the technological changes of the platform are a critical feature in the evolution of the ecosystem. Whether complementors can smoothly enter the new-generation platform and continue to develop complementary goods will become an essential issue in the evolution of the ecosystem. This study analyzes how 19 silicon IP vendors can leapfrog to 130nm, 110nm, 90nm, 80nm, 65nm, 55nm, 45nm, 40nm, and 28nm semiconductor process generation of Taiwan IC chipset foundry (Company A). We found that when IP has high uniqueness and compatibility, it will allow IP to more successfully leap over to the next generation of semiconductor manufacturing processes. In this study, we call them the ability of generation-innovative capability and generation-transformative capability. This research complements the discussion of the evolutionary mechanism of the ecosystem from the perspective of complementors. We believe that the generation-innovative capability and generation-transformative capability will change the ecosystem’s health and its impact on generativity. Besides, this study can further complement the discussion about the generational transition in the ecosystem. The generation-innovative capability and generation-transformative capability are based on the quality of complementary goods, which is different from the number of complementary goods as the basis for ecosystem evolution. We suggest that the platform owner cooperates with high-quality complementors to enable complementary goods to continue to be transferred to the new generation of platforms. On the other hand, the platform owner can continue to work with low-quality complementors to create unique complementary goods and require low-quality complementors to improve the quality and the compatibility of complementary goods.

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Afuah, A. (2000). How much do your co‐opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 397-404.
Amit, R. (1986). Cost leadership strategy and experience curves. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 281–292.
Anderson, E. G., Parker, G., & Tan, B. (2014). Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 152–172.
Andreessen, M. (2007). The three kinds of platforms you meet on the internet. Pmarchive (blog).
Ansari, S., & Garud, R. (2009). Inter-generational transitions in sociotechnical systems: The case of mobile communications. Research Policy, 38(2), 382–392.
Ansari, S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor’s dilemma: Tivo and the u.S. Television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1829–1853.
Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Newell, MA.: Kluwer.
Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The economic journal, 99(394), 116-131.
Baldwin, & Woodard, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 19-37). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Baldwin, C. (2018). Bottlenecks, modules and dynamic architectrual capabilities. In D. Teece & S. Heaton (Eds.), The oxford handbook of dynamic capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baldwin, C., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, C. Y. (2008). Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(1), 155-195.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Woodard, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (Vol. 32, pp. 19-37). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barreto, I., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy‐based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1559-1581.
Binken, J. L. G., & Stremersch, S. (2009). The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. Journal of marketing, 73(2), 88-104.
Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. Devolving control. Management science, 56(10), 1849-1872.
Boudreau, K. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409–1427.
Boudreau, K. (2017). Platform boundary choices & governance: Opening-up while still coordinating and orchestrating. In J. Furman, A. Gawer, & B. S. Silverman (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms (advances in strategic management) (english) (pp. 227-298): Emerald Publishing Limited.
Boudreau, K., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2015). Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1761-1777.
Boudreau, K. J. (2008). Opening the platform vs. Opening the complementary good? The effect on product innovation in handheld computing. Northeastern University, Unpublished Working Paper.
Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009a). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 163-191). UK: Edward Elgar.
Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009b). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Platforms, Markets Innovation, 1, 163-191.
Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 309-328.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS quarterly, 263-290.
Cennamo, C. (2018). Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3038-3069.
Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2018). Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 461-478.
Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. (2019). Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organization Science, 30(3), 617-641.
Chen, P.-Y., & Forman, C. (2006). Can vendors influence switching costs and compatibility in an environment with open standards? MIS quarterly, 30, 541–562.
Chintagunta, P. K., Jain, D. C., & Vilcassim, N. J. (1991). Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. Journal of marketing research, 28(4), 417-428.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy, 24(2), 233-257.
Christensen, C. M., Suarez, F., & Utterback, J. M. (1998). Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management science, 44(12), 207-220.
Church, J., & Gandal, N. (1996). Strategic entry deterrence: Complementary products as installed base. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(2), 331-354.
Claussen, J., Kretschmer, T., & Stieglitz, N. (2015). Vertical scope, turbulence, and the benefits of commitment and flexibility. Management science, 61(4), 915–929.
Clements, M. T., & Ohashi, H. (2005). Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the us, 1994–2002. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(4), 515-542.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.
Corts, K. S., & Lederman, M. (2009). Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the us home video game market. international Journal of industrial Organization, 27(2), 121-136.
Cozzolino, A., Verona, G., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2018). Unpacking the disruption process: New technology, business models, and incumbent adaptation. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1166-1202.
Csaszar, F. A., & Siggelkow, S. (2010). How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organization Science, 21(3), 661–676.
Dallas, M. P., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2019). Power in global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 26(4), 666-694.
Dutton, J., & Thomas, A. (1984). Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 235-247.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270-1285.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Opening platforms: How, when and why? In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 131-162). UK: Edward Elgar.
Ethiraj, S. K. (2007). Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 563-584.
Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239.
Farrell, J., & Katz, M. L. (2000). Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in systems markets. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(4), 413-432.
Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177.
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2004). The strategy field from the perspective of management science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management science, 50(10), 1309–1318.
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from intel. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 16(1), 1-34.
Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035-1071.
Gilbert, R., & Katz, M. L. (2001). An economist’s guide to u.S. V. Microsoft. Journal of economic perspectives, 15(2), 25–44.
Golder, P. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1993). Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend? Journal of marketing research, 30(2), 158-170.
Gomez, J., Lanzolla, G., & Maicas, J. P. (2016). The role of industry dynamics in the persistence of first mover advantages. Long Range Planning, 49(2), 265-281.
Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
Greenstein, S. M. (1993). Did installed base give an incumbent any (measureable) advantages in federal computer procurement? The RAND Journal of Economics, 24(1), 19-39.
Gulati, R. (2007). Managing network resources alliances, affiliations and other relational assets. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571-586.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706.
Gupta, S., Jain, D. C., & Sawhney, M. S. (1999). Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Science, 18(3), 396-416.
Hagiu, A., & Halaburda, H. (2010). Responding to the wii? HBS Case 709-448, Harvard Business School, Boston.
Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163-3192.
Haunschild, P. R. (1993). Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 564-592.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9-30.
Hermelo, F. D., & Vassolo, R. (2010). Institutional development and hypercompetition in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1457–1473.
Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., & Tuertscher, P. (2021). Sustaining complement quality for digital product platforms: A case study of the philips hue ecosystem. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 21–48.
Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of panel data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges. Test, 16(1), 1-22.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability: Harvard Business Press.
Iansiti, M., & Strojwas, M. (2003). Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company: Building a platform for distributed innovation. Harvard Business School Case, 604-044.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35(8), 1200-1221.
Jacobides, M. G., & Tae, C. J. (2015). Kingpins, bottlenecks, and value dynamics along a sector. Organization Science, 26(3), 889-907.
Jacobides, M. G., & Winter, S. G. (2005). The co‐evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 395-413.
Kapoor, R. (2013). Collaborating with complementors: What do firms do? In R. Adner, J. Oxley, & B. Silverman (Eds.), Collaborating and competition in business ecosystems, advances in strategic management (Vol. 30, pp. 3-25). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017). Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the ios and android smartphone ecosystems. Organization Science, 28(3), 531-551.
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 274-296.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of political economy, 94(4), 822-841.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1992). Product introduction with network externalities. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(1), 55-83.
Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of marketing, 56(4), 33-52.
Kim, J.-Y. (2002). Product compatibility as a signal of quality in a market with network externalities. international Journal of industrial Organization, 20(7), 949-964.
Kim, S.-H., & Nam, S. (2004). Across the threshold: Role of performance and compatibility in innovative new products' market penetration. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(8), 689-699.
Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 405–425.
Koski, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2005). Entry, standards and competition: Firm strategies and the diffusion of mobile telephony. Review of Industrial Organization, 26(1), 89-113.
Kretschmer, T., & Claussen, J. (2016). Generational transitions in platform markets—the role of backward compatibility. Strategy Science, 1(2), 90–104.
Landsman, V., & Stremersch, S. (2011). Multihoming in two-sided markets: An empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. Journal of marketing, 75(6), 39-54.
Lawless, M. W., & Anderson, P. C. (1996). Generational technological change: Effects of innovation and local rivalry on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1185-1217.
Leiponen, A. E. (2008). Competing through cooperation: The organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Science, 54(11), 1904-1919.
Leten, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Roijakkers, N., Clerix, A., & Van Helleputte, J. (2013). Ip models to orchestrate innovation ecosystems. California management review, 55(4), 51-64.
Levinthal, D. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management science, 43(7), 934–950.
Lieberman, M. B. (1984). The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(2), 213-228.
Lieberman, M. B. (1989). The learning curve, technological barriers to entry, and competitive survival in the chemical processing industries. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 431-447.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1111-1125.
Lindman, M. (2000). New product uniqueness in the context of industrial product development. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1-3), 247-271.
Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418-438.
Markovich, S., & Moenius, J. (2009). Winning while losing: Competition dynamics in the presence of indirect network effects. international Journal of industrial Organization, 27(3), 346-357.
McIntyre, D., Srinivasan, A., Afuah, A., Gawer, A., & Kretschmer, T. (2020). Multi-sided platforms as new organizational forms. Academy of Management Perspectives. Advance online publication. https://
doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0018.
McIntyre, D. P., & Subramaniam, M. (2009). Strategy in network industries: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1494-1517.
Mitchell, W. (1991). Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 85-100.
Monteverde, K. (1995). Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management science, 41(10), 1624-1638.
Montfort, N., & Bogost, I. (2009). Racing the beam: The atari video computer system. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Naik, H. S., Fritzsche, A., & Moeslein, K. M. (2020). Modularity in making: Simplifying solution space for user innovation. R&D Management, 1-16.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA.: Havard University Press.
Nocke, V., Peitz, M., & Stahl, K. (2007). Platform ownership. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(6), 1130-1160.
Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Disruption in platform‐based ecosystems. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1203-1241.
Panico, C., & Cennamo, C. (2015). What drives a platform’s strategy? Usage, membership, and competition effects. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 15942.
Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2018). Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science, 64(7), 3015-3032.
Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Jiang, X. (2017). Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS quarterly, 41(1), 255–266.
Petersen, T., & Koput, K. W. (1991). Density dependence in organizational mortality: Legitimacy or unobserved heterogeneity? American Sociological Review, 399-409.
Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307-318.
Randall, T., & Ulrich, K. (2001). Product variety, supply chain structure, and firm performance: Analysis of the u.S. Bicycle industry. Management science, 47(12), 1588-1604.
Rietveld, J., & Eggers, J. P. (2018). Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: Implications for complementors. Organization Science, 29(2), 304-322.
Rietveld, J., Ploog, J. N., & Nieborg, D. B. (2020). The coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: Effects on complementor performance outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries, forthcoming.
Rietveld, J., Schilling, M. A., & Bellavitis, C. (2019). Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organization Science, 30(6), 1232-1251.
Ritala, P., Agouridas, V., Assimakopoulos, D., & Gies, O. (2013). Value creation and capture mechanisms in innovation ecosystems: A comparative case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 63, 244-267.
Rivkin, J. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management science, 46(6), 824–844.
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. doi:10.1162/154247603322493212
Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two‐sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667.
Rosenkopf, L., & Tushman, M. L. (1998). The coevolution of community networks and technology: Lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(2), 311-346.
Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of economic perspectives, 23(3), 125-143.
Schilling, M. A. (1998). Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 267-284.
Schilling, M. A. (2002). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 387-398.
Schilling, M. A. (2003). Technological leapfrogging: Lessons from the u.S. Video game console industry. California Management Review, 45, 6–32.
Schilling, M. A., Vidal, P., Ployhart, R., & Marangoni, A. (2003). Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management science, 49, 39–56.
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92-121.
Shiu, J.-M. (2017). The scope of support of toolkits in the smartphone industry. Annals of Business Administrative Science, 16(2), 55-65.
Spence, M. (1981). The learning curve and competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 12(1), 49-70.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary—digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.
Tiwana, A. (2015). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266-281.
Tiwana, A. (2018). Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 829-848.
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. (2010). Research commentary—platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675-687.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 439-465.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38, 8-30.
VanderWerf, P. A., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of first-mover advantages. Management science, 43(11), 1510-1519.
Venkatraman, N., & Lee, C.-H. (2004). Preferential linkage and network evolution: A conceptual model and empirical test in the us video game sector. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 876-892.
Von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management science, 48(7), 821-833.
Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195-1215.
Wiggins, R. R., & Rueffi, T. W. (2002). Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organization Science, 13(1), 81–105.
Wiggins, R. R., & Rueffi, T. W. (2005). Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 887–911.
Xu, X., Venkatesh, V., Tam, K. Y., & Hong, S.-J. (2010). Model of migration and use of platforms: Role of hierarchy, current generation, and complementarities in consumer settings. Management science, 56(8), 1304-1323.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity - a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2012). Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 88–106.
Zittrain, J. L. (2006). The generative internet. Harvard Law Review, 119(7), 1974–2040.
新宅純二郎, 田中辰雄, & 柳川範之. (2003). ゲーム産業の経済分析 - コンテンツ産業発展の構造と戦略: 東洋経済新聞社.