| 研究生: |
王冠卜 Wang, Kuan-Pu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
影響臺灣銀行業對消費者金融住宅備抵呆帳提撥之因素探討 Determinants of bank loan loss provisions for consumer mortgage loans in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
王澤世
Wang, Alan T. |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 103 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 26 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 消費者金融住宅備抵呆帳提撥 、景氣循環理論 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | LLPs for consumer mortgage loan, Pro-cyclical hypothesis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:84 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自2007年金融監督管理委員會規定台灣銀行業必須揭露放款品質,銀行處理消費者金融房屋貸款上更加的透明化。根據景氣循環理論,銀行在面臨景氣好時,因貸款人可能因為景氣好轉收入提高使得房貸違約率下降,銀行在提列消費者金融住宅備抵呆帳提撥上會下降。反之若景氣差時,銀行在提列銀行在提列消費者金融住宅備抵呆帳提撥上會上升。
本研究利用2008年第2季至2014年第4季(27季度)的消費者住宅放款資料,利用Panel Data迴歸分析。實證結果發現,在考慮季節性因素下,消費者金融住宅備抵呆帳提撥在預測未來景氣變化與房地產景氣上不具顯著性,與當期消費者金融住宅之逾放款、當期消費者金融住宅之放款有顯著正相關,當期消費者金融住宅之提存率有顯著負相關。
Financial Supervisory Commission of Taiwan in 2007 mandated the banks in Taiwan to disclosure the quality in mortgage loans. According to the pro-cyclical hypothesis, when the economy is in the periods of upturns, the probability of default decreases and banks will provision less on consumer mortgage loans.
The empirical results of this study indicate that, in the period from 2008Q2 to 2014Q4, loan loss provisions (LLPs) for consumer mortgage loans have no predictive power for the prices of real estate and economic conditions. It suggests LLPs for consumer mortgage loans do not support the pro-cyclical hypothesis. In this study, the empirical results also find that LLPs for consumer mortgage loan is positively related to the levels of consumer mortgage loan and non-performing loan. Finally, reverse ratio, defined as the ratio of loan loss reserves to loans, has a negative impact on loan loss provisioning by bank managers.
Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C., & Thomas, S. (1999). Bank loan loss provisions: a reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signaling effects Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), 1-25.
Balla, E., Rose, M. J., & Romero, J. (2012). Loan Loss Reserve Accounting and Bank Behavior. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, EB12-03, 1-4.
Bikker, J. A., & Metzemakers, P. A. J. (2005). Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 15, 141-157.
Curcio, D., & Hasan, I. (2015). Earnings and capital management and signaling: the use of loan-loss provisions by European banks. The European Journal of Finance, 21(1), 26-50.
He, Z. (2009). The Sale of Multiple Assets with Private Information. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4847-4820.
Huang, X., & Xiong, Q. (2015). Bank capital buffer decisions under macroeconomic fluctuations: Evidence for the banking industry of China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 36, 30-39.
KANAGARETNAM, K., LOBO, G. J., & YANG, D.-H. (2004). Joint Tests of Signaling and Income Smoothing through Bank Loan Loss Provisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4), 843-884.
Laeven, L., & Majnoni, G. (2003). Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: too much, too late? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12, 178-197.
Moyer, S. E. (1990). Capital adequacy ratio regulations and accounting choices in commercial banks. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13(2), 123-154.
Packer, F., & Zhu, H. (2012). Loan loss provisioning practices of Asian banks. BIS Working Papers, No 375.
Sood, H. A. E. (2012). Loan loss provisioning and income smoothing in US banks pre and post the financial crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25, 64-72.
Wang, C.-A., & Shen, C.-H. (2011). Does Bank's Loan Loss Provision Residential Mortgage Loan Have any Signal Effects on Economic Condition? The Empirical Evidence and the Policy Implication from Taiwan Unique Database of Loan Disclosure. Taiwan Banking & Finance Quartery, 12(4), 1-39.
校內:2025-12-31公開