本研究嘗試在新市場環境下，探討價值共創是否能有效應用在太陽光電系統產業發展實務，面對往下游轉型成發電系統之開發、整合、建設，太陽光電產業發展需要多方資源整合，因此以「價值共創」角度探討利害關係人之互動關係，以及如何使利害關係人達到共創並形成服務生態系統，以致於達成團隊績效目標。
本研究將透過質性研究的單一個案研究法，深入探究「茂捷公司」，結合價值主張、價值共創與服務生態系統之相關理論，分析資源整合、互動、服務生態系統的演變過程。本研究對「茂捷公司」之分析結果發現，要成功發展太陽光電發電系統下游市場，要先建立明確的「價值主張」，然後以服務生態系統的觀點思考如何進行資源整合和服務整合，最後共創價值，讓參與其中的所有行動者皆能獲益，並逐漸形成服務生態系統。
再生能源發展近年來漸受重視，本研究建議在推行太陽光電產業政策時，可以試著用價值共創的觀點思考如何透過政策來集結相關行動者進行資源整合與共享，進而共創價值。

This study will explore the "Motech Energe Company" through a single case study method of qualitative research. Combine the theory of value proposition, value co-creation and service ecosystem to analysis the evolution process of resource integration, interaction and service ecosystem. The analysis of "Motech Energe Company" in this study found that to successfully develop the downstream market of solar photovoltaic power generation system, we must first establish a clear "value proposition", and then think about how to integrate resources and integrate services from the perspective of the service ecosystem. Finally, creating value allows all actors involved to benefit and gradually form a service ecosystem. The development of renewable energy has been paid more and more attention in recent years. This study suggests that when implementing the solar photovoltaic industry policy, we can try to use the value co-creation perspective to think about how to integrate relevant actors through policy to integrate and share resources, and create value together.

1.林淑馨. (2010). 質性研究: 理論與實務: 巨流圖書股份有限公司.
2.陳雅文. (1995). 內容分析法. 圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典 (頁 323). 台北: 漢美.潘淑滿. (2003). 質性研究-理論與應用. (心理出版社).
3.蕭瑞麟. (2007). 不用數字的研究: 鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究: 臺灣培生教育出版.
4.劉光瑩、呂國禎 (2016) 「綠色企業新趨勢 放長線賺綠金」天下雜誌，第579期
5.陳向明. (2002). 社会科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司
6.Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge University Press.
7.Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2010). Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance. Journal of Brand Management, 17(8), 590-604.
8.Margaret Rouse., (2016). "What is value proposition (VP) - Definition from WhatIs.com". SearchCIO. Retrieved 2016-04-01
9.GRÖNROOS, Christian. Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing theory, 2011, 11.3: 279-301.
10.Grönroos, C., & Ravald, A. (2011). Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 5-22.
11.Grönroos, C. (2012). Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13-14), 1520-1534.
12.McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Vargo, S. L., Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C., & Kasteren, Y. V. (2012). Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. Journal of Service Research, 15(4), 370-389.
13.Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing theory, 11(1), 35-49.
14.Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2016). Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 93-106.
15.Saarijärvi, H., Kannan, P. K., & Kuusela, H. (2013). Value co-creation: theoretical approaches and practical implications. European Business Review, 25(1), 6-19.
16.Kambil, A., Ginsberg, A., & Bloch, M. (1996). Re-inventing value propositions.
17.Lanning, M. (1998). Delivering profitable value: A revolutionary framework to accelerate growth. Perseus, New York, NY: Generate Wealth and Rediscover the Heart of Business.
18.Bower, M., & Garda, R. A. (1985). The role of marketing in management. McKinsey Quarterly, 3(1), 34-46.
19.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
20.Smith, S., & Wheeler, J. (2002). Managing the customer experience: Turning customers into advocates. Pearson Education.
21.N. Bolton, R., Gustafsson, A., McColl-Kennedy, J., J. Sirianni, N., & K. Tse, D. (2014). Small details that make big differences: a radical approach to consumption experience as a firm's differentiating strategy. Journal of Service Management, 25(2), 253-274.
22.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
23.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
24.Kowalkowski, C. (2011). Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service-dominant logic. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 277-294.
25.Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of retailing, 83(1), 5-18.
26.Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice: Taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202-210.
27.Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Hilton, T., Davidson, A., Payne, A., & Brozovic, D. (2014). Value propositions: A service ecosystems perspective. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 327-351.
28.Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), 18-20.
29.Grönroos, C., & Ravald, A. (2011). Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 5-22.
30.Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard business review, 71(4), 65-77.
31.Gummesson, E. (1996). Relationship marketing and imaginary organizations: a synthesis. European journal of Marketing, 30(2), 31-44.
32.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan management review, 44(4), 12-18.
33.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic. The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions.
34.Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), 83-96.
35.Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Troye, S. V. (2008). Trying to prosume: toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 109-122.
36.Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152.
37.Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), 18-20.
38.Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-business Management, 7(4), 395-406.
39.Pickett, S. T., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2002). The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems, 5(1), 1-10.
40.Mars, M. M., Bronstein, J. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). The value of a metaphor: Organizations and ecosystems. Organizational Dynamics, 41(4), 271-280.
41.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It's all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial marketing management, 40(2), 181-187.
42.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
43.Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Payne, A. (2016). Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care ecosystem. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 24-39.
44.Romero, D., & Molina, A. (2011). Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production Planning & Control, 22(5-6), 447-472.
45.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46-67.
46.Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage.
47.Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative researching. Sage.
48.Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Sage Publications.
49.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). London and Singapore: Sage.
50.Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage.
51.Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education (5th.).
52.Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization science, 4(4), 595-616.