簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭旭原
Kuo, Hsu-yuan
論文名稱: 運用QFD及DEA技術於新產品開發功能評選之研究
Apply QFD and DEA method to evaluate the design function in new product development
指導教授: 黃宇翔
Huang, Yeu-Shiang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系碩士在職專班
Department of Industrial and Information Management (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 51
中文關鍵詞: 新產品開發品質機能展開資料包絡分析設計功能評選
外文關鍵詞: data envelopment analysis, quality function deployment, new product development
相關次數: 點閱:171下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 為了取得全球市場競爭優勢,企業不斷發展新產品,並運用有限時間與資源開發滿足顧客需求之高品質產品,然新產品的設計功能愈來愈多且複雜度高,如何評選最合適的設計功能組合,減少開發時間,降低成本與滿足顧客需求則成為重要之課題。本研究建構一個系統化的設計功能評選過程,量化決策者主觀評斷準則與提供相對客觀的評選結果,透過品質機能展開技術將顧客需求展開到產品設計的各項功能需求,依照顧客需求相對重要性,競爭產品和銷售策略等相關屬性決定新產品開發的品質企劃程度,並且使用資料包絡分析技術衡量各項功能設計之間的相對效率值,將各個設計功能依照效率值加以排序,最後在新產品開發總限制時間內選出適合的新產品功能設計組合。而應用實例顯示,除少數設計功能因決策者特殊偏好的評選準則而相異,整體而言利用本決策整合流程所評選之設計功能大致與實際相符合,同時花費較少產品開發時間與滿足更多顧客需求,以及協助決策者面對眾多設計功能組合可以更清楚客觀地評選產品設計功能。

    In order to gain the competitive advantage in the global market, enterprises with limitations of time and resources must keep developing new products continually and designing high quality products to satisfy customers' requirements. However, functions of new product tend to be highly changeable and complex, so it would be an important issue to evaluate an appropriate combination of functions with the concerns of decreasing the design time, reducing production cost, and meeting customers' requirements. This study proposes a systematic process in evaluating product functions by assessing the subjective criteria of decision makers’ preferences and adopting the objective measures of performance appraisal.
    This modeling process first uses quality function deployment technique to deploy the customers' requirements to the function attributes of the product in determining the quality plan according to the relative importance of customers' requirements, the competitor's product, and the sale strategy respectively, and then applies the data envelopment analysis method to evaluate the functions of the product and rank them by their efficiencies. Finally, a suitable combination of functions for the new product development can be obtained with a limited total production time. In the case study, the selected functions result in shorter production time, and satisfy more customers’ requirements. In addition, the product with functions selected by the proposed approval is similar to the one selected by project manager in actual project. The proposed model can assist the decision maker who faces the choices of function combinations in evaluating the efficiency of the entire product with better systematic judgments.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 2 第四節 論文架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 新產品開發(New Product Development) 4 一、 新產品的定義 4 二、 新產品開發的過程 5 三、 新產品開發的關鍵成功因素 6 第二節 品質機能展開(Quality Function Deployment) 8 一、 QFD於新產品開發之相關應用 8 二、 QFD於決策分析的相關研究 12 第三節 資料包絡分析(Data Envelopment Analysis) 14 一、 基本概念與相關模式 14 二、 應用於評選排序的相關研究 16 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 問題描述 19 第二節 研究架構 22 第三節 模式建構 23 一、 顧客需求與設計技術的QFD評估 23 二、 設計功能資源策略之DEA決策模式 28 三、 有限時間內之最適功能評選 31 第四章 應用分析 32 第一節 產品專案說明與品質屋初始設定 32 第二節 模式套用與結果討論 35 第五章 結論與建議 44 第一節 研究成果 44 第二節 研究限制 44 第三節 未來研究方向 45 參考文獻 46 附錄一、品質要素與技術屬性之原始關聯矩陣 50 附錄二、投入成本之原始數據 51

    Adler, N., L. Friedman, and Z. Sinuany-Stern. Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(2), 249-65, 2002.
    Akao, Yoji. QFD: Past, Present, and Future. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third Annual International QFD Symposium, Linkoping, 1997.
    Alirezaee, M. R., and M. Afsharian. Model Improvement for Computational Difficulties of DEA Technique in the Presence of Special DMUs. Applied mathematics and computation, 186, 1600-11, 2007.
    Andersen, P., and N. C. Petersen. A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261-65, 1993.
    Astebro, T. Key Success Factors for Technological Entrepreneurs' R&D Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 314-21, 2004.
    Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-92, 1984.
    Bouyssou, D. Using DEA as a Tool for MCDM: Some Remarks. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(9), 974-78, 1999.
    Calantone, R., and R. G. Cooper. New Product Scenarios - Prospects for Success. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 48-60, 1981.
    Cariaga, I., T. El-Diraby, and H. Osman. Integrating Value Analysis and Quality Function Deployment for Evaluating Design Alternatives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-Asce, 133(10), 761-70, 2007.
    Chan, L. K., and M. L. Wu. Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 463-97, 2002.
    Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(4), 339-39, 1978.
    Charnes, A., and W.W. Cooper. The Non-Archimedean CCR Ratio for Efficiency Analysis: A Rejoinder Boyd and Fare. European Journal of Operational Research, 15(3), 333-34, 1984.
    Cohen, L. Quality Function Deployment. How to Make QFD Work for You: Addison Wesley, 1995.
    Cook, W. D., and J. Zhu. Classifying Inputs and Outputs in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 692-99, 2007.
    Cooper, R. G. Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 93-103, 1979.
    ———. Stage-Gate Systems - a New Tool for Managing New Products - Conceptural and Operational Model. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-54, 1990.
    Crawford, M., and AD. Benedetto. New Products Management. 9th ed: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2008.
    Cristiano, J. J., J. K. Liker, and C. C. White. Customer-Driven Product Development through Quality Function Deployment in the U.S. and Japan. An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 17(4), 286-308, 2000.
    Delano, G., G. S. Parnell, C. Smith, and M. Vance. Quality Function Deployment and Decision Analysis - a R&D Case Study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(5-6), 591-609, 2000.
    Farrell, M.J. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-90, 1957.
    Ferdows, K., and A. De Meyer. Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 168-84, 1990.
    Franceschini, F. , and S. Rossetto. Quality Function Deployment: How to Improve Its Use. Total Quality Management & Business, 9(6), 491-500, 1998.
    Golany, B., and Y. Roll. An Application Procedure for DEA. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 17(3), 237-50, 1989.
    Gonzalez, F. J. M., and T. M. B. Palacios. The Effect of New Product Development Techniques on New Product Success in Spanish Firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(3), 261-71, 2002.
    Griffin, A., and J. R. Hauser. The Voice of the Customer. Marketing Science, 12(1), 1-27, 1993.
    Hadad, Y., L. Friedman, Z. Sinuany-Stern, and A. Mehrez. DEA Super Efficiency Multistage Ranking. Computer Modelling & New Technologies, 7(1), 37-46, 2003.
    Hauser, J. R., and D. Clausing. The House of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3), 63-73, 1988.
    Jariri, F., and S. H. Zegordi. Quality Function Deployment Planning for Platform Design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(5-6), 419-30, 2008.
    Karlsson, J. Managing Software Requirements Using Quality Function Deployment. Software Quality Journal, 6(4), 311-25, 1997.

    Kleinschmidt, E. J., and R. G. Cooper. The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 240-51, 1991.
    Krishnan, V., and K. T. Ulrich. Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature. Management Science, 47(1), 1-21, 2001.
    Lai, X., K. C. Tan, and M. Xie. Optimizing Product Design Using Quantitative Quality Function Donloyment: A Case Study. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23(1), 45-57, 2007.
    Lewin, A. Y., and J. W. Minton. Determining Organizational-Effectiveness - Another Look, and an Agenda for Research. Management Science, 32(5), 514-38, 1986.
    Linton, J. D., J. Morabito, and J. S. Yeomans. An Extension to a DEA Support System Used for Assessing R&D Projects. R & D Management, 37(1), 29-36, 2007.
    Lockamy, A., and A. Khurana. Quality Function Deployment: Total Quality Management for New Product Design. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12(6), 73-84, 1995.
    Mehrabian, S., M. R. Alirezaee, and G. R. Jahanshahloo. A Complete Efficiency Ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Computational Optimization and Applications, 14(2), 261-66, 1999.
    Mehrabian, S., G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. R. Alirezaee, and G. R. Amin. An Assurance Interval for the Non-Archimedean Epsilon in DEA Models. Operations Research, 48(2), 344-47, 2000.
    Park, T., and K. Kim. Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality. Journal of Operations Management, 16(5), 569-81, 1998.
    Poolton, J., and I. Barclay. New Product Development from Past Research to Future Applications. Industrial Marketing Management, 27(3), 197-212, 1998.
    Rosas-Vega, R., and R. J. Vokurka. New Product Introduction Delays in the Computer Industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(3-4), 157-63, 2000.
    Saren, M. A. A Classification and Review of Models of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process. R & D Management, 14(1), 11-24, 1984.
    Seiford, L. M., and J. Zhu. Infeasibility of Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Models. Infor, 37(2), 174-87, 1999.
    Sexton, T.R., R.H. Slinkman, and A.J. Hogan. Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 32, 73-105, 1986.
    Song, X. M., and M. M. Montoya-Weiss. Critical Development Activities for Really New Versus Incremental Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124-35, 1998.

    Stewart, T. J. Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(5), 654-65, 1996.
    Thompson, R. G., L. N. Langemeier, C. T. Lee, E. Lee, and R. M. Thrall. The Role of Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1-2), 93-108, 1990.
    Troy, L. C., D. M. Szymanski, and P. R. Varadarajan. Generating New Product Ideas: An Initial Investigation of the Role of Market Information and Organizational Characteristics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 89-101, 2001.
    Tzokas, N., E. J. Hultink, and S. Hart. Navigating the New Product Development Process. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(7), 619-26, 2004.
    Van de Poel, I. Methodological Problems in QFD and Directions for Future Development. Research in Engineering Design, 18(1), 2007.
    Vonderembse, M., T. Van Fossen, and T.S. Raghunathan. Is Quality Function Deployment? Good for Product Development Forty Companies Say Yes. Quality Management Journal, 4, 65–79, 1997.
    Wasserman, G. S. On How to Prioritize Design Requirements During the QFD Planning Process. IIE Transactions, 25(3), 59-65, 1993.
    Zirger, B. J., and M. A. Maidique. A Model of New Product Development - an Empirical-Test. Management Science, 36(7), 867-83, 1990.

    下載圖示
    2009-06-29公開
    QR CODE