工業聚落(industrial village)空間係由工作生產與居住生活緊密互動而形成，而聚落內不同類型與數量的居住單元反映了不同階段的產業活動所衍生的居住需求，最終此種空間發展與互動模式構成了特殊的聚落空間構成現象。在空間上，工業聚落承接了工人住宅(workers' housing)的居住形式並建立空間配置的規則；產業的發展伴隨著都市的擴張，佔有廣大面積的工業聚落影響了工業城市(industrial city)的空間發展。近年來隨著產業轉型或工廠的停閉，在都市核心中釋出了大面積以生產為目的規劃，並且各項生活機能與設施完整的土地。因此，如何合理運用既有工業聚落空間，成為了工業城市下個階段的都市規劃的重要課題。然而，現階段的再發展策略多以建築物或土地為單位。若能延續過往累積的空間形塑，讓活動單元的特色得以發揮，或可使得投入修復或發展成本後，產生更大的效益。
爰此，為突破現階段工業聚落在大尺度上以機能區分空間或在小尺度上以建築風格、構造等單點特徵分析之方法。本研究嘗試透過活動分類空間單元並且以系統性之分析方法解讀工業聚落空間。研究方法首先以都市空間構成理論為基礎，分析工業聚落空間的元素、階層與網路關係。其次，以拓樸與空間型構法則從實質環境指認各類型居住單元及其構成的空間系統，並且以平均深度(Mean Depth)為描述整體與局部空間系統之量化指標。最後，輔以工業聚落之發展脈絡與空間特徵，歸納空間構成分析結果。實證範圍經清查與歸納台灣現有之工業聚落，篩選為中油宏南宏毅宿舍群。
研究發現，(1)在整體空間系統上，接近宿舍區出入口與邊界處不易建構空間認知(spatial cognition)，具有活動不易產生、缺乏方向性等空間特徵；而接近宿舍之區位中心處為人們較容易辨認方向並產生活動之區域，因此宿舍區具有較強的向心性。(2)以在局部空間系統部分，雖同為中油高雄煉油廠之宿舍區，但三個區域間的局部系統卻具有顯著差異。在宏南宿舍區中以建築物局部空間系統之核心，街道為邊界；在宏毅宿舍區中則以街道為核心，臨街的建築物為邊界，形成局部系統。(3)宏南宏毅宿舍群之空間發展可分為準備期(1942-1945年)、發展期(1946-1968年)、停滯期(1969-1982年)、安定期(1982-2015年)四個階段，居住單元之空間階層與半私密性之過渡空間隨著發展階段的演進減少且類型趨向單一。從活動空間的角度檢視工業聚落空間，可以歸納出構成宿舍空間的基本單元，並且單元的組成反映了各個階段的產業活動變化，此研究成果或可做為工業聚落保存或再發展之策略與投入規模之參考。

The industrial settlement space is formed by the close interaction between work, production and residential life. In this process, this spatial development and interactive mode constitute a unique settlement space constitutes a phenomenon. In terms of space, the development of the industry is accompanied by the expansion of cities, and the large-scale industrial settlements have affected the spatial development of industrial cities. In recent years, with industrial transformation or the closure of factories, the land of industrial settlements was released. Therefore, rationally using the existing industrial settlement space has become an essential topic in the next stage of urban planning for industrial cities. However, the current redevelopment strategy is mostly based on buildings or land. Suppose the spatial shaping accumulated in the past can be continued. In that case, the characteristics of the activity unit can be brought into play, or greater benefits can be generated after the investment in repair or development costs.
This research attempts to interpret the space of industrial settlements through the classification of spatial units of activities and a systematic analysis method. This research found that (1) In terms of the overall spatial system, it is not easy to construct spatial cognition near the entrance and border of the dormitory area; and the location centre near the dormitory is an area where people can easily recognize the direction and generate activities. (2) In the part of the local space system. In the Hongnan dormitory area, the building is the core of the local system; in the Hongyi dormitory area, the street is the core of the local system. (3) The spatial development of Hongnan Hongyi's dormitory group can be divided into four stages. The transitional space between the spatial hierarchy and semi-privacy of residential units decreases with the evolution of the development stage and tends to be unitary. To sum up, the aforementioned research results may be used as a reference for the strategy and investment scale of the preservation or redevelopment of industrial settlements.

Al Sayed, K. (2014). Space Syntax methodology. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Bordens, K. S. & Abbott, B. B. (2005). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill College
Bernard, H. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Chen, C-H. & Chen, C-Y. (2017, July). City-like settlement to industrial city A case of urban transformation in Huwei township. The 24th International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF 2017), Valencia Spain.
Conzen, M.R.G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in Town-plan Analysis. London, UK: The institute of British Geographers.
Conzen, M. R. G. (1985). Morphogenesis and Structure of the Historic Townscape in Britain. Thinking about urban form: Papers on Urban Morphology, 1932-1988, 60-77. London, England: European Academic Publishers.
Cullen, G. (1995). The Concise Townscape. New York: Architectural Press.
Engles, F. (1845) “The Great Towns” from The Condition of the Working Class in England. LeGates, R.T.& Stout, F.(eds). The City Reader (pp.46-55). London, England: Routledge.
Eisner, S.& Gallion, A. (1964) The Urban Pattern City Planning and Design. New York: Wiley.
Garner, J.(ed.). (1992). The Company Town: Architecture and Society in the Early Industrial Age. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Gehl, J.(1971). Life Between Buildings－Using Public Space. Island Press.Washington, D.C.
Gehl, J. &Svarre, B. (2013). How to Study Public Life. Island Press. Washington, D.C.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J., Graham, H. (1987). Ideas are in Things: An Application of the Space Syntax Method to Discovering House Genotypes. Evironment and Planning: Planning and Design, (14), 363-385.
Hillier, B. (1996). Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B. (1999). The Need for Domain Theories. Evironment and Planning: Planning and Design, (26), 163-167.
Hillier, B. & Tzortzi, K. (2006).Space syntax: the language of museum space. In Sharon, M. (Ed), A Companion to Museum Studies (pp.282-301). United Kingdom: Routledge.
Hillier, B. (2012). Studying Cities to Learn about Minds: Some Possible Implications of Space Syntax for Spatial Cognition. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39, 12-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/b34047t.
Hillier, B. (2016). What are cities for-And how does this relate to their spatial form. Journal of Space syntax, (6)2, 199-212.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, NY: Random House.
Garner, J.(ed.). (1992) The Company Town: Architecture and Society in the Early Industrial Age. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Koter, M. (1990). The Morphological Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century City Centre: Łódź, Poland 1825-1973. In Slater, T. R. (ed.), The Built Form of Western Cities: Essays for M.R.G. Conzen on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday (pp. 107-141). London: Leicester Univ Pr.
Kieb, W. (1992) Urbanismus im Industriezeitalter: Von der klassizistischen Stadt zur Garden City. Germany: Axel Menges.
Kropf, K. (1998). Typological Zoning. In Petruccioli, A. (ed) Typological Process and Design(pp.127-140). Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture.
Kropf, K. (2009). Aspects of urban form. Urban morphology, 13(2), 105-20.
Kropf. K. (2013). Ambiguity in the definition of built form. Urban morphology, 18(1), 41-57.
Kropf, K. (2017). The Handbook of Urban Morphology. United Kingdom: Wiley.
Karimi, K. (2012). A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology. URBAN DESIGN International, 17(4), 297-318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19.
Karimi, K. (2017) Space syntax: consolidation and transformation of an urban research field. Journal of Urban Design, 23, 1-4.
Kikata, J., Nakae, K., Yokokawa, H., ＆Okada, H. (2016). Assimilation of the Industrial Village concept by Japanese business circles at the turn of the 20th Century. In Hein, C. History Urbanism Resilience: Vol. 02. The Urban Fabric (pp. 353-364). Delft, Netherlands: TU Delft. Doi:10.7480/ 978-94-92516-09-1
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Moudon, A.V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban morphology, 1, 3-10.
Morisset, L. K. (2017). From Town-building to Society-making: Company Towns in Canada. Journal of the Society for the Study of Architecture in Canada. 42(1). 42-60.
Teixeira, M. (2014, July) The ‘ilhas’ of Oporto, a fundamental component of the city’s nineteenth century urban morphology. Our common future in UrbanMorphology (ISUF 2014). FEUP, Porto.
Santi, M. &Laiola, G. (2019). Retrofitting Company Towns’ residential buildings: from international best practices to local implementations in Friuli Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy). International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, 4(2),13-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2019.11158
Oswald, F. & Baccini, P. (2004). Netzstadt: Designing the Urban. Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
Oliveria, V. (2018). Introduction. In Oliveria, V (Ed.), Teaching Urban Morphology (pp.1-8). Germany: Springer.
Psarra, S., Kostourou, F. & Krenz, K. (2018). A Bisociative Approach to Design: Integrating Space Syntax into Architectural Education. In Oliveria, V (Ed.), Teaching Urban Morphology (pp.221-242). Germany: Springer.
Porteous, J. D. (1970). The Nature of the Company Town. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 50, 127-142.
Raith, E. (2000). Stadtmorphologie: Annäherungen, Umsetzungen, Aussichten. Australia: Springer.
Schwarz, G. (1959). Allgemeine Siedlungsgeographie. Berlin, Germany: Walter D. Gruyter.
Scheer, B. C. (2016). The epistemology of urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 20, 5-17.
Santi, M.V.& Laiola, G. (2019) Retrofitting of Company Towns’ residential buildings: from international best practices to local implementations in Friuli Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy). International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability. (4)2, 13-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2019.11158
Varini, V. (2016). Building an industrial society: welfare capitalism in the ‘city of factories’, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy. European Review of History. (23)4, 724-750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2016.1154928
Yorifusa Ishida. (1990). Japanese industrial villages and a reformist factory owner. Journal Planning Perspectives. (5)3, 295-305.
Zhai,.Y & Baran,.P (2013, October) Application of Space Syntax Theory in Study of Urban Parks and Walking. 2013 International Space Syntax Symposium. Seoul, Korea.
沙學浚 (1974)。城市與似城聚落。臺北市：正中。
汪文聖 (2001)。現象學方法理論與反思：一個質性方法介紹。應用心理研究，(12)，49-76。
李琦華、林豐田 (2007)。台灣聚落的空間型構法則分析。中華民國建築學會建築學報，60，27-45。
林身振、林炳炎(2013)。第六海軍燃料廠探索-台灣石油/石化工業發展基礎。高雄市：春暉。
洪紹洋 (2015)。產業與社會：高雄煉油廠相關文獻解題，高雄文獻，152-164。
胡振洲 (1977)。聚落地理學。臺北，三民。
吳昱瑩 (2018)。圖解台灣日式住宅建築。臺中市：晨星。
陳志宏 (2018)。研訂雲林縣虎尾都市計畫糖業風貌專用區都市設計準則案成果報告書。雲林縣政府委託研究。雲林縣：雲林縣政府。
郭瓊瑩 (2012)。都市可以被「設計」嗎？--論「都市設計」政策與都市發展間之矛盾與蛻變。臺灣建築學會會刊雜誌，66，11-23。
郭中端 (2017)。中油宏南宏毅宿舍群文化景觀保存維護計畫既保存計畫整體規劃成果報告書。高雄市政府文化局委託研究。高雄市：高雄市政府文化局。
堀込憲二 (2007)。日式木造宿舍-修復．再利用．解說手冊。行政院文化建設委員會委託研究。臺中市：文化部文化資產局。
張瑞宗(主編) (2016)。70年來之中油公司。臺北市：台灣中油。
鄭水萍 (2000)。後勁大代誌。高雄市：高雄市立中正文化中心。
蔡偉銑 (1997)。台灣石化工業發展過程的政治經濟分析。東吳政治學報，8，57-224。
劉淑芬(譯) (1991)。建築設計資料集成 都市-區域9 (原作者：日本建築學會編)。台北市：茂榮圖書有限公司。
薛琴 (2000)。臺北市日式宿舍調查研究專案報告書。台北市政府民政局委託研究。臺北市：臺北市政府民政局。
賴光邦 (2001)。日治時期台灣製鹽工廠社區暨其聚落空間變遷之研究成果報告。(編號：NSC90－2211－E－006－093－)，未出版。
蘇智鋒 (1999)。空間型態之內在組構邏輯SPACE SYNTAX 之介紹。載於陳鈺蕙(主編)，建築向度－設計與理論數位與文化 (45-53頁)。臺北市：田園城市。
蘇智鋒 (2005年11月)。空間型構基因導論 SPACE SYNTAX (空間型構法則分析)之運用。第五屆建築生產及管理技術研討會，台中逢甲大學。
穆佩芬 (1996)。現象學研究法。護理研究，4(2)，195-202。
蕭家興 (2008)。社區規劃學：住宅建築社區化之規劃。臺北市：唐山出版社。
貳、學位論文
王文安 (1987)。光復臺灣居住空間型態的演變與未來發展之研究。淡江大學建築研究所學位論文(碩士論文)。
林怡芳 (2008)。蒜頭糖廠職住型聚落的生活方式(1910-2001)。國立高雄師範大學地理學系學位論文(碩士論文)。
周禹晴 (2018)。台灣增生式集合住宅形態類型學研究-以黃埔新村家戶單元之類型程序為例。國立成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文(碩士論文)。
陳信安 (2004)。台灣總督府官舍建築標準之研究。國立成功大學建築系學位論文(博士論文)。
陳佩琪 (2000)。日治時期台灣新式製糖工場空間之研究。國立成功大學建築研究所學位論文。(碩士論文)。
陳春得 (2006)。社區環境空間歷史變遷-以高雄煉油廠區員工宿舍為例。樹德科技大學建築與古蹟維護所學位論文(碩士論文)。
許經緯 (2010)。探討北高雄歷史工業聚落的發展歷程與時代挑戰 - 以台灣中油高雄煉油廠員工宿舍區再發展為例。國立高雄大學都市發展與建築研究所學位論文(碩士論文)。
曾裕恆 (1996)。台灣住宅社區演變與發展之研究。國立成功大學建築研究所學位論文。(碩士論文)。