本研究企圖由實證研究台灣高科技產業之組織溝通對技術策略、技術能力與創新績效關聯性之影響。以中華徵信所2007 年出版的「台灣地區大型企業排名TOP5000」中的高科技產業公司，並以中高階技術主管為受訪對象進行抽樣，發放600 份問卷，回收有效問卷為158 份，有效問卷回收率為26.3﹪。
本研究根據研究目的與研究假設，並且使用因素分析、相關分析、迴歸分析及差異性分析等資料分析方法，將問卷結果加以分析、歸納與解釋經由迴歸分析驗證研究假設，並得到以下結論：
一、 經實證結果發現，技術多角化程度會顯著的影響到企業技術能力的表現。
二、 本研究實證探討可知，技術能力會顯著影響到企業創新績效層面的表現。
三、 在本研究結果發現，技術多角化程度會顯著影響到企業創新績效層面的
表現。
四、 經實證結果發現，技術能力對於企業在技術策略的活動發展與企業創新
績效之間，扮演著顯著的中介作用角色。
五、 本研究實證探討發現，組織溝通對於企業在技術多角化發展與企業的技
術能力之間，存在著顯著的關鍵交互作用。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the high technological industry in Taiwan
with an empirical study of relationships among organizational communication,
technological strategy, technological capacity and innovation performance. The samples of this study collects the high technological industry listed in Taiwan Top 5,000 Firms that published on 2007 by China Credit Information Service,Ltd.
According to research purposes and hypotheses, this research use Factor Analysis
and Reliability Analysis, Correlation analysis, Regression analysis and ANOVA to
analyze, summarize, explain the data derived from questionnaires , and then test
hypotheses by regression models. Finally, we reach/obtain conclusions as follows:
1. The technological diversitifity has the significantly positive effect on technological
capacity.
2. The technological capacity has the significantly positive effect on innovation
performance.
3. The technological diversitifity has the significantly positive effect on innovation
performance.
4. According to the empirical analysis results, mutual influences exist between
technological capacity and technological strategy and innovation performance.
5. The empirical analysis also reveals that mutual influences exist between organizational communication and technological diversitifity and technological capacity.

一、中文部份
1. 丁錫鏞(1992)，「現代科技管理學」，嵐德出版社。
2. 王明妤、袁建中(1992)，「國際策略聯盟成效的影響因素分析－以新竹科學園區為例」，科技管理研討會。
3. 司徒達賢(1995)，「資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討」(國科會，No.NSC82-0301-H-110-040)，台北：行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
4. 吳青松(1990)，「本國產業策略聯盟結構與績效之評估」，發表於產業科技研究發展管理研討會，台北：中國生產力中心。
5. 吳思華(1996)，「策略九說-策略思考的本質」，初版，麥田出版社，台北。
6. 吳萬益、汪昭芬(2000)，「組織學習、知識創造、知識蘊蓄與創新績效之關聯性研究: 科技製造業、一般製造業及服務業之實證」，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7. 李信勇(2001)，「以資源基礎理論探討電子商務經營之成功要素—策略矩陣分析法之應用」，朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8. 李國瑋(2000)，「相關知識環境變動程度，業務型態對組織動態能耐演化影響之研究~~以台灣無線通訊廠商專案團隊為例」，輔仁大學管理研究所碩士論文。
9. 佘日新、梁家隆、陳厚銘(2000)，「廠商如何經由國外夥伴之技術合作提昇企業技術能力－以臺灣資訊電子廠商為例」，管理學報，第十七卷第二期，297-316頁(TSSCI) 。
10.林文成(1995)，「台灣育成中心模式之研究─科技研發成果商品化的培育措施」，交大科技管理研究所碩士論文。
11.洪德芳(1993)，「高科技企業技術策略與行銷策略配合對新產品發展績效關係影響之研究」，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
12.張保隆、蔡千姿(2001)，「台灣電子產業技術發展階段模式之研究---採技術能力與技術策略互動觀點」，交通大學經營管理研究所博士論文。
13.莊立民(2002)，「組織創新模式與實證之研究-以台灣資訊電子業為例」，成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
14.陳芙靜(2002)，「技術/行銷策略配合、產品創新性、產品創新績效三者間關係之研究」，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.溫偉利(1996)，「技術環境、技術策略與技術發展績效關係之研究:以台灣汽車電子零組件產業為例」，政大企管所碩士論文。
16.經濟部網站：
http://w2kdmz1.moea.gov.tw/user/news/detail-1.asp?kind=4&id=13344
17.劉常勇、唐人璠(2003) ，「企業多角化內部創業經營策略之研究──以
電信業工程部門為例」，中山大學企業管理學系碩士班論文。
18.蔡兆哲(1995)，「企業技術能力，海外投資動機/方式，投資環境與技術
移轉績效關係之研究」，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
19.蔡明田(2001)，「CEO 外部環境認知對技術政策，創新績效、與組織績效
影響之研究」， 國科會計劃編號： NSC89-2416-H006-062 。
20.蔡明田、顏仲億(2007)，「技術多角化與創新績效、技術折損之關連性研
究」，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
21.鄭伶如(2004)，「技術情境與策略規劃整合性模式之研究」，管理與系統
ISSN 1023-9863，第十一卷第四期，541-558頁。
22.謝良武(1997)，「我國半導體製造業技術策略之研究」，中興大學企業管
理研究所碩士論文
23.謝龍發(1993)，「我國商參與政府主導共同研究發展聯盟的動機、類型和
管理機制的相關研究」，政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
24.謝龍發(1997)，「科技管理」，國立空中大學，民八十六年，374-375頁。
二、英文部份
1. Aulake, P. S., Masaaki, K., & Arrind, S. (1996), Trust and performance in cross-broder marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5),1005-1032.
2. Barney, J.B.,(1991), “Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage,”Journal of Management, Vol. 17(1), pp.99-120.
3. Barney, J.B.,(1997), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage,Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
4. Beamish, P. (1984), Joint venture performance in developing countries.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Dntario, New York.
5. Bettis, R. A. & Hitt, M. A. (1995),“The new competitive landscape.” Strategic Management Journal, (Summer special issue) 16: 7-20.
6. Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F. (2003), Knowledge-Relatedness in Firm Technological Diversification. Research Policy 32: 69-87.
7. Bruce, M.L., Leverick, F. and Wilson, D., (1995), “Success of Factor Collaboration Produce Development: A Study of Supplier of Information Communication, Technology,” R&D Management, 25(1), pp.33-34.
8. Chanaron, J. J. & Perrin, J. (1987), “The transfer of research, development and design todeveloping countries.” Futures, 503-512.
9. Chandler G.N. & S.Hanks(1994),Founder Competence, the Environment & VenturePerformance, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,18(3),pp.77-89.
10. Chandler, A. D. (1962),Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chen,C.(陳忠仁) and B. Lin(林博文), 2004, "The effects of environment,knowledge attribute, organizational climate, and firm characteristics on knowledge sourcing decision", R&D Management, 34(2), Pages 137-146.(SSCI).
12. Clark K. (1987), Investment in New Technology and Competitive Advantage.In: Teece D.(Ed.), The Competitive Challenge. Ballinger. Cambride, MA.
13. Clark, K., Ford, D., Saren, M., (1989), “Company TechnologyStategies”, R&T Manaement,Vol. 19, No. 3, pp.215-229.
14. Covin J., Slevin D., Covin T. (1990), Content and Performance of Growth-Seeking Strategies: a Comparison of Small Firms in High- and Low-Technology Industries. J Bus Venturing 5(6): 391-412.
15. Danila, N.,(1989), “Strategic Evolution and Selection of R&D Projects”, D&D Management, Vol. 19, Jan., pp.47-62.
16. Day,G.eorge S. (1994),〝The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations〞,
Journal of Marketing ,Vol.58(October), pp.37-52.
17. Devlin, G. And Bleackley, M.,(1988), “Strategic Alliance-Guidelines for
Success”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp.18-23.
18. Dodgson, Mark,(1993), Technological Collaboration in Industry, London,
Routledge
19. Dollinger, M. J. (1995), Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources. Boston,MA: Irwin.
20. Gallon, Mark R., Stillman, Harold M. and Coats, David, May-June (1995),”PuttingCore Competency Thinking to Practice.” Technology Management,pp.20-28.
21. Garcia-Vega M. (2006), Does Technological Dversification Promote Innovation? An Empirical Analysis for European Firms. Research Policy 35:230-246.
22. Granstrand O, Oskarsson C. (1994),Technology Diversification in“MUL-TECH” Corporations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Managemen 41(4): 355-364.
23. Granstrand O, Sjölander S. (1990), Managing Innovation in Multi-Technology Corporations. Research Policy 19: 35-60.
24. Grant, R. M., (1991), The Resources-Based Theory of Competitive dvantage:Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, Vol. 33.Spring p.115.
25. Grindley P.C., Teece D.J. (1997), Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics. Calif Manage Rev 29(2): 8-41.
26. Hamel, G. & C. K. Prahalad (1994), Competing for The future—Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
27. Hamel, G. and Prahala, C. K.,(1995) , Competing for Future 競爭大未來，顧淑馨譯，智庫文化股份有限公司，台北.
28. Hamel. G, (2000), Leading the Revolution 啟動革命，李田樹、李芳齡譯，天下遠見出版有限公司，台北.
29. Henderson and Clark (1990), Architectural Innovation：The Reconfiguration of Existing , Administrative Science Quarterly, Ithaca; Mar 1990; Vol. 35, Iss.1; pg. 9, 22 pgs.
30. Itami H. (1987), Mobilizing invisible assets. Havard University. Press,
Cambridge, MA.
31. Jao, I.Y., (1997),The Interaction-Learning Effects in Cross-Border Manufacturing Alliances, The First International Management Conference,National Chi-Nan University, Puli, Taiwan.
32. Kodama F. 1986. Technological Diversification of Japanese Industry. Science 233(4761): 291-296.
33. Lado, A.A., Boyd, N.G.and Wright, P., 1992, A Competency-Base Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Toward a Conceptual Integration,Journal of Management , Vol.18(1), pp 77-91.
34. Lee, J., Bae, Z. T. & Choi, D. K. (1988),Technology development Process: A model for a developing country with a global perspective. R&D Management,
35. Lerner J. 1994. The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis. The Rand Journal of Economics 25(2): 319-333.
36. Li ﹐ T. & Calantone ﹐ R.J. ﹐ (1998),The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination, Journal of Marketing, Vol.62, pp.13-29. October.
37. Luchsinger, V. P., 1990, Managing Technological Transfer and Innovation:The Small Business Innovation Research Program, in Khalil T. and Bayarktar B.(ed), Management of Technology II, Industrial Engineering and Management Press, U.S.A., pp.15-22.
38. Malerba F, Orsenigo L. 1996. Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation Are Technology-Specific. Research Policy 25: 451-478.
39. Malerba F, Orsenigo L. 1999. Technological Entry, Exit and Survival: An Empirical Analysis of Patent Data. Research Policy 28: 643-660.
40. Morris, D. and Hergert, M., (1987), Trends in International Collaborative Agreements, Columbia Journal of World Business, pp.15-27.
41. Nelson R.R. (1991), Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does It Matter? Strategic Manage Journal 12: 61-74.
42. Nelson RR. (1959), The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. The Journal of Political Economy 67(3): 297-306.
43. Page R., Wiersema M. (1992), Entrepreneurial Strategies and Radical Innovation: A Punctuated Disequilibrium Approach. J High Technol Manage Reviews 3(1): 65-81.
44. Perlmutter, H. V., David, A. H. ,(1986),Cooperate to Compete Globally,Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr., pp.136-152.
45. Porter, M. E., (1985), Technology and competitive strategy, in Competitive Advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, Chapter 5, Free Press, New York.
46. Prahalad, C. K. & G. Hamel (1990), The Core Competence of the Corporation,Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
47. Prahalad, C. K. & R. A. Bettis (1986) ,The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diversity and Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 7(10),485-501.
48. Rosenberg and Firschtak(1985), International Technology Transfer: Concepts Measures and Comparisons, New York: Praeger.
49. Sharder, R. C. & Simon, M.(1997), Corporate versus independent new ventures: resource, strategy and performance differences. Journal of Business Venturing, 12: 47-66.
50. Shikhar, S. and Vijay, M. (2001), The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams, Journal of Marketing, vol.44, pp.28-46.
51. Smilor, R. and Gibson, D., (1991), Accelerating technology transfer in R&D consortia, Research Technology Management,vol.35,no.1, pp.44-49.
52. Smilor, R. and Gibson, D., (1991), Accelerating technology transfer in R&D consortia, Research Technology Management,vol.35,no.1, pp.44-49 .
53. Smith, J. B., & Barclay, D. W. (1997), The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationship.Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 3-21.
54. Song, M. & Montoya-Weiss (2001), The Effect of Perceived Technological Uncertainty on Japanese New Product Development, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, Iss.1, pp. 61-80.
55. Souder, W. E., Daniel Sherman J., & Davies-Cooper, R., (1998),Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Integration, and New Product Development Effectiveness: A Test of Contingency Theory, Journal of Product Innovation Management 15, pp.520-433.
56. Souder, W. E.,(1987), Managing new product innovations, Lexington Mass.,pp.83-98.
57. Sounder, W. E. And Nassor, S., (1990), Managing R&D Consortia for Success, Research Technology Management, Sep.-Oct., pp.44-50.
58. Steel, L.W. (1989), Managing Technology, New York: McGraw Hill Book company.
59. TAT(Technology Atlas Team), (1987), Components of Technology for Resources Transformation, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.32, pp.19-35.
60. Tirole J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press.Cambridge.
61. Wernerfelt, B., (1984), A Resource-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5(1), pp.171-180.
62. Wilfred Schoenmakers and Geert Duysters(2006),Learning in strategic technology alliances.Technology, Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 18, No. 2,245-264.
63. Wong, J. K.（1995）, Technology Transfer in Thailand：Descriptive Validation of a Technology Transfer Model, International Journal of Technology Management,10(7/8),pp.788-796.
64.Wolf, M.F., (1994), Building Trust in Alliances, Research Technology Management, pp.12-15.
65. Zahra, S. A., (1996), Technology Strategy and New Venture Performance: a Study of Corporate-Sponsored and Independent Biotechnology Ventures,Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 11, Jul., pp.289-.