國內機場跑道大多是剛性鋪面，若達到使用年限而產生裂縫(cracking)、落差(fault)、填縫料老化等破壞狀況，可能影響飛機起降安全與旅客舒適度，在原有道面上加鋪柔性鋪面是一個值得考量的方向，為穩固鋪面結構，面層需使用耐航機荷重的材料。本研究選採用改質III型瀝青搭配美國民航局(FAA)之機場密級配級配規範(P401)和AAPTP報告建議之機場石膠泥瀝青混凝土(SMA)級配規範，三種不同標稱最大粒徑(NMAS 9.5、12.5和19mm)天然料進行SMA配合設計，並使用NMAS 19mm標稱最大粒徑同時比較天然料和轉爐石密級配瀝青混凝土配合設計。在各項試驗中，使用鋪砂法量測巨觀紋理與英式擺錘(BPN)量測微觀紋理來進行鋪面抗滑評估，使用飛散磨耗試驗進行各級配剝脫性質評估以模擬機場跑道異物損害(FOD)，並以不同浸水養治時間天數之車轍試體進行輪跡試驗以評估其抵抗水侵害之能力，進而篩選符合機場跑道高載量、高安全性與高使用壽命之瀝青混凝土鋪面。
本實驗五種級配於工程性質比較中並無明顯的差異，於抗滑性比較中，NMAS 19mm之SMA有相對優異的績效表現，機場跑道鋪面需要提供飛機降落時有良好的摩擦能力，以使的飛機能較快速且安全的降低速度而離開跑道，因此抗滑性質在此非常重要。由抗水侵害性質的比較中可看出，車轍深度雖然有優異差別，但因車轍深度皆小於2mm，實則五種級配皆有相當良好的抗車轍能力，剝脫性質試驗則是評估機場跑道另一項重點，FOD是機場跑道安全的重要議題，從實驗比較中知，剝脫性質隨著標稱最大粒徑的上升而提高，因此使用標稱粒徑19mm級配就有較高的異物損害風險。綜合以上結果，由本實驗的成果建議使用轉爐石取代天然料粗粒料之機場密集配作為機場跑道鋪面的基底強化層用以承受飛機之高載重以提高跑道的使用壽命，並使用NMAS 12.5之SMA作為跑道的磨耗層以提供飛機足夠的摩擦力與抗異物損害的安全性。

Domestic airport is mostly rigid pavement of the runway, if they meet the useful life and the Crack (cracking) And the fall (fault) , Fillers and aging damage condition may affect aircraft taking off and landing for security and passenger comfort, the existing road surface paving on flexible pavements is a direction worth considering, for a solid pavement, surface aircraft load resistance of materials you want to use. This study adopts modification III -type asphalt mix United States civil aviation authorities (FAA) airport of dense graded specifications (P401) and AAPTP Report recommended that the airport of stone mastic asphalt (SMA) grading specifications, nominal maximum size of three different (NMAS 9.5, and12.5 and 19mm) natural material SMA with the design, and uses the NMAS 19mm nominal maximum particle size and compare natural stone and converter dense asphalt concrete mix design . In the experiment, using sand texture measurement view and British Pendulum Number (BPN) micro-textured pavement skid resistance evaluation to measurement, use cantabro test evaluation at all levels enjoy stripping in nature with the simulation of airport runway foreign object damage (FOD), And different days Cure time soaking wheel track rutting test of ability of the test to assess their resistance against water and filter meet runway high load, high security and high service life of asphalt concrete pavements.
This experiment five graded on engineering properties of no significant difference in the comparison, in comparison of slip resistance, NMAS 19mm SMA Relative excellent performance, airport runway paving need to provide the aircraft when landing the ability of friction, so that aircraft can quickly and safely slow down the runway, so anti-sliding property in this very important. By anti-water against nature of comparison in the can seen, rut depth although has excellent differences, but due to rut depth are is less than 2mm, actually five kind of level enjoy are has quite good of anti-rut capacity, stripping nature test is assessment airport runway other a items focus,FOD is airport runway security of important issues, from experimental comparison in the know, stripping nature as nominal maximum grain diameter of rose and improve, Nominal diameter 19mm grade has a higher risk of foreign object damage. Integrated above results, by this experimental of results recommendations using BOF replaced natural material rough grain material of airport intensive enjoy as airport runway paving of basement strengthened layer to bear aircraft of high load to improve of using life, and using NMAS 12.5 of SMA as runway of wear layer to provides aircraft enough of friction and against FOD of security.

參考文獻

王金鐘 (2005) 轉爐石作為基底層材料及其工程特性之研究，博士論文，國立成功大學土木工程系，台南。

中華鋪面工程學會 (2004) 「第六屆鋪面材料再生學術研討會論文集」，桃園。

中華鋪面工程學會 (2010) 「轉爐石應用於瀝青混凝土鋪面使用手冊」，第11-13頁。

李育成(2012)鋼鐵冶煉製程爐石副產品礦物特徵與性質介紹，高雄。

沈金安 (1999)「改性瀝青與SMA路面」，人民交通出版社，中國。

Bagampadde, U., AI-Abdul Wahhab, H. I., and Aiban, S. A. (1999). “Optimization of Steel Slag Aggregate for Bituminous Mixes in Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 11, n 1, pp. 30-35.

Brown, E.R. and Mallick, R.B., (1995). “Evaluation of Stone-on-Stone Contact in Stone Matrix Asphalt,” Transportation Research Board：Journal of Transportation Research Record 1492, pp.208-215.

Brown, E.R., Haddock, J.E., Mallick, R.B., and Lynn, T.A., (1997). “Development of a Mixture Design Procedure for Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA), ” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol.66, pp.1-30.

Elsenaar, P. M. W., Reichert, J. and Sauterey, R., (1976). “Pavement Characteristics and Skid Resistance,” Transportation Research Record 622, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences.

Lynn, T.A., Brown, E.R., and Cooley, L.A., (1999). “Evaluation of Aggregate Size Characteristics in Stone Matrix Asphalt and Superpave Mixtures,” Transportation Research Board：Journal of Transportation Research Record 1681, pp.19-27.

Nikolaids, A., (2000). “Rutting and Volumetric Properties of SMA Mixture, ”Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers Transport, Vol.141, No.3, pp.135-141.

Prowell, B., Watson, D.E., Hurley, G.C. and Brown, E.R. (2009). “Evaluation of Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) for Airfield Pavements,” Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program, AAPTP04-04, Final report Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

Vavrik, W.R., Pine, W.J., Huber, G., Carpenter, Samuel,　H., Bailey, R., (2001). “The Bailey method of gradation evaluation: The Influence of Aggregate Gradation and Packing Characteristics on Voids in The Mineral Aggregate,” Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists of the Technical Sessions, Vol.70, pp.132-175.