簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許東讚
Hsu, Dong-tzann
論文名稱: 人格特質、創業精神與創業績效之關連性探討
The Relationship among Personality Traits, Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Performance
指導教授: 蔡明田
Tsai, Ming-tien
康信鴻
Kang, Hsin-hong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 創業精神人格特質創業績效
外文關鍵詞: entrepreneurial performance, entrepreneurship, personality traits
相關次數: 點閱:83下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的在針對創業績效其及影響因素進行關連性探討。過去創業管理的相關研究,多從創業者的特質、創業團隊的能力、產品與技術的特性等方面進行探討。從這些研究中,雖有助於了解創業過程中該掌握的層面,但某種程度上此議題仍缺乏一較完整的探討。故藉由人格特質、創業能力、創業動機、創業精神的整合性整合,本研究針對創業績效影響因素進行較系統的探討。
    在抽樣方面,本研究共發放600份問卷,有效回收樣本104份,有效回收率為17%。本研究並進一步藉由因素分析、迴歸分析與變異數分析針對研究假設進行驗證。研究結果顯示人格特質對於創業能力、創業動機與創業精神皆有正向顯著影響。同時,創業能力、創業動機與創業精神對於創業績效皆有顯著影響。本研究並發現不同年齡層、產業別與員工數的創業者,其創業精神的內涵特質皆有顯著不同。

    The main purpose of this study is to explore the issue of entrepreneurial performance and the factors that affect the performance. In the researches of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial performance, most studies discuss the issue from the perspective of personality traits, the capability of founding team, product and market. These researches are helpful for understanding the key dimensions of entrepreneurial management. However, to a certain extent, the issue is still lack of a more complete discussion. By integrating the constructs of personality traits, entrepreneurial motivation, ability and entrepreneurship, the study explores the factors that affect entrepreneurial performance.
    In total, 600 questionnaires were sent out and 104 effective questionnaires were returned with effective recovery rate 17%. Factor analysis, regression analysis, and analysis of variance are used to examine the hypotheses furthermore. The results of the research show that personality traits, entrepreneurial motivation and ability have positive effects on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial motivation, ability and entrepreneurship have significant influence on entrepreneurial performance. In addition, the findings also show that the entrepreneurship is significant different between different age, industry and employees.

    目錄………………………………………………………………………………………Ⅰ 表目錄……………………………………………………………………………………Ⅱ 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 第壹章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………………6 第三節 研究流程……………………………………………………………………8 第四節 研究範圍……………………………………………………………………11 第貳章 文獻探討 ………………………………………………………………………12 第一節 創業與創業家………………………………………………………………12 第二節 創業精神……………………………………………………………………15 第三節 人格特質……………………………………………………………………22 第四節 創業能力……………………………………………………………………27 第五節 創業動機……………………………………………………………………34 第六節 創業績效……………………………………………………………………37 第七節 各研究構面間推論…………………………………………………………40 第參章 研究方法 ………………………………………………………………………48 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………………48 第二節 研究假設……………………………………………………………………49 第三節 問卷題項設計發展…………………………………………………………51 第四節 抽樣方法與樣本……………………………………………………………56 第五節 資料分析方法………………………………………………………………57 第肆章 資料分析結果 …………………………………………………………………59 第一節 敘述性統計分析……………………………………………………………59 第二節 信度與效度分析……………………………………………………………61 第三節 各研究構面關連性探討……………………………………………………70 第伍章 研究結論與建議 ………………………………………………………………78 第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………………78 第二節 討論與意涵…………………………………………………………………80 第三節 研究限制與未來研究發展…………………………………………………85 參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………………………86 附錄 ………………………………………………………………………………………92

    一、中文部份
    1. 鄧國良,2005,以企業創投觀點探討組織創業精神之管理模式-以IC設計產業為例,國立中山大學企管所碩士論文。

    2. 常國強,2004,組織創業精神及創新與組織績效關係之研究,國立中央大學企管所碩士論文
    3. 林正智,2004,高階經理人的社會網絡與中小企業聯盟關係之研究,國立中興大學企管所碩士論文

    4. 張金山,1990,創業行為與成就動機、家族背景之相關性研究,國立台灣大學商研所碩士論文。

    5. 魏順得,1993,台灣中小企業創業行為之研究─台灣資訊軟體業個案研究,政治大學勞工所碩士論文。

    二、西文部份
    1. Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B., 2003, “Introduction to the Handbook of
    Entrepreneurship Research”. in Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3-20.

    2.Amabile T. M., 1986, “Maintaining Children's Motivation and Creativity”,Symposium on Frontiers of Creativity Research: A Focus on Creative Learning , Buffalo, New York.

    3. Amabile T. M., 1983, The Social Psychology of Creativity, New York:
    Springer-Verlag.

    4. Bentz, B.1993, “Choosing the Right Media for 900-number Campaigns,” Telemarketing, 12(4), pp.96-102.

    5. Birkinshaw, J. 2000. Entrepreneurship in the global firm. London: Sage Publications.
    6. Bowen, D. D., and Hisrich, R. D., 1986, “The female Entrepreneur: A Career Development perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 11(2), pp.397-399.

    7. Brockhaus, R.H.,1982,“The Psychology of the Entrepreneur,” In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, and K.H. Vesper(Eds.), Encyclopedia Entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall, pp.39-71.

    8. Carland, F. H., Boulton, W. R., and Carland, J. A. C., 1984, “Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization”, Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp. 354-369.

    9. Cooper, A., 2003, “Entrepreneurship: The Past, the Present, the Future”. In Acs Z.J. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers,pp. 21-36.

    10. Cooper, C. A. and Artz, K. W., 1995, “Determinants of Satisfaction for Entrepreneurs”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10, pp. 439-457.

    11. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1988, “The Influence of Organization Structure on The Utility of An Entrepreneurial Top Management Style,” Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), pp 105-180.

    12. Davidsson, P. and Wiklund, J., 2001, “Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(2), pp. 81-99.
    13. Deniz Ucbasaran, Paul Westhead, Mike Wright, 2001 “The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process Issues,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), pp.57-80.

    14. Dollingers, M. J., 2003, Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources, Prentice Hall, (3ed.).

    15. Drucker, Peter F., Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Rye Field Publishing Co, 1995.

    16. Drucker, Peter F., Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, 1985.

    17. Elfring, T. and Hulsink, W., 2003, “Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-Technology Firms”, Small Business Economics, Vol.21, 409-422.

    18. Fong, C. M., 1995, The Effects of Organizational Characteristics on Entry Timing: A Multi-Industry Study, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Maryland.

    19. Gartner, W. B., 1985, “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation” Academy of Management Review,10 (4), pp. 696-707.

    20. Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A., 1984, “Upper Echelons: The Organization as A Reflection of Its Top Managers”, Academy of Management Review, 9,pp. 193-206.
    21. Hart, S. L. (1992). An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes. Academy of Management Reviews, 17, pp.327-351.

    22. Kirzner, I. M., 1973, Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    23. Larson, A., 1992, “Networks Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37,pp. 76-104.

    24. Low, M.B., and MacMillan, I. C., 1988, “Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges”, Journal of Management, 14 (2), 139-161.

    25. Lumpkin, G.T. and Gregory G. Dess, 1996“Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance,” Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), pp.135-72.

    26. Miller, D., 1983 “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms,” Management Science, 29,pp. 770-791.

    27. Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W. and. Hill, R. C., 1996, “Measuring Performance in Entrepreneurship Research”, Journal of Business Research, 36 (1), 15-23.

    28. Numazaki, I., 1997, “The Laoban-Led Development of Business Enterprises in Taiwan: An Analysis of the Chinese Entrepreneurship,” The Developing Economies, 35(4),pp. 440-57.
    29. Penrose, E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: John Wiley.

    30.Per Davidsson, Johan Wiklund, 2001“Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), pp.81-99.

    31. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    32. Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Translated from the German by Redvers Opie.

    33. Shane, S. A., 2005, Finding Fertile Ground: Identifying Extraordinary Opportunities for New Venture, Wharton School Publishing.

    34.Shane S., 2003, A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA.

    35.Shane, S., 2000, “Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurship Opportunities”, Organization Science, 11(4), pp.448-469.

    36.Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., 2000, “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research”. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), pp. 217-226.

    37.Shieh, G-S, 1992, "Boss" Island: The Subcontracting Network and Micro-Entrepreneurship in Taiwan’s Development, New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    38. Timmons, J. A., 1999, New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century, The McGraw-Hill.

    39. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P. and Wright, M., 2001, “The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process Issues”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (2), 57-80.

    40. Venkataraman, N., 1989“Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionslity and measurement,” Management Science, 35,, pp.942-962.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2008-07-07公開
    QR CODE