簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳明標
Wu, Ming-Piao
論文名稱: 以社會認知理論觀點探討社會資本與組織支持對知識分享行為之影響-以台灣製造業為例
The Influences on Knowledge Sharing Behavior from Social Capital and Organizational Support Based on Social Cognitive Theory – A Case Study of the Manufacturing Industry in Taiwan
指導教授: 蔡明田
Tsai, Ming-Tien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工程管理碩士在職專班
Engineering Management Graduate Program(on-the-job class)
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 87
中文關鍵詞: 社會認知理論社會資本組織支持知識分享
外文關鍵詞: Social Cognitive Theory, Social Capital, Organizational Support, Knowledge Sharing
相關次數: 點閱:126下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 二十一世紀是知識經濟的時代,企業的競爭力不再取決於土地、勞力、廠房、機器等有形資產,而是取決於更為重要的智慧資產-知識。如何進行知識的辨識、獲取、創造、分享、移轉、利用與儲存等知識管理工作,讓知識發揮最大的效用,是企業在知識管理上要面對的重要課題,其中知識分享是重要因素之一。
    本研究以社會認知理論的角度出發,將影響組織員工知識分享的因素區分為環境因素、個人因素及行為因素三個構面。環境因素方面包括社會資本及組織支持,社會資本包括結構構面、關係構面及認知構面,並分別以人際關係、信任及共同願景代表;而組織支持則以同仁支持及主管支持代表;在個人因素方面則以知識分享態度代表;在行為因素方面則以知識分享行為代表。本研究期望建立一個以社會認知理論的環境、個人及行為三個構面為架構的知識分享行為分析模式,以提供企業參考。
    本研究以台灣製造業員工為研究對象,以問卷調查方法收集知識分享相關資料,總計回收212份有效問卷,並以因素分析、變異數分析、迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析驗證。本研究經實證分析結果發現如下:
    1.社會資本的「人際關係」及「共同願景」對於「知識分享態度」有顯著影響。
    2.組織支持的「同仁支持」及「主管支持」對於「知識分享態度」有顯著影響。
    3.「知識分享態度」對於「知識分享行為」有顯著影響。
    4.在有效樣本的個人資料變數的變異數分析中,不同「性別」在「人際關係」因素的平均數有顯著差異;不同「婚姻狀況」在「主管支持」因素的平均數有顯著差異;不同「年齡」在「知識分享行為」因素的平均數有顯著差異;不同「工作年資」在「共同願景」及「知識分享行為」的平均數有顯著差異。

    In the twenty-one century, the era of knowledge based-economy, the competitiveness of enterprises no longer depend on land, labor, plant, machinery and other tangible assets, but on more important assets, knowledge. Using knowledge management, comprised of knowledge identifying, acquiring, creation, sharing, transferring, using, storing and so on, to maximize knowledge is the most important issue of all enterprises. And knowledge sharing is therein an important factor.
    The study based on social cognitive theory is divided into three parts: environmental factors, personal factors and behavior factors on effects of organizational employee's knowledge sharing. Environmental factors include social capital and organizational support. Social capital include structural dimensions, relationship dimensions and cognitive dimensions, and respectively represent relationships, trust and shared vision, and then organizational support represent colleagues supports and supervisors supports. Individually and on behalf of personal factors and behavior factors is knowledge sharing attitude, and knowledge sharing behavior. The study attempts to establish a knowledge sharing behavior analysis model constituted of three dimensions based on social cognitive theory: environmental, personal, and behavior factors. The results could provide a reference for enterprises.
    Study objects is the employees from manufacturing industry in Taiwan. To collect the knowledge sharing data, we use the questionnaire, and there are 212 questionnaires recovered totally. Then we analyze data by using factor analysis, ANOVA and regression analysis. The study results of positive analysis were as follows:
    1.Relationship and shared vision in social capital have significant effects on knowledge sharing attitude.
    2.Colleagues supports and supervisors supports in organizational support have significant effects on knowledge sharing attitude.
    3.Knowledge sharing attitude has significant effects on knowledge sharing behavior.
    4.In the results of ANOVA with effective personal data variables, there are significant difference between the means in these factors: sex in relationship, marital status in supervisor supports, age in knowledge sharing behavior, and years of work experience in shared vision and knowledge sharing behavior.

    目錄 中文摘要.Ⅰ Abstract.Ⅱ 目錄.Ⅳ 表目錄.Ⅵ 圖目錄.Ⅷ 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的3 第三節 研究流程4 第四節 論文結構5 第二章 文獻探討6 第一節 社會認知理論6 第二節 社會資本8 第三節 組織支持12 第四節 知識分享15 第三章 研究方法24 第一節 研究架構24 第二節 研究假說26 第三節 研究變項之操作性定義與問卷設計29 第四節 研究對象與抽樣35 第五節 研究方法與資料分析35 第四章 資料分析結果40 第一節 敘述性統計分析40 第二節 因素分析47 第三節 信度分析及效度分析52 第四節 變異數分析57 第五節 迴歸分析64 第五章 結論與建議68 第一節 研究結果68 第二節 研究貢獻72 第三節 研究限制73 第四節 未來研究建議74 參考文獻75 附錄一、問卷(A卷)83 附錄二、問卷(B卷)86 表目錄 表2-1 社會資本的定義9 表2-2 知識的定義15 表2-3 知識的分類16 表2-4 知識的分類架構17 表2-5 內隱知識與外顯知識的比較18 表2-6 知識分享的定義20 表2-7 知識分享的相關研究(國內)21 表2-8 知識分享的相關研究(國外)23 表3-1 研究變項之操作性定義與參考來源33 表3-2 KMO值參考標準36 表4-1 本研究問卷發放及回收統計40 表4-2 有效樣本的性別統計表41 表4-3 有效樣本的婚姻狀況統計表41 表4-4 有效樣本的年齡統計表42 表4-5 有效樣本的教育程度統計表43 表4-6 有效樣本的工作年資統計表43 表4-7 有效樣本的與直屬主管共事年資統計44 表4-8 有效樣本的服務部門統計表45 表4-9 有效樣本的公司人數統計表45 表4-10 有效樣本的產業別統計表46 表4-11 各構面之KMO值與Bartlett球形檢定表47 表4-12 社會資本變項之因素分析48 表4-13 組織支持變項之因素分析49 表4-14 知識分享態度變項之因素分析50 表4-15 知識分享行為變項之因素分析51 表4-16 社會資本變項之信度分析53 表4-17 組織支持變項之信度分析54 表4-18 知識分享態度變項之信度分析55 表4-19 知識分享行為變項之信度分析56 表4-20 不同性別之樣本在各因素之變異數分析58 表4-21 不同婚姻狀況之樣本在各因素之變異數分析59 表4-22 不同年齡之樣本在各因素之變異數分析60 表4-23 不同工作年資之樣本在各因素之變異數分析62 表4-24 社會資本對知識分享態度之迴歸分析表65 表4-25 組織支持對知識分享態度之迴歸分析表66 表4-26 知識分享態度對知識分享行為之迴歸分析表67 表5-1 研究假設驗證結果彙整69 圖目錄 圖1-1 研究流程4 圖2-1 社會認知理論的PBE互動模式6 圖2-2 知識的轉換模式19 圖3-1 研究架構25

    一、中文文獻
    1.朱燦榮,「組織公平組織氣候社會資本對知識分享意圖的影響」,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,2009。
    2.阮微涵,「以社會認知理論觀點探討社會支持及社會資本對知識分享行為之影響」,國立成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程碩士論文,2009。
    3.何幸娟,「以計劃行為理論探討企業員工知識分享意圖與行為」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2009。
    4.吳盛,「以計畫行為理論探討資訊人員的知識分享行為」,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所博士論文,2003。
    5.吳萬益,「企業研究方法」,吳萬益出版,2008。
    6.李城忠,「應用統計學SPSS完全攻略」,新文京開發出版,2008。
    7.胡龍騰,「公共組織成員知識分享之實證研究」,五南圖書出版,2009。
    8.林志昇,「以計劃行為理論探討台灣企業組織成員之分享意圖」,國立成功工學院工程管理專班碩士論文,2009。
    9.林東清,「知識管理」,智勝文化,2009。
    10.邱玉婷,「以社會認知理論觀點探討組織知識分享行為對研發績效之影響」,國立成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程碩士論文,2009。
    11.黃家齊,「人力資本投資系統、創新策略與組織績效-多種契合觀點的驗證」,管理評論,第22卷第一期,99~126頁,2003。
    12.黃家齊、林億明,「團隊導向人力資源管理活動及社會資本對團隊知識分享與創新之影響」,台大管理論叢,16(2),101-130頁,2006。
    13.鄭玉華,「以社會資本、交易成本與代理理論探索組織知識分享之行為」,國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文,2008。
    14.蔡岳儒,「社會支持、工作滿意與工作績效之關係研究-以雲林縣政府員工為例」,國立雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,2008。
    15.蔡富村,「以社會認知及社會資本觀點探討工程師的知識分享意圖」,國立成功大學工學院工程管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,2009。
    16.劉京偉譯,勤業管理顧問公司,「知識管理的第一本書」,商周出版社,24-40頁,2000。
    17.劉哲良,「從社會資本觀點探討知識分享、組織學習對組織學習績效影響之研究」,大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文,2005。
    18.鍾瑞國、羅潔伶,「從社會資本觀點論組織知識移轉」,明道學術論壇,第一卷第一期,1~14頁,2005。
    19.謝哲豪,「組織政治知覺、信任與知識分享關係之研究」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,2006。
    20.謝素禎,「社會網路、社會資本、知識社會化對知識分享影響之研究-以銀行業為例」,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,2008。
    21.龔振源,「以理性行動理論探討內部稽核人員知識分享意圖」,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,2009。
    二、英文文獻
    1.Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W., Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept, Academy of Management Review, 27(1), pp.17-40, 2002.
    2.Applehans, W., A. Globe, & G.. Laugero, Managing Knowledge-A Practical Web-based Approach, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1999.
    3.Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L., Affective Commitment to the Organization: The Contribution of Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5),pp.825-836, 2001.
    4.Bandura, A., Social Learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs , NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
    5.Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
    6.Bock, G. W., & Kim Y. G.., Breaking the Myths of Rewards : An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing, Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), pp.14-21, 2002.
    7.Bock, G..-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G.., & Lee, J.-N., Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Role of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp.87-111, 2005.
    8.Brownell, A., & Shumaker, S. A., Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps, Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), pp.11-36, 1984.
    9.Burt, R.S., The Social Structure of Competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles(Eds), Networks and Organization: Structure, Form, and Action, pp.57-91. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
    10.Chen, I. Y. L., Chen, N. S., & Kinshuk, Examing the Factors Influencing Participant’s Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Learning Communities, Educational Technology & Social, 12(1), pp.134-148, 2009.
    11.Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E.T.G., Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories, Decision Support System,42(3), pp.1872-1888, 2006.
    12.Chowdhury, S., The Role of Affect and Cognition-Based Trust in Complex Knowledge Sharing, Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(3), pp.310-326, 2005.
    13.Coleman, J. S., Foundation of Social Theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.
    14.Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A., Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skill, Information Systems Research, 6(2), pp.118-143, 1995.
    15.Cobb, S., Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress, Psychosomatic Medicine, pp.300-314, 1976.
    16.Cummings, A., & Oldham, G. R., Enhancing Creativity: Management Work Contexts for the High Potential Employee, California Management Review, 40(1), pp.22-38, 1997.
    17.Davenport, T. H., & Pruask, L., Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
    18.Davis, J. H., Mayer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D., An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), pp26-61, 1995.
    19.Dixon, N. M., Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
    20.Dretske, F., Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
    21.Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K., Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge sharing Network: The Toyota Case. Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.345-367, 2000.
    22.Dyer, K. R., Estuaries, A Physical Introduction, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp.195, 1997.
    23.Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D., Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp.500-507, 1986.
    24.Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M., Individual Innovation,In West M. A. & Farr, J. L.(Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work, New York: Wiley, 1990.
    25.Fukuyama, F., Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press, 1995.
    26.George, J. M., & Zhou, J., When Job Dissatisfy Action Leader to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice, Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp.682-694, 2001.
    27.Granovetter, M., Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology, pp.25-26 in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
    28.Hagger M. S.,& Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., A Meta-Analytic Review of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior in Physical Activity : Predictive Validity and the Contribution of Additional Variables, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(1), pp.3-32, 2002.
    29.Harris, D. B., Creating a Knowledge Centric Information Technology Environment, Retrieved July 28, 2003, from Http:dbharris.com/ckc.htm, 1996.
    30.Hendriks, P., Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on Motivation for Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), pp.91-100, 1999.
    31.Hidding, G. J., & Shireen, M. C., Anatomy of a Learning Organization: Turning Knowledge into Capital at Andersen Consulting, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.5, No.1,pp.3-13, 1998.
    32.House, J. S., Work Stress and Social Support Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981.
    33.Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., & Chang. C., Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship between Trust, Self-efficacy, and Outcome Expectations, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), pp.153-169, 2007.
    34.Kaiser, H. F., A Second Generation Little Jiffy, Psychometrika, Vol.35, pp.401-415, 1970.
    35.Kuo, F. Y., & Young, M. L., Predicting Knowledge Sharing Practices through Intention : A Test of Competing Models, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, pp.2697-2722, 2008.
    36.Levinson, H., Reciprocation: The Relationship between Man and Organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, pp.370-390, 1965.
    37.Lin, N., Social Capital: A theory of Social Structure and Action, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    38.Machlup, F., The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962.
    39.Mayer, R.C., Davis, H., & Schoorman F.D., An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, No.3, pp.709-734, 1995.
    40.Mitchell, J. C., Social Networks and Urban Situations, Manchester : Manchester University Press, 1969.
    41.Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S., Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Creation of Value in Firms, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242-266, 1998.
    42.Nohria, N., & Eccles, R., Face to Face: Making Network Organizations Work. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (EDS.). Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp.288-308, 1992.
    43.Nonaka, I., A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science, 5, pp.14-37, 1994.
    44.Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge – Creating Company, New York, Oxford University Press, 1995.
    45.Pondy, L., & Mitroff, Beyond Open Systems Models of Organization, In L.L.Cummings & B. M. Staw (Ed.) Research in Organization Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979.
    46.Portes, A., Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp.1-24, 1998.
    47.Puser, R. E., & Pasmore, W. A., Organizing for Learning, In William A. Pasmore & Richard W. Woodman (Ed.), Research in Organizational Change and Development, London: JAI Press, 1992.
    48.Putnam, R. D., The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. American Prospect, 13, pp.35-42, 1993.
    49.Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R., Perceived Organization Support: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Applied Psychology, pp.698-714, 2002.
    50.Ruggles, R., Knowledge Management Tools, Boston: Butterworth- Heinemann, 1996.
    51.Senge, P., Sharing Knowledge, Executive Excellence, 15(6), pp.17-18, 1997.
    52.Sian, P. M., & Cahill, D. J., From Coworker to Friends: The Development of Peer Friendships in the Workplace, Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), pp.273-299, 1998.
    53.Sveiby, K., The new Organizational Wealth, San Francisco: Berrett Keohler, 1997.
    54.Thoits, P. A., Social Support as Coping Assistance, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(4), pp.416-423, 1986.
    55.Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S., Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intra-firm Networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), pp.464-476, 1998.
    56.Turban, E., Decision Support and Expert Systems, Management Support Systems. New York/; Macmillan, p.846, 1990.
    57.Wu, W. L., Hsu, B. F., & Yeh, R. S., Fostering the Determinants of Knowledge Transfer: A team-level analysis, Journal of Information Science, 33(3), pp.326-339, 2007.
    58.Zhou, J., & George, J. M., When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.682-696, 2001.

    下載圖示 校內:2013-07-20公開
    校外:2013-07-20公開
    QR CODE