| 研究生: |
蔡育憲 TSAI, YU-HSIEN |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
產品知識管理於產品開發流程之研究 Research on Product Knowledge Management in the Product Development Process |
| 指導教授: |
邵揮洲
Shaw, Heiu-Jou |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 系統及船舶機電工程學系 Department of Systems and Naval Mechatronic Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 110 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 失效模式與效應分析 、案例式推論 、工作流程引擎 、知識管理 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, Case-Base Reasoning, Workflow Engine, Knowledge Management |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:67 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來資訊科技與網路技術的快速發展,傳統產品的開發產業,紛紛導入電子化的資訊系統,並且能透過資訊系統的整合,達到公司內外部的有效管理;但是往往忽略了導入電子化系統的目的,不只是幫助公司做好有效的管理,同時也是建立了良好的電子化環境,所以本研究能夠以電子化的系統為基礎,透過資訊科技的整合,達到知識管理與智慧型決策才是電子化的最終目的。
而本文運用知識管理的流程架構,建立在產品的開發流程上,從知識創造、知識來源、知識分類、知識學習與知識運用等五個部份作為知識管理的流程,並且結合產品資料管理系統內的工程流程引擎,作為知識的主要來源;之後運用產品在開發過程中,所累積的資料,進行產品案例庫的建立,並且透過案例式推論,進行案例庫內案例知識的擷取,作為新產品開發時在產品設計與製程參數設定的決策依據;最後運用工程流程引擎所累積的工程知識,進行工程知識庫的建立,解決開發流程中所產生的問題,並且透過失效模式與效應分析的方法,達到設計流程與製造流程問題預防的效果。
對於研究內將知識管理建立在產品開發流程上,主要增加產品設計者對於設計外型的參考與設計時程上的評估,有著有效的搜索機制;另外製程參數的設定者,不會因為知識經驗的缺乏,產生參數設定的不當,造成成本上的浪費;至於工程知識庫的建立,以達成問題診斷與問題預防為目標,最後以縮短產品的開發時程為最終目的。
Recently, with the fast development of internet technology, traditional production development industry gradually implants electrical information system. Through the integration function by electrical information system, it becomes easier to manage, and eventually helps the users achieve knowledge management and make intelligent decisions.
The framework of knowledge management processes builds upon the product developments. Knowledge source, knowledge creation, knowledge classification, knowledge learning, and knowledge application are the keys to knowledge management. The combination of knowledge management and the workflow in product development management system is our major information source. And then we use those gathered data during the product developments to create a product database. We also can access the data through Case Base Reason, which can be used for decision authority during the product design and process parameters. Lastly, by using the process engine we can turn the experiences we gained into a knowledge database to resolve the problems in the development process, and through FMEA to achieve preventing problems in the design and production processes.
Implanting the knowledge management helps the product designers having more thoughtful consideration in exterior design and timing design while designing new products by its efficient search option. In the other hand, new designers can avoid extra cost due to parameter setting error. Overall, the implant of knowledge database can provide diagnosis and precaution to development problems, and finally save time in product development process.
1.Aamodt, A. and Plaza, E., “Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches”, Artificial Intelligence Communications, Vol.7, pp.39–59, 1994.
2.Aha, D. W., “The Omnipresence of Case-Based Reasoning in Science and Application”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol.11, pp.261-273, 1998.
3.Belton, V. and Gear, A. E., “The Legitimacy of Rank Reversal—A Comment”, Omega, Vol.13, No.3, pp.227-230, 1989.
4.Davenport, T. H., “Ten Principles of Knowledge Management and Four Case Studies”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.4, No.3, pp.187-208, 1997.
5.Demarest, M., “Understanding Knowledge Management,” Long Range Planning, Vol.30, pp.374-384, 1997.
6.Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V., “Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension:Lessons from Nucor Steel”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.42, pp.71-80, 2000.
7.Hedlund, G., “A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, No.15, pp.73-79, 1994.
8.Chung, J. H. and Lee, K. W., “A framework of collaborative design environment for injection molding”, Computer in Industry, Vol.47, pp.319-337, 2002.
9.Kwong, C. K., Smith, G. F. and Lau, W. S., “Application of Case Based Reasoning in Injection Moulding”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol.63, pp.463-467, 1997.
10.Leymann, F. and Roller, D., “Production Workflow:Concepts and Techniques”, Prentice Hall PTR, 1999.
11.Millet, I. and Harker, P.T., “Globally Effective Questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.48, pp.88-97, 1990.
12.Mok, S. L., Kwong, C. K. and Lau, W. S., “An intelligent hybrid system for initial process parameter setting of injection moulding”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol.38, No.17, pp.4565-4576, 2000.
13.Mok, S. L., Kwong, C. K. and Lau, W. S., “A Hybrid Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm Approach to the Determination of Initial Process Parameters for Injection Moulding”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.18, No.6, pp.404–409, 2001.
14.Mok, S. L. and Kwong, C. K., “Application of artificial neural network and fuzzy logic in a case-based system for initial process parameter setting of injection molding”, Journal off Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.13, pp.165-176, 2002.
15.O’Dell, C. and Grayson, C. J., “If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices”, California Management Review, Vol.40, pp.154-173, 1998.
16.Shin, M., Holden, T. and Schmidt, A., “From Knowledge theory to management practice: towards an integrated approach”, Information Processing and Management, Vol.37, pp.335-355, 2001.
17.Wiig, K., “Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management”, Long Range Planning, Vol.30, pp.399-405., 1997.
18.Watson, I., “Case-based reasoning is a methodology not a technology”, Knowledge based systems, Vol.12, pp.303-308, 1999.
19.Wu, M. C., Lo, Y. F. and Hsu, S. H., “A fuzzy CBR technique for generating product ideas”, Expert Systems with Application, Vol.34, pp.530-540, 2008.
20.小野寺勝重著,張書文譯,“實踐FMEA手法-提昇產品或系統的可靠度、維護度和安全性”,中衛發展中心,2001。
21.王瓊瑤、吳筱琦、楊千,“工作流程與知識管理之關連性探討-以半導體產業為例”,第七屆資訊管理研究暨實務研討會,2001。
22.汪明生,“模糊層級分析法應用於IC產業政策選取之研究”,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所,碩士論文,2003。
23.杜權益,“產品功能需求為基之參考設計擷取技術研發”,國立成功大學製造工程研究所,碩士論文,2004。
24.尚文利,王成恩,張士杰,尹朝萬,“基於IDEF與UML的系統建模方法”,計算機集成製造系統(CIMS),第10卷,第3期,第252-258頁,2004年3月。
25.林立鴻、曾守正,“以XML為基礎之跨組織工作流程整合架構與其應用”,Journal of e-Business,第7卷,第1期,第87-120頁,2005年3月。
26.郭炳宏、黃弘毅,“ 案例式推理法應用於產品開發知識整合之研究-以產品設計概念發展階段為例”,2001年科技與管理學術研討會論文集,2001。
27.柯志杰,“UML參考辭典”,博碩文化股份有限公司,2004。
28.許盛堡,“建構一個QFD與FMEA之整合架構”, 私立元智大學工業工程與管理學系(所),碩士論文,2002。
29.張有恆、徐村和,“模糊度量AHP法-交通運輸計畫評估新模式”,中華民國第一屆模糊理論與應用研討會,第365-371頁,1993。
30.黃弘毅,“設計概念階段之產品知識建構與應用-以案例式推理法為例”,私立東海大學工業設計學系,碩士論文,2002。
31.曾憲雄編著,“專家系統導論/工具/應用”,文魁資訊股份有限公司,2002。
32.鈴木順二郎、牧野鐵治、石坂茂樹,“FMEA,FTA實施法”,先鋒企業管理發展中心,1998。
33.劉大銘,“以知識管理為基礎建構中小型船廠研發設計知識社群系統之研究”,國立成功大學系統及船舶機電工程學系,碩士論文,2002。
34.台塑網,http://www.efpg.com.tw/