本研究主要釐清互補財廠商在生態系中如何學習平台廠商所提供的新世代技術。我們運用深化性學習與探索性學習的觀點，藉此補足了生態系理論中互補財廠商的學習策略與表現等相關探討。本研究將互補財廠商從舊世代技術跨越到新世代技術稱作為跨世代的學習，並且分析11家智慧型手機廠商在安卓生態系中軟體程式的邊貢獻邊學習的程度與方式。進一步證明了智慧型手機廠商在舊世代的安卓作業系統所進行跨世代的深化性學習將會有效地提升其在新世代安卓作業系統的跨世代探索性學習表現以及快速上市的表現。本研究主張互補財廠商必須進行跨世代學習以因應平台技術變化。具體而言，生態系中平台技術引起的不連續性變化並非就只是單純地破壞互補財廠商既有的知識體系，互補財廠商在深化舊世代平台技術之下的經驗積累，將可以幫助互補財廠商跨越到新世代平台。

This study explores how complementors should learn for the new-generation technologies provided by platform manufacturers in the ecosystem. We adopt the concept of exploitative-learning and explorative-learning and complement the discussion of the learning strategies and performance of complementors in the ecosystem theory. We define learning from old-generation technology to the new-generation technology as intergenerational learning and analyze 11 smartphone manufacturers' learning by contributing to different Android operation system versions. Our results show that smartphone manufacturers' intergeneration-exploitative learning to the old-generation Android operating system will significantly affect intergeneration-explorative learning to new-generation Android operating systems and enhance smartphone time-to-market. This study argues that complementors should do intergeneration learning in response to platform technology changes. Specifically, the discontinuous changes caused by platform technology in the ecosystem are not just destroying the existing knowledge. Still, the accumulated experience in old-generation technology will help complementors the leapfrog to a new-generation technology.

Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation: Penguin Uk.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Afuah, A. (2001). Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1211-1228.
Alcacer, J., & Oxley, J. (2014). Learning by supplying. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 204-223.
Anderson, E. G., Parker, G., & Tan, B. (2014). Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 152–172.
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 604-633.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717.
Ansari, S., & Garud, R. (2009). Inter-generational transitions in sociotechnical systems: The case of mobile communications. Research Policy, 38(2), 382–392.
Appleyard, M. M., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 310-321.
Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In T. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. (pp. 609-625). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Athey, S., & Ellison, G. (2014). Dynamics of open source movements. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 23(2), 294-316.
Atuahene-Gima, K., & Murray, J. Y. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in china. Journal of International Marketing, 15(2), 1-29.
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1652-1661.
Baldwin. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, & Woodard, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 19-37). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Baldwin, C., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, C. Y. (2015). Bottlenecks, modules and dynamic architectural capabilities. Paper presented at the Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, Boston, MA.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Woodard, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (Vol. 32, pp. 19-37). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Belenzon, S., & Schankerman, M. (2015). Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 795-820.
Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase's penguin, or, linux and" the nature of the firm". Yale law journal, 369-446.
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676-707.
Bijwaard, G. E., Janssen, M. C., & Maasland, E. (2008). Early mover advantages: An empirical analysis of european mobile phone markets. Telecommunications Policy, 32(3-4), 246-261.
Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. Devolving control. Management science, 56(10), 1849-1872.
Boudreau, K. J. (2008). Opening the platform vs. Opening the complementary good? The effect on product innovation in handheld computing. Northeastern University, Unpublished Working Paper.
Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009a). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Platforms, Markets Innovation, 1, 163-191.
Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009b). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 163-191). UK: Edward Elgar.
Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2001). Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 179-205.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS quarterly, 263-290.
Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Battaglia, R. D. (2015). Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design? Telecommunications Policy, 39(3-4), 162-175.
Cennamo, C. (2018). Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3038-3069.
Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2018). Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 461-478.
Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. (2019). Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organization Science, 30(3), 617-641.
Chellappa, R. K., & Saraf, N. (2010). Alliances, rivalry, and firm performance in enterprise systems software markets: A social network approach. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 849-871.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
Clark, K. B. (1985). The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy, 14(5), 235-251.
Clark, K. B. (1989). Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management science, 35(10), 1247-1263.
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Claussen, J., Kretschmer, T., & Stieglitz, N. (2015). Vertical scope, turbulence, and the benefits of commitment and flexibility. Management science, 61(4), 915–929.
Cohen, M. A., Eliasberg, J., & Ho, T.-H. (1996). New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management science, 42(2), 173-186.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990a). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(1), 128-152.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990b). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.
Corts, K. S., & Lederman, M. (2009). Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the us home video game market. international Journal of industrial Organization, 27(2), 121-136.
Cusumano, M., & Selby, R. (1995). Microsoft secrets. New York: The Free Press.
Dallas, M. P., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2019). Power in global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 26(4), 666-694.
Daly, A. J., Baetens, J. M., & De Baets, B. (2018). Ecological diversity: Measuring the unmeasurable. Mathematics, 6(7), 119.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 2(3), I47-62.
Dosi, G., Hobday, M., Marengo, L., & Prencipe, A. (2005). The econonics of system integration: Towards an evolutionary interpretation. In A. Prencipe, A. Davies, & M. Hobday (Eds.), The business of systems integration (pp. 95-113). New York: Oxford University Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 84-110.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270-1285.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Opening platforms: How, when and why? In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 131-162). UK: Edward Elgar.
Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2009). Open r&d and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311-316.
Ethiraj, S. K. (2007). Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 563-584.
Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.
Fernández, Z., & Usero, B. (2007). The erosion of pioneer advantage in the european mobile telecommunications industry. Service Business, 1(3), 195-210.
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), 1019-1039.
Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177.
Foster, R. (1986). Innovation: The attacker’s advantage. New York: Summit Books.
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2004). The strategy field from the perspective of management science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management science, 50(10), 1309–1318.
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 28-35.
Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035-1071.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
Gomez, J., Lanzolla, G., & Maicas, J. P. (2016). The role of industry dynamics in the persistence of first mover advantages. Long Range Planning, 49(2), 265-281.
Gomory, R. (1987). Dominant science does not mean dominant product. Research and Development, 29, 72-74.
Gomory, R., & Schmitt, R. (1988). Science and product. Science, 240, 1131-1204.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
Grewal, R., Lilien, G. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2006). Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Science, 52(7), 1043-1056.
Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571-586.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706.
Gupta, A. K., & Wilemon, D. L. (1990). Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California management review, 32(2), 24-44.
Gupta, S., Jain, D. C., & Sawhney, M. S. (1999). Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Science, 18(3), 396-416.
Hagiu, A., & Halaburda, H. (2010). Responding to the wii? HBS Case 709-448, Harvard Business School, Boston.
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
Helfat, C. E. (1994). Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm r&d. Management science, 40(12), 1720-1747.
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2000). Product sequencing: Co‐evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 961-979.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9-30.
Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS quarterly, 37(3), 907–932.
Hermann, S., Hartel, S., & Niedner, S. (2000). Linux study homepage, www.Psychologie.Uni-kiel.De/linux-study/writeup.Html.
Himanen, P., Torvalds, L., & Castells, M. (2001). The hacker ethic. New York: Random House.
Hippel, E. v., & Krogh, G. v. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209-223.
Hoetker, G. (2006). Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management Journal, 27(6), 501-518.
Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15(1), 70-81.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability: Harvard Business Press.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35(8), 1200-1221.
Jacobides, M. G., & Tae, C. J. (2015). Kingpins, bottlenecks, and value dynamics along a sector. Organization Science, 26(3), 889-907.
Jakopin, N. M., & Klein, A. (2012). First-mover and incumbency advantages in mobile telecommunications. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 362-370.
Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363-375.
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017). Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the ios and android smartphone ecosystems. Organization Science, 28(3), 531-551.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of political economy, 94(4), 822-841.
Kim, N., & Atuahene‐Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 519-536.
Koch, S., & Kerschbaum, M. (2014). Joining a smartphone ecosystem: Application developers’ motivations and decision criteria. Information and Software Technology, 56(11), 1423-1435.
Kohanski, D. (1998). Moths in the machine. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Koski, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2007). Innovation and dominant design in mobile telephony. Industry and Innovation, 14(3), 305-324.
Kretschmer, T., & Claussen, J. (2016). Generational transitions in platform markets—the role of backward compatibility. Strategy Science, 1(2), 90–104.
Kumar, S., & Terpstra, D. (2004). The post mortem of a complex product development—lessons learned. Technovation, 24(10), 805-818.
Landsman, V., & Stremersch, S. (2011). Multihoming in two-sided markets: An empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. Journal of marketing, 75(6), 39-54.
Langlois, R., & Robertson, P. L. (1995). Innovation, networks, and vertical integration. Research Policy, 24(4), 543-562.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among uk manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
Lawless, M. W., & Anderson, P. C. (1996). Generational technological change: Effects of innovation and local rivalry on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1185-1217.
Lee, C. Y., & Huang, Y. C. (2012). Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance. Management Decision, 50(6), 1096-1116.
Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125.
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197-234.
Levinthal, D. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management science, 43(7), 934–950.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
Liu, X., Liu, J., Zhu, S., Wang, W., & Zhang, X. (2019). Privacy risk analysis and mitigation of analytics libraries in the android ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 19(5), 1184-1199.
MacCormack, A., Baldwin, C., & Rusnak, J. (2012). Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis. Research Policy, 41(8), 1309-1324.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
Marengo, L. (1993). Knowledge distribution and coordination in organizations: On some social aspects of the exploitation vs exploration trade-off. Revue International De Systémique, 7(5), 553-571.
Montfort, N., & Bogost, I. (2009). Racing the beam: The atari video computer system. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
Nagle, F. (2018). Learning by contributing: Gaining competitive advantage through contribution to crowdsourced public goods. Organization Science, 29(4), 569-587.
Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40-57.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA.: Havard University Press.
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm—the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632.
O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32(7), 1179-1198.
Page, S. E. (2010). Diversity and complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307-318.
Raju, K. V., & Kumar, D. P. (2015). Customer perceptions about android os s martphones in hyderabad. Journal of Marketing Vistas, 5(1), 43.
Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. CA: O’Reilly: Sebastopol.
Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2010). Large-scale open innovation: Open source vs. Patent pools. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3), 477-496.
Rietveld, J., & Eggers, J. P. (2018). Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: Implications for complementors. Organization Science, 29(2), 304-322.
Rietveld, J., Ploog, J. N., & Nieborg, D. B. (2020). The coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: Effects on complementor performance outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries, forthcoming.
Rivkin, J. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management science, 46(6), 824–844.
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. doi:10.1162/154247603322493212
Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two‐sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667.
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of economic perspectives, 23(3), 125-143.
Shah, S. K. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management science, 52(7), 1000-1014.
Shibata, T., Yano, M., & Kodama, F. (2005). Empirical analysis of evolution of product architecture fanuc numerical
controllers from 1962 to 1997. Research Policy, 34(1), 13–31.
Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92-121.
Shiu, J.-M. (2017). The scope of support of toolkits in the smartphone industry. Annals of Business Administrative Science, 16(2), 55-65.
Shiu, J.-M., & Yasumoto, M. (2016). Benefitting from contributions to the android open source community. Annals of Business Administrative Science, 15(5), 239-250.
Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18(1), 20-38.
Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.
Singh, P. V. (2010). The small-world effect: The influence of macro-level properties of developer collaboration networks on open-source project success. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 20(2), 1-27.
Singh, P. V., Tan, Y., & Mookerjee, V. (2011). Network effects: The influence of structural capital on open source project success. MIS quarterly, 813-829.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536.
Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., & Fleming, L. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994-1017.
Sowe, S. K., & Stamelos, I. (2008). Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: An empirical study. Journal of Systems Software, 81(3), 431-446.
Stalk Jr, G., & Hout, T. M. (1990). Competing against time. Research-Technology Management, 33(2), 19-24.
Staudenmayer, N., Tripsas, M., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Interfirm modularity and its implications for product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(4), 303-321.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387.
Teece, D. J., & Chesbrough, H. (1996). When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 65-73.
Thomke, S., & Fujimoto, T. (2000). The effect of “front‐loading” problem‐solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(2), 128-142.
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary—digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.
Tiwana, A. (2015). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266-281.
Tiwana, A. (2018). Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 829-848.
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. (2010). Research commentary—platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675-687.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 439-465.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38, 8-30.
Ülkü, S., & Schmidt, G. M. (2011). Matching product architecture and supply chain configuration. Production and Operations Management, 20(1), 16-31.
Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419-440.
Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of s&p 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221-231.
Venkatraman, N., & Lee, C.-H. (2004). Preferential linkage and network evolution: A conceptual model and empirical test in the us video game sector. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 876-892.
Von Braun, C.-F. (1990). The acceleration trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 49.
Von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management science, 48(7), 821-833.
Von Hippel, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2006). Free revealing and the private‐collective model for innovation incentives. R&D Management, 36(3), 295-306.
Von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 32(7), 1217-1241.
Wang, C., Chin, T., & Lin, J.-H. (2020). Openness and firm innovation performance: The moderating effect of ambidextrous knowledge search strategy. Journal of knowledge management, 24(2), 301-323.
Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195-1215.
Wayner, P. (2000). Free for all. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832-847.
West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 32(7), 1259-1285.
West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831.
West, J., & Dedrick, J. (2000). Innovation and control in standards architectures: The rise and fall of japan's pc-98. Information Systems Research, 11(2), 197-216.
West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223-231.
Xu, J., Christley, S., & Madey, G. (2006). Application of social network analysis to the study of open source software. In J. Bitzer & P. J. H. Schröder (Eds.), The economics of open source software development (pp. 247-269): Elsevier Science.
Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., & Griffith, D. A. (2007). An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities: Implications for product innovation and market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63-93.
Yayavaram, S., & Ahuja, G. (2008). Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 333-362.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 147-150.
Zhu, J., Zhou, M., & Mockus, A. (2014). Patterns of folder use and project popularity: A case study of github repositories. Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 1-4.
Zittrain, J. L. (2006). The generative internet. Harvard Law Review, 119(7), 1974–2040.