加拿大魁北克大學管理科學院學者Sabourin & Pinsonneault（1997）在「科技管理國際期刊」中提出對加拿大高科技產業群聚競爭力策略模式之研究中，以哈佛大學教授Michael E. Porter(1990)在「國家競爭力」一書（The Competitive Advantage of Nations）所提四個「產業群聚策略性資源」作為群聚要素，同時發現此四要素具有一個連續路徑的因果關係。因產業群聚是企業產生創新能力之原動力所在，也是國家競爭力的根本，亦是「國家創新體系」（NIS）中重要的一環。國家為扶持高科技產業可透過科學園區之設立，再由其引進旗艦廠商，進而吸引上下游廠商進駐。群聚廠商間因彼此相互依存關係產生價值鏈群聚（value-chain cluster），創造了「產業群聚關係與效果」，使公司在此基礎下透過創新之作為而增加了企業本身的競爭力。

　　本研究結果發現產業群聚策略性資源（高品質人力資源、知識、技術基礎、資本資源與基礎建設等）確實有助於產業群聚之發展，企業之群聚關係（合作與競爭）及其產生之效果（廠商地理區位集中、上下游垂直整合、水平競爭、水平合作及資源共享）亦會在產業群聚下產生顯著關係，同時公司亦會在產業群聚之創新氛圍(innovative milieu)取向下，針對新產品、新服務、新產業與新組織之需求，會產生創新優勢作法，而使整體經濟產生繁榮景象，並可從矽谷的多樣化產業、竹科的積體電路與南科的光電產業加以證明。

　　因鑑於此，本研究結論，在於藉此研究，而能鼓勵產、官、學、研投入「產業群聚策略性資源」之研究，使未來產業能在充足之資源下茁壯與永續經營，如此方能與世界主要科學園區在企業經營績效與創新研發成果方面並駕齊驅。

　Scholars in University of Quebec, Sabourin & Pinsonneault（1997）, in R&D Management proposed a strategic model study of competitiveness of high tech industrial cluster in Canada based on four elements of “strategic resources of industrial cluster” of Porter’s (1990) The Competitive Advant- age of Nations ; meanwhile, a cause-effect relationship of consecutive path has been found within these four elements. Industrial cluster is the drive for enterprises to generate innovative abilities, the basic of national competitiveness, an essential link of National Innovative System (NIS). Through the establishment of science parks, a nation-state is able to foster the development of its high tech industry and then invite leading companies and up and down stream suppliers. Because of value-chain cluster, the interdependent companies create industrial cluster relationship and effects and companies based on this innovative base will be able to enhance its competitiveness.

　This research found that strategic resources of industrial cluster (high quality human resources, knowledge, technical base, capital resources, and infrastructure) indeed help the development of industrial cluster. There is also a significant relationship shown in industrial cluster relationship between enterprises (cooperation and competition) and the generation of effects (geographic concentration, integration of up to down stream suppli- ers, horizontal competition, vertical cooperation and resource sharing). At the same time, companies will create innovative advantages in response to demands of new products, new services, new industries, and new organizations due to innovative milieu and further bring prosperity to
overall economy. This has been proven by the development of diversified industries in Silicon Valley, integrated circuit industry in Hsinchu Science Park, and Photonic Industry in Southern Taiwan Science Park.

　In short, it is also the purpose of this research to invite more participation in the study of strategic resources of industrial cluster from the industrial, governmental, and academic circles to promote and maintain sustainable development of industries in the future and to keep up with science parks around the world in the regards of management efficiency and R&D innovative results.

參考文獻
一、中文部份
孔憲法（1996）,從全球看兩岸科學園區發展,第三屆兩岸都市變遷與展望研討會.

孔憲法(2003),南科光電產業群聚與區域創新資源整合發展策略, 國立成功大學都市計劃學系.

孔憲法、陳忠仁(2004),南部科學園區中長期發展策略委辦計畫案,國立成功大學國土發展中心，南科管理局.

行政院國家科學委員會（2004）,南部科學工業園區2003年營運績效分析.http://www.nsc.gov.tw/head.asp?add_year=2004&tid=3

行政院國家科學委員會（2004）,新竹科學工業園區2003年營運績效分析與中部科學工業園區開發現況. http://www.nsc.gov.tw/

吳萬益、林清河(2001),企業研究方法,華泰圖書出版公司.

陳聖文(2004),台灣地區平面顯示器產業之區位選擇,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文.

林建元、胡太山、簡文彥、陳閔惠、劉皓寧與卓麗芳(2003),科學園區未來平衡發展策略研究,委託單位:科學工業園區管理局,執行單位:中華民國都市計劃學會.

波特著;李明軒與邱如美合譯（1996）,國家競爭優勢(上、下) ,天下文化出版社.

南科籌備處、南台灣生技產業推動團隊(2002),台南科學園區生技產業聚落發展計畫,南科管理局.

南部科學工業園區管理局投資環境簡介與統計資料,取自2004 06 30.http://www.stsipa.gov.tw/webapp/TnsipaWebApp/investment_info/ivm_main_intro.jsp

洪敏雄、黃文星、孔憲法、賴溪松、蕭世裕、吳榮華與陳忠仁 (2000) ,台南園區產業資源投入產出與發展策略研究,委託單位:科學工業園區管理局，執行單位:國立成功大學研究發展處.

胡瑋珊譯(2003) ,創新經濟時代,培生集團出版.

馬維揚（1995）,我國高科技產業發展之績效評估—以科學工業園區為例，台北銀行月刊,26,2,29-40.

張揚隆(2001),產業群聚成因、廠商行為與組織績效之關聯性研究-以台灣高科技產業為例,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文.

陳添枝（2004）,產業群聚對產業競爭力之影響, 委託單位:行政院經濟建設委員會,執行單位:中華經濟研究院.

陳銘煌(2003),2003年竹科投資環境介紹,新竹科學工業管理局提供.

單冀、王弓合編(2003),科技產業聚落之發展:矽谷、竹科與上海，國立中央大學台灣經濟發展研究中心與工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心出版.

彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯（1999）,區域優勢：矽谷與128 公路的文化與競爭, Saxenian,140 Annalee,天下遠見出版.

新竹科學工業園區管理局投資簡介與統計資料,取自2004 06 30. http://www.sipa.gov.tw/1/in7/index-in7-1.htm
楊齡媛(2004)，The Southern Tainan Science Park –Taiwan’s Second Silicon Valley，南科:台灣高科技產業的希望園區，光華雜誌，2004年七月第二十九卷 第七期。
虞炳昌(2000)，台南科學工業園區開發之沿革, 委託單位:台南科學工業園區開發籌備處,執行單位:中國工商傳播事業有限公司.

鄭聖時、楊國樑、莊淑姿與劉瀚榆(2002) ,台南科學園區產業發展需求調查與規劃,委託單位:南部科學工業園區管理局,執行單位:立德管理學院管理學群.

羅於陵、柏安東、李杏芬(2001) ,國家創新系統:向知識經濟轉化,行政院國家科學委員會科學技術資料中心.

羅於陵、廖盈琪、蔡旻樺與梁家榮(2003),台灣產業集群發展及創新能力分析,行政院國家科學委員會科學技術資料中心.

二、英文部分

Carrie, A. (2000), From Integrated Enterprises to Regional Clusters: the Changing Basis of Competition, Computers in Industry, 42(2-3), 289-298 .

Anderson ,G. (1994), Industry Clustering for Economic Development, Economic Development Review, 12(2), 26.

Bahraml, H. & Evans,S. (1995), Flexible Re-Cycling and High-Technology Entrepreneurship, Calfornia Management Review, 37(3), 62-89.

Bergman, E.M. & Feser, E. J. (1999), Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications, Regional Research Institute, WVU.

Bergman, E.M.,Carles, D. and Hertog, P.D. (2001), Innovative Cluster：Drivers of National Innovation Systems, OECD Proceedings,p1-50.

Newlands, D. (2003), Competition and Cooperation in Industrial Clusters: The Implications for Publics Policy, European planning Studies, 11(5), 521.

Drucker, P. F.(1986), Innovation and Entrepreneurship：Practice and Principles, Harper & Row Press.

Feser, E. J. & Bergman, E. M. (2000), National Industry Cluster Templates：A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis, Regional Studies, 34(1), 1-20.

Feser, E. J.（2001）,Targeting Opportunities:Industry and Labor Clusters in Southeastern North Carolina, North Carolina’s Southeast,Office of Economic Development, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Joint Venture's (2003), Index of Silicon Valley-Highlights, Joint Venture.Org. http://www.jointventure.org.

Kung, S. F. (1995), The Role of Science Park in the Development of High Technology Industry, with Special Reference to Taiwan, Unpublished Cambridge University Ph.D. Thesis.

Yu, L. (2002), How Location Clusters Affect Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 16.

Marshall, A (1890), Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan (for the Royal Economic Society).

Olson, K. (1998), Strategic Clustering, Executive Excellence, 15(12), 16.
Park, S.C. & Lee, S.K. (2004), The regional innovation system in Sweden: a study of regional clusters for the development of high technology, AI & Society,18(3), 276.

Dicken, P. (1998), Global Shift：Transforming the World Economy(3rd ed), Paul Chapman Publishing.

Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1998), Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.

Sabourin, V. & Pinsonneault, I. (1997), Strategic Formation of Competitive High Technology Clusters, International Journal of Technology Management, 13(2) ,165-178.

San Diego Association of Government (2001).San Diego Regional Employment Clusters-Engines of the Modern Economy, Sandag Info, 8(1),p1-10.

San Diego Association of Government (1998). San Diego Regional Employment Clusters-Engines of the Modern Economy ,What are Industrial Clusters, Sandag Info, 5-6,p1-20.

Steinle, C. & Schiele, H. (2002), When do Industries Cluster? A Proposal on How to Assess an Industry’s Propensity to Concentrate at a Single Region or Nation, Research Policy, 31(6), 849.