研究生: |
周翰臨 Chou, Hen-Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
非貫入式電極改善地電阻法探測地下管線與地層之研究 The Improvement of ERT Method in Underground Pipe and Layers Detection with Flat-Base Electrodes |
指導教授: |
吳建宏
Wu, Jian-Hong |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 178 |
中文關鍵詞: | 地電阻剖面影像法 、非破壞性檢測 、透地雷達 |
外文關鍵詞: | Electrical Eesistivity Tomography method, Non-destructive tests, Ground Penetrating Radar. |
相關次數: | 點閱:99 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究之目的為解決地電阻影像法在硬地上施測之限制性,以及改變電極間距使得成像結果產生之差異,並在三維排列的應用上予以比較並整理,期望能提升地電阻剖面影像法應用於相關管線探測與大地環境下之研究的精確性及應用效益;首先本研究以非貫入式電極的施測與貫入式電極的比較得出其可靠性,以及在三維的排列中設計不同的排列方式,回字型與弓字型討論成像差異與可行性,並藉由本試驗中之三案例,以來義鄉的案例證明地電阻剖面影像法在地層層面具良好的解析能力,並在成功大學勝利校區管線的案例中討論非貫入式電極以及貫入式電極以不同的間距排列所得到的成像剖面中得到非貫入式電極具相當的可靠性,並將非貫入式電極應用在第三個案例小琉球層面的地層研究中去討論小琉球石灰岩質砂岩與泥岩之層面,另外再結合文獻資料、透地雷達的探測,地質鑽探資料的比對與地電阻剖面影像法與地下水的分析相互比對及驗證其結果,證明地電阻剖面影像法對地層具有良好的解析能力,以及應用非貫入式電極所改善的時間與成效性。
The purpose of this study is to improve the result of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) method when applying on hard ground surface, and to determine the effects of changing electrode intervals on the imaging results. This study also compared and organized the results of 3-D ERT formations to try to improve the accuracy and efficiency of ERT in the application of underground pipeline and Geo-Environmental surveying.This study first compared the method of flat-base electrodes and standard electrodes to determine the reliability of the ERT method. Different 3-D formations, center shape and Snake shape, were also designed to discuss the Imaging differences and feasibility of ERT. Three tests were performed to verify the results. Combined the results from the third test with other references, results from ground penetration radar (GPR) tests, the borehole information, and the comparison between the results of ERT and the location of groundwater, it is proven that ERT method is able to provide a good estimation of rock layers with improved efficiency and effectiveness.
1.中央地質調查所,地質資料整合查詢系統,「http://gis.moeacgs.gov.tw/gwh/gsb97-1/sys8/index.cfm」
2.行政院農業委會水土保持局,土石流防災資訊網,
「http://246.swcb.gov.tw/debrisInfo/DebrisStatistics.aspx
3.行政院農業委會水土保持局台南分局 「來社溪集水區土砂變遷與分析計畫報告」,2014。
4.井寶地質工程公司,「屏東縣琉球鄉本漁段235-2、236-2、216-5地號地基調查工程」,地質鑽探資料,2011。
5.尤仁弘,「應用地電阻影像法於壩體潛在滲漏之研究」,國立交通大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2006。
6.李維峰,張嘉峰,梅興泰,蔡道賜,「地電阻影像剖面探測法於地下工程之應用」,地工技術,第108期,第91-104頁,2006。
7.李正兆,「整合地電阻法與水文地質調查於崩塌地滑動之機制研究 」,國立中央大學地球物理研究所博士論文,2009。
8.吳宏哲,「應用透地雷達與目視調查評估混凝土河堤淘空程度之研究」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2011。
9.吳建宏,李德河,鐘廣吉,「102琉球鄉地質構造景觀調查及導覽講習計畫」,2014。
10.林明寬,「透地雷達在地下掩埋物探測之應用」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2001。
11.林志平,洪瑛鈞,尤仁弘,鄒和瀚,「電阻剖面影像法於壩體滲漏調查之應用」,先進工程學刊,第三卷第一期,第49-55頁,2008。
12.林朝棨,「臺灣之第四紀」,臺灣文獻14,1963。
13.邱君豪,「應用透地雷達探測地下埋設物及地層構造之研究」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,1997。
14.佳達科技工程顧問有限公司,「台中市立安和國民中學B棟教室、校園基流失地質詳細檢測工程探查成果報告」,2006。
15.周治國,「透地雷達於地下水調查之研究」,國立中央大學應用地質研究所碩士論文,1993。
16.周允文,謝政璋,蔡同宏,劉振維,「地電阻影像剖面法應用於莫拉克風災後高133線不老溫泉區之地滑調查與研析」,中華技術,第87期,第128-143頁,2010。
17.段偉宗,「併合二維、三維地電阻影像法及透地雷達法應用於管線及估計電石渣總量上之研究」,國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文,2000。
18.姚奕全,「應用地電阻法於崩積層含水特性調查與監測之初探」,國立交通大學土木工程研究所碩士班碩士論文,2007。
19.曹正宇,「併合地球物理法在斷層及管線之研究」,國立中央大學 地球物理研究所碩士論文,1997。
20.許尚逸,「工程地質研討會(十八)~小琉球及南台灣 與會報導」,地工技術書,第124期,第95-102頁,2010。
21.許朝景,「透地雷達應用於大地環境調查之應用」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2000。
22.陳宜傑,「應用地電阻法於土石流地滑之研究」,國立中央大學應用地質研究所碩士論文,2004。
23.陳亦嘉,「地電阻影像剖面法應用之介紹」,地質教室,Vol.24,No.2,2005。
24.陳昱源,「應用地電阻影像法探測墩基深度之初步研究」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2009。
25.陳力齊,「應用地電阻量測方法於環境監測與實驗室入滲試驗之研究」,嘉南藥理科技大學環境工程與科學研究所碩士論文,2013。
26.陳澤承,「由波速的量測改善透地雷達應用於古蹟遺址的探測之效益」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2013。
27.梅興泰,鄭富書,蔡道賜,「地電阻影像剖面法對非均質地下實體之模擬分析」,技術學刊,第四期,第369-382頁,2006。
28.黃亦青,「應用三維地電阻方法評估 污染物的傳輸及分佈之可行性先導研究」,嘉南藥理科技大學環境工程與科學研究所碩士論文,2008。
29.黃鑑水、劉桓吉,五萬分之一台灣地質圖及說明書-硫球嶼幅,經濟部中央地質調查所出版,1990。
30.馮正一,陳奕凱,鄭旭涵,「應用ERT法於崩塌地特性調查與水分變化之研究」,中華水土保持學報,第41卷,第1期,第15-26頁,2010。
31.單信瑜、賴昀暉、郭豐彰,「土壤電阻之量測」,第八屆大地工程研討會,大地工程學會,pp. 349-350,1999。
32.董彥閔,「地電阻影像法於古蹟遺址探測與大地環境應用之研究」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文,2011。
33.楊潔豪,「應用地電阻影像法調查地層中DNAPL污染團」,台灣土壤及地下水環境保護協會簡訊,第二十五期 ,第3-6頁,2007。
34.劉興昌,「莫拉克風災後(新開部落、小林村)地質調查成果」,國家災害防救科技中心,災害防救科技專欄,第50期,2009。
35.謝啟萬、陳建宏、林千貴、賈譯真,「污水下水道塑膠管檢測法之探討」,2001年下水道工程實務研討會論文集,台北,第22-1~12頁,2001。
36.魏毓亭,「地電阻法應用於探測地下異質性之研究」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2013。
37.羅經書,「透地雷達應用於管線與地層調查之研究」,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,1998。
38.Advanced Geosciences Inc., Instruction manual for EarthImager 2D, Austin, TX, USA ,2008.
39.Arulanandan, K., and Smith, S. S. “Electrical Dispersion in Relation to
Soil Structure.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 99(SM12): 1113-1131 ,1973.
40.Athanasiou E., Tsourlos P., Tsokas G., Papazachos C., and Vargemezis G., “Non-destructive DC resistivity surveying using flat-base electrodes,” Near surface, Palermo, Italy, pp. 4-7 ,2005.
41.Bergström, G., “Försök med elektrisk malmletning,” Sveriges geologiska undersöknings årsbok Stockholm 7, pp. 1–10 ,1913.
42.Bowling, J. C., Harry, D. L., Rodriguez, A.B., Zheng, C., “Integrated geophysical and geological investigation of a heterogeneous fluvial aquifer in Columbus Mississippi“ Journal of Applied Geophysics, 62, 58-73, 2007
43.Burger, R.H., Exploration geophysics of the shallow subsurface, Prentice Hall, Houston, TX, U.S.A. ,1992.
44.Butsuri, T.G., Application of geophysical methods to engineering and environmental problems, Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan, Japan ,2004.
45.Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L., and Constable, C.G., “Occam’s Inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data,” Geophysics, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 289-300 ,1987.
46.Claerbout, J.F., and Muir, F., “Robust modeling with erratic data,” Geophysics, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 826-844 ,1973.
47.Davis, L., and Annan, A.P., “Ground Penetrating Radar for High Resolution Mapping of Soil and Rock Straigraphy,” Geophysics Prospecting, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 535-551 ,1989.
48.Dahlin, T., and Zhou,B”A Numerical Comparison of 2D Resistivity Imaging with 10 Electrode Arrays,” Geophysical, Vol. 52, pp. 379-398 ,2004.
49.Doolittle, J. A., Collins, M. E., “Use of soil information to determine application of ground penetrating radar,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol.33, No.1-3, pp.101-108 ,1995.
50.deGroot-Headlin, C., and Constable, S., “Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data,” Geophysics, Vol. 55, No. 12, pp. 1613-1624 ,1990.
51.Edwards, L.S., “A modified pseudo-section for resistivity and induced polarization,” Geophysics, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 1020-1036 ,1977.
52.Geophysical Survey Systems Inc., SIRveyor SIR-20 User’s Manual, USA, pp. 1-51 ,2002.
53.Geophysical Survey Systems Inc., SIRveyor SIR-20 User’s Manual, USA, pp. 1-51, 2014.
54.Geophysical Survey Systems Inc., RADAN for Windows Version 7 User’s Manual, USA, pp. 1-176 ,2014.
55.Hall,P., “Electromagnetic Fields And Waves” Hardcover ,1992.
56.Hubbert, M.K., “The theory of ground-water motion,” Journal of geology, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp.785-944 ,1940.
57.Hatton, L., Worthington, M.H., and Makin. J., Seismic Data Processing: Theory and Practice, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK ,1986.
58.Hsu, H.L., Yanites, B.J., Chen, C.C. and Chen, Y.G., “Bedrock detection using 2D electrical resistivity imaging along the Peikang River, central Taiwan,” Geomorphology, Vol. 114, No. 3, pp. 406-414 ,2010.
59.Inman, J.R., “Resistivity inversion with ridge regression,” Geophysics, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 798-817 ,1975.
60.Jonathan E. Chambers , Paul B. Wilkinson, Alan L. Weller , Philip I.Meldrum ,Richard D.Ogilvy,S.C, ”Mineshaft imaging using surface and crosshole 3D electrical resistivity tomography”: Journal of Applied Geophysics,Vol.62 ,pp.324–337 ,2007.
61.Karastathis, V.K., Karmis, P.N., Drakatos, G. and Stavrakakis, G., “Geophysical methods contributing to the testing of concrete dams. Application at the Marathon Dam,” Journal of applied geophysics, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 247-260 ,2002.
62.Kovas, J. E. “Survey Application of Ground-penetrating Radar,” Surveying and Land Information Systems, Vol.51, No.3, pp. 144-148 ,1991.
63.Klein, K. and Santamarina, J. C. “Electrical Conductivity in Soils:Underlying Phenomena,”J.Env.Eng.Geophys.,Vol.8(4),pp.263–273 ,2003.
64.Kearey,P.,Brooks,M. “An introduction to geophysical exploration. “ Scientific Publications, Osney Mead, Oxford, p 296 ,1984.
65.Lines, L.R., and Treitel, S., “ A review of least-squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems, ” Geophysical Prospecting, 32, 159-186 ,1984.
66.Loke, M.H., Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys, Geotomo Software, Malaysia, pp. 11-17 ,2003.
67.Loke, M.H., Acworth, I., and Dahlin, T., “A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion method in 2D electrical imaging surveys,” Exploration geophysics, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 182-187 ,2002.
68.Loke, M.H., and Barker, R.D., “Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method,” Geophsical prospecting, Vol. 44, pp. 131-152 ,1996.
69.Maijala, P., Application of Some Seismic Data Processing Methods to Ground Penetrating Radar Data, Geological Survey of Finland, pp. 133-138 ,1992.
70.Mellett, J. S., Location of Human Remains with Ground-penetrating Radar, Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 16, pp. 359-365,1992.
71.Olhoeft,C., “Maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar. “ Journal of Applied Geophysics. v43. 175-187,2000.
72.Olayinka, A.I., and Yaramanic, U., “Use of block inversion in the 2-D interpretation of apparent resistivity data and its comparison with smooth inversion,” Journal of applied geophysics, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 63-81 ,2000.
73.Petersson, W., “Om malmsökande medelst elektricitet,” Jern-Kontorets annaler 2–3, pp. 153–171 ,1907.
74.Sauer, M.C., Southwick, P.F., Spiegler, K.S., and Wyllie, M.R.J., “Electrical conductance of porous plugs ion exchange resin-solution system,” Industrial and engineering chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 2187-2193 ,1955.
75.Schlumberger, C., German Patent No. 269,928 ,1912.
76.Schlumberger, C., Etude sur la prospection electrique du sous-sol, Gauthier-Villars, Paris ,1920.
77.Sheriff, R.E., and Geldart, L. P., Exploration Seismology, Cambridge University Press, N. Y. ,1982.
78.Teford, W.M, Geldart, L.P.and Sheriff, R.E. “Applied Geophysics. ”Cambridge University Press ,1990.
79.Van Nostrand,R.G.,and Cook K.L.,Interpretation of resistivity data, USGS, Washington ,1966.
80.Wenner F “The four-terminal conductor and the Thomson bridge. “ US Bureau Stand Bull 8:559–610 ,1912.
81.Wolke, R., and Schwetlick, H., “Iteratively reweighted least squares algorithms, convergence analysis, and numerical comparisons,” SIAM journal on scientific and statistical computing, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 907–921 ,1988.
82.Yang, X., and Lagmanson, M., Comparison of 2D and 3D electrical resistivity imaging methods, Advanced Geosciences, Inc., Austin, Texas ,2006.