簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王光宇
Wang, Kuang-Yu
論文名稱: 高階人才招募之文化契合、信號傳遞與價值共創之影響
Cultural Fit, Signaling, and Value Co-creation in Exclusive Recruitment
指導教授: 張佑宇
CHANG, YU-YU
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 55
中文關鍵詞: 高階人才招募文化契合信號傳遞心理契約價值共創
外文關鍵詞: Executive Recruitment, Cultural Fit, Signaling Theory, Psychological Contract, Value Co-creation
相關次數: 點閱:55下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在高階人才招募情境中,企業愈加重視候選人是否能與組織文化相契合,文化契合亦逐漸成為招募決策中的重要依據。然而,實務上卻頻繁出現即便候選人具備高度專業能力,仍因「文化不符」而未能媒合成功,甚至於錄用後短期離職的情形,顯示文化契合在招募過程中可能同時產生吸引與排除的雙重效果。
    本研究以個體–組織契合理論、信號理論與服務主導邏輯為理論基礎,採質性研究取向,透過半結構式訪談方式,訪談九位參與高階人才招募之行動者,包括用人公司主管、獵頭顧問與高階候選人各三位,以主題分析法深入探討高階人才招募過程中的文化判斷、信號傳遞與參與經驗。
    研究結果顯示,首先,文化契合在招募前期已被操作為一項結構性篩選機制,除吸引價值一致之人才外,亦排除了具備異質專業背景的潛在貢獻者。其次,中階用人主管於招募互動中的信號傳遞,受到制度與績效壓力之限制,容易聚焦於短期責任與可控範圍,進而影響候選人對組織誠意與心理契約的形成。第三,透過參與式招募與價值共創安排,候選人得以於招募階段即參與職務定位與策略討論,有助於降低不確定感並提升長期承諾意願。
    本研究之發現補充了既有個體–組織契合理論多聚焦於入職後結果的不足,並指出在高度數據導向的組織情境中,文化判斷的運作邏輯可能進一步嵌入制度化決策架構。研究結果對高階人才招募實務具有重要啟發,建議企業重新審視文化契合的運用方式,並透過參與式招募機制促進組織與人才之長期價值共創。

    This study examines how cultural fit, organizational signaling, and value co-creation shape decision-making and commitment formation in executive recruitment. The objective is to investigate how cultural judgments operate as both attraction and exclusion mechanisms during recruitment, how organizational signals influence candidates’ perceptions of sincerity and psychological contracts, and whether participatory recruitment practices enhance long-term commitment.
    Grounded in Person–Organization Fit theory, Signaling Theory, and Service-Dominant Logic, this research adopts a qualitative approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine executive recruitment actors—three hiring managers, three executive search consultants, and three executive candidates. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to capture recurring patterns in cultural evaluation, signal interpretation, and participatory experiences.
    The results reveal three key findings. First, cultural fit is applied early as a rigid screening criterion, often privileging value congruence while excluding candidates with heterogeneous professional expertise. Second, middle managers’ signaling behavior is constrained by institutional routines and performance pressures, leading to an emphasis on short-term responsibilities rather than long-term organizational vision, which weakens candidates’ perceptions of organizational sincerity and psychological contract completeness. Third, participatory recruitment practices that involve candidates in role definition and strategic dialogue reduce uncertainty and strengthen commitment intentions through value co-creation.
    The study concludes that rigid applications of cultural fit may undermine executive recruitment effectiveness. Organizations should redesign recruitment processes to improve signal quality and incorporate participatory mechanisms to support sustainable value co-creation and long-term commitment.

    摘要 I Abstract II 致謝 VII 目錄 VIII 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究問題與研究目的 4 1.3 研究範疇與研究貢獻 5 1.4 章節架構 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1個體–組織契合 (P–O Fit) 與招募決策的權衡 6 2.2招募過程中的資訊不對稱與信任治理風險 7 2.3中階管理者在心理契約建立中的角色與策略悖論 9 2.4參與式決策:透過價值共創強化承諾的機制 11 2.5研究命題展開(P1–P3)13 第三章 研究設計與方法 15 3.1 研究方法與理論基礎 15 3.2 研究對象與樣本設計 16 3.3研究命題與訪談設計 17 3.4 資料分析方法 18 3.5 研究品質與信實度 18 3.6 研究倫理 19 第四章 研究發現與分析 20 4.1 研究發現與分析概述 20 4.2 文化契合作為招募篩選機制 24 4.3 中階管理者的信號傳遞與誠意困境 26 4.4 參與式招募與價值共創經驗 27 4.5 關鍵研究發現 29 第五章 討論與結論 31 5.1 研究發現之理論對話 31 5.2 管理實務意涵 33 5.3 研究限制與未來研究建議 34 5.4 理論與實務的昇華結合 34 參考文獻 35 附錄 39

    1. Al Aina, R., & Atan, T. (2020). The impact of implementing talent management practices on sustainable organizational performance. Sustainability, 12(20), 8372. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208372
    2. Canagasuriam, D. (2021). The effect of organizational culture on faking in the job interview. Psychological Applications and Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25035/PAD.2021.01.008
    3. Chen, T., Yang, S. O., & Leo, C. (2017). The beginning of value co-creation: Understanding dynamics, efforts and betterment. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(6), 1145–1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-12-2015-0257
    4. Egan, T. (2019). Trust in executive search: The client’s perspective. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v16i1.1365
    5. Faulconbridge, J. R., Beaverstock, J. V., Hall, S., & Hewitson, A. (2009). The “war for talent”: The gatekeeper role of executive search firms in elite labour markets. Geoforum, 40(5), 800–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.02.001
    6. Goldberg, A., Srivastava, S. B., Manian, V. G., Monroe, W., & Potts, C. (2016). Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1190–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416671873
    7. Ichdan, D. A., Maryani, M., & Yuliansyah, Y. (2023). Participation in decision-making, career development, and organizational commitment. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 18(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2023.v18.i02.p10
    8. Jooss, S. (2024). Middle managers as key talent management stakeholders: Navigating paradoxes. European Management Review, 21(2), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12587
    9. Kim, T.-Y., David, E. M., Chen, T., & Liang, Y. (2022). Authenticity or self-enhancement? Effects of self-presentation and authentic leadership on trust and performance. Journal of Management, 49(3), 944–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211063807
    10. Koivunen, S., Olsson, T., Olshannikova, E., & Lindberg, A. (2019). Understanding decision-making in recruitment: Opportunities and challenges for information technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), Article 242. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361123
    11. Miles, S. J., & McCamey, R. (2018). The candidate experience: Is it damaging your employer brand? Business Horizons, 61(5), 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.05.007
    12. Ozyilmaz, A., Erdogan, B., & Karaeminogullari, A. (2018). Trust in organization as a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and workplace outcomes: A social cognitive theory-based examination. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(1), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12189
    13. Park, R. (2015). Employee participation and outcomes: Organizational strategy does matter. Employee Relations, 37(5), 604–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2014-0107
    14. Peltokorpi, V. (2022). Headhunter-assisted recruiting practices in foreign subsidiaries and their (dys)functional effects: An institutional work perspective. Journal of World Business, 57(6), 101366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101366
    15. Raziq, M., Rizvi, S. T., & Mahjabeen, A. (2021). The impact of transformational leadership on employee retention: The role of job satisfaction and communication. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 15(4), 103–125.
    16. Rivera, L. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412463213
    17. Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2014). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization–stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784–1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
    18. Shulga, L. V. (2021). Front-line employee self-determination in value co-creation: Generational profiles. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.08.004
    19. Shulga, L. V., & Busser, J. A. (2020). Hospitality employee and customer role in value co-creation: Personal, organizational and collaborative outcomes. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102648
    20. Sonnenberg, M., van Zijderveld, V., & Brinks, M. (2014). The role of talent-perception incongruence in effective talent management. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.011
    21. Sukoco, B. M., Lestari, Y. D., Susanto, E., Nasution, R. A., & Usman. (2022). Middle manager capabilities and organisational performance: The mediating effect of organisational capacity for change. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1365–1384. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2019-0364
    22. Tholen, G. (2023). Matching candidates to culture: How assessments of organisational fit shape the hiring process. Work, Employment and Society, 38(3), 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231155294
    23. Tumasjan, A., Kunze, F., Bruch, H., & Welpe, I. M. (2020). Linking employer branding orientation and firm performance: Testing a dual mediation route of recruitment efficiency and positive affective climate. Human Resource Management, 59(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21980
    24. Valentino, C. L. (2004). The role of middle managers in the transmission and integration of organizational culture. Journal of Healthcare Management, 49(6), 393–404. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15603115
    25. Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2000). Person–organization fit: The match between newcomers’ and recruiters’ preference for organizational cultures. Personnel Psychology, 53(1), 113–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00196.x
    26. Vandenberghe, C. (1999). Organizational culture, person–culture fit, and turnover: A replication in the health care industry. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(2), 175–184. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3100418
    27. Waseem, D., Biggemann, S., & Garry, T. (2021). An exploration of the drivers of employee motivation to facilitate value co-creation. Journal of Services Marketing, 35(4), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2019-0458
    28. Zopiatis, A., Constanti, P., & Theocharous, A. L. (2018). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job involvement: The mediating role of job involvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00132

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE