| 研究生: |
陳海通 Chen, Hai-Tung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
天然粒料與轉爐石瀝青混凝土之工程性質、產製、施工及績效評估 Evaluation of Engineering Properties, Production, Construction and Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixed with Natural Aggregate and Basic Oxygen Furance(BOF) Slag |
| 指導教授: |
陳建旭
Chen, Jian-Shiuh |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系碩士在職專班 Department of Civil Engineering (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2012 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 198 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 轉爐石 、石膠泥瀝青凝土 、密級配瀝青混凝土 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag, Stone Mastic Asphalt, Dense Graded Asphalt Concrete |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:103 下載:10 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討市區道路使用轉爐石Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag (BOF)取代天然粗粒料,做為石膠泥Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA)及密級配Dense Graded Asphalt Concrete (DGAC)瀝青混凝土面層,評估轉爐石密級配瀝青凝土(BOF DGAC)和石膠泥瀝青凝土 (BOF SMA)材料工程性質、產製、施工評估及鋪面績效。本研究於台南市中華西路一段及中華南路二段所進行轉爐石石膠泥瀝青凝土(BOF SMA)、轉爐石密級配瀝青混凝土(BOF DGAC)和天然粒料密級配瀝青混凝土(DGAC)試鋪路段施工前、後進行鋪面現況指標(PCI)、抗滑度試驗、平坦度試驗、車轍量試驗、鋪面密度試驗、Clegg Hammer鋪面衝擊試驗及鑽心試驗等績效評估。
試驗結果顯示平坦度試驗以天然粒料DGAC之IRI值比轉爐石瀝青混凝土上升趨勢大;車轍量試驗以粗粒料與粗粒料接觸產生粒料間互鎖機制之BOF SMA抗車轍能力較佳;Clegg Hammer鋪面衝擊試驗呈現BOF SMA和BOF DGAC路面結構較佳;抗滑度試驗顯示天然粒料DGAC平均BPN值有下降趨勢;鋪面現況指標(PCI)以BOF SMA和BOF DGAC鋪面現況較佳。數據分析顯示添加轉爐石可提升路面績效,目前所呈現結果以BOF SMA路面績效最佳,其次為BOF DGAC,最後為天然粒料DGAC,屬於短期績效,長期路面績效仍需持續觀察。須注意轉爐石粒型方正,粒料容易堆積緊密,且轉爐石表面孔隙較多,吸入孔隙中之瀝青視為無效瀝青,有效瀝青的減少,導致 VMA降低。轉爐石富含鐵質,當冷料經過乾燥爐加熱,溫度提升較天然粒料快速,乾燥爐的轉速及溫度必須調整穩定,減少拌和溫度上下起伏之情形。
Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) slag was utilized in this study to replace the natural coarse aggregates on Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) and Dense Graded Asphalt Concrete (DGAC). The engineering properties, production, construction and performance of asphalt concrete mixed with natural aggregate and BOF slag were investigated.
The test results showed that International Roughness Index (IRI) of traditional DGAC is more sensible than that of BOF DGAC. The resistance to pavement rutting for BOF SMA is better compared to other mixtures. The Clegg Impact Value (CIV) obtained using Clegg hammer test for BOF SMA and BOF DGAC are better than DGAC. Compared with the mixtures with BOF slags, the trend of British Pendulum Number (BPN) for NADGAC is decreased. In addition, the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) results exhibited that the BOF SMA had the better pavement performance. The use of BOF in the substitution of the natural aggregates for asphalt mixtures improves pavement performance. According to the short-term pavement performance, BOF SMA has the best performance, followed by BOF DGAC and DGAC. It is noted that asphalt mixtures containing BOF slags had relatively lower VMA due to the higher porosity compared to natural aggregates.
王金鐘 (2005) 「轉爐石作為基底層材料及其工程特性之研究」,博士論文,國立成功大學土木工程系,台南。
王耀寬 (2007) 「轉爐石對多孔隙瀝青混凝土之影響」,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程系,台南。
林秉祈 (2001) 「台灣地區推動SMA可行性之研究-以竹北市鋪道路為例」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,中壢。
黃隆昇,林登峰,林平全,許伯良 (2010) 「評估煉鋼爐石應用於瀝青混凝土之性質及現場鋪設成效」,中國工程師高雄會刊,第18卷,第2期,第47-55頁。
黃大衛 (2008) 「轉爐石取代傳統粒料對瀝青混凝土VMA性質影響之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程系,中壢。
陳偉全,林平全,葉志潁,姜智通,翁偉儒 (2010) 「轉爐石添加量對多孔隙瀝青混凝土特性之研究」,中國礦冶工程學會礦冶會刊,第54卷,第1期,第97-108頁。
陳虹潔 (2000) 「骨材顆粒組構及型態對瀝青混凝土抗變形能力之影響」,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程系,台南。
袁家偉 (2007) 「使用轉爐石提升耐久性瀝青混凝土成效之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程系,中壢。
歐木己(1991) 「中鋼公司爐石資源化簡介」,第一屆工業減廢技術與策略研討會,第5-9~5-26 頁,台北。
蔡攀鰲 (1984) 瀝青混凝土,三民書局,台北。
蔡攀鰲、陳建旭 (2002),「嘉義市興業路石膠泥瀝青(SMA)試驗路面成效之評估」,國立成功大學,台南。
中國國家標準 (2001)「CNS14602 道路用鋼爐渣」,經濟部標準檢驗局。
中國鋼鐵股份有限公司 (2000) 「轉爐石推廣手冊」,高雄。
中鋼集團 (2007) 「轉爐石利用推廣手冊」,高雄。
施工綱要規範(2003)「第02743章石膠泥瀝青混凝土舖面V3.1」,行政院公共工程委員會。
Brown, E.R. and Mallick, R.B. (1995). “Evaluation of Stone on Stone Contact in Stone Matrix Asphalt,” Journal of Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record, 1492, pp.208-219.
Brown, E.R. and Cooley, Jr. L.A. (1999). “Designing Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures for Rut-Resistant Pavements,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report425.
Brown, E.R. and Haddock, J.E. (1997). “Characterization of Stone Matrix Asphal Mortarst, Eighth International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Seattle Washington, Vol. I Proceedings .
Brown, E.R., Mallick, R.B., Haddock, J.E. and Bukowski, J. (1997).“ Performance of Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) Mixtures in the United States,” National Center for Asphalt Technology, NCAT Report, No.97-1, Auburn University, Alabama.
Brown, E.R., Mallick, R.B., Haddock, J.E. and Bukowski, J. (1997).“ Performance of Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) Mixtures in the United States,” National Center for Asphalt Technology, NCAT Report, No.97-3, Auburn University, Alabama.
Brown, E.R. and Haddock, J.E. (1997). “A Method to Ensure Stone-on-Stone Contact in Stone Matrix Asphalt Paving Mixtures,” Journal of Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record, 1583, pp.11-18.
Bellin, P. (1992). “Use of Stone Mastic Asphalt in Germany State of Art,” Subitted to Transportation Research Board, (on CD ROM).
Brewer, R., (1972). “Fabric and Mineral Analysis of Cohesionless Soils,” John Wiley and Sons, Wiley, New York.
Kandhal, P.S., Roberts, F.L, Browen, E.R., Dah-Yinn, Lee and Kennedy,T.W. (1996). “Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction,”NAPA Education Foundation:Lanham, Maryland, 2nd edition.
Koide (1993). “Research on using BOF slag for road construction,” Nakayama Steel Works Technical Report, Osaka, Japan.
Kuo, C.Y., Rollings, R.S., and Lynch, L.N., (1998). “Morphological Study of Coarse Aggregate Using Image Analysis, “Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, pp.135-142.
National Asphalt Pavement Association. (1994). “Guidelines for Materials, Production, and Placement of Stone Matrix Asphalt,” SMA Technical Working Group(TWG),Maryland.
Noureldin, A. S., and McDaniel, R. S. (1990). “Evaluation of Surface Mixtures of Steel Slag and Asphalt,” Transportation Research Record, n 1269, pp. 133-147.
Scherocman, J.A.(1991).” Stone Mastic Asphalt Reduces Rutting,” Better Roads Vo161, No 11, p.26.
Schmiedlin, R.B.,Bischoff, P.E.D.L.(2002) “STONE MATRIX ASPHALT THE WISCONSIN EXPERIENCE,” FINAL REPORT, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Wisconsin,U.S.
Stuart, K.D., (1990). “Moisture Damage in Asphalt Mixture-A State of the Art Report,” FHWA-RD-90019, Virginia.
The European Slag Association(2006) .“Legal Status of Slags Position Paper”, European。
U.S. Geological Survey(2005).“Iron and Steel Slag End-Use Statistic”, U.S.。