簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 魏旨伶
Wei, Chih-Ling
論文名稱: 金融業購併價值創造之研究-以T金控併購S金控為例
Research on The Value Creation of Financial Sector Merger – A Case Study of The Merger of “T” Financial Holdings and “S” Financial Holdings
指導教授: 楊朝旭
Young, Chaur-Shiuh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 價值創造金融業購併
外文關鍵詞: Value Creation, Financial Sector Merger
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣金融業面臨國內高度競爭及國際競爭壓力,壓縮獲利的空間,如何經營才能更有競爭力是個重要的議題,而購併就是其中的手段。實務上購併案屢見不鮮,失敗者也不在少數,由於購併是為增加價值,因此本研究採用價值創造理論,分別從效率、互補、鎖定及創新四個因子討論,期望金融機構於購併時可以有更全面的考量。本研究以實際金融業購併案為例,蒐集各種次級資料,進行四大構面的分析,探討如何透過購併來創造價值。研究結論如下:
    一、效率面的價值創造
    金融業購併可以藉由整合系統、營業據點及人員等降低總成本,並藉由擴大規模及市占率,提升經營效率。
    二、互補面的的價值創造
    金融業購併可以建立銀行、保險、證券等多元獲利引擎,分散風險,建立更穩健的財務結構。以雙方現有的海外據點為基礎,強化國際佈局實力。整合龐大的通路體系、雙方專業人員及客戶群,產生互補優勢,創造價值。
    三、鎖定面的價值創造
    金融業購併可以提供更多元的金融產品與服務,精準切合客戶需求,保留品牌價值及留任優秀員工,使客戶的轉換成本提高,提升顧客忠誠度。
    四、創新面的價值創造
    金融業購併可以結合兩者的產品創新與設計能力和經驗,發展金融科技,開發更多元化的產品、發展高資產客戶業務,導入AI強化精準行銷及提升作業效率,藉由異業結盟打造更貼近生活的智慧金融服務,發展新的商業模式。

    Taiwan’s financial sector faces fierce domestic competition and international competitive pressures, both of which compress profit margins. How financial institutions can enhance their competitiveness has become a critical issue. Mergers and acquisitions are one of the key strategic approaches to achieve the goal.
    In practice, mergers and acquisitions are commonplace, but numerous cases ended in failure. Since the purpose of mergers and acquisitions is value creation, this study adopts Value Creation Model to discuss four key factors about efficiency, complementarities, lock-in and novelty. The objective is to provide financial institutions with a more comprehensive perspective when they make decisions of mergers and acquisitions.
    The study uses an actual merger and acquisition case in the financial sector, collects secondary data and analyzes four dimensions to explore how value can be created through mergers and acquisitions. The findings of this research are as follows:
    1. Value Creation from Efficiency
    Mergers and acquisitions in the financial sector can reduce total costs through the integration of systems, branches and human sources. Financial institutions can expand the scale and market share to enhance their operational efficiency.
    2. Value Creation from Complementarities
    Mergers and acquisitions in the financial sector enable financial institutions to develop multiple profit engines such as banking, insurance and securities which build strong financial structure and diversify risk. Building upon overseas locations of both parties can expand the international business. By integrating extensive distribution networks, human resources and customer bases from both sides, complementary advantages can be generated to create value.
    3. Value Creation from Lock-in
    Mergers and acquisitions in the financial sector enable financial institutions to provide more diversified financial products and services that meet customer needs precisely. Retaining brand value and staffs increases customer switching costs and enhances customer loyalty.
    4. Value Creation from Novelty
    Mergers and acquisitions in the financial sector enable financial institutions to combine their capabilities and experience in product innovation and design, and develop financial technology and diversified products. They can further expand high–net-worth client services and introduce AI to enhance precision marketing and operational efficiency. Through Cross-industry alliances create smart financial services that are more closely integrated with daily life to innovate business model .

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第三節 研究流程 7 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 金融業併購 8 第二節 價值創造 12 第三章 研究方法 16 第一節 質性個案研究法 16 第二節 研究架構 17 第三節 資料蒐集 18 第四節 個案簡介 19 第四章 個案分析 21 第一節 效率 21 第二節 互補 27 第三節 鎖定 36 第四節 創新 39 第五章 研究結論與建議 46 第一節 研究結論 46 第二節 研究建議 48 第三節 研究限制 51 參考文獻 52

    一、中文文獻
    1. 呂文芳(2015),金融業併購及經營綜效之個案研究分析-以開發金併購凱基證券,國立台北大學會計系碩士論文。
    2. 李淑芬(2006),企業購併前後之經營績效研究,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)碩士論文。
    3. 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005),質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析,身心障礙研究季刊,第三卷第二期,pp122-136。
    4. 洪逸瑞(2005),金控公司消費金融行銷通路策略之研究~以台北富邦銀行與國泰世華銀行為例,私立淡江大學管理科學研究所企業經營碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    5. 高憶娟(2013),台灣壽險公司購併後之經營績效研究-以富邦人壽購併ING 安泰人壽為例,國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
    6. 張夢涵(2015),國內金控同業、異業購併績效探討,國立臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
    7. 陳一誨(2016),中國信託金融控股公司購併績效分析,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)碩士論文。
    8. 陳妙玲、陳欣瑜(2010),金融控股公司購併後業務多角化對財務績效之影響:以成本與市場相關表現爲中介變數,臺大管理論叢,第20卷第2期,pp 251-272。
    9. 陳彥君(2010),服務品質、轉換成本、顧客知識與顧客忠誠度之關聯性研究,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    10. 陶志朋(2022),企業併購案例分析: 以富邦金併購日盛金為例,國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)碩士論文。
    11. 曾昭琪(2014),金融業併購與經營績效關聯性之探討-以B銀行為例,私立東吳大學EMBA高階經營碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    二、英文文獻
    1. Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), pp 895-947.
    2. Penas, M. F., & Unal, H . (2004). Gains in bank mergers: Evidence from the bond markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(1), pp 149-179.
    3. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), pp 306-333.
    4. Alexander, G., Tetimau, F. E., Mahendra, A., & Linawati, N. (2025). Analysis of the Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty of Banking Companies in Indonesia. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 5(2), pp 250-256.
    5. Altunbas, Y., Evans, L., & Molyneux, P. (2001). Bank ownership and efficiency. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33(4), pp 926-954.
    6. Alvarez González, P., & Otero Neira, C. (2019). The effect of mergers and acquisitions on customer–company relationships: Exploring employees’perceptions in the Spanish banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(2), pp 409-428.
    7. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), pp 493-520.
    8. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), pp 181-199.
    9. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp 99-120.
    10. Bergh, D. D. (2001). Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of retained acquired company top executives on corporate acquisition performance. Journal of Management, 27(5), pp 603-622.
    11. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition definition. British Journal of Management, 11, pp 1-15.
    12. Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1983). The rationale behind interfirm tender offer: Information or synergy? Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), pp 183-206.
    13. Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), pp 119-139.
    14. Chesbrough, H. (2017). The future of open innovation: The future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), pp 35-38.
    15. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, pp 3-21.
    16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp 532-550.
    17. Houston, J. F. , & Ryngaert, M. D. (1994). The overall gains from large bank mergers. Journal of Banking and Finance, 18(6), pp 1155-1176.
    18. Houston, J. F. , James, C. M. , & Ryngaert, M. D. (2001). Where do merger gains come from? Bank mergers from the perspective of insiders and outsiders. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), pp 285-331.
    19. Lepak, D. P., Smith, K.G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), pp 180-194.
    20. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), pp 1111-1125.
    21. Liu, T. K. (2010). An empirical study of firms' merger motivations and synergy from Taiwanese banking industry. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 38, pp 13-27.
    22. Lucking-Reiley, D., & Spulber, D. F. (2001). Business-to-Business electronic commerce. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), pp 55-68.
    23. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. NY: Free Press.
    24. Ranft, A. L., & Lord, M. D. (2002). Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4), pp 420-441.
    25. Rhoades, S. A. (1998). The efficiency effects of bank mergers: An overview of case studies of nine mergers. Journal of Banking And Finance, 22(3), pp 273-291.
    26. Rhoades , S. A. (2000). Bank Mergers and Banking Structure in the United States, 1980–98. Staff Study 174, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    27. Singh, H., & Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic management journal, 8(4), pp 377-386.
    28. Ulaga, W., & Chacour, S. (2001). Measuring customer-perceived value in business markets: a prerequisite for marketing strategy development and implementation. Industrial marketing management, 30(6), pp 525-540.
    29. Williamson, O. E. (1977). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(3), pp 540-544.
    30. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), pp 233-261

    QR CODE