簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 朱凱聖
Chu, Kai-Sheng
論文名稱: 領導者-部屬交換關係變異對於組織公平、衝突與職場偏差行為之影響
The influence of LMX differentiation on organizational justice,conflict and deviant workplace behavior
指導教授: 鄭詩瑜
Cheng, Shih-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 組織公平團隊衝突職場偏差行為領導者-部屬交換關係變異
外文關鍵詞: Organizational Justice, Team Conflict, Deviant Workplace Behavior, LMX differentiation
相關次數: 點閱:212下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在高度競爭的環境中,為提升組織整體的效率(effectiveness)與效能(efficiency)以降低環境的不確定性,故以團隊為基礎的運作模式已成為趨勢。然而,在團隊中領導者並非與每位部屬皆建立一致的互動關係。根據領導者-部屬交換關係(Leader-Member Exchange, LMX)理論,必定有某些特定的部屬較受到領導者重視、提拔,故同一團隊內的部屬可能會有認知不公平的情形發生。多數文獻僅探討單一對偶之交換關係(單一領導者與部屬),若將受到不同待遇之部屬組成工作團隊(單一領導者與多部屬),此團隊互動過程是值得探討的議題(Graen & Uhi-Bien, 1995)。故本研究目的在於了解LMX differentiation (團隊中知覺與領導者交換關係變動的程度)與團隊衝突對於LMX、部屬組織公平感受、職場偏差行為之影響,藉以了解部屬之組織公平感受在團隊運作過程中所扮演重要的角色。

    本研究之研究對象為台灣製造業之工作團隊,以問卷調查收集45組工作團隊,共169份問卷(169位非管理職員工)。利用階層線性模式(HLM)進行資料分析,以下四點為本研究主要貢獻:一、部屬之互動公平感受在LMX與職場偏差行為間扮演中介的效果;二、部屬之互動公平感受在團隊關係衝突與職場偏差行為間扮演跨層次中介的效果;三、LMX differentiation會負向影響部屬之互動公平感受;四、LMX differentiation在LMX與部屬互動公平感受具有跨層次調節的效果。

    本研究結論建議企業應以提供獎金或給予部屬表達意見的權力為基礎,且對於部屬的決策應採取尊重與信任的態度,其可增進部屬之成就感或自尊,藉以提升部屬互動公平感受。當部屬遇到困難時,領導者可以與部屬分享寶貴的經驗,甚至可以引進師徒制,以降低不公平的認知。最後,領導者應適時透提案制度,激發部屬間良性衝突,並根據增強理論,透過公司相關法規 (如:解僱、扣除薪資),適時抑減部屬間惡性衝突的發生,以提升團隊的競爭優勢。

    The team-based operation has become more and more popular in the highly competitive business world, because it will enhance the enterprises’ effectiveness and efficiency. However, team leader will not treat each subordinate equally and certain subordinates will get more attention from leader according to Leader Member Exchange theory (LMX). Under such circumstance, subordinates within the same team may perceive injustice. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to understand the impact of LMX differentiation (the extent variability of LMX relationships are perceived within a team) and teamconflict on LMX, subordinates’ perceived organizational justice and their workplace deviant behavior.

    Survey data was collected from 169 subordinates comprising 45 teams in Taiwan manufacturing enterprise through self-developed questionnaire. Research hypotheses were tested with the deployment of hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). Results of the study revealed that (1) the relationship between LMX and workplace deviant behavior is mediated by the subordinates’ perceived interactional justice;(2) the relationship between team relationship conflict and workplace deviant behavior is mediated by the subordinates’ perceived interactional justice;(3) LMX differentiation at group-level has a negative effect on subordinates’ perceived interactional justice;(4) The relationship between LMX and subordinates’ perceived interactional justice is moderated by LMX differentiation at group-level.

    Based on the findings, this study suggests that enterprises should provide subordinates extra bonus or the right to express his/her own ideal. Enterprises should also respect and trust the decision made by subordinates so as to enhance the subordinates’ achievement, self-esteem and perceived interactional justice. When subordinates have some troubles, their leaders can share some valuable experiences or advocate the mentoring to reduce subordinates’ perceived injustice. Finally team leaders should stimulate the functional conflict by suggestion system and to eliminate the dysfunctional conflict by regulations (e.g. layoff or deduct salary) according to reinforcement theory for the advancement of the team competity.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iv 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究範圍 3 第四節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 領導部屬交換理論(Leader-Member Exchange;LMX) 6 2.1.1 LMX之發展與其內涵 6 2.1.2 領導者-部屬交換理論發展程序模型 10 2.1.3 領導者-部屬交換關係變異(LMX differentiation) 11 第二節 組織公平(Organizational Justice) 13 2.2.1 分配公平(Distributive Justice) 13 2.2.2 程序公平(Procedural Justice) 14 2.2.3 互動公平(Interactional Justice) 14 第三節 團隊衝突(Team Conflict) 16 2.3.1 衝突觀點定義與內涵 16 2.3.2 衝突的類型 17 2.3.3 衝突之來源 18 2.3.4 衝突之正負面影響 20 第四節 職場偏差行為(Workplace Deviant Behavior;WDB) 21 2.4.1 職場偏差行為之定義 21 2.4.2 職場偏差行為之分類準則 22 2.4.3 職場偏差行為之衡量構面 24 第五節 研究變數間之關聯性 26 第三章 研究方法 29 第一節 研究模型與假設 29 3.1.1 研究模型架構 29 3.1.2 研究假設 30 第二節 問卷設計 37 3.2.1 問卷設計流程 37 3.2.2 研究變數概念性定義 37 3.2.3 衡量項目與問卷設計 39 第三節 資料分析與驗證 43 3.3.1 敘述性統計分析(Descriptive Statistics Analysis) 43 3.3.2 相關性分析(Correlation Analysis) 43 3.3.3 哈門氏單因子檢定法(Harman’s one factor test) 43 3.3.4 無反應偏差檢定(Non-response bias test) 43 3.3.5 信度分析(Reliability Analysis) 44 3.3.6 驗證型因素分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis;CFA) 44 3.3.7 中介效果驗證 48 3.3.8 階層線性模式(Hierarchical linear modeling;HLM) 49 第四節 問卷前測 55 第五節 資料收集與回收 56 第四章 實證分析結果 57 第一節 敘述性統計分析 57 第二節 常態性檢定 58 第三節 相關性分析 60 第四節 Harman’s單因子檢定 61 第五節 無反應偏差檢定 61 第六節 信度分析 62 第七節 效度分析 63 4.7.1收斂效度 63 4.7.2區別效度 67 第八節 模式契合度檢定 68 第九節 階層線性模式分析 69 4.9.1 虛無模式 69 4.9.2 隨機係數迴歸模式 71 4.9.3 截距預測模式 77 4.9.4 平均數為結果模式 78 4.9.5 斜率預測模式 81 第十節 中介效果的檢驗與分析 82 第十一節 研究假設驗證整理 86 第五章 結論與建議 88 第一節 研究結論 88 5.1.1 個體層次之探討 88 5.1.2 脈絡效果之探討 90 第二節 管理意涵 92 5.2.1 降低部屬間對於組織公平感受的缺口 92 5.2.2 衝突管理的制度 93 第三節 研究貢獻 94 第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 95 5.4.1 研究限制 95 5.4.2 未來研究建議 96 參考文獻97 附錄 研究問卷 106

    中文部分
    邱皓政(民97)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊。

    陳正昌(民98)。多元迴歸分析。陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵 (編著),多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用(27-78頁)。五南文化。

    溫福星(民95)。階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用,台北:雙葉書廊。

    廖卉、莊璦嘉(民97)。多層次理論模型的建立與研究方法。陳曉萍、徐淑英、樊景立、鄭伯壎(編著),組織與管理研究的實證方法(381-411頁)。華泰文化。

    蔡啟通 (民95)。領導者部屬交換與員工創新行為:組織正義之中介效果及組織特性之干擾效果。管理學報,23(2),171-193。

    劉毓玲(譯)(民89)。21世紀的管理挑戰(原著作:P. Drucker)。台北市:天下遠見。

    鄭清揚(民94)。組織公平與職場偏差行為關係之研究。文大商管學報,10(1),75-99.

    Valentine, S.、李清潭、宋兆賢 (民94)。溝通與人際互動。中山大學企業管理學系(編著),管理學-整合觀點與創新思維(354-359頁)。前程文化事業股份有限公司。

    英文部分
    Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Alexander, S. & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 177-198.

    Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.

    Amason, A. C., & Sapiznza, H. J. (1997). The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495-516.

    Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 947-965.

    Armstrong, J. S. & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys, Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.

    Aquino, K., Lewis, M. U., & Bradfield, M. (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1073-1091.

    Aryee, S., & Chen, Z. X. (2006). Leader–member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 793-801.

    Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P., & Biron, M. (2010). Alcohol consumption and workplace absenteeism: The moderating effect of social support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 334-348.

    Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 216-244.

    Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

    Bauer, T. N. & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.

    Bassiri, D. (1988). Large and small sample properties of maximum likelihood estimates for the hierarchical linear model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

    Bennett, R. J. & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360.

    Bies, R. J. & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 676-685.

    Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional Justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard,&M. H. Barerman(Eds), Research on negotiations in organization. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, nonindependence,and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J.Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246-257.

    Bono, J. E., Boles, T. L., Judge, T. A., & Lauver, K. J. (2009). The role of personality in task and relationship conflict. Journal of personality, 70(3), 311-344.

    Burton, J. P., Sablynski, C. J., & Sekiguchi, T. (2008). Linking Justice, Performance, and Citizenship via Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23(1), 51-61.

    Choi, S. (2010). Task and relationship conflict in subordinates and supervisors relations : Interaction effects of justice perceptions and emotion management.(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Cohen-charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organization: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86(2), 278-321.

    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science, 2nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y.(2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445.

    Cosier, R. A., & Rose, G. L. (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19(2), 378-391.

    Cox, K. B. (2003). The effects of intrapersonal, intragroup, and intergroup conflict on team performance effectiveness and work satisfaction. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 153-163.

    Creer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2008). Conflict Transformation: A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between different types and intragroup conflict and the moderating role of conflict resolution. Small Group Research, 39(3), 278-302.

    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

    Cropanzano, R., Bowen D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34-48.

    Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27(3), 324-351.

    Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & B., Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.

    Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and future development. The Academy of Management Review 11(3), 618-634.

    Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2001). Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 547-559.

    Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137-149.

    Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004). Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 67-80.

    Erdogan, B. & Liden, R. C. (2006). Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organization justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organization Behavior, 27(1), 1-17.

    Erdogan, B. (2001). LMX Differentiation fairness: Initial evidence of a new construct. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington D.C.

    Erdogan, B. (2002). A justice perspective to understanding the effects of LMX Differentiation for individual attitudes. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.

    Erdogan, B., Enders, J., & Bauer, T. N. (2007). A multilevel investigation of leader-memberexchange theory: LMX, differentiation, and their implications for justice perceptions andinterpersonal citizenship. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York, NY.


    Folger, R. & Konovsky, M (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Managemen Journal, 32(1), 115-130.

    Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (1999). A model of work frustration–aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 915–93

    Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291-309.

    Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (Eds.). 1997. Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77-88.

    Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109-131.

    Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.

    Graen, G. B. (1976). Role marking process within complex organization. In M. D. Dunette (Eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organization Psychology. Chicago: Rand-NcNally.

    Graen, G. B. (Ed.). 2004. LMX leadership: New frontiers of leadership. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applies Psychology, 75(5), 561-568.

    Greenberg, L., & Barling, J. (1999). Predicting employee aggression against coworkers, subordinates and supervisors: The roles of person behaviors and perceived workplace factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 897-913.

    Guetzkow, H., & Gry, J. (1954). An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups, Human Relations, 7(3), 367-382.

    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517-534.

    Hofmann, D. A. (1977). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical liner models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723-744.

    Hollinger, R. C. & Clark, J. P. (1982). Formal and informal social controls of employee deviance. The Sociological Quarterly, 23(3), 333-343.

    Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal leader-member exchange(LMX) quality: The effects on perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 20-30.

    Ishak, N. A. & Alam, S. S. (2009). The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Empirical Study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 324-334.

    James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation Bias in the Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229.

    James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology,69(1), 85-98.

    Jehn, K. A. & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 187-242.

    Jehn, K. A. & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance.. Academy of management Journal, 44(2), 123-148.

    Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 223-238.

    Jehn, K. A. (1995). A Multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282.

    Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organization groups. Administrative Science quarterly, 42(3), 530-557.

    Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 8(4), 287-305.

    Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.

    Joo, B. K. (2010). Organizational commitment for knowledge workers: The roles of perceived organizational learning culture, leader-member exchange quality, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 69-85.

    Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a Measure of Unethical Behavior in the Workplace: A Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978-1008.

    Kenny, D.A ., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology (4th ed.). In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (Ed), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.

    Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Korsgaard, M. A., Jeong, S. S., Mahony, D. M., & Pitariu, A. H. (2008). A multilevel of intragroup conflict. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1222-1252.

    Lee, J. (2001). Leader-member exchange, perceived organization justice, and cooperative communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 574-589.

    Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Liden,R. C., Erodgan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723-746.

    Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, Control, and Procedural Justice: Instrumental and Noninstrumental Concerns in Fairness Judgments. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 59(5), 952-959.

    Mangione, T. W. & Quinn, R. P. (1975). Job satisfaction, counterproductive behavior, and drug use at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 114-116.

    Mass. C. J. M. & Hox. J. J. (2004). The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46(3), 427-440.

    Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.

    Mikula, G., & Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and social conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 126-135.

    Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2004). Working in a Context of Hostility Toward Women: Implications for Employees’ Well-Being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2), 107-122.

    Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.

    Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1996). Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management, 22(3), 507–526.

    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. (2007). Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcome. Journal of Management, 33(2), 196-222.

    Parayitam, S. & Dooley, R. S. (2009). The interplay between cognitive and affective conflict and cognitive and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. Journal of business Research, 62(8), 789-796.

    Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcome: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615-631.

    Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.

    Peterson, D. K. (2002). Deviant Workplace Behavior and the organization’s ethical climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 47-61.

    Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. E. (1986). Self-Report in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.

    Richard, O. C., Taylor, E. C., Barnett, T., & Nesbit, M. F. A. (2002). Procedural voice and distributive justice: their influence on mentoring career help and other outcomes: Do employees' perceptions of conflicting guidance call the tune? Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 725-735.

    Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organization Behavior, 11th ed. N.J. Prentice Hall.

    Robinson, S. L. & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behavior: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.

    Roch, S. G., & Shanock, L. R. (2006). Organizational Justice in an Exchange Framework:Clarifying Organizational Justice Distinctionst. Journal of Management, 32(2), 299-322

    Scandura, T. A. (1999). Rethinking leader-member exchange: An organizational justice perspective. Leadership, 10(1), 25-40.

    Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of applied Psychology, 82(3), 434-443.

    Smythe, E. (2000). Antecedents of interdepartmental conflict in cross-function enterprise integration project teams. Pacific Asia Conference Information Systems 2000 Proceedings. 931-947.

    Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodlogy (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Song, M., Dyer, B., & Thieme, R. J. (2006). Conflict management and innovation performance: An integrated contingency perspective. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 341-356.

    Spreitzer, G. M. & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 828-847.

    Stewart, M. M. & Johnson, O.E. (2009). Leader Member Exchange as a moderator of the relationship between work group diversity and team performance. Group Organization and Management, 34(5), 507-535.

    Tepper, B. J., Carr, J.C., Breauk, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2006). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance:A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156-167.

    Tekleb, A. G., Takeuchi, R. & Taylor, M. S. (2005). Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 146-157.

    Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79-92.

    Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedure justice:A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

    Thomas, K. A. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274.

    Van Breukelen, W., Schyns, B., & Blanc, P. L. (2006). Leader-member exchange theory and research: Accomplishments and future challenges. Leadership, 2(3), 295-316.

    Van Woerkom, M., & Van Engen, M. L. (2010). Learning from conflicts? The relations between task and relationship conflicts, team learning and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 18(4), 381-404.

    Vodosek, M. (2007). Intragroup conflict as a mediator between cultural diversity and work group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(4), 345-375.

    Wall, V. D. & Nolan, L. L. (1986). Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction and conflict in task-oriented groups. Human Relations, 39(11), 1033-1051.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2021-12-31公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE