| 研究生: |
許雅琳 Hsu, Ya-Lin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業生命週期對併購後股票長期異常報酬之影響:以台灣之主併公司為例 The Impact of Life Cycle on Long-term Abnormal Return of M&A Activities: Evidence from Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
王澤世
Wang, Tse-Shih |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 58 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 企業併購 、企業生命週期 、併購型態 、長期異常報酬 、買進與持有報酬 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | M&A activities, corporate life cycle, M&A types, long-term abnormal return, Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Return |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:152 下載:27 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討主併公司企業生命週期對併購後股票長期異常報酬之影響,另外本研究亦認為企業於不同生命週期階段傾向進行不同型態的併購,間接也影響了併購結果,故一併探討併購型態對併購後股票長期異常報酬之影響。研究樣本為2002年至2016年間台灣上市櫃公司已完成且併購後取得過半控制權之併購案,總樣本數為241件。生命週期變數參考Anthony & Ramesh於1992年使用的生命週期階段衡量指標,將公司分為成長期、成熟期與停滯期三個階段,併購後股票長期異常報酬使用Barber & Lyon於1997年提出的買進與持有報酬(Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Return, BHAR)為衡量指標,實證結果如下:(1)停滯期公司併購後長期績效表現最佳;(2)從事水平合併長期績效表現優於從事多角化合併;(3)併購後的長期績效表現與公司規模呈負相關;(4)併購後長期績效表現與財務槓桿及自由現金流量呈正相關;(5)併購後長期績效表現與Tobin’s Q及獲利能力呈負相關。
This thesis is to explore the impact of the corporate life cycle of the acquirer on its long-term abnormal return of stock after mergers and acquisitions (M&As). This study argues that companies tend to conduct different M&A types at different stages of life cycle, which indirectly affects the results of M&A activities. Therefore, the effect of M&A type on the long-term abnormal stock return after the mergers is also discussed together. The research sample includes M&A activities of Taiwan’s listed companies that have obtained more than half of the ownership after the merger from 2002 to 2016. The life cycle stage is similarly defined as in Anthony & Ramesh (1992), and the companies are divided into three stages: growth, mature and stagnant. This study applies the long-term abnormal stock return proposed by Barber & Lyon (1997) to examine the long-term performance of the acquirer. The empirical results are as follows: (1) Acquirers in the stagnant stage perform the best in terms of long-term performance; (2) Acquirers perform better for horizontal mergers than for conglomerate mergers; (3) Acquirers’long-term performance after merger is negatively associated with its size. (4) Acquirers’ long-term performance after merger is positively associated with its degree of financial leverage and free cash flow; (5) Acquirers’long-term performance after merger is negatively associated with both the acquirer’s Tobin's Q and profitability.
一、中文文獻
1.杜曉君 (1999),「購併事件宣告時主併公司特質對股東財富影響之研究-以台灣上市公司為例」,東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
2.李國榮、呂素蓮、洪榆棟 (2012),「企業購併績效再檢驗:以台灣電子業為例」,臺灣企業績效學刊,5卷2期,第153-171頁。
3.李興晟 (2017),「公司治理特性對公司併購績效之影響」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
4.林惠玲 (2003),「廠商合併與其生產力─台灣製造業廠商之驗證」
5.林家樂 (2013),「企業生命週期對併購活動與併購後經營績效影響之研究」,東海大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
6.邱俊耀 (2019),「台灣上市櫃公司併購前之公司特徵對併購後績效影響:以主併公司為例」,國立臺中科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
7.陳匯中 (1995),「上市公司購併宣告對股東財富影響之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8.陳柔全 (2008),「企業購併決策因素與購併後長期績效之研究」,台灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
9.彭一正 (1992),「臺灣企業進行國際併購對股東財富影響之實證研究」,輔仁大學理學研究所碩士論文。
10.曾昭玲、周小玲 (2007),「企業成長機會之於融資政策及股利政策影響之多期性研究」,東吳經濟商學學報,第五十七期,頁49-77。
11.曾皓炫 (2010),「自由現金流量假說與代理理論之台灣實證」,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
12.黃冠育 (2020),「企業財務特性、併購型態與支付工具對併購後績效之影響」,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
13.楊朝旭、黃潔 (2004),「企業生命週期、資產組合與企業未來績效關聯性之研究」,商管科技季刊,第五卷,第一期,頁49-71。
二、外文文獻
1.Asquith, P., Bruner, R. F., & Mullins Jr, D. W. (1983). The gains to bidding firms from merger. Journal of financial economics, 11(1-4), 121-139.
2.Adizes, I. (1988). Corporate lifecycles: How and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it. Business & Professional Division.
3.Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and economics, 15(2-3), 203-227.
4.Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. the Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.
5.Ahmed, K., & Jinan, M. (2011). The association between research and development expenditure and firm performance: Testing a life cycle hypothesis. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 7(4), 267-286.
6.Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of financial Economics, 21(1), 3-40.
7.Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of financial economics, 43(3), 341-372.
8.Black, E. L. (1998). Which is more value relevant: Earnings or cash flows? A life cycle examination.” University of Arkansas.
9.Crutchley, C. E., & Hansen, R. S. (1989). A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends. Financial Management, 36-46.
10.Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series, 4 (16), 386-405.
11.Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S., Hsing, A., & Huang, C. W. (2007). Investment opportunities, free cash flow, and stock valuation effects of secured debt offerings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28, 123-145.
12.Christensen, C. M., Alton, R., Rising, C., & Waldeck, A. (2011). The new M&A playbook. Harvard business review, 89(3), 48-57.
13.Chuang, K. S. (2017). Corporate life cycle, investment banks and shareholder wealth in M&As. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 63, 122-134.
14.Datta, D. K., Pinches, G. E., & Narayanan, V. K. (1992). Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: A meta‐analysis. Strategic management journal, 13(1), 67-84.
15.Dong, M., Hirshleifer, D., Richardson, S., & Teoh, S. H. (2006). Does investor misvaluation drive the takeover market?. The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 725-762.
16.Elgers, P. T., & Clark, J. J. (1980). Merger types and shareholder returns: Additional evidence. Financial management, 66-72.
17.Eckbo, B. E. (1983). Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth. Journal of financial Economics, 11(1-4), 241-273.
18.Fan, J. P., & Goyal, V. K. (2006). On the patterns and wealth effects of vertical mergers. The Journal of Business, 79(2), 877-902.
19.Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review 50 (4): p. 37-46.
20.Greiner, L. E. (1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard business review, 76(3), 55-64.
21.Gorton, G., Kahl, M., & Rosen, R. J. (2009). Eat or be eaten: A theory of mergers and firm size. The Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1291-1344.
22.Haire, M. (1959). Biological models and empirical histories of the growth of organizations. Modern organization theory, 10, 272-306.
23.Higgins, R. C., & Schall, L. D. (1975). Corporate bankruptcy and conglomerate merger. The Journal of Finance, 30(1), 93-113.
24.Halpern, P. (1983). Corporate acquisitions: A theory of special cases? A review of event studies applied to acquisitions. The journal of Finance, 38(2), 297-317.
25.Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. (1997). Which takeovers are profitable? Strategic or financial. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 45.
26.Hayward, M. L., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative science quarterly, 103-127.
27.Heaton, J. B. (2002). Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial management, 33-45.
28.Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
29.Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
30.Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.
31.Jarrell, G. A., Brickley, J. A., & Netter, J. M. (1988). The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. Journal of Economic perspectives, 2(1), 49-68.
32.Jensen, M. C.(2005). Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financial management, 34(1), 5-19.
33.Jiang, J. (2019). An empirical study on M&A performance: Evidence from horizontal mergers and acquisitions in the United States. Open Journal of Business and Management, 7(02), 976.
34.Levitt, T. (1965). Exploit the product life cycle (Vol. 43). Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
35.Lewellen, W. G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. The journal of Finance, 26(2), 521-537.
36.Lewis, V. L., & Churchill, N. C. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
37.Lichtenberg, F. R., Siegel, D., Jorgenson, D., & Mansfield, E. (1987). Productivity and changes in ownership of manufacturing plants. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 643-683.
38.Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. the Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771-787.
39.Lang, L. H., Stulz, R., & Walkling, R. A. (1991). A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The case of bidder returns. Journal of financial economics, 29(2), 315-335.
40.Limmack, R. J. (1991). Corporate mergers and shareholder wealth effects: 1977-1986. Accounting and Business Research, 21(83), 239-252.
41.Leeth, J. D., & Borg, J. R. (2000). The impact of takeovers on shareholder wealth during the 1920s merger wave. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(2), 217-238.
42.Marris, R. (1964), “The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism” Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
43.Meeks, G. (1977). Disappointing marriage: A study of the gains from merger (Vol. 51). CUP Archive.
44.Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of financial economics, 73(2), 201-228.
45.Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. the Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1851-1889.
46.Nocke, V., & White, L. (2007). Do vertical mergers facilitate upstream collusion?. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1321-1339.
47.Owen, S., & Yawson, A. (2010). Corporate life cycle and M&A activity. Journal of banking & finance, 34(2), 427-440.
48.Pettway, R. H., & Yamada, T. (1986). Mergers in Japan and their impacts upon stockholders' wealth. Financial Management, 43-52.
49.Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of business, 197-216.
50.Rodrik, D. (1999). The new global economy and developing countries: making openness work (Vol. 24). Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.
51.Steinmetz, L. L. (1969). Critical stages of small business growth: When they occur and how to survive them. Business horizons, 12(1), 29-36.
52.Servaes, H. (1991). Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers. The journal of finance, 46(1), 409-419.
53.Sudarsanam, S., Holl, P., & Salami, A. (1996). Shareholder wealth gains in mergers: effect of synergy and ownership structure. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23(5‐6), 673-698.
54.Sharma, D. S., & Ho, J. (2002). The impact of acquisitions on operating performance: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1‐2), 155-200.
55.Telser, L. G. (1984). Innovation: its public and private aspects and some of their empirical implications for mergers. Economic Inquiry, 22(4), 634-659.
56.Telser, L. G. (1987). A theory of efficient cooperation and competition. Cambridge Books.
57.Weinberg, M. (2008). The price effects of horizontal mergers. Journal of competition Law and Economics, 4(2), 433-447.
58.Wang, S., Wu, K., & Lai, S. (2022). Acquisition for innovations? M&A intensity and intra-firm innovation reallocations. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101721.
59.Zhao, L., & Zhang, Q. (2020). The Performance of Enterprise M&A Under Various Types of M&A. In IEIS2019: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering (pp. 545-556). Springer Singapore.