簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉岳政
Liu, Yueh-Cheng
論文名稱: 永續金融評鑑對臺灣金融業財務績效與企業價值之影響
The Impact of Sustainable Finance Evaluation on Financial Performance and Corporate Value of Taiwan's Financial Industry
指導教授: 黃華瑋
Huang, Hua-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 永續金融評鑑財務績效企業價值固定效應模型
外文關鍵詞: Sustainable Finance Evaluation, Financial Performance, Corporate Value, Fixed Effects Model, Signaling Theory
相關次數: 點閱:5下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討金管會推動之「永續金融評鑑」與臺灣金融業財務績效及企業價值之關聯性。研究樣本涵蓋 2022 年至 2024 年之臺灣金融機構面板資料,並採用固定效應模型進行計量分析。基於資料可得性與估計之嚴謹性,本研究之會計績效模型包含 171 筆有效觀察值,市場價值模型則為 138 筆有效觀察值。
    本研究期望透過科學化之數據檢驗,釐清金融機構投入永續轉型對其財務與市場評價之影響。本研究之探討不僅可為國內新興之永續金融政策提供量化參考,亦可協助主管機關評估政策推動成效、提供金融業者優化資源配置之管理意涵,並作為市場參與者客觀之投資決策指標。

    This study investigates the strategic relationship between the "Sustainable Finance Evaluation" mandated by the Financial Supervisory Commission and both the financial performance and market corporate value of financial institutions in Taiwan. Utilizing a panel dataset from 2022 to 2024 and employing a Panel Fixed Effects Model, this research bifurcates the sample into an accounting performance model (171 observations) and a market valuation model (138 observations) based on data availability. The empirical findings reveal a distinct asymmetrical "J-curve" effect: achieving a top-tier evaluation ranking exerts a temporary compression on current-period accounting profitability (ROE) due to substantial compliance and structural transition costs, particularly within the highly leveraged banking sector. Conversely, the capital market rewards these top-tier institutions with a significant signaling premium, manifested in enhanced market valuations (P/B Ratio and Tobin's Q). Robustness checks confirm that the negative accounting shock is short-lived, dissolving in subsequent periods as dynamic governance dividends materialize. These insights offer crucial institutional references for regulators, corporate executives, and market investors.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的 4 第四節 研究對象與範圍 5 第五節 研究貢獻 6 第二章 文獻探討與研究假說 7 第一節 相關理論基礎與演進 7 第二節 金融機構之技術性清算與當期財務壓力 10 第三節 永續金融評鑑之動態演進與價值形塑 11 第四節 制度演進:永續金融評鑑之特性對比 12 第五節 研究價值、限制與未來展望 12 第六節 研究假說建立 14 第三章 研究方法 16 第一節 樣本選取與資料來源 16 第二節 變數定義與衡量 18 第三節 實證模型設定 19 第四節 分析方法 21 第四章 實證結果與分析 23 第一節 敘述性統計與業別異質性分析 23 第二節 相關分析 26 第三節 實證迴歸結果分析 28 第四節 市場價值分析:訊號傳遞假說之檢證 31 第五節 跨期動態分析:J 型曲線之初步檢證 34 第六節 穩健性檢定 35 第五章 結論與建議 40 第一節 研究結論 40 第二節 文獻與理論對話 42 第三節 研究啟示與因應對策 43 第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向 44 參考文獻 46 參考網頁 50 附錄一:永續金融評鑑執行機制與計分架構彙整 51 附錄二:永續金融評鑑關鍵技術指標明細表 53 附錄三:評鑑指標與本研究變數對照表 54 附錄四:永續金融評鑑優異名單與分級彙總表 (2022-2024) 55 附錄五:第一屆與第二屆永續金融評鑑受評機構名單 56

    沈中華、張元 (2008)。企業的社會責任可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例。經濟論文,36(3),339-385。
    林俊傑、劉梧柏、黃華瑋 (2018)。公司治理評覽與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討:以臺灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例。商略學報,10(1),23-46。
    吳惠淑(2019)。《台灣金融業公司治理評鑑與企業價值研究》。國立成功大學財務金融所在職專班碩士論文
    金融監督管理委員會 (2022)。綠色金融行動方案3.0。臺北:金管會。
    金融監督管理委員會 (2022,2024)。永續金融評鑑作業說明。臺北:金管會。
    Azmi, W., Hassan, M. K., Houston, R., & Karim, M. S. (2021). ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, 101277.
    Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304-1320.
    Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325-1343.
    Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Kuo, H. I., & Wang, M. E. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716.
    Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.
    Danisman, G. O., & Tarazi, A. (2024). ESG activity and bank lending during financial crises. Journal of Financial Stability, 70, 101206.
    Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87-109.
    Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
    Eccles, R. G., & Youmans, T. (2016). Materiality in corporate governance: The unfolding of a shareholder primacy paradigm. Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 39-46.
    Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
    Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568.
    Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
    Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
    Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 32-33.
    Houston, J. F., & Shan, H. (2022a). Corporate ESG profiles and banking relationships. The Review of Financial Studies, 35(7), 3373–3417.
    Houston, J. F., & Shan, H. (2022b). Corporate social responsibility and bank debt. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(2), 449–477.
    Hunjra, A. I., Jebabli, I., Thrikawala, S. S., Alawi, S. M., & Mehmood, R. (2024). How do corporate governance and corporate social responsibility affect credit risk? Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102139.
    IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S1 General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information.
    Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
    Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2023). ESG dimensions and banking performance: An empirical investigation in Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(3), 563-586.
    Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
    Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.

    QR CODE