臺灣的工藝產業受柳宗悅提出的民藝運動影響很深，其所包含的觀點深深影響著現代人的生活態度。然而由於外在環境改變，臺灣的工藝產業優勢銳減，面臨轉型危機，而2008年台灣的工藝產業納入了文創產業，這無疑是一個重要的里程碑，期望透過增添文化、創意和生活的元素，透過跨域合作，為傳統工藝產業找一個新方向。國立臺灣工藝研究發展中心創立「Yii」品牌即是以當代設計轉化傳統工藝，將工藝技術帶進日常生活，透過工藝師與設計師的跨域合作，突破傳統創作界限，賦予工藝產品當代的意義，尋找工藝產業新的可能性。然而綜觀Yii品牌下的當代工藝品，發現許多工藝品在意義上有別於傳統工藝品，部分實現以意義創新將工藝融入當代生活模式的理念，但是當前學者鮮少談到工藝產品的意義改變層面，且少有研究探討有關於工藝產品的跨域合作流程。因此，本研究目的是於工藝產品的合作中，檢視工藝師與設計師的角色，探討工藝產業所需的意義創新，以設計師為詮釋者之視角，分析工藝師與設計師合作模式和發展意義創新的流程與操作策略。
根據文獻探討和研究目的，本研究採用質性研究中的多個案研究和和深度訪談。透過九位來自工藝領域和設計領域的受訪資料，研究主要發現臺灣工藝產業需要在文化教育面多做投資，穩固基底後，才能做有效的意義創新，另一意義創新的關鍵在於工藝生活化，唯有與生活接軌，才能促進工藝的發展。在跨域合作方面，即使工藝師與設計師的界線愈來愈模糊，工藝師與設計師仍各有特點，本研究分析出三種工藝師與設計師的跨域合作模式，根據工藝的文化特性，提出適合臺灣工藝的意義創新流程，並根據各個階段提出操作策略，期望能提供欲涉略跨域合作的工藝師或設計師一些發現和指引作為參考，進而提升工藝產業與設計師之跨域合作意義創新的可能性。

Taiwan's craft industry is deeply influenced by the Mingei movement proposed by Sôetsu. It significantly influences modern people’s life style. However, due to changes in the external environment, the advantage of Taiwan's craft industry sharply decreased. Craft industry faced with the crisis of transformation. At this moment, Taiwan's craft industry has been categorized into the cultural and creative industries in 2008, which is undoubtedly an important milestone. By adding cultural, creative and life elements, it aims to find a new way out. National Taiwan Craft Research and Development Center, developed the "Yii" brand which transforms traditional craft by modern design and brings craft into daily life. Through the interdisciplinary collaboration between craftsmen and designers, it breaks the boundaries of traditional craft and gives the significance of modern products, exploring new possibilities. Among the modern craft products in the Yii brand, it is found that the meaning of many craft products is different from the traditional ones. It partly realized the idea of using meaning innovation to bring craft into the modern lifestyle. However, scholars seldom discuss the phase of meaning change of craft products. And there is also few research related to the process of the interdisciplinary collaboration of craft products. Therefore, this research aims (1)to identify profile of designer and craftsman; (2)to clarify the type of meaning innovation in craft industry; (3)to explore the pattern of interdisciplinary collaboration between craftsman and designer; and (4)to develop meaning innovation process and operational strategy of craft products under the circumstance of designer as interpreter.
Based on the literature review and research objectives, this research adopts qualitative methods, multiple case study, and in-depth interview. According to interview data from nine interviewees of craft discipline and design discipline, this research presents that in Taiwan’s craft industry, it is essential to put more efforts on the education of cultural context. Only if the foundation is stable, it is possible to conduct efficient meaning innovation. Another key point of meaning innovation is to make craft get closer to life. The more craft gets closer to life, the more development we can make. Regarding of interdisciplinary collaboration, even if the line between craftsmen and designers is getting blurred, they still have their respective characteristics. Furthermore, this research proposes three patterns of interdisciplinary collaboration. According to the cultural context of craft, meaning innovation process and operational strategy in each phase are presented, especially for craft in Taiwan. It is hoped to provide some insights and guideline for craftsmen or designers who are interested in the interdisciplinary collaboration as a reference. Furthermore, increase the possibility of meaning innovation in the interdisciplinary collaboration between craftsmen and designers.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Babbie, E. R. (1989). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Babbie, E. R. (2015). The practice of social research. Nelson Education.
Berg, B. L., Lune, H., & Lune, H. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Berg BL (2009) Qualitative Research Methods For The Social Sciences. Seventh edition. Allyn and Bacon, Boston MA.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.
Brewer, G. D. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy sciences, 32(4), 327-337.
Bridges J, Gray W, Box G et al (2008) Discovery interviews: a mechanism for user involvement. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 3, 3, 206-210.
Blauvelt, G., Wrensch, T., Eisenberg, M. (1999). Integrating craft materials and computation. In L. Candy & R. Edmonds(Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Creativity & Cognition (C & C’99), (pp. 50-56). New York, NY:ACM.
Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., & Arnold, T. J. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of consumer research, 29(4), 551-565.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Crawford, A. (1997). Ideas and objects: the arts and crafts movement in Britain. Design Issues, 13(1), 15-26.
Crook, T. (2009). Craft and the dialogics of modernity: the arts and crafts movement in late-Victorian and Edwardian England. The Journal of Modern Craft, 2(1), 17-32.
Dell’Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2007) Strategies of Innovation and Imitation of Product Languages. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 580-599.
Dell'Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2009). Design‐driven laboratories: organization and strategy of laboratories specialized in the development of radical design‐driven innovations. R&d Management, 39(1), 1-20.
Dell'Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2010). Collaborative strategies in design-intensive industries: knowledge diversity and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 123-141.
Dell'Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2010). Diffusion Processes of Product Meanings in Design-Intensive Industries: Determinants and Dynamics. In Proceedings of 17th International Product Development Management Conference. European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management. (EIASM Conference Proceedings Series).
Dell'Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2011). Diffusion Processes of Product Meanings in Design‐Intensive Industries: Determinants and Dynamics. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 881-895.
Deloumeaux, L. (2016). The Globalisation of Cultural Trade: A Shift in Consumption.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Gil, J., Bedolla, D., & Lloveras, J. (2004). New ways to educate designers through the learning of craft and new craft design in the creation of material culture. In DS 33: Proceedings of E&PDE 2004, the 7th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Delft, the Netherlands, 02.-03.09. 2004.
Farhana. M., Bimenyimana, E.(2015). Design Driven Innovation as a Differentiation Strategy -in the Context of Automotive Industry. Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation, 10(2).
Kembaren, P., Togar M. S., Larso, D. (2011) The Exploration of Design Driven Innovation as a Dynamic Capability, The Asian Journal of Technology Management Vol. 4 No. 1 (2011) 16-27
Kikuchi, Y. (1994). The Myth of Yanagi's Originality: The Formation of" Mingei" Theory in Its Social and Historical Context. Journal of Design History, 7(4), 247-266.
Kikuchi, Y. (1997). A Japanese William Morris: Yanagi Soetsu and Mingei Theory. Journal of William Morris Studies (JWMS), (12), 39-45.
Kouhia, A. (2012). Categorizing the meanings of craft: A multi-perspectival framework for eight interrelated meaning categories. Techne Series-Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 19(1).
Mamykina, L., Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communications of the ACM, 45(10). doi: 10.1145/570907.570940
McGuiggan, R., & Lee, G. (2008). Cross-Case Analysis: An Alternative Methodology Robyn McGuiggan and Geoffrey Lee, University of Western Sydney. In Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2008 (pp. 1-7).
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books.
Norman, D. A. (2005). Emotional Design. Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-05136-7.
Norman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues, 30(1), 78-96. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00250
Petri, L. (2010, April). Concept analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration. In Nursing forum (Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 73-82). Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Pöllänen, S. (2013). The meaning of craft: Craft makers' descriptions of craft as an occupation. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 20(3), 217-227.
Raulik, G. (2004). Models of design intervention. FutureGround, 188-201.
Risatti, H. (2007). A theory of craft. Function and aesthetic expression. The University of North Carolina.
Soetsu, Y. (1972). The unknown craftsman: A Japanese insight into beauty. Kondasha International LTD.
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18.
Schmitt, B. & Simonson, A. (1997). Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity, and Image. New York: The Free Press.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Sanaka, Tadashi. (2010). A socioeconomic essay on Mingei movement with some reference to the arts and crafts movement in UK. 比治山大学現代文化学部紀要, (17), 63-78.
Santagata, W. (2002). Cultural districts, property rights and sustainable economic growth. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1), 9-23.
Stankiewicz, M. A. (1992). From the aesthetic movement to the arts and crafts movement. Studies in Art Education, 33(3), 165-173.
Takeyama, M., Tsukui, K., Yamaguchi, H., & Matsuo, K. (2016, May). Design-Driven Service Innovation: A Method to Change the Meaning of a Service. In Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes. 2016 Conference (No. 125, pp. 53-64). Linköping University Electronic Press.
Tress, B., Tress, G., and Fry, G., 2003. Potential and limitations of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., Van der Valk, A., et al. eds. Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in landscape studies: potential and limitations. Delta Program, Wageningen, 182-192. Delta Series no. 2.
Tress, B., Tress, G., & Fry, G., 2005. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70 (1/2), 177-191.
Tress, G., Tress, B., & Fry, G., in press. Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology.
Tress, B., Tress, G. & Fry, G. 2005. Defining integrative research concepts and process of knowledge production. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., Fry, G., Opdam, P. (eds.). From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application. Heidelberg, Springer, 13-26.
Tress, B., Tress, G. & Fry, G. 2005. Ten steps to success in integrative research projects. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., Fry, G., Opdam, P. (eds.). From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application. Heidelberg, Springer, 241-257.
Tress, G., Tress, B. & Fry, G. (2006). Publishing integrative landscape research: analysis of editorial policies of peer-reviewed journals. environmental science & policy, 9(5), 466-475.
Tung, F. -W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6(3), 71-84.
Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: a researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19(1-2), 75-87.
UNESCO. (2005). Designers meet artisans. New Dheli, India: Craft Revival Trust.
UNCTAD, W. (2009). World investment report 2009. Retrieved February, 18, 2010.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405.
Verganti, R. (2003). Design as brokering of languages: Innovation strategies in Italian firms. Design Management Review, 14(3), 34-42.
Verganti, R. (2006). » Design as Brokering of Languages: The Role of Designers in the Innovation Strategy of Italians Firms.«. Design Management Journal, 14(3), 34-42.
Verganti, R. (2013). Design driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard Business Press.
Verganti, R. (2006). Innovating through design. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 114-122.    
Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of product innovation management, 25(5), 436-456.
Verganti, R. (2009). Design Driven Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.     
Verganti, R. (2011). Designing Breakthrough Products. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89, N 10, pp. 114-120.  
Verganti, R., & Dell'Era, C. (2009). Design-driven innovation. Boston, MA.
Verganti, R., & Öberg, Å. (2013). Interpreting and envisioning—A hermeneutic framework to look at radical innovation of meanings. Industrial marketing management, 42(1), 86-95.
Verganti, R. & Pisano, G. P. (2008) Which Kind of Collaboration is Right for You. Harvard Business Review,Harvard Boston, USA, Vol. 86, pp. 78-86.
Winder, N., 2003. Successes and problems when conducting interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary (= integrative) research. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., Van der Valk, A., et al. eds. Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in landscape studies: potential and limitations. Delta Program, Wageningen, 74-90. Delta Series no. 2.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.
林伯賢(2011)。工藝產業，再現風華。
林炎旦(2010)。《文化創意產業理論與實務》。臺北市:師大書苑。
林炎旦(2012)。從兩岸競合關係談我國工藝產業之發展。臺灣工藝季刊47：6-13。
林承緯(2006)。柳宗悅與台灣民藝。文資學報，2，71-88。
林承緯(2008)。 顏水龍的台灣工藝復興運動與柳宗悅-生活工藝運動之比較研究-。藝術評論，18，167-195。
林媛婉 (2002)。從後殖民文化論述探討台灣傳統工藝的演變。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC 90-2411-H-324-003)。
林媛婉(2003)。傳統工藝的現代化─由英國美術工藝運動談起。政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC91-2411-H-324-002-)。
林媛婉(2004)。台灣工藝研究的議題-一個後殖民文化論述的觀點。設計學報，9，2，1-12。
高宜淓(2012)。竹山竹工藝產業的發展轉型與文化創意(博士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/20808499834762684204。
陳依蓉(2015)。傳統工藝的文創產業轉型之研究-以苗栗工藝產業研發分館為例(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/67357741968472190822。
陳怡錩(2009)。工藝產業經營績效評估指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/70534560093514025992。
黃台生，王韻筑(2009)。是工藝亦或是工器。2009年世界華人工業設計論壇。取自http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/handle/310901800/8960。
黃世輝(2008)。97工藝產業資源調查規畫暨執行結案報告書。國立台灣工藝研究發展中心，南投，未出版。
黃世輝(2009)。98工藝產業資源調查規畫暨執行結案報告書。國立台灣工藝研究發展中心，南投，未出版。
黃世輝(2010)。台灣百年工藝展規劃結案報告書。國立台灣工藝研究發展中心，南投，未出版。
黃世輝，高宜淓(2009)。工藝產值的現況與潛在能量，視界‧2008臺灣工藝創意產業。國立台灣工藝研究發展中心，南投，頁112-117。
黃世輝，高宜淓(2010)。台灣工藝產業再發展與轉型之研究。科技學刊，19，人文社會類，1，49-58。
黃世輝，劉秋雪(2013)。台灣工藝之家在設計與行銷上的轉型問題分析。科技學刊，22，人文社會類，2，121-133。
黃筱媛(2013)。以設計創新融合工藝技法之實驗創作—以漆藝為例(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/91256375028409472675。
蕭正鼎(2012)。工業政策對台灣工藝地方產業之影響(碩士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/50750953462809565346。
謝玫晃 (2014)。藝術商品設計創新與營銷策略之研究(博士論文)。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/80105037350380202730。
蘇佩萱，黃婷琪(2012)。手感品牌研究－以臺灣工藝時尚品牌「Yii」為例。藝術學報，(90)，89-116。
104 年工藝產業趨勢研究計畫 (2015)。委託專業服務採購案結案報告書。