| 研究生: |
吳澤生 Wu, Tse-Sheng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
影響矯正機關醫療滿意度因素之研究-以臺灣臺中監獄醫療專區為例 The Research on Factors of Medical Care Satisfaction in Correctional Institution-An Empirical Study of Medical Treatment Special Quarter in Taichung Prison |
| 指導教授: |
馬瀰嘉
Ma, Mi-Chia 蔡明田 Tsai, Ming-Tien |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 105 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 邏輯斯迴歸 、醫療專區 、矯正機關 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Logistic Regression Model, Medical Treatment Special Quarter, Correctional Institution |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:91 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
獄政革新近年來已有顯著的進步,但在收容人的醫療課題上,始終無法突破。目前各監所醫療設備僅能對收容人施以簡單、基本之診療,如遇收容人罹患重病或急病仍需以「戒護外醫」之方式辦理,因此,臺灣臺中監獄受命辦理法務部中區醫療專區,收容各矯正機關的男性精神病患、肺結核病患、尿毒症病患、後天免疫缺乏症候群感染者及附設培德醫院收容一般急性病房住院病患,其目的除了集中管理急重症病患以外,亦可減少各監所戒護外醫的次數。
本研究主要以收容於臺中監獄醫療專區急重症之病患為對象,探討不同個人基本特性在原屬監所及在醫療專區醫療服務滿意情形,並比較收容人在原屬監所和醫療專區醫療滿意度之改變是否顯著,探討個人基本資料、醫療滿意度五大構面,對推薦其他收容人到醫療專區就醫意願的影響情形,藉邏輯斯迴歸模型找出之間的關係。
本研究採用分層隨機抽樣方式發放調查問卷,以SPSS統計軟體進行實證資料分析,使用之研究方法有信度分析、敘述性統計分析、變異數分析、Pearson相關分析、配對t檢定和邏輯斯迴歸分析等,研究結果發現:
一、 本研究問卷各構面之信度至少80%。
二、 不論對原屬監所或醫療專區,個人基本資料中,移入專區不同疾病原因的收容人對醫療服務五大構面之平均滿意度有顯著差異;入監執行時間和就醫行政面有顯著相關。
三、 五大構面滿意度問卷,19題中有15題顯示原屬監所及醫療專區醫療服務滿意度有顯著差異,且醫療專區醫療服務滿意度大於原屬監所。
四、 醫療專區收容人有無推薦意願和原屬監所醫療服務滿意度無顯著相關,但和醫療專區醫療服務滿意度有顯著相關。
五、 影響醫療專區收容人推薦其他收容人至醫療專區就診之因素有「移入專區疾病原因」、「醫療設備品質」滿意度和「醫師、護理人員、檢驗人員、藥劑師是否充足」的滿意度,「移入專區疾病原因」中以肺結核疾病的收容人有推薦意願比例最高。
本研究結果冀能提供法務部評量各矯正機關對醫療專區的需求程度,並期待經筆者的著力,能有效提升各矯正機關的醫療環境與醫療品質。
In recent years, the correctional facilities have been improved significantly, however, issues regarding prisoners’ medical care are still difficult to break through. At the moment , every prison can only provide prisoners with simple and basic treatments. In case the prisoners are sick with acute or serious diseases, they will be sent under custody for out-prison-treatment. To reduce the frequency of out-prison-treatment, Taichung Prison had been instructed by Minister of Justice to manage a Central Taiwan Medical Treatment Special Quarter in order to take care of male prisoners with mental illness, tuberculosis, urinemia or HIV. There’s an affiliated Pei-De Hospital with wards to deal with the prisoners who have acute and serious diseases.
This research is aimed at the prisoners in Taichung Prison’s Medical Treatment Special Quarter. It is based on various characteristics of the prisoners and the five facets of medical care services, we compared their satisfaction toward medical care service at their pervious prisons and at the Medical Treatment Special Quarter. Furthermore, a logistic regression model is applied to discover the influential factors of prisoners’ willingness to recommend other prisoners for treatment at Medical Treatment Special Quarter.
The stratified random sampling method was adopted in investigation of questionnaire. The SPSS statistical software was utilized to carry on reliability analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis, pair t analysis and logistic regression analysis. The results of study are given as follows:
1. The reliabilities of all constructional facets are greater than 80% for this questionnaire of medical care service.
2. According to personal data of prisoners who are transferred to the Quarter with various types of disease reasons, their mean satisfaction of five facets of medical care at previous prison and at Medical Treatment Special Quarter are different significantly. The time that prisoners had served is significantly related to the administration of medical treatment.
3. In the questionnaire of five constructional facets, 15 out of 19 questions showed that the satisfaction of medical treatment at the Taichung Medical Treatment Special Quarter is much greater than that at the pervious prison.
4. The willingness for prisoners in Medical Treatment Special Quarter to recommend other prisoners for the same treatment isn’t significantly related to the treatment which they previously had, but it does obviously relate to the satisfaction of medical treatment at Medical Treatment Special Quarter.
5. The influential factors of willingness for prisoners at Medical Treatment Special Quarter to recommend other prisoners for the medical treatment are “the type of diseases for prisoners transferred to Special Quarter”, “the satisfaction of medical facilities”, “the satisfaction of having adequate doctors, nursing staffs, examining personnel and druggists”. In the influential factors of “the type of diseases for prisoners transferred to Special Quarter”, the prisoners with tuberculosis are the highest in proportion to recommend.
The results of the research will be provided as a reference to Minister of Justice for measurement of necessity for Correctional Institution to facilitate the Medical Treatment Special Quarter, and hope the efforts will be able to expedite the efficiency and quality of medical environment for all Correctional Institutions.
一、中文參考文獻
1. 丁志音、江東亮(1996),「以健康行為型態分類臺灣地區之成年人口群-群聚分析之應用」,中華公共衛生雜誌,15:175-186。
2. 仇方娟(1997),「南區五專生健康促進生活形態及其相關因素」,高雄醫學院碩士論文。
3. 古導賢(2005),「九十四年度醫管組評鑑說明、九十四年度醫學中心評鑑說明會簡報資料」。臺北:財團法人醫院服務暨醫療品質促進會。
4. 任正明(2000),「監院所收容人納入全民健康保險可行性之研究」,醫事法學,7:62-73。
5. 李卓倫、紀駿輝及賴俊雄(1996),「醫療需求研究之分析方法與限制—以中醫門診為例」,公共衛生,22(4):247-254。
6. 李庭毓(2000),「在不同專案特性下控制機制對專案績效之影響」,靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7. 李清泉(2000),「矯正機關經營管理之意義及其成功關鍵因素」,法務部矯正人員論文集。
8. 李麗文(2004),「矯正機關收容人醫療保健照護問題之探討—兼與日本矯正醫療政策之比較」,中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。
9. 周世靜(1992),「企業研究發展專案績效評估模式之研究」,中山大學企業管理研究所。
10. 邱文達、石崇良及侯勝茂(2004),「病人安全與醫學倫理—建構以病人為中心的醫療體系」,臺灣醫學人文學刊,5:1-2。
11. 高志宏(1993),「管理行為與專案特徵對專案績效的權變影響研究」,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
12. 張伍隆(2005),「矯正機關收容人醫療利用與滿意度調查」臺中健康暨管理學院健康管理研究所碩士論文。
13. 郭澤原(1995),「科技研究發展專案績效評估作業之探討」,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
14. 陳秀麗(2005) ,「不同醫療提供型態對監獄收容人醫療服務之影響」,臺中健康暨管理學院健康管理研究所碩士論文。
15. 陳恩航(1993),「影響專案計畫成效之關鍵因素研究」,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
16. 楊宗鑫(2005),「廠商特性、專案特徵、互動機制、專案績效關聯性研究-以產研技術移轉專案為例」,成功大學國立成功大學/企業管理學系碩士論文。
17. 蔣曉秋(2002),「影響醫師處方藥品的重購意願之探討」,義守大學管理研究所MBA碩士論文。
18. 蔡文正(2004),「監獄醫療之現況調查與需求評估」,行政院衛生署九十三年委託研究計畫研究報告,計畫編號:DOH93-TD-M-113-004。
19. 韓揆(1994),「醫療品質管理及門診服務品質定性指標」,中華衛誌,13(1):38。
20. 藍忠孚、熊惠英、胡澤芷及葉佳禧(2000),「臺灣地區醫療機關品質管理現況分析」,醫療品質,2(1):5-12。
二、英文參考文獻
1. Aday, L. A. & Andersen, R. (1974), “A Framework for the Study of
Access to Medical Care”, Health Services Research, 9(3), 208-220.
2. Aday, L. A. & Andersen, R. M. (1981), “Equity to Access to Medical
Care: A Conceptual and Empirical Overview”, Medical Care,
19(12), 4-27.
3. American Institute of Medicine, http://www.aiom.org.
4. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C. & Lehmann, D. R.(1994),
“Customer Satisfaction, Market Share and Profitability: Findings from
Sweden”, Journal of Marketing, 58(July), 53-66.
5. Andersen R. M. (1995), “Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter? ”, Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
36, 1-9.
6. Belloc, N. B., Breslow, L. & Hochstim , J. R. (1971), “Measurement of Physical Health in a General Population Survey”, American Journal of Epidemiology, 93(5), 328-336.
7. Brook, R.H. & Lohr, K.N. (1987), “ Monitoring Quality of Care in Medicare Program”, Journal of American Medicare Association, 258(21),3138-3141.
8. Brown, R. T. (1993), “Health Needs of Incarcerated Youth”, Bulletin
of the New York Academy of Medicine, 70, 208-218.
9. Churchill, G. A. & Surprenant, C. (1982),“An Investigation Into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction”, Journal ofMarketing
Research,19(November),pp.491-504.
10. Cleland, D. I. (1986), “Project owners: Beware”, Project Management
Journal,17(5), 83-92.
11. Cuieford, J. P. (1965), Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, 4th ed., New York: McGraw- Hill.
12. Dever, G. E. A.(1976), “An Epidemiological Model for Health Policy
Analysis”, Social Indicators Research, 2, 453-466.
13. Donabedian, A. D. (1988), “The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed?”, JAMA, 260(12), 1743-1748.
14. Donabedian, A. D. (1995), “The Quality of Care: How Can It Be
Assessed In Graham?”, Quality Evaluation, Maryland: Aspen.
15. Harris, D. M. & Guten, S. (1979), “Health-Protective Behavior: An
Exploratory Study”, Journal of health and social behavior, 20(1), 17-29.
16. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (1996),
USA: http://www.jacho.org.
17. Kasl, S. V. & Cobb, S. (1966), “Health Behavior Illness Behavior and
Sick Role Behavior”, Archives of Environmental Health, 12, 246-266.
18. Keller, R. T. (1994),“Technology-Information and the Locus of Influence
in the R&D Martix”, Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 167-179.
19. Koyama, W. (2000), “Lifestyle Change Improves Individual Health
and Lowers Healthcare Costs.”, Methods of Information in Medicine, 39, 22-232.
20. LaBarbera, P. A. & Mazursky, D. (1983),“A Longitudinal
Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction:The Dynamic
Aspect of the Cognitive Process”,Journal of Marketing Research, 20(4), 393-404.
21. Marshall T., Simpson S. & Stevens A. (2001), “Health Care Needs Assessment in prisons: A Toolkit”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, 23, 198-204.
22. Might, R. J. & Fischer, W. A. (1984), “The Role of Structural Factors
in Determining Project Management Success”, IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management, 32(2), 71-77.
23. Oliver, R. L. (1980),“A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and
Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions”, Journal of Marketing Research,
17(November), 460-469.
24. Pinto, J. K. & Slevin, D. P. (1988), “Project Success: Definition and
Measurement Techniques”, Project Management Journal, 19(1), 67-72.
25. Suchman, E. (1965), “Stages of Illness and Medical Care”, Journal of
Health and Human Behavior, 6, 114-128.
26. Tuman, G. J. (1983), Development and Implementation of Effective
Project Management Information and Control System, New York:
Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
27. Weitzman, B. C. (1995), Improving Quality of Care, In Jonas’s Health Care Delivery in the United States (5th Ed.) Anthony R. Kovner(ed.) New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc. , 374-400.