| 研究生: |
蔡緹佳 Kanjana Chaitika |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
無人機引導八段錦運動之系統建構與動作表現評估 Development of a Drone-Guiding System for Baduanjin Exercise and its Effects on Movement Performance |
| 指導教授: |
蘇芳慶
Su, Fong-Chin |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 生物醫學工程學系 Department of BioMedical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 104 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 無人機引導系統 、八段錦 氣功 、人機互動 、視覺與聽覺暗示 、壓力中心 、動作平滑程度 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Drone-guiding system, Baduanjin Qigong, Human-drone interaction (HDI), Visual and auditory cues, Center of pressure (COP), Smoothness of arm movement |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:159 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
目的: 本研究旨在開發一種無人機引導系統,以協助老年人進行安全有效的運動(例如:八段錦),並研究不同的引導策略在進行八段錦運動時對人體運動生物力學的影響。
設計:觀察性研究。
受試者:12位年齡高於60歲的健康人。
介入: 用於引導八段錦運動中兩個選定動作的音頻、視頻和無人機引導系統。
方法: 分別使用動作捕捉系統和測力板觀察每位受試者跟隨不同引導系統執行八段錦中兩個選定動作的運動學和力量數據。實驗結束後,每位受試者都需要完成一份問卷,以評估他們的感受和動機,並了解他們對特別是無人機引導這種新興的運動介入引導系統的回饋。
結果: 這項研究的主要結果是評估無人機引導系統之準確性和精確度。次要結果是比較所提出的系統與傳統引導系統對人體生物力學參數的效果,傳統引導系統為音頻和視頻引導下進行的八段錦運動,而人體生物力學參數包含壓力中心 (COP) 和手臂運動的流暢性。此外,在整個調查問卷中測量了參與者對無人機引導系統的動機和反饋。
結論:結果顯示無人機引導系統有效且可靠,而受試者樂於使用無人機進行八段錦運動。通過此系統,受試者為了在整個運動過程中保持身體的平衡,壓力中心更加地分散在測力板上。另外,由於更專注於跟隨無人機,受試者手臂運動的流暢性優於其他引導系統。這些結果表明參與者可以在運動的某些階段比其他兩項引導系統更好地跟隨和專注於無人機的引導。
Objective: This study aims to develop a drone-guiding system to support the elderly in practicing a safe and effective exercise like Baduanjin, also to investigate the effects of different guiding strategies using the developed system on biomechanics and motor control of human movement while performing Baduanjin exercise.
Design: Observational Study.
Participants: 12 healthy individuals with age above 60 years old.
Intervention: Audio, video, and drone-guiding system for guiding two selected movements of Baduanjin exercise.
Methods: A motion capture system and force platforms were used to record kinematic data, and force data, respectively, of each participant while performing two selected movement of Baduanjin with following each guiding program. A questionnaire is required for every participant after the experiment to evaluate their feeling and motivation, also explore their feedbacks especially onto the drone-guiding system, which is a new technology of exercising guidance platform.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome of this study was evaluated by conducting accuracy and precision testing of the drone-guiding system. The secondary outcome was measured by figuring out the effectiveness of using the developed system compares with conventional guiding cues, which are audio and video illustration of Baduanjin exercise on functional performance parameters, the center of pressure (COP) and smoothness of arm movement. In addition, motivation, and feedbacks of participants toward the drone-guiding system were measured throughout a questionnaire.
Results: The results showed that the drone-guiding system could work properly with validity and reliability, and the participants were pleasant to perform Baduanjin exercise with the drone. Besides, with this system, the participants could to be able to follow and focus on the guidance of the drone better than other two guiding cues in some phases of the movement. This can be implied to more broad distribution in center of pressure on force platforms in order to maintain the balance of their body throughout the entire movement. In addition, the value in smoothness parameters of their arm movement were lower than the other guidance due to more concentration in following the drone.
[1] U. N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Ageing 2019. United Nations, 2019.
[2] P. S. Lin, C. C. Hsieh, H. S. Cheng, T. J. Tseng, and S. C. Su, “Association between physical fitness and successful aging in Taiwanese older adults,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150389.
[3] J. S. McPhee, D. P. French, D. Jackson, J. Nazroo, N. Pendleton, and H. Degens, “Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty,” Biogerontology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 567–580, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10522-016-9641-0.
[4] F. Zhao, S. Sun, J. Xiong, and G. Zheng, “The effect of Baduanjin exercise on health-related physical fitness of college students: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial,” Trials, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3672-1.
[5] L. Zou, J. E. Sasaki, H. Wang, Z. Xiao, Q. Fang, and M. Zhang, “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Baduanjin Qigong for Health Benefits: Randomized Controlled Trials,” Evidence-based Complement. Altern. Med., vol. 2017, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/4548706.
[6] X. Liu, J. Gao, B. Yin, X. Yang, and D. Bai, “Efficacy of Ba Duan Jin in Improving Balance: A Study in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults,” J. Gerontol. Nurs., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 38–46, 2016, doi: 10.3928/00989134-20160201-03.
[7] Z. peng Zeng, Y. bin Liu, J. Fang, Y. Liu, J. Luo, and M. Yang, “Effects of Baduanjin exercise for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Complement. Ther. Med., vol. 48, no. April 2019, p. 102279, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102279.
[8] R. Li et al., “The effect of Baduanjin on promoting the physical fitness and health of adults,” Evidence-based Complement. Altern. Med., vol. 2014, 2014, doi: 10.1155/2014/784059.
[9] G. Zheng, Q. Fang, B. Chen, H. Yi, Q. Lin, and L. Chen, “Qualitative evaluation of baduanjin (Traditional Chinese Qigong) on health promotion among an elderly community population at risk for ischemic stroke,” Evidence-based Complement. Altern. Med., vol. 2015, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/893215.
[10] M. Suteerawattananon, G. S. Morris, B. R. Etnyre, J. Jankovic, and E. J. Protas, “Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait in individuals with Parkinson’s disease,” J. Neurol. Sci., vol. 219, no. 1–2, pp. 63–69, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2003.12.007.
[11] C. K. Tse and C. K. C. Yu, “The effects of visual cues, blindfolding, synesthetic experience, and musical training on pure-tone frequency discrimination,” Behav. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.3390/bs9010002.
[12] A. C. Pierno, A. Caria, and U. Castiello, “Comparing effects of 2-D and 3-D visual cues during aurally aided target acquisition,” Hum. Factors, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 728–737, 2004, doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.4.728.56815.
[13] R. Sodhi, H. Benko, and A. Wilson, “LightGuide: Projected Visualizations for Hand Movement Guidance,” in CHI ’12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 2012, pp. 179–188, [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/lightguide-projected-visualizations-hand-movement-guidance/.
[14] J. La Delfa, M. A. Baytas, R. Patibanda, H. Ngari, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller, “Drone Chi: Somaesthetic Human-Drone Interaction,” Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc., 2020, doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376786.
[15] H. Kim and J. A. Landay, “Aeroquake: Drone augmented dance,” DIS 2018 - Proc. 2018 Des. Interact. Syst. Conf., pp. 691–702, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3196709.3196798.
[16] S. Eriksson, Å. Unander-Scharin, V. Trichon, C. Unander-Scharin, H. Kjellström, and K. Höök, “Dancing with drones crafting novel artistic expressions through intercorporeality,” Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc., pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300847.
[17] S. G. Zwaan and E. I. Barakova, “Boxing against drones: Drones in sports education,” Proc. IDC 2016 - 15th Int. Conf. Interact. Des. Child., pp. 607–612, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2930674.2935991.
[18] J. La Delfa, R. Jarvis, R. A. Khot, and F. Mueller, “Tai Chi in the clouds: Using micro UAVs to support tai chi practice,” CHI Play 2018 - Proc. 2018 Annu. Symp. Comput. Interact. Play Companion Ext. Abstr., pp. 513–519, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3270316.3271511.
[19] J. La Delfa, O. Wichtowski, M. A. BaytaŞ, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller, “Are drones meditative?,” Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc., pp. 1–4, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3290607.3313274.
[20] W. S. Ng and E. Sharlin, “Collocated interaction with flying robots,” Proc. - IEEE Int. Work. Robot Hum. Interact. Commun., pp. 143–149, 2011, doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005280.
[21] J. R. Cauchard, L. E. Jane, K. Y. Zhai, and J. A. Landay, “Drone & Me : A n Exploration I nto Natural Human - D rone Interaction,” pp. 361–365, 2015.
[22] J. A. Landay, J. R. Cauchard, and W. Windsor, “Drone & Wo : Cultural Influences on Human-Drone Interaction Techniques,” 2017.
[23] P. Abtahi, D. Zhao, J. E., and J. Landay, “Drone Near Me: Exploring Touch-Based Human-Drone Interaction,” Proc. ACM Interactive, Mobile, Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3130899.
[24] Bitcraze, “Bitcraze Products,” © 2021 Bitcraze AB, 2021. https://store.bitcraze.io/ (accessed May 30, 2021).
[25] “健康养生操《八段锦》,只要记住这段口令学起来一点也不难.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqiENrM30Yk (accessed May 30, 2021).
[26] Bitcraze, “Crazyflie Bitcraze,” © 2021 Bitcraze AB, 2021. https://www.bitcraze.io/ (accessed May 30, 2021).
[27] Bitcraze, “Loco Positioning System,” © 2021 Bitcraze AB, 2021. https://www.bitcraze.io/documentation/system/positioning/loco-positioning-system/ (accessed May 30, 2021).
[28] A. Wojciechowska, J. Frey, S. Sass, R. Shafir, and J. R. Cauchard, “Collocated Human-Drone Interaction: Methodology and Approach Strategy,” ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interact., vol. 2019-March, pp. 172–181, 2019, doi: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673127.
[29] K. Chaitika, “pim_feedback_autonomous_sound_mc_p2.” https://github.com/PimKanjana/crazyflie-lib-python/blob/master/examples/PimMasterThesis/
pim_feedback_autonomous_sound_mc_p2.py (accessed May 30, 2021).
[30] K. Chaitika, “pim_feedback_autonomous_sound_mc_p3.” https://github.com/PimKanjana/crazyflie-lib-python/blob/master/examples/PimMasterThesis/
pim_feedback_autonomous_sound_mc_p3.py (accessed May 30, 2021).
[31] Bitcraze, “bitcraze / crazyflie-lib-python,” © 2021 Bitcraze AB, 2021. https://github.com/bitcraze/crazyflie-lib-python (accessed Jul. 02, 2021).
[32] T. H. Tran and F.-C. Su, “Investigation of the relationship between the posture during wheelchair propulsion and subacromial space,” National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, 2018.
[33] K. Vaughan, “Extracting force plate information from C3D files,” 1999. https://isbweb.org/software/movanal/vaughan/kistler.pdf (accessed May 30, 2021).
[34] U. the Department of Health and H. Services, “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control The 4-Stage Balance Test,” 2017, [Online]. Available: www.cdc.gov/steadi.
[35] T. T. Şimşek and İ. E. Şimşek, “Balance and postural control,” Comp. Kinesiol. Hum. Body, pp. 467–475, 2020, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-812162-7.00026-6.
[36] T. Paillard and F. Noé, “Techniques and Methods for Testing the Postural Function in Healthy and Pathological Subjects,” Biomed Res. Int., vol. 2015, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/891390.
[37] A. Bendo, S. Kuvarati, D. Skënderi, and A. Veveçka, “A Theoretical Study on the Evaluation of the Stability and Postural Sway, Based on the Results of the Confidence Ellipse,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2319–7064, 2013, [Online]. Available: www.ijsr.net.
[38] S. Balasubramanian, A. Melendez-Calderon, A. Roby-Brami, and E. Burdet, “On the analysis of movement smoothness,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0090-9.
[39] M. L. Schiefelbein et al., “Upper-limb movement smoothness after stroke and its relationship with measures of body function/structure and activity – A cross-sectional study,” J. Neurol. Sci., vol. 401, no. January, pp. 75–78, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.04.017.
[40] J.-J. Chang, Y. Yusheng, W.-L. Wu, L.-Y. Guo, and F.-C. Su, “The Constructs of Kinematic Measures for Reaching Performance in Stroke Patients,” J. Med. Biol. Eng., vol. 28, pp. 65–70, Jun. 2008.
[41] A. Choi, S. Bin Joo, E. Oh, and J. H. Mun, “Kinematic evaluation of movement smoothness in golf: Relationship between the normalized jerk cost of body joints and the clubhead,” Biomed. Eng. Online, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014, doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-20.
[42] A. Owen, “Assumptions for repeated measures ANOVA,” © Ellen Marshall, University of Sheffield, 2018. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.531222!/file/MASH_repeated_measures_ANOVA_SPSS.pdf.
[43] Laerd Statistics, “Repeated Measures ANOVA,” © 2018 Lund Research Ltd, 2018. https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/repeated-measures-anova-statistical-guide.php.
[44] E. Park, M. Cho, and C. S. Ki, “Correct use of repeated measures analysis of variance,” Korean J. Lab. Med., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2009, doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.1.1.
[45] Leard Statistics, “Friedman Test in SPSS Statistics,” © 2018 Lund Research Ltd, 2018. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/friedman-test-using-spss-statistics.php.
[46] I. Advanced Instructional Systems and Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of North Carolina, “Measurements and Error Analysis,” © 2011 Advanced Instructional Systems, Inc. and the University of North Carolina, 2011. https://www.webassign.net/question_assets/unccolphysmechl1/measurements/manual.html (accessed Jul. 11, 2021).