簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 簡高竹
Chien, Kao-Chu
論文名稱: 內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱耐火性能增進策略之數值模擬
The Numerical Simulations for the Fire-Resistance Enhancement Strategies of Concrete-Filled Steel Box Columns at Elevated Temperatures
指導教授: 鍾興陽
Chung, Hsin-Yang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 297
中文關鍵詞: 內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱火害非線性有限元素法破壞溫度高溫補強
外文關鍵詞: Concrete-Filled Steel Box Column, Fire, Nonlinear Finite-Element Method, Failure Temperatures, Enhancement Strategies
相關次數: 點閱:203下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文以三維非線性有限元素軟體所建立的數值模型,模擬內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱於高溫下承受軸向壓力的結構行為,數值模型採用定載升溫的方式,在內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱模型表面施予ISO-834的溫升歷程,透過順序耦合的熱傳與結構分析,進行其高溫火害的數值模擬,本研究先針對內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱的柱長、載重比、混凝土強度、柱板厚度進行參數分析,計算柱之破壞溫度並探討其破壞模式,藉以瞭解各參數對內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱高溫結構行為的影響,此外,本研究亦針對內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱的五種高溫補強策略(即:普通鋼柱板加勁肢補強、耐火鋼柱板加勁肢補強、普通鋼內十字形板補強、耐火鋼內十字形板補強、全耐火鋼柱板補強)進行數值模擬、分析與比較,尋求最佳溫度提升的補強策略與最佳經濟效益的的補強策略,數值模擬結果顯示:耐火鋼內十字形板補強策略之溫度提升效果最佳,能提升約21.3%的破壞溫度;普通鋼內十字形板補強策略有最佳的經濟效益。

    The Numerical Simulations for the Fire-Resistance Enhancement Strategies of Concrete-Filled Steel Box Columns at Elevated Temperatures

    Author: Kao-Chu Chien
    Advisor: Professor Hsin-Yang Chung
    Department of Civil Engineering
    National Cheng Kung University

    SUMMARY

    This thesis utilized the numerical models developed by a three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element program to simulate the structural behaviors of concrete-filled box columns (CFBCs) with the constant axial compressive load at elevated temperatures. The numerical models employed the sequentially coupled thermal-stress analysis to conduct heat transfer and structural analyses for the CFBCs with the constant axial compression and elevated by the ISO-834 time-temperature curve. First, this thesis conducted parameter analyses for column length, load ratio, concrete strength and column plate thickness of CFBCs to investigate the failure temperatures and the failure modes of CFBCs, and to understand the influences of the four parameters on the high temperature structural behaviors of the CFBCs. In addition, this thesis also performed numerical simulations, analyses and comparisons for five kinds of fire-resistant enhancement strategies (including the normal steel column-plate stiffener strengthening method, the fire-resistant steel column-plate stiffener strengthening method, the interior cross-shaped normal steel stiffener strengthening method, the interior cross-shaped fire-resistant steel stiffener strengthening method and the fire-resistant steel column plate strengthening method) to find the best strategy of improving failure temperature and the most economical strategy of improving fire resistance. The numerical simulation results showed that the interior cross-shaped fire-resistant steel stiffener strengthening method demonstrated the best failure temperature improvement strategy, which could improve failure temperature by 21.3%. The interior cross-shaped normal steel stiffener strengthening method was the most economical strategy of improving fire resistance.

    Key words:Concrete-Filled Steel Box Column, Fire, Nonlinear Finite-Element Method, Failure Temperatures, Enhancement Strategies.
    INTRODUCTION

    The tall building designs in Taiwan frequently adopt steel structures. One benefit is to decrease the self weight of building by reducing column size. The other benefit is to increase the bay length (i.e. beam length) and the usable floor area. Considering the seismic effects, structural designs in Taiwan for beam-to-column connections especially pay more attention on the ductility and toughness. The design concept of “Strong Column and Weak Beam” are always adopted in building design. As a result, steel column constructions in Taiwan usually utilize the design of concrete-filled box column (CFBC). The CFBCs are different from the steel reinforced concrete columns in which steel is covered by concrete against fire. The CFBCs are frequently utilized in the columns of the lower floors because they bear the heavy weights of the upper floors. In CFBCs, the steel box bears more load than the infilled concrete. In fire, the stiffness and strength of steel decrease when the fire temperature increases. This jeopardizes the structural safety of steel buildings. How to increase the fire-resistance of the CFBCs is very important. Our group have successfully simulated the three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element steel H-shaped frame model at elevated temperatures with a finite-element program and have successfully strengthened a three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element steel H-shaped frame model at elevated temperatures using fire-resistance steel. I will continue our research group’s works to develop the CFBC numerical models using the three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element program to investigate the structural behaviors of the CFBCs with the constant axial compressive load at elevated temperatures and to find the best strategy of improving failure temperature and the most economical strategy of improving fire resistance from the five kinds of fire-resistant enhancement strategies, including the normal steel column-plate stiffener strengthening method, the fire-resistant steel column-plate stiffener strengthening method, the interior cross-shaped normal steel stiffener strengthening method, the interior cross-shaped fire-resistant steel stiffener strengthening method and the fire-resistant steel column plate strengthening method.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Research methods were mainly divided into three parts. The first part was that three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element CFBCs numerical models were developed and were verified by the experiment to confirm each step of the model establishments correct. The second part was employed the sequential heat transfer and stress analysis to simulate the surface of CFBCs numerical models heated by ISO-834 time-temperature curve in constant load. Parameter analyses were divided into column length, load ratio, concrete strength and column plate thickness of CFBCs to investigate the numerical results and to realize the effects of the CFBCs by each parameter model at elevated temperature. The third part was employed the sequential heat transfer and stress analysis to simulate the surface of CFBCs numerical strengthening models heated by ISO-834 time-temperature curve in constant load. Enhancement strategies were divided into the steel column-plate stiffener strengthening method, the interior cross-shaped steel stiffener strengthening method, the fire-resistant steel column plate strengthening method and etc. to research for the best economical strategy of improving fire resistance.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    The results of column length parameter analyses in the same load ratio were showed that failure temperature of the long length column was higher than failure temperature of the short length column. The normal compression strength of the long column is lower than the normal compression strength of the short column at room temperature, so the long column bears the lower compression than the short column in the same load ratio. The normal compression strength decreased in high temperatures, so the failure temperature of the long column bearing the lower compression was higher than the failure temperature of the short column bearing the higher compression as Figure 5-87.
    The results of column length parameter analyses in the same load (13970 kN) were showed that failure temperature of the long length column was lower than failure temperature of the short length column. The normal compression strength decreased in high temperatures, so the failure temperature of the short column was higher than the failure temperature of the long column as Figure 5-88.
    The results of load ratio parameter analyses were showed that failure temperature of the high ratio column was lower than failure temperature of the low ratio column in the same section size as Figure 5-89. According to my research, it was illustrated that the failure temperature was decreased in 60˚C per increasing load ratio by every 10%.
    The results of concrete strength parameter analyses in the same load ratio were showed that failure temperature of the high strength concrete column was higher than failure temperature of the low strength concrete column in the same size section as Figure 5-90. Concrete temperature was low at elevated temperature due to the poor concrete conductivity, so concrete could bear the part axial force. The failure temperature of CFBCs was improved by increasing the concrete compression strength.
    The results of column plate thickness of CFBCs parameter analyses in the same load ratio were showed that failure temperature of the thin plate column was higher than failure temperature of the thick plate column. The normal compression strength of the thick plate column is higher than the normal compression strength of the thin plate column at room temperature, so the thick plate column bears the higher compression than the thin plate column in the same load ratio. The failure temperature of the thick plate column bearing the higher compression was lower than the failure temperature of the thin plate column bearing the lower compression but the 25 mm plate thickness had the local maximum failure temperature and the failure temperature was increased in plate thickness 22 mm to 25 mm as Figure 5-69.
    The results of column plate thickness of CFBCs parameter analyses in the same load (13970 kN) were showed that failure temperature of the thick plate column was higher than failure temperature of the thin plate column. The normal compression strength of the thick plate column is higher than the normal compression strength of the thin plate column at room temperature. The normal compression strength was decreased in high temperatures, so the failure temperature of the thick plate column was higher than the failure temperature of the thin plate column in the constant load as Figure 5-91.
    The results of the CFBCs strengthening models were showed that the fire-resistance steel was better the normal steel to improve failure temperature of the CFBCs as the interior cross-shaped fire-resistant steel stiffener strengthening method (20mm×120mm) which could improve failure temperature by 21.3%. The interior cross-shaped steel stiffener strengthening method was better than steel column-plate stiffener strengthening method to improve failure temperature due to the interior cross-shaped steel stiffener strengthening method covering by concrete against fire to keep the stiffness and strength.

    CONCLUSION

    The results of the concrete-filled steel box column exposed to standard fire were showed as follows:
    (1) The failure temperature of the long length column was higher than failure temperature of the short length column in the same load ratio.
    (2) The failure temperature of the long length column was lower than failure temperature of the short length column in the constant load.
    (3) The failure temperature of the high ratio column was lower than failure temperature of the low ratio column in the same size section.
    (4) The failure temperature of the high strength concrete column was higher than failure temperature of the low strength concrete column in the same size section.
    (5) The failure temperature of the thick plate column was higher than failure temperature of the thin plate column in the constant load.
    (6) The interior cross-shaped fire-resistant steel stiffener strengthening method (20mm×120mm) improved failure temperatures by 21.3%.
    (7) The interior cross-shaped normal steel stiffener strengthening method was the most economical strategy of improving fire resistance.

    摘要 I Extended Abstract III 誌謝 IX 目錄 XI 表目錄 XV 圖目錄 XVI 符號表 XXI 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究方法 4 1.4 論文架構 5 第2章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 前言 7 2.2 高溫下混凝土材料性質之相關研究 7 2.3 高溫下填充式鋼管混凝土柱之相關實驗研究 10 2.4 高溫下填充式鋼管混凝土柱之相關數值分析研究 12 2.5 高溫下鋼構架數值分析之相關研究 15 第3章 有限元素分析相關理論 17 3.1 前言 17 3.2 工程與真實應力-應變轉換 17 3.3 材料破壞準則 20 3.3.1 鋼材降伏準則 20 3.3.2 混凝土破壞準則 20 3.4 疊代收斂性 25 3.5 接觸理論 26 3.6 元素理論 28 3.7 熱傳理論 31 3.8 後挫屈分析 33 第4章 內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱之高溫數值模型建立 41 4.1 前言 41 4.2 基本假設 41 4.3 模型種類與編號 42 4.3.1 驗證用之內填充混凝土鋼管柱模型 42 4.3.2 參數分析用之內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱模型 43 4.3.3 高溫補強用之內填充混凝土箱型鋼柱模型 46 4.4 材料參數 49 4.4.1 鋼材介紹 50 4.4.2 混凝土材料介紹 51 4.4.3 彈性模數 52 4.4.4 塑性應力-應變曲線 52 4.4.5 柏松比 53 4.4.6 膨脹係數 54 4.4.7 熱傳導係數 55 4.4.8 比熱 56 4.4.9 密度 57 4.5 分析步設定 58 4.6 接觸設定 61 4.7 邊界設定 62 4.7.1 力加載 62 4.7.2 邊界條件 64 4.7.3 溫度給定 64 4.8 網格設定 65 4.8.1 網格劃分 65 4.8.2 元素選擇 67 4.9 後處理 67 4.9.1 分析結果輸出 67 4.9.2 試體破壞準則 69 第5章 參數分析模型之數值模擬結果 101 5.1 前言 101 5.2 不同柱長試體之模擬結果 101 5.2.1 固定載重比下不同柱長試體之模擬結果 102 5.2.1.1 試體P-CL1-3500 102 5.2.1.2 試體P-CL1-4500 103 5.2.1.3 試體P-CL1-5500 104 5.2.1.4 試體P-CL1-6500 105 5.2.1.5 試體P-CL1-10000 106 5.2.1.6 固定載重比下不同柱長試體模擬結果之比較 107 5.2.2 固定載重下不同柱長試體之模擬結果 108 5.2.2.1 試體P-CL2-3500 108 5.2.2.2 試體P-CL2-4500 109 5.2.2.3 試體P-CL2-5500 110 5.2.2.4 試體P-CL2-6500 111 5.2.2.5 試體P-CL2-10000 112 5.2.2.6 固定載重下不同柱長試體模擬結果之比較 113 5.3 不同載重比試體之模擬結果 114 5.3.1 試體P-LR-0.3 114 5.3.2 試體P-LR-0.4 115 5.3.3 試體P-LR-0.5 116 5.3.4 試體P-LR-0.6 117 5.3.5 不同載重比試體模擬結果之比較 118 5.4 不同混凝土抗壓強度試體之模擬結果 119 5.4.1 試體P-FC-28 119 5.4.2 試體P-FC-35 120 5.4.3 試體P-FC-42 121 5.4.4 試體P-FC-49 122 5.4.5 試體P-FC-56 123 5.4.6 不同混凝土抗壓強度試體模擬結果之比較 124 5.5 不同柱板厚試體之模擬結果 125 5.5.1 固定載重比下不同柱板厚試體之模擬結果 126 5.5.1.1 試體P-PT1-16 126 5.5.1.2 試體P-PT1-19 127 5.5.1.3 試體P-PT1-22 128 5.5.1.4 試體P-PT1-23 129 5.5.1.5 試體P-PT1-24 130 5.5.1.6 試體P-PT1-25 131 5.5.1.7 試體P-PT1-26 132 5.5.1.8 試體P-PT1-27 133 5.5.1.9 試體P-PT1-28 134 5.5.1.10 試體P-PT1-32 135 5.5.1.11 試體P-PT1-36 136 5.5.1.12 固定載重比下不同柱板厚試體模擬結果之比較 137 5.5.2 固定載重下不同柱板厚試體之模擬結果 138 5.5.2.1 試體P-PT2-16 138 5.5.2.2 試體P-PT2-19 139 5.5.2.3 試體P-PT2-22 140 5.5.2.4 試體P-PT2-25 141 5.5.2.5 試體P-PT2-28 142 5.5.2.6 試體P-PT2-32 143 5.5.2.7 試體P-PT2-36 144 5.5.2.8 固定載重下不同柱板厚試體模擬結果之比較 145 5.6 參數分析總結 146 第6章 高溫補強模型之數值模擬結果 233 6.1 前言 233 6.2 未補強試體之模擬結果 234 6.2.1 試體S-CN 234 6.3 普通鋼柱板加勁肢補強試體之模擬結果 235 6.3.1 試體S-CN-FN20×40 235 6.3.2 試體S-CN-FN20×80 236 6.3.3 試體S-CN-FN20×120 237 6.4 耐火鋼柱板加勁肢補強試體之模擬結果 238 6.4.1 試體S-CN-FF20×40 238 6.4.2 試體S-CN-FF20×80 239 6.4.3 試體S-CN-FF20×120 240 6.5 普通鋼內十字形板補強試體之模擬結果 241 6.5.1 試體S-CN-XN20×40 241 6.5.2 試體S-CN-XN20×80 242 6.5.3 試體S-CN-XN20×120 243 6.6 耐火鋼內十字形板補強試體之模擬結果 244 6.6.1 試體S-CN-XF20×40 245 6.6.2 試體S-CN-XF20×80 246 6.6.3 試體S-CN-XF20×120 247 6.7 全耐火鋼柱板補強試體之模擬結果 248 6.7.1 試體S-CF 248 6.8 各模型高溫補強後之溫度提升效益 249 6.9 各模型高溫補強後之經濟效益 250 第7章 結論與建議 285 7.1 結論 285 7.2 建議 290 參考文獻 291 自述 297

    ABAQUS HTML Documentation, “User’s Manual,” Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.

    Cheng, F. P., Kodur, V. and Wang, T. C., “Stress-Strain Curves for High Strength Cocnrete at Elevated Temperatures,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.84-90, (2004).

    Espinos, A., Romero, M. L. and Hospitaler, A., “Advanced Model for Predicting the Fire Response of Concrete Filled Tubular Columns,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 66, Issues 8-9, pp.1030-1046, (2010).

    Eurocode-2, “Design of Concrete Structures-Part1.2:General Rules-Structural Fire Design,” ENV1992-1-2, (1995).

    Eurocode-3, “Design of Steel Structures-Part1.2:General Rules-Structural Fire Design,” ENV1993-1-2, (1995).

    Fares, H., Noumowe, A. and Remond, S., “Self-Consolidating Concrete Subjected to High Temperature Mechanical and Physicochemical Properties,” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 39, Issue 12, pp.1230-1238, (2009).

    Han, L. H., Chen, F., Liao, F. Y. and Tao, B. U., “Fire Performance of Concrete Filled Stainless Steel Tubular Columns,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 56, pp.165-181, (2013).

    Hong, S. and Varma A. H., “Analytical Modeling of the Standard Fire Behavior of Loaded CFT Columns,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, Issue 1, pp. 54-69, (2009).

    ISO834-1, “Fire-Resistance Tests, Elements of Building Construction-Part 1:General Requirements,” (1999).

    Khaliq, W. and Kodur, V., “Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced High Performance Self-Consolidating Concrete at Elevated Temperatures,” Cement and Concrete Reaearch, Vol. 41, Issues 11, pp.1112-1122, (2011).

    Kodur, V. and Khaliq, W., “Effect of Temperature on Thermal Properties of Different Types of High-Strength Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 23, Issue 6, pp.793-801, (2011).

    Lee, J. and Fenves, G. L., “Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division-ASCE, Vol. 124, Issues 8, pp.892-900, (1998).

    Lie, T. T. and Irwin, R. J., “Fire Resistance of Rectangular Steel Columns Filled with Bar-Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering,Vol. 121, Issue 5, pp.797-805, (1995).

    Lu, H., Zhao, X. L. and Han, L. H., “Fire Behaviour of High Strength Self-Consolidating Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Stub Columns,” Journal Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, Issues 10–11, pp.1995-2010, (2009).

    Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S. and Onate, E., “A Plastic-Damage Model for Concrete,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 25, Issues 3, pp.299-326, (1989).

    Luecke, W. E., McCowan, C. N. and Banovic, S. W., “Mechanical Properties of Structural Steels,” Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster, National Institute of Standards and Technology, (2005).

    Poh, K. W., “Stress-Strain-Temperature Relationships for Structural Steel,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 13, Issue 5, pp.371-379, (2001).

    Schaumann, P., Kodur, V. and Bahr, O., “Fire Behaviour of Hollow Structural Section Steel Columns Filled with High Strength Concrete,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, Issues 8–9, pp.1794-1802, (2009).

    Sideris, K. K., “Mechanical Characteristics of Self-Consolidating Concretes Exposed to Elevated Temperatures,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 8, pp.648-654, (2007).

    Uygunoğlu, T. and Topçu, I. B., “ Thermal Expansion of Self-Consolidating Normal and Lightweight Aggregate Concrete at Elevated Temperature,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 23, Issues 9, pp.3063-3069, (2009).

    Wang, K. and Young, B., “Fire Resistance of Concrete-Filled High Strength Steel Tubular Columns,” Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 71, pp.46-56, (2013).

    王金昌、陳頁開,「ABAQUS在土木工程中的應用」,浙江大學出板社,浙江 (2006)。

    石亦平、周玉蓉,「ABAQUS有限元分析實例講解」,機械工業出板社,北京 (2006)。

    世盟科技彙編,「ABAQUS熱傳遞與熱應力」,士盟科技股份有限公司,台北 (2013)。

    世盟科技彙編,「ABAQUS接觸收斂」,士盟科技股份有限公司,台北 (2013)。

    李玉生、楊國珍、曹源暉、陳映菖、陳彥鈞、許書豪,「高溫下內灌混凝土耐火鋼箱型鋼柱之軸向受力行為研究」,內政部建築研究所協同研究報告,(2010)。

    李祈安,「實尺寸箱型鋼柱高溫補強之數值模擬」,碩士論文,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程學系,台南 (2011)。

    李鎮宏等人,「鋼管混凝土柱軸力下耐火性能技術報告彙編」,內政部建築研究所,台南 (2013)。

    柯宗滕,「火害下剪力釘於合成梁及柱之力學行為」,碩士論文,國立交通大學土木工程學系,新竹 (2013)。

    陳景智,「實尺寸H型鋼構架高溫火害行為之數值模擬」,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程學系,台南 (2009)。

    陳誠直、林政億、柯宗騰、胡耀光,「包覆填充式箱型鋼管混凝土柱火害行為研究」,內政部建築研究所委託研究報告,(2012)。

    陳誠直、趙文成、林政意、吳易宸,「含混凝土箱型鋼柱火害下軸向受力行為之研究」,內政部建築研究所委託研究報告,(2010)。

    鄭瑋,「實尺寸複合梁鋼構架高溫火害行為之數值模擬」,碩士論文,國立成功大學土木工程學系,台南 (2010)。

    愛發股份有限公司編著,「ABAQUS實務入門引導」,全華科技圖書股份有限公司印行,台北 (2005)。

    聶建國、王宇航,「ABAQUS混凝土本構模型用於模擬結構靜力學行為的比較研究」,工程力學,Vol.30,No. 4,59-67頁。

    無法下載圖示 校內:2019-09-05公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE