簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 姚潔明
Yao, Jie-Ming
論文名稱: 以消費價值理論探討消費者採用行動支付之考量因素: 比較 Line Pay 與街口支付
A Study on Using Intention of Mobile Payment from The Theory of Consumption Values: Compare Line Pay and JKO Pay
指導教授: 黃瀞瑩
Huang, Ching-Ying
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 77
中文關鍵詞: 行動支付消費價值理論信任使用意圖
外文關鍵詞: Mobile Payment, Consumption Value Theory, Trust, Using Intention
相關次數: 點閱:211下載:73
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 2020年後台灣行動支付與電子支付產業已開始進入高速成長的階段,至2021年3月為台灣使用行動支付的交易額突破新台幣5032億元,創下歷史新高。未來行動支付在台灣會更加普及,業者所面臨的競爭將更為激烈,因此本研究將針對台灣消費者對不同行動支付品牌的採用進行研究。
    本研究將採用Sheth, Newman, and Gross (1991)所提出的消費價值理論(Consumption Value Theory)針對兼具行動支付及電子支付的兩大支付龍頭Line Pay及街口支付進行探討,並以信任為調節變數,研究台灣的兩大行動支付品牌,提供消費者的消費價值以及是否有所差異,且消費者在獲得消費價值後,對其使用意圖之影響。
    本研究透過網路問卷,分別針對Line Pay及街口支付的使用者個別投放網路問卷。共回收了街口支付429份問卷、Line Pay351份問卷。分析結果顯示,街口支付及Line Pay樣本中「功能性價值」、「情緒性價值」、「情境性價值」與「使用意圖」的關係皆為顯著正向影響;然而分析也顯示,街口支付及Line Pay樣本中「社會性價值」與「使用意圖」的關係皆不顯著;另外,街口支付樣本中「認知性價值」與「使用意圖」的關係為顯著正向影響;Line Pay樣本中並沒有顯著影響。在調節效果的分析中顯示,街口支付樣本中「信任」在「功能性價值」、「使用意圖」間不具有顯著調節效果;Line Pay樣本中卻具有顯著調節效果;而街口支付及Line Pay樣本中,「信任」在「情緒性價值」、「使用意圖」間具有顯著調節效果;另外,街口支付樣本中「信任」在「認知性價值」、「使用意圖」間不具有顯著調節效果;分析亦顯示,街口支付樣本中「信任」在「情境性價值」、「使用意圖」間不具有顯著調節效果;Line Pay樣本中卻具有顯著調節效果。

    Since 2020, Taiwan's mobile payment and electronic payment industry has begun to enter a stage of rapid growth. Thus, this study will use the Consumption Value Theory to discuss the two major mobile payment leaders, Line Pay and JKO Pay, which combine mobile payment and electronic payment. To study the two major mobile payment brands in Taiwan, provide consumers with the consumption value and whether there is any difference, and the influence of consumers on their use intentions after obtaining the consumption value.
    The results are as follow:
    1. For both JKO Pay and Line Pay users, Functional Value, Emotional Value, and Conditional Value has significant effect on using intention.
    2. For both JKO Pay and Line Pay users, Social Value has no significant effect on using intention.
    3. For JKO Pay users, Epistemic Value has significant effect on using intention. For Line Pay users, Epistemic Value has no significant effect on using intention.
    4. For JKO Pay users, Trust has no significant moderation effect between Functional Value and Using Intention. But for Line Pay users, it has.
    5. For both JKO Pay and Line Pay users, Trust has significant moderation effect between Emotional Value and Using Intention.
    6. For JKO Pay users, Trust has significant moderation effect between Epistemic Value and Using Intention.
    7. For JKO Pay users, Trust has no significant moderation effect between Conditional Value and Using Intention. But for Line Pay users, it has.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌謝 VII 目錄 VIII 表目錄 X 圖目錄 XII 第一章、緒論 1 第二章、文獻回顧 8 第一節、行動支付 8 第二節、消費價值理論 10 第三節、使用意圖 13 第四節、信任 14 第三章、研究方法 17 第一節、研究架構 17 第二節、研究假設 20 第三節、問卷設計及衡量方法 24 第四章、研究結果 31 第一節、樣本資料分析 31 第二節、敘述性統計分析 37 第三節、驗證性因素分析與信效度分析 39 第四節、結構方程模型分析 52 第五章、研究結論與建議67 第一節、研究結論 67 第二節、管理意涵 71 第三節、研究限制及未來方向 72 參考文獻 74 網路資料 74 中文文獻 74 英文文獻 74

    網路資料

    國家發展委員會(2018)https://reurl.cc/2ZLlEr
    資策會-未來流通(2021) https://www.mirai.com.tw/taiwan-e-payment-industry-map/

    中文文獻

    李勇輝, 黃靖文, & 邱怡嘉. (2016). 以消費價值理論與理性行為理論探討 Instagram 使用者實際行為之研究. 管理研究學報, 16(2), 31-57.

    英文文獻

    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
    Asshidin, N. H. N., Abidin, N., & Borhan, H. B. (2016). Perceived quality and emotional value that influence consumer's purchase intention towards American and local products. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 639-643.
    Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: testing the structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 332-340. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.042
    Bueno, S., & Salmeron, J. L. (2008). TAM-based success modeling in ERP. Interacting with computers, 20(6), 515-523.
    Campbell, J. Y., Ramadorai, T., & Ranish, B. (2014). Getting better or feeling better? How equity investors respond to investment experience. Retrieved from
    Cao, X., Yu, L., Liu, Z., Gong, M., & Adeel, L. (2018). Understanding mobile payment users’ continuance intention: a trust transfer perspective. Internet Research.
    Cengiz, E., & Kirkbir, F. (2007). Customer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale in hospitals. Problems and perspectives in management(5, Iss. 3 (contin.)), 252-268.
    Cheng, X., Guo, F., Chen, J., Li, K., Zhang, Y., & Gao, P. (2019). Exploring the Trust Influencing Mechanism of Robo-Advisor Service: A Mixed Method Approach. Sustainability, 11(18). doi:10.3390/su11184917
    Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., & Zmijewska, A. (2008). Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 165-181.
    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
    De Sanctis, G. (1983). Expectancy theory as an explanation of voluntary use of a decision-support system. Psychological Reports, 52(1), 247-260.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
    Dennehy, D., & Sammon, D. (2015). Trends in mobile payments research: A literature review. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(1), 49-61.
    Dewan, S. G., & Chen, L.-D. (2005). Mobile payment adoption in the US: A cross-industry, crossplatform solution. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 1(2), 4-28.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Ganesan, S., & Hess, R. (1997). Dimensions and levels of trust: implications for commitment to a relationship. Marketing letters, 8(4), 439-448.
    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 51-90.
    Greiner, M. E., & Wang, H. (2010). Building consumer-to-consumer trust in e-finance marketplaces: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 105-136.
    Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
    Han, L., Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Li, J. (2017). The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 185-197.
    Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of applied psychology, 72(2), 307.
    Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. A. (1999). Information privacy in the marketspace: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the Web. The Information Society, 15(2), 129-139.
    Hur, W.-M., Kim, Y., & Park, K. (2013). Assessing the Effects of Perceived Value and Satisfaction on Customer Loyalty: A ‘Green’ Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(3), 146-156. doi:10.1002/csr.1280
    Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R. A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision sciences, 28(2), 357-389.
    Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 23(3), 531-546.
    Karahasanović, A., Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., Lüders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., . . . Jans, G. (2009). Co-creation and user-generated content–elderly people’s user requirements. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 655-678.
    Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., & Ghuman, K. (2021). The value proposition of food delivery apps from the perspective of theory of consumption value. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
    Khan, S. N., & Mohsin, M. (2017). The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 65-74.
    Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision support systems, 44(2), 544-564.
    Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413-432.
    McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35-59.
    Moorthy, K., Suet Ling, C., Weng Fatt, Y., Mun Yee, C., Ket Yin, E. C., Sin Yee, K., & Kok Wei, L. (2017). Barriers of Mobile Commerce Adoption Intention: Perceptions of Generation X in Malaysia. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 12(2), 37-53. doi:10.4067/s0718-18762017000200004
    Paglieri, F., Castelfranchi, C., da Costa Pereira, C., Falcone, R., Tettamanzi, A., & Villata, S. (2014). Trusting the messenger because of the message: feedback dynamics from information quality to source evaluation. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 20(2), 176-194.
    Peng, R., Xiong, L., & Yang, Z. (2012). Exploring tourist adoption of tourism mobile payment: An empirical analysis. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 7(1), 21-33.
    Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications. In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation (pp. 25-38): Springer.
    Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust 1. Journal of personality, 35(4), 651-665.
    Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. In (Vol. 32, pp. 344-354): Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
    Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22(2), 159-170.
    Slade, E., Williams, M., Dwivedi, Y., & Piercy, N. (2015). Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(3), 209-223.
    Slade, E. L., Williams, M. D., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Mobile payment adoption: Classification and review of the extant literature. The Marketing Review, 13(2), 167-190.
    Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
    Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
    Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2010). User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective. Information & management, 47(1), 53-59.
    Wang, E. S.-T., & Lin, R.-L. (2017). Perceived quality factors of location-based apps on trust, perceived privacy risk, and continuous usage intention. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(1), 2-10.
    Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & management, 42(5), 719-729.
    Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in organizational behavior.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE