簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡欣諭
Tsai, Hsin-Yu
論文名稱: 電商個人化服務促進購買意圖:以心理所有權觀點探討
How E-commerce Personalization Enhances Purchase Intention: A Psychological Ownership Perspective
指導教授: 蔡惠婷
Tsai, Huei-Ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 106
中文關鍵詞: 個人化心理所有權知覺控制熟悉程度自我投資AI知覺真實性購買意圖
外文關鍵詞: Psychological Ownership, Personalization, Perceived Authenticity of AI, Purchase Intention
相關次數: 點閱:40下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在日漸競爭激烈的行銷環境中,電商平台越發重視個人化服務,以及如何將生成式AI作為個人化行銷的工具,利用AI科技生成個人化行銷訊息,抑或是藉助AI分析顧客偏好,以打造專屬的個人化體驗。回顧過往文獻,本研究認為個人化服務與購買意願間的關係,與稟賦效應的理念有相似之處,當消費者認為商品屬於自己時,將會對其有更高的評價。因此,本研究參考心理所有權的理論框架,深入探討當消費者在網路上購物時,是否無需藉由真實的服務或實際接觸產品,僅透過生成式AI打造的購物體驗便對電商平台產生擁有感,進而提升購買意圖。同時,將消費者評估AI生成內容之真實程度,納入研究變數,更全面的探討AI如何驅動個人化行銷。
    本研究參考心理所有權理論,探討產生心理所有權的三大路徑:知覺控制、熟悉程度、自我投資,在AI生成的個人化行銷中對於心理所有權的影響,以及進一步對購買意圖之影響。此外加入AI知覺真實性此構面,探討其對於心理所有權的影響。總體來說,本研究探討了知覺控制、熟悉程度、自我投資、AI知覺真實性對於心理所有權的影響,以及心理所有權對於購買意圖之影響。
    本研究以網路問卷形式發放,共回收321份有效問卷,使用SPSS 30.0檢視量表之信效度、檢測共同方法偏誤,並運用Pearson相關分析及迴歸模型,了解變數間之關係,此外,使用 PLS-SEM 分析資料,以檢視研究假設之成立情況。結果顯示,對電商平台之知覺控制、熟悉程度、自我投資、AI知覺真實性對於心理所有權具有正向影響,且對電商平台產生之心理所有權對於購買意圖亦有正向影響。此外,實證了心理所有權在知覺控制、熟悉程度、自我投資、AI知覺真實性與購買意圖之間皆具有部分中介效果。以上研究結果可幫助我們更進一步了解心理所有權在AI生成的個人化行銷情境中的重要性。

    With the swift advancement of personalization and AI technologies, e-commerce firms start to deal with how to provide satisfied customer experience by utilizing generative AI. This study examines the impact of AI-generated personalization in e-commerce on purchase intention from the perspective of the endowment effect. Drawing on psychological ownership theory, a conceptual model is proposed and tests if three routes to psychological ownership, controlling the target, coming to intimately know the target, and investing the self into the target, have positive effects on psychological ownership in the context of AI-generated personalization in e-commerce. In addition, this study seeks to understand how perceived authenticity toward AI-generated content influence psychological ownership, and how psychological ownership influence purchase intention.
    This research collected data through online questionnaire survey and obtained 321 valid responses. The results show that perceived control, intimate knowledge, self-investment, and perceived authenticity of AI have significant positive effects on psychological ownership. In addition, psychological ownership have positive effect on purchase intention, and it also partially mediates the relationships between perceived control, intimate knowledge, self-investment, perceived authenticity of AI and purchase intention. The study’s outcomes add to existing knowledge and suggest useful strategies for practitioners applying personalization techniques in e-commerce contexts.

    目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 x 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的 5 第四節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 心理所有權 7 第二節 知覺控制 10 第三節 熟悉程度 13 第四節 自我投資 15 第五節 AI知覺真實性 18 第六節 購買意圖 20 第參章 研究方法 24 第一節 研究架構與假設 24 第二節 操作型定義與問卷設計 28 第三節 資料分析方法 35 第四章 資料分析結果 38 第一節 前測結果與分析 38 第二節 樣本資料分析 39 第三節 敘述性統計分析 42 第四節 共同方法偏差檢測 47 第五節 因素分析與信度分析 47 第六節 Pearson相關分析 60 第七節 迴歸分析 61 第八節 結構方程模型 70 第五章 結論與建議 77 第一節 研究結論 77 第二節 研究貢獻 80 第三節 研究限制與建議 83 參考文獻 84 附錄一 正式問卷 88

    Aitken, R., Watkins, L., Williams, J., & Kean, A. (2020). The positive role of labelling on consumers’ perceived behavioural control and intention to purchase organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120334.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
    Aksoy, L., Cooil, B., & Lurie, N. H. (2011). Decision quality measures in recommendation agents research. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 110–122.
    Arora, N., Ensslen, D., Fiedler, L., Liu, W. W., Robinson, K., Stein, E., & Schüler, G. (2021). The value of getting personalization right—or wrong—is multiplying. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/the-value-of-getting-personalization-right-or-wrong-is-multiplying
    Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173–191.
    Bagga, C. K., Bendle, N., & Cotte, J. (2019). Object valuation and non-ownership possession: How renting and borrowing impact willingness-to-pay. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 97–117.
    Bui, H. T., Filimonau, V., & Sezerel, H. (2024). AI-thenticity: Exploring the effect of perceived authenticity of AI-generated visual content on tourist patronage intentions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 34, 100956.
    Chan, H.-L., & Choi, T.-M. (2025). Using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in marketing: Development and practices. Journal of Business Research, 191, 115276.
    Chandra, S., Verma, S., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Personalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward. Psychology & Marketing, 39(8), 1529–1562.
    Chang, H., Kwak, H., Puzakova, M., Park, J., & Smit, E. G. (2015). It's no longer mine: The role of brand ownership and advertising in cross-border brand acquisitions. International Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 593–620.
    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
    Deloitte. (2024). Personalization: It’s a value exchange between brands and customers. https://www.deloittedigital.com/us/en/insights/research/personalizing-growth.html
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.
    Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
    Hajli, N., Sims, J., Zadeh, A. H., & Richard, M.-O. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71, 133–141.
    Harmeling, C. M., Moffett, J. W., Arnold, M. J., & Carlson, B. D. (2017). Toward a theory of customer engagement marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 312–335.
    Hayes, M., & Downie, A. (2024). AI personalization. IBM. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-personalization
    Hermann, E., & Puntoni, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI. Journal of Business Research, 180, 114720.
    Hernandez, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172–193.
    Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415.
    Kim, H., Li, J., & So, K. K. F. (2024). Psychological ownership research in business: A bibliometric overview and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114502.
    Kirk, C. P., & Givi, J. (2025). The AI-authorship effect: Understanding authenticity, moral disgust, and consumer responses to AI-generated marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114984.
    Kumar, J. (2019). How psychological ownership stimulates participation in online brand communities? The moderating role of member type. Journal of Business Research, 105, 243–257.
    Kumar, J. (2021). Understanding customer brand engagement in brand communities: An application of psychological ownership theory and congruity theory. European Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 969–994.
    Kumar, J. (2024). Psychological mechanisms behind access-based luxury brand consumption: Empirical investigation from the lens of new ownership paradigm. Journal of Business Research, 175, 114539.
    Kumar, V., & Kaushal, V. (2021). Perceived brand authenticity and social exclusion as drivers of psychological brand ownership. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102579.
    Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Whitson, J. A. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 694–722.
    Lee, Y., & Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269–307.
    Lim, S., van Osselaer, S. M., Goodman, J. K., Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2024). The Starbucks effect: When name-based order identification increases customers' store preference and service satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 100(2), 316–329.
    Merfeld, K., Klein, J. F., de Regt, A., Baltin, A.-S., & Henkel, S. (2025). In-store technology personalization: A typology and research agenda based on type of automation and data collection. Journal of Business Research, 191, 115236.
    Morewedge, C. K. (2021). Psychological ownership: Implicit and explicit. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 125–132.
    Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: An integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 339–348.
    Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W., Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021). Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196–218.
    Nunes, J. C., Ordanini, A., & Giambastiani, G. (2021). The concept of authenticity: What it means to consumers. Journal of Marketing, 85(4), 1–20.
    Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447.
    Peng, H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge? Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 398–415.
    Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
    PwC. (2025). What’s important to the CMO in 2025. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/executive-leadership-hub/cmo.html
    Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768.
    Shu, S. B., & Peck, J. (2011). Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 439–452.
    Sinclair, G., & Tinson, J. (2017). Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption. Journal of Business Research, 71, 1–9.
    Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439–459.
    Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Chau, P. Y., & Zhang, L. (2012). Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 32(6), 574–588.
    Zheng, R., Li, Z., & Na, S. (2022). How customer engagement in the live-streaming affects purchase intention and customer acquisition, E-tailer's perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103015.
    未來流通研究所. (2024). 【產業地圖圖解】2024台灣零售與電商產業地殼變動:電商登頂. https://www.mirai.com.tw/trends-and-changes-in-taiwans-retail-and-e-commerce-industry-2010-2024/

    QR CODE