簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王鶯兒
Wang, Ying-Er
論文名稱: 供應商能力、協同能力、競爭優勢與組織績效之關係研究-以汽車零件製造業為例
The Relationship among Supplier’s capability, Collaborate capability, Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance –A Study of Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing Industry In Taiwan.
指導教授: 林清河
Lin, Ching-Ho
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 63
中文關鍵詞: 競爭優勢組織績效協同能力供應商能力
外文關鍵詞: supplier capability, competitive advantage, organizational performance, collaborate capability
相關次數: 點閱:76下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   隨著全球化市場競爭與資訊科技的發展,再加上台灣加入WTO 後對於汽車零件製造業所造成的衝擊,此產業的製造商都必須充分提升供應鏈管理的實力,才能成為世界大廠行銷全球的緊密夥伴。企業在制定供應鏈相關策略時,應考慮企業的資訊科技基礎架構的配合,及供應商、配銷商之相互配合等,運用各方資源而建構供應鏈的核心競爭力,以確保競爭優勢及延續企業生命。

      本研究以台灣的汽車零件製造業為研究對象,供應商能力、協同能力、競爭優勢與組織績效進行等構面互動關係以及不同組織規模在各構面間差異分析之實證研究。

      本研究透過問卷的收集,以因素分析,典型相關分析(AMOS),線性結構分析(LISREL)等多變量變異數分析(MANOVA),進行等構面互動關係以及不同組織規模在各構面間差異分析之實證研究。以瞭解國內汽車零件製造業在全球供應鏈管理的新架構下,其對供應商能力、協同能力、競爭優勢及組織績效等相關基礎構面為何。

      研究結果發現,供應商能力和協同能力,供應商能力和競爭優勢,協同能力和競爭優勢等兩兩間有顯著的互動關係。供應商能力和協同能力對其他構面只有部分正向影響;競爭優勢對組織績效有正向的影響。但組織績效和協同能力及供應商能力間卻不很顯著,這說明競爭優勢是一個關鍵樞紐點,這其中環環相扣的關係是產業界迫切須要了解的,也是學術界及產業界密切之研究的重點。

      In the terms of global market competition and new digital technological information development, and plus the impact for automotive parts industry when Twain join the WTO. All these kinds of industry maker need to upgrade the supply chain management’s capability in advance. Under this concept and structure , the firm could be one of closer partner for a famous company. Once firm set up the supply chain management relative strategy , it indeed need to think about some coordination. Such as internal information technology structure base, co-work cooperation between supplier and distribution center. How to use the whole resources to build up the core competence to make sure extending the firm’s life cycle and competence advantage is a must.

      The theme of this research focus on Taiwan automotive parts industry. And the basic researching structure are supplier’s capability, collaborate capability, competitive advantage and organization performance relative relation. Besides that , it is also to study the differential analysis of each organization within four basic structure.

      The research is through the questioner collection and analysis methodology are factor analysis, canonical correlation (AMOS), linear structure relation (LISREL) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The aim is to get each organization within four basic structure differential analysis. The purpose is to understand Twain automotive parts industry what is the result and would be taken of supplier capability, collaborate capability, competitive advantage and organization performance structure relative relation under the worldwide new supply chain management structure.

      Under the systematic and scientific study, the result can be described that supplier capability v.s collaborate capability, supplier capability v.s competitive advantage, collaborate capability v.s competitive advantage, both of them have the conspicuous positive relative relation and correlation. Especially, supplier capability and collaborate capability v.s others structure have partial positive influence. Competitive advantage predominance v.s organization performance with full positive influence. But, it doesn’t have relative relation obviously between organization performance, co work coordination and supplier capability. It can be explained that competitive advantage is key point. All these relative influence key factor is worthy for automotive parts maker industry to understand. Not only this but it also for academic community to study it.

    目錄 VII 表目錄 X 圖目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍 3 一、 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 產業結構分析 4 一、 產業之定義 4 二、 汽車零件製造業結構分析 4 三、 產業面臨之問題 7 第二節 供應商能力 7 第三節 協同能力 11 一、 協同的定義 11 二、 協同的方式 12 三、 影響協同的關鍵因素 12 第四節 競爭優勢 13 一、 競爭優勢的意義 13 二、 競爭優勢之關鍵因素 14 第五節 組織績效 15 一、 組織績效衡量指標 16 第六節 各構面之間的關係 17 一、 協同能力與供應商能力的關係 17 二、 供應商能力與競爭優勢的關係 18 三、 協同能力與競爭優勢的關係 19 四、 供應商能力與組織績效的關係 19 五、 競爭優勢與組織績效的關係 20 六、 協同能力與組織績效的關係 20 七、 不同公司組織規模之企業,在供應商能力、協同能力、競爭優勢與組織績效互動關係。 21 八、 不同公司年度營業額之企業在供應商能力、協同能力、競爭優勢與組織績效互動關係。 21 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 研究架構 22 第二節 研究範圍及樣本 23 第三節 研究假設 23 第四節 研究變項(基礎構面)及操作性定義 24 一、 供應商能力 24 二、 協同能力 24 三、 競爭優勢 25 四、 組織績效 26 第五節 問卷設計 27 第六節 研究流程 29 第七節 研究分析方法 30 第四章 資料分析 33 第一節 回收樣本結構分析 33 第二節 樣本基本資料分析 33 第三節 因素分析與信度檢定 34 一、 供應商能力構面 34 二、 協同能力構面 35 三、 競爭優勢構面 36 四、 組織績效構面 36 第四節 各構面之差異分析 37 一、 不同經營規模之企業,在各研究構面因素之差異性分析 37 二、 不同營業額之企業,在各研究構面因素之差異性分析 39 第五節 典型相關 40 一、 供應商能力與協同能力 40 二、 供應商能力與競爭優勢 41 三、 供應商能力與組織績效 42 四、 協同能力與競爭優勢 43 五、 協同能力與組織績效 44 六、 競爭優勢與組織績效 44 第六節 線性結構模式 45 第五章 結論與建議 49 第一節 研究結論 49 第二節 管理實務意函 51 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 53 參考文獻 55 一、 中文文獻 55 二、 英文文獻 56 附錄A 60

    一、中文文獻
    1. 丁惠民譯,2003。六標準差管理,麥格羅∙希爾國際出版公司。
    2. 吳萬益,1996。台美日企業在台灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究,台大管理論叢,7 卷1 期,頁49-84。
    3. 林清河、施坤壽,2003。組織結構、全面品質管理、ISO 9000與競爭優勢、組織績效之結構化模式分析,第二十卷第五期,頁965-992。
    4. 張文菁,2001。企業特性、人力資本、產業環境與組織績效之相關性研究,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    5. 張建仁,2001。汽車零件製造商生產與作業策略之個案研究,政大經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    6. 陳哲彥,1998。人力資源管理與組織績效之關係─本土及外資企業的比較,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    7. 黃貝玲,2001。供應鏈管理之概念解析與發展趨勢,電子化企業經理人報告,ARC遠擎管理顧問公司。
    8. 黃俊英,1999。行銷研究:管理與技術,台北:華泰書局
    9. 趙郁文,1998。跨國委託製造對台灣資訊電子廠商營運能力之提升效果,中山管理評論,第六卷第四期,頁1113-1136。
    10. 蔡明田、張淑昭,2001。多角化策略之綜論,台北市銀月刊,第二十一卷第四期,頁48-59。

    二、英文文獻
    1. Aaker, D. A., Developing Business Strategies, New York: Wiley & Sons, 1984.
    2. Anderson, G. C., Managing Performance Appraisal Systems, Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
    3. Bae, J. and J. J. Lawler, "Organizational and HRM Strategies in Korea: Impact on Firm Performance in an Emerging Economy," Academy of Management Journal 43, 2000, pp.503-517.
    4. Bessant, J., "Towards Total Integrated Manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics 34(3), 1994, pp.237-251.
    5. Bharadwaj, N., "Investigating the Decision Criteria used in Electronic Components Procurement," Industrial Marketing Management 33, 2004, pp.317-323.
    6. Burgess, T. F., H. K. Gules and M. Tekin, "Supply-chain Collaboration and Success in Technology Implementation," Integrated Manufacturing systems 8(15), 1997, pp.323-332.
    7. Cagliano, R., V. Chiesa and R. Manzini, "Differences and Similarities in Managing Echnological Collaborations in Research Development and Manufacturing: A Case Study," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17, 2000, pp.193-244.
    8. Campbell, D. T. and D. W. Fiske, "Converge and Discriminate Validation by the Multirait-Multimethod Matrix," Psychological Bulletion 54, 1959, pp.81-105.
    9. Chen, I. J. and M. H. Small, "Implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technology: An Integrated Planning Model," Omega 22(1), 1994, pp.91-103.
    10. Choi, T. Y. and J. L. Hartley, "An exploration of Supplier Selection Practices Across the Supply Chain," Journal of Operation Management 14, 1996, pp.333-343.
    11. Cooper, D. R. and C. W. Emoryfifth, " Business Research Methods", Richard D. Irwin, Inc, 1995.
    12. Dess, G. C. and R. B. Robinson, "Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absent of Objective Measure," Strategic Management Journal 5(3), 1984, pp.265-273.
    13. Diskson, G. W., "An Analysis of Supplier Selection System," Journal of Purchasing 2, 1966, pp.5-17.
    14. Ellarm, L. M., "A Managerial Guideline for the Development and Implement of Purchasing Partnerships," International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 31(13), 1990, pp.2-6.
    15. Joreskog, K. and D.Sorbom, “LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS command language,” Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1993.
    16. Kerrin, M., "Continuous improvement along the supply chain: the impact of customer-supplier relations," Journal of Integrated Manufacturing Systems 13(3), 2001, pp.141-149.
    17. Krause, D. R. and L. M. Ellram, "Supplier Development Current Practice and Outcomes," International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 33(2), 1998, pp.12-19.
    18. Lau, R. S. M., "Competitive factors and their relative importance in the US electronics and computer industries," International Journal of Operations and Production Management 22(1), 2002, pp.125-135.
    19. Leavy, B., "Two Strategic Perspective on the Buyer-supplier Relationship," Production and Inventory Management Journal 35(2), 1994, pp.47-51.
    20. Lee, H. L., "Creating Value through Supply Chain Integration," Supply Chain Management Review September/ October, 2000, pp.1-4.
    21. Lindberg, P. and L. Trygg, "Manufacturing strategy in the value system," International Journal of Operations & Production Management 11(3), 1991, pp.52-62.
    22. Mcgee, J. E., M. J. Dowling and W. L. Megginson, "Cooperative Strategy and New Venture Performance:The role of Business Strategy and Management Experience," Strategv Management Journal 16, 1995, pp.565-580.
    23. Mentzer, J. T., S. Min and Z. G. Zacharia, "Nature of Interim Partnering in Supply Chain Managemen," Journal of Retailing 76, 2000, pp.549-568.
    24. Moller, K. E. K. and P. Torronen, "Business Suppliers' Value Creation Potential: A Capability-based Analysis," Industrial Marketing Management 32, 2003, pp.109-118.
    25. Olesen, K. and M. D. Myers, "Trying to Improve Communication and Collaboration with Information Technology: An Action Research Project which Failed," Information Technology & People 12(4), 1999, pp.317-332.
    26. Pearson, J. N., L. M. Ellram and C. R. Carter, "Status and Recognition of the Purchasing Function in the Electronic Industry," Journal of Supply Chain Management 32(2), 1995, pp.30-36.
    27. Petroni, A. and B. Panciroli, "Innovation as a Determinant of Suppliers Roles and Performances: An Empirical Study in the Food Machinery Industry," European Journal of Purchasing Supply Management 8, 2002, pp.135-149.
    28. Prasad, S. and J. Sounderpandian, "Factors Influencing Global Supply Chain Efficiency: Implications for Information Systems," Supply Chain Management 8(3/4), 2003, pp.241-251.
    29. Ree, H. J., "The Added Value of Office Accommodation to Organizational Performance," Work Study 5(7), 2002, pp.357-363.
    30. Schonberger, R. J. and J. P. Gilbert, "Just-in-time Purchasing Challenge for US Industry," California Management Review 26(1), 1983, pp.54-68.
    31. Scrinivasa, K. and S. Wadhwa, "Flexibility: An Emerging Meta-Competence for Managing High Technology," International Journal of Technology Management 19(7/8), 2000, pp.820-845.
    32. Shamdasani, P. N. and J. N. Sheth, "An Experimental Approach to Investigating Satisfaction and Continuity in Marketung Alliances," European Journal of Marketing 29(4), 1995, pp.6-23.
    33. Shin, H., D. A. Collier and D. D. Wilson, "Supply Management Orientation and Supplier/Buyer Performance," Journal of Operations Management 18, 2000, pp.317-333.
    34. Swift, C. O., "Preference for Single Sourcing and Supplier Selection Criteria," Journal of Business Research 32(2), 1995, pp.105-111.
    35. Tan, K., V. Kannan, R. Handfield and S. Ghosh, "Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Study of its Impact on Performance," International Journal of Operations and Production Management 19(10), 1999, pp.1034-1052.
    36. Tersine, R. J. and E. A. Hummingbird, "Lead-time Reduction: The Search for Competitive Advantage," International Journal of Operations and Production Management 15(2), 1995, pp.8-18.
    37. Tracey, M., M. A. Vondermbse and J. Lim, "Manufacturing Technology and Strategy Formulation: Keys to Enhancing Competitiveness and Improving Performance," Journal of Operations Management 17, 1999, pp.411-428.
    38. Tracey, M. and C. L. Tan, "Empirical Analysis of Supplier Selection and Involvement, Customer Satisfaction, and Firm Performance," Managing Service Quality 6(4), 2001, pp.174-188.
    39. Venlatraman, V. and N. Ramanujam, "Measuring of Business Performance on Strategy Reasarch: A Comparison of Approaches," Academy of Management Review 11(4), 1986, pp.801-814.
    40. Vonderembse, M. A. and M. Tracey, "The Impact of Supplier Selection Criteria and Supplier Involvement on Manufacturing Performance," The Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(3), 1999, pp.33-39.
    41. Wagner, B. A., D. K. Macbeth and D. Boddy, "Improving Supply Chain Relations: An Empirical Case Study," Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 7(4), 2002, pp.253-264.
    42. Walker, M., "Supplier-Retailer Collaboration in European Grocery Distribution," Logistics Information Management 7(6), 1994, pp.23-27.
    43. Weber, C. A., J. R. Current and W. C. Benton, "Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods," European Journal of Operational Research 50, 1991, pp.2-18.
    44. Wrenn, S. M., "Factors in Choosing a Communications Test Equipment Supplier," Telecommunications 28, 1994, pp.53-54.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2005-07-29公開
    QR CODE