| 研究生: |
張璟橒 Chang, Ching-Yun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
社會網絡對顧客關係、品牌價值與市場績效 影響之研究 - 以台灣機械設備買賣業為例 The Study of the Relationships among Social Network, Customer Relationship, Brand Equity, and Market Performance - A Case of Taiwan Mechanical Device Merchandising Industry |
| 指導教授: |
莊雙喜
Chuang, Shuang-Shii 蔡明田 Tsai, Ming-Tien |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 74 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 顧客關係 、市場績效 、社會網絡 、台灣機械設備買賣業 、品牌權益 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Customer Relationship, Social Network, Brand Equity, Taiwan Mechanical Device Merchandising Industry, Market Performance |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:144 下載:7 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究針對影響市場績效之前因變數社會網絡、顧客關係、品牌權益等構面設計量表,共郵寄400 份問卷進行實際問卷調查,回收有效問卷為264份,有效問卷回收率為67.50%。本研究採用SPSS 與Amos統計軟體作為統計分析之工具,針對樣本資料使用之研究方法,包括:敘述性統計分析、因素分析、信度分析、結構方程模式(SEM)等方法,探討社會網絡對顧客關係、品牌權益與市場績效之影響性。
研究結果發現:(1)社會網絡與顧客關係對品牌權益具有顯著的正向影響。(2)社會網絡、顧客關係與品牌權益對市場績效具有顯著的正向影響。(3)社會網絡正向影響品牌權益,透過品牌權益的中介效果間接地正向影響市場績效。(4)顧客關係正向影響品牌權益,透過品牌權益的中介效果間接地正向影響市場績效。
These studies focus on how the cause exogenous independent variables including social network, customer relationship and brand equity influence market performance. This study also design a questionnaire using these structural faces, sending out a total of 400 copies. After rejecting the invalid questionnaires, we have a total of 264 applicable results. That is a 67.50% effective rate of recovery. This study adopt SPSS and Amos statistical software as the tool for statistical analysis. The research mothed of this paper includes descriptive statistics analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis and Structural Equation Model(SEM)and so on. To discuss the influence of social network on customer relationship, brand equity and market performance.
The results of this study are as follows: (1) Social network and customer relationship have a significant positive influence on brand equity. (2) Social network, customer relationship and brand equity have a significant positive influence on market performance. (3) Social network has a significant positive influence on brand equity and indirectly has a positive influence on market performance through the moderating effect by brand equity. (4) Customer relationship has a significant positive influence on brand equity and indirectly has a positive influence on market performance through the moderating effect by brand equity.
一、 中文
1. 丘昌泰(2002),邁向績效導向的地方政府管理,研考雙月刊,第26卷第3期,頁47-56。
2. 吳萬益(2005),企業研究方法,台北:華泰書局。
3. 沈進成、楊琬琪(2007),渡假飯店顧客體驗、體驗價值與品牌權益影響關係之研究-以劍湖山王子飯店為例,旅遊管理研究,第7卷第1期,頁55-81。
4. 林仲曦(2006),經營策略與顧客關係管理投入程度對組織績效的影響,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
5. 侯嘉政、張孝宗(2004),市場導向、知識特性、組織學習型態與企業績效關係之研究,中原企管評論,第2卷第2期,頁113-130。
6. 洪正明(2007),以社會網絡觀點探討網絡集中度對技術創新之影響 -兼論專屬資產之調節效果,人力資源管理學報,第7卷第1期,87-108。
7. 張火燦、劉淑寧(2002),從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享,人力資源管理學報,第2卷第3期,101-113。
8. 陳振燧(2001),從品牌權益觀點探討品牌延伸策略,輔仁管理評論,第8卷第1期,頁33-56。
9. 陳順宇(2005),多變量分析,台北:華泰書局。
10. 陳榮德(2004),組織內部社會網絡的形成與影響:社會資本觀點,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
11. 曾義明、黃筱霈(2003),品牌權益內涵之整合性的驗證 - 線性結構模式的比較,輔仁管理評論,第10卷第3期,頁27-56。
12. 閔庭祥(2001),顧客關係管理系統之價值模型建構,國立中央大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
13. 黃延聰(2006),網絡結構、經濟行動結果與企業績效-臺灣中小企業網絡的探討,臺灣管理學刊,第6卷2期,頁21-37。
14. 黃蓉芬(2006年7月23日),我國機械設備國內需求分析,工研院IEK系統能源組。
15. 黃蓉芬(2006年9月7日),我國機械設備進口分析,工研院IEK系統能源組。
16. 楊敏鈺(2006),數位化時代下消費者社會網絡對消費型態之影響研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
17. 楊棠堯(2002),顧客關係管理系統互動性之實驗分析,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
18. 劉信宏(2007年7月11日),我國機械內需市場分析,工研院IEK系統能源組。
二、 英文
1. Aaker, D. (1991), Managing Brand Equity, New York: The Free Press.
2. Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S. W. (2000), Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, in Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, Butterworth-Heinemann.
3. BarNir, A. & Smith, K. A., (2002), Interfirm Alliances in the Small Business: The Role of Social Networks, Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 219-232.
4. Boulding, W. Staelin, R. Ehret, M. & Johnston, W. J. (2005), A Customer Relationship Management Roadmap: What Is Known, Potential Pitfalls, and Where to Go, Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 155-166.
5. Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P. & Covin, T. J. (1990), Content and Performance of Growth-Seeking Strategies: A Comparison of Small Firms in High- and Low Technology Industries, Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6), 391-412.
6. Dess, G. G. & Robinson, R. B. (1984), Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures : the Case of the Privately-Held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 265-273.
7. Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howton, S. W. (2002), The Relationship Between the Learning Organization Concept and Firm’s Financial Performance: An Empirical Assessment, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 5-21.
8. Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001), Procedural Justice as a Two-Dimensional Construct: An Examination in the Performance Appraisal Account, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(2), 205-222.
9. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981), Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
10. Freeman, L. C., Borgatti, S. P., & White, D. R. (1991), Centrality in Valued Graphs: A Measure of Betweens Base on Network Flow, Social Networks, 13, 141-154.
11. Hoeffler, S. & Keller, K. L. (2003), The Marketing Advantages of Strong Brands, Journal of Brand Management, 10(6), 421-445.
12. Homburg and Pflesser (2000), A Multiple-Layer Model of Market-Oriented Organizational Culture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 449-462.
13. Johansson, U., & Elg, U., (2002), Relationships as Entry Barriers: a Network Perspective, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18(3), 393-419.
14. Kalakota, R. & Robinson, M. (1999), E-Business: Roadmap for Success, Addison-Wesley.
15. Kanji, G. K. (2002), Business Excellence: Make It Happen, Total Quality Management, 13 (8), 1115-1124.
16. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P., (1992), The Balanced Scorecard Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
17. Keller, K. L. (1993), Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer- Based Brand Equity, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
18. Lin, N. (2001), Social capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, UK: Cambridge Uni. Press.
19. Mitchell, J. C. (1969), Social Networks and Urban Situations, England: Manchester University Press.
20. Morgan, R. P. (2000), A Consumer-Oriented Framework of Brand Equity and Loyalty, International Journal of the Market Research Society, 42(1), 65-78.
21. Murray, J. Y., Wildt, A. R., & Kotabe, M. (1995), Global Sourcing Strategies of U.S. Subsidiaries of Foreign Multinationals, Management International Review, 35(4), 307-324.
22. Reinartz, W., Krafft, M. & Hoyer, W. D. (2004), The Customer Relationship Management Process: Its Measurement and Impact on Performance, Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 293-305.
23. Simon, C., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993), The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach, Marketing Science, 12(1), 28-52.
24. Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (1992), The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency, Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 296-313.
25. Stringfellow, A., Nie, W., & Bowen, D. E. (2004), CRM: Profiting from Understanding Customer Needs, Business Horizons, 47(5), 45-52.
26. Swift, R. S. (2001), Accelerating Customer Relationship, London, Prentice Hall.
27. Wang, Y., Lo, H. P., Chi, R. & Yang, Y. (2004), An Integrated Framework for Customer Value and Customer-Relationship-Management Performance: A Customer-Based Perspective Form China, Managing Service Quality, 14(2-3), 169-182.
28. Winer, R. S. (2001), A Framework for Customer Relationship Management, California Management Review, 43(4), 89-105.
29. Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research Design and Methods, London: Sage Publication.
30. Yorgey, L. A. (2002), 10 CRM Trends to Watch in 2002, Target Marketing, 25(3), 82-83.
31. Zablah, A. R., Bellenger, D. N. & Johnson, W. J. (2004), An Evaluation of Divergent Perspectives on Customer Relationship Management: Towards a Common Understanding of an Emerging Phenomenon, Industrial Marketing Management, 33 (6), 475-489.