創造力是人類文明前進的動力之一，無論是在教育學界或是企業組織中都備受關注。如何培養和促進創造力成了人們研究的重點。中庸思維是東方文化下的一種思維方式。本研究欲分別探討中庸思維中之陰陽轉換、和諧觀及全局思維同創造力之間的關係。
以台灣南部某大學的學生作為研究對象，分別進行了研究一（陰陽轉換與創造力的關係）、研究二（和諧觀與創造力的關係）及研究三（全局思維與創造力的關係）這3個研究，結果發現：研究一，被操弄陰陽轉換思維的實驗組相比非操弄陰陽轉換思維的對照組在創造力的流暢力表現上要顯著高，在創造力的獨創力表現上也較高，但不顯著；研究二，和諧觀中的避免分裂與促進和諧同創造力的流暢力沒有顯著相關。和諧觀中的避免分裂和創造力的獨創力呈現顯著負相關，和諧觀中的促進和諧和創造力的創獨創力沒有顯著相關；研究三，全局思維和創造力的流暢力和獨創力之間都沒有顯著相關。
最後根據研究結果進行探討，並對研究貢獻、研究限制與未來研究方向加以闡述。

This study examined the relationship between Zhong-Yong thinking and creativity. To clearly figure out this complicated relationship, we did three separated studies from three different aspects of Zhong-Yong thinking. We hypothesized that (1) Yin-Yang convertibility of Zhong-Yong thinking is positively related to creativity; (2) Harmony enhancement of Zhong-Yong thinking is positively related to creativity and Disintegration avoidance of Zhong-Yong thinking is negatively related creativity; (3) Holistic thinking of Zhong-Yong thinking is positively related to creativity.
Using a combination of experimental design and questionnaire survey, we analyzed data from 163 students of university in northern Taiwan.
Results show that (1) hypothesis that Yin-Yang convertibility of Zhong-Yong thinking is positively related to creativity is partial supported; (2) hypothesis that Harmony enhancement of Zhong-Yong thinking is positively related to creativity is not supported and hypothesis that Disintegration avoidance of Zhong-Yong thinking is negatively related creativity is partial supported; (3) hypothesis that Holistic thinking of Zhong-Yong thinking is positively related to creativity is not supported.
Finally, the contributions and limitations of this study were discussed, and
the recommendations for academic and practical applications were also provided.

中文參考文獻

陳宗逸. (1995). 家庭背景, 教師行為, 制握信念與國小學童創造思考相關之研究.
鄧傳忠. (2008). 中庸思維對拿捏行為與心理適應的調節效果. 臺灣大學心理學研究所學位論文, 1-91.
郭桂梅, & 段兴民. (2007). 个体特征对员工创造性的影响研究综述. 科技进步与对策, 24(10), 206-210.
郭侃, & 曾维希. (2012). 大学生中庸思维在情绪调节和情绪间的作用.
許功餘. (2006). 華人辯證思維與 “性格與行為關連性內隱理論” 之關係. 中華心理學刊, 48(3), 291-313.
許潔虹, 李紓, & 孫悅. (2008). 陰陽轉換思維與概率思維的關係研究. 中國社會心理學會主辦 [第七屆中國社會心理學會年會](天津) 宣讀之論文.
許詩淇, & 黃囇莉. (2006). “情同母女” 之外: 婆媳關係的多元和諧. 本土心理學研究(26), 35-72.
黃金蘭, 林以正, & 楊中芳. (2012). 中庸信念-價值量表之修訂. 本土心理學研究(38), 3-41.
黃囇莉, & 許詩淇. (2006). 虛虛實實之間: 婆媳關係的和諧化歷程與轉化機制. 本土心理學研究(25), 3-45.
蒋建武, & 赵曙明. (2010). 中国情境下的员工创造力研究: 挑战与展望. 第五届 (2010) 中国管理学年会——组织行为与人力资源管理分会场论文集.
李慧賢. (1995). 原住民學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究-年級, 性別, 教師教學創新行為, 父母教養態度, 社會支持與創意經驗, 創造思考能力之關係. 國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文 (未出版).
林升栋. (2008). 阴阳转换思维之测量. 中国社会心理学会 2008 年全国学术大会论文摘要集.
林升棟. (2002). 尋找中庸自我的研究. 廣州中山大學心理學研究所, 未發表之博士論文.
林瑋芳, 鄧傳忠, 林以正, & 黃金蘭. (2013). 進退有據: 中庸對拿捏行為與心理適應之關係的調節效果. 本土心理學研究(40), 45-84.
毛連塭. (1999). 特殊兒童教學法. 台北: 心理.
孫蒨如, & 王崇信. (2005). 華人的自我評價與自我肯定歷程. 本土心理學研究(24), 139-187.
王為蒨, & 林以正. (2006). 華人的均衡自我觀與心理適應. 中國社會心理學會主辦 [第一屆中庸與其心理學相關研究集思會](安徽黃山) 宣讀之論文.
吴佳辉. (2006). 自我拿捏的本质: 自我变异与自我确定. 中国社会心理学会 2006 年学术研讨会论文集.
吴佳辉, & 林以正. (2005). 中庸思维量表的编制. 本土心理学研究, 24, 247-299.
吳佳煇. (2006). 中庸讓我的生活更好: 中庸思維對生活滿意度的影響. 華人心理學報》(香港), 7,163-176.
吳靜吉. (2002). 華人學生創造力的發掘與培育 12.
吳靜吉, & 程炳林. (1992). 激勵的學習策略量表之修訂. 測驗年刊, 39, 59-78.
徐芝君, 陳學志, & 邱發忠. (2012). [報紙的不尋常用途] 測驗之編製. 創造學刊, 3(2), 33-56.
杨中芳, & 林升栋. (2012). 中庸实践思维体系构念图的建构效度研究. 社会学研究, 4, 1-21.
楊中芳. (2001). 中國人的世界觀: 中庸實踐思維初探. 如何理解中國人》. 台北: 遠流出版公司.
楊中芳. (2010). 中庸實踐思維體系探研的初步進展. 本土心理學研究(34), 3-96.
楊中芳, & 趙志裕. (1997). 中庸實踐思維初探. 中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心主辦 [華人心理與行為科技學術研討會](南港) 刊載之論文.
张德胜, 金耀基, 陈海文, 陈健民, 杨中芳, 赵志裕, & 伊莎白. (2001). 论中庸理性: 工具理性, 价值理性和沟通理性之外. 社会学研究, 2, 33-48.
张光曦, & 古昕宇. (2015). 中庸思维与员工创造力. 科研管理, 36, 251-257.
张建新, & 周明洁. (2006). 中国人人格结构探索——人格特质六因素假说. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 574-585.
赵志裕, & 康萤仪. (2011). 文化社会心理学. 北 京: 中 国 人 民 大 学 出 版 社.
趙志裕. (2000). 中庸思維的測量. 香港社會科學學報》(香港), 18, 33-55.

英文參考文獻

Alonso, M. A. P. (2015). Metacognition and Sensorimotor Components Underlying the Process of Handwriting and Keyboarding and Their Impact on Learning. An Analysis from the Perspective of Embodied Psychology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 263-269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.470
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity: Hachette UK.
An, S. U., Ji, L. J., Marks, M., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2017). Two Sides of Emotion: Exploring Positivity and Negativity in Six Basic Emotions across Cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00610
Anderson, N. H., & Nakamura, C. Y. (1964). Avoidance decrement in avoidance conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57(2), 196.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173-177.
Bai, Y. T., Harms, P., Han, G. H., & Cheng, W. W. (2015). Good and bad simultaneously? Leaders using dialectical thinking foster positive conflict and employee performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(3), 245-267. doi:10.1108/ijcma-09-2014-0070
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological bulletin, 112(3), 461.
Belolutskaya, A. K. (2015). Multidimensionality of thinking in the context of creativity studies. Psychology in Russia-State of the Art, 8(1), 43-60. doi:10.11621/pir.2015.0105
Boekhorst, J. A. (2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: A social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241-264. doi:10.1002/hrm.21669
Cai, Y. H., Jia, L. D., & Li, J. X. (2017). Dual-level transformational leadership and team information elaboration: The mediating role of relationship conflict and moderating role of middle way thinking. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(2), 399-421. doi:10.1007/s10490-016-9492-x
Cancer, V., & Mulej, M. (2010). The Dialectical Systems Theory's Capacity for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(3), 285-300. doi:10.1002/sres.1016
Castro, D. R., Anseel, F., Kluger, A. N., Lloyd, K. J., & Turjeman-Levi, Y. (2018). Mere listening effect on creativity and the mediating role of psychological safety. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. doi:10.1037/aca0000177
10.1037/aca0000177.supp (Supplemental)
Chang, T. Y., & Yang, C. T. (2014). Individual differences in Zhong-Yong tendency and processing capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01316
Chen, C. C., Chen, X.-P., & Huang, S. (2013). Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1), 167-207.
Chen, C. C., Chen, Y.-R., & Xin, K. (2004). Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2), 200-209.
Chen, T. T., Leung, K., Li, F. L., & Ou, Z. Y. (2015). Interpersonal harmony and creativity in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 648-672. doi:10.1002/job.2001
Chen, X. P., Xie, X. F., & Chang, S. Q. (2011). Cooperative and Competitive Orientation among Chinese People: Scale Development and Validation. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 353-379. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00215.x
Chen, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhou, M. (2015). How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 511-521. doi:10.1037/a0038036
10.1037/a0038036.supp (Supplemental)
Cheng, C.-Y., Sanchez-Burks, J., & Lee, F. (2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1178-1184.
CHEUNG, C. K., Rudowicz, E., Yue, X., & Kwan, A. S. (2003). Creativity of university students: What is the impact of field and year of study? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(1), 42-63.
Chiu, C.-Y., Gelfand, M. J., Yamagishi, T., Shteynberg, G., & Wan, C. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 482-493.
Chiu, C.-y., & Kwan, L. Y. (2010). Culture and creativity: A process model. Management and Organization Review, 6(3), 447-461.
Chiu, C. y., Gries, P., Torelli, C. J., & Cheng, S. Y. (2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 663-676.
Chiu, C. Y., Kwan, L. Y. Y., & Liou, S. (2013). Culturally motivated challenges to innovations in integrative research: Theory and solutions. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 149-172.
Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C., & Park, H. (2003). Culture and judgement of causal relevance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(1), 46.
Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691-705.
Chou, L. F., Chu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, J. (2014). Work stress and employee well‐being: The critical role of Zhong‐Yong. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 115-127.
Chou, L. F., Hu, J. F., & Lin, J. C. (2016). The Critical Role of Zhong-Yong thinking for Well-being of Chinese employee and undergraduate: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 319-319.
Commons, M. L. (2018). Four forces that prevent change in organizations: How to become an innovative organization. Behavioral Development, 23(1), 14-21. doi:10.1037/bdb0000073
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information‐processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child development, 67(3), 993-1002.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2014). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In The systems model of creativity (pp. 161-184): Springer.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. (1977). Characteristics of creatively gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(4), 546-551.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. (1982). Group inventory for finding interests:(GIFFI) I and II: Instruments for identifying creative potential in the junior and senior high school. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(1), 50-57.
de Oliveira, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2017). Culture Changes How We Think About Thinking: From "Human Inference" to "Geography of Thought". Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 782-790. doi:10.1177/1745691617702718
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(3), 497.
Fang, T. (2012). Yin Yang: A New Perspective on Culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25-50. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of management journal, 46(5), 618-630.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills, and personality factors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(4), 255-268.
Forisha, B. L. (1978a). Creativity and imagery in men and women. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(3_suppl), 1255-1264.
Forisha, B. L. (1978b). Mental imagery and creativity: Review and speculations. Journal of Mental Imagery.
Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of experimental social psychology, 40(6), 739-752.
Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906-914. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication research, 14(5), 529-552.
G. Aiken, E., S. Thomas, G., & A. Shennum, W. (1975). Memory for a Lecture: Effects of Notes, Lecture Rate, and Informational Density (Vol. 67).
Gabora, L., & Tseng, S. (2017). The social benefits of balancing creativity and imitation: Evidence from an agent-based model. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(4), 403-419. doi:10.1037/aca0000132
Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1119.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(4), 531.
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(8), 1398.
Grohman, M. G., Ivcevic, Z., Silvia, P., & Kaufman, S. B. (2017). The role of passion and persistence in creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(4), 376-385. doi:10.1037/aca0000121
Gruber, H. E. (1982). On the hypothesized relation between giftedness and creativity. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1982(17), 7-29.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education.
Guilford, J. P. (1985). The structure-of-intellect model. Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications, 225-266.
Guoxin, L., Xue, Y., Wei, X., & Yingqiu, Z. (2017). SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS AND CUSTOMER-GENERATED CONTENT: THE MODERATION EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 245-253.
Gutworth, M. B., Cushenbery, L., & Hunter, S. T. (2016). Creativity for deliberate harm: Malevolent creativity and social information processing theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi:10.1002/jocb.155
Hall, D. T. (1971). A theoretical model of career subidentity development in organizational settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(1), 50-76.
Hall, D. T., & Lawler, E. E. (1969). Unused potential in research and development organizations. Research Management, 12(5), 339-354.
He, C., Gu, J., Wu, W., Zhai, X., & Song, J. (2017). Social media use in the career development of graduate students: the mediating role of internship effectiveness and the moderating role of Zhongyong. Higher Education, 74(6), 1033-1051.
Hideg, I., & Ferris, D. L. (2017). Dialectical Thinking and Fairness-Based Perspectives of Affirmative Action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 782-801. doi:10.1037/apl0000207
Hideg, I., & van Kleef, G. A. (2017). When expressions of fake emotions elicit negative reactions: The role of observers' dialectical thinking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1196-1212. doi:10.1002/job.2196
Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4(1), 25-40.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75): Springer.
Hu, J., Erdogan, B., Jiang, K., Bauer, T. N., & Liu, S. (2018). Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 313-323. doi:10.1037/apl0000277
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 851-862. doi:10.1037/a0022465
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549-569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
Hwang, K.-K. (1998). Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7(1), 17-38.
January, A. M., Meyerson, D. A., Reddy, L. F., Docherty, A. R., & Klonoff, E. A. (2014). Impressions of misconduct: Graduate students’ perception of faculty ethical violations in scientist-practitioner clinical psychology programs. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(4), 261-268. doi:10.1037/tep0000059
Jiang, F., Lu, S., Hou, Y. B., & Yue, X. D. (2013). Dialectical thinking and health behaviors: The effects of theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 206-214. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.656130
Kallio, E. (2011). Integrative thinking is the key: An evaluation of current research into the development of adult thinking. Theory & Psychology, 21(6), 785-801. doi:10.1177/0959354310388344
Kao, C.-Y. (2018). How combining opposite, near-opposite, and irrelevant concepts influence creativity performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. doi:10.1037/aca0000166
Kay, M. B., Proudfoot, D., & Larrick, R. P. (2018). There’s no team in I: How observers perceive individual creativity in a team setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4), 432-442. doi:10.1037/apl0000270
Kelly, L. (1973). Toward competence and creativity in an open class. College English, 34(5), 644-660.
Kiefer, M., Schuler, S., Mayer, C., Trumpp, N., Hille, K., & Sachse, S. (2015). Handwriting or Typewriting? The Influence of Penor Keyboard-Based Writing Training on Reading and Writing Performance in Preschool Children (Vol. 11).
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622.
Korpela, K. M. (2010). How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: The Breuning case revisited. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 26(4), 843-847. doi:10.1185/03007991003603804
Le Masson, P., Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2011). The Interplay between Creativity Issues and Design Theories: A New Perspective for Design Management Studies? Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(4), 217-237. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00613.x
Leung, K., Brew, F. P., Zhang, Z.-X., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 795-816.
Li, J., Fraser, M. W., & Wike, T. L. (2013). Promoting social competence and preventing childhood aggression: A framework for applying social information processing theory in intervention research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(3), 357-364. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2013.01.001
Li, P. P. (2014). The Unique Value of Yin‐Yang Balancing: A Critical Response. Management and Organization Review, 10(2), 321-332.
Li, P. P. (2016). Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: how to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(1), 42-77.
Li, X. (2018). Zhong-Yong as dynamic balancing between Yin-Yang opposites. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(2), 375-379. doi:10.1108/ccsm-12-2016-0209
Li, Y., Yang, B., & Ma, L. (2018). When is task conflict translated into employee creativity? The moderating role of growth need strength. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17(1), 22-32. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000192
Lin, S. C., Chou, L. F., Jen, C. K., & Haw, Y. Z. (2016). Do Employee Voice Behaviors matter to Autonomy and Environmental Mastery? The Critical Role of Supervisor's Zhong-Yong thinking. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 764-764.
Liu, H., Wang, F.-x., & Yang, X.-y. (2015). More dialectical thinking, less creativity? the relationship between dialectical thinking style and creative personality: the case of China. PloS one, 10(4), e0122926.
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J.-C., & Velay, J.-L. (2006). Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Human Movement Science, 25(4), 646-656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. The creative cognition approach, 269-302.
M. Quade, A. (1996). An Assessment of Retention and Depth of Processing Associated with Notetaking Using Traditional Pencil and Paper and an On-line Notepad during Computer-Delivered Instruction.
Ma, C. P., Gu, J. B., & Liu, H. F. (2017). Entrepreneurs' passion and new venture performance in China. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1043-1068. doi:10.1007/s11365-017-0435-x
Ma, C. P., Liu, H. F., Gu, J. B., & Dou, J. S. (2018). How entrepreneurs' Zhong-yong thinking improves new venture performance: The mediating role of guanxi and the moderating role of environmental turbulence. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 323-345. doi:10.1108/cms-10-2016-0219
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(5), 922.
McKay, A. S., Grygiel, P., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Connected to create: A social network analysis of friendship ties and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 284-294. doi:10.1037/aca0000117
10.1037/aca0000117.supp (Supplemental)
Mercier, H., Zhang, J. H., Qu, Y. P., Lu, P., & Van der Henst, J. B. (2015). Do Easterners and Westerners Treat Contradiction Differently? Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15(1-2), 45-63. doi:10.1163/15685373-12342140
Morgan, G. A., Harmon, R. J., & Gliner, J. A. (2001). Ethical issues related to publishing and reviewing. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(12), 1476-1478. doi:10.1097/00004583-200112000-00020
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631-659.
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard:Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159-1168. doi:10.1177/0956797614524581
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.
Munro, D. J. (1985). Individualism and holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist values: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan Ann Arbor.
Nakamura, H. (1985). Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples Honolulu. In: University of Hawaii Press.(Original work published 1964).
Neubert, M. J., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1220-1233. doi:10.1037/a0012695
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological review, 108(2), 291.
Nyikos, M., & Oxford, R. (1993). A factor analytic study of language‐learning strategy use: Interpretations from information‐processing theory and social psychology. The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 11-22.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Paletz, S. B. F., & Peng, K. P. (2009). Problem Finding and Contradiction: Examining the Relationship Between Naive Dialectical Thinking, Ethnicity, and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 139-151. doi:10.1080/10400410902858683
Pan, W., & Sun, L. Y. (2018). A Self-Regulation Model of Zhong Yong Thinking and Employee Adaptive Performance. Management and Organization Review, 14(1), 135-159. doi:10.1017/mor.2017.33
Parkinson, S. (1994). Scientific or ethical quality? Psychological Science, 5(3), 137-138. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00648.x
Parnes, S. J., & Meadow, A. (1959). Effects of" brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. Journal of educational psychology, 50(4), 171.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American psychologist, 54(9), 741.
Poster, E., Pearson, G. S., & Pierson, C. (2012). Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 25(1), 1-2. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6171.2011.00317.x
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4), 741.
Price, J. H., Dake, J. A., & Islam, R. (2001). Selected ethical issues in research and publication: Perceptions of health education faculty. Health Education & Behavior, 28(1), 51-64. doi:10.1177/109019810102800106
Qu, Y., Wu, W., Tang, F., Si, H., & Xia, Y. (2018). Why do I conform to your ideas? The role of coworkers’ regulatory focus in explaining the influence of zhongyong on harmony voice. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 346-368.
Reamer, F. G. (2013). Social work in a digital age: Ethical and risk management challenges. Social Work, 58(2), 163-172. doi:10.1093/sw/swt003
Reiser, S. J. (1993). Overlooking ethics in the search for objectivity and misconduct in science. Academic Medicine, 68(9), S84-S87. doi:10.1097/00001888-199309000-00041
Resnik, D. B., & Dinse, G. E. (2013). Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings. Journal of Medical Ethics: Journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics, 39(1), 46-50. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100766
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative science quarterly, 219-244.
Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. Journal of experimental social psychology, 43(6), 933-946.
Rodriguez, C. M., Smith, T. L., & Silvia, P. J. (2016). Multimethod prediction of physical parent–child aggression risk in expectant mothers and fathers with Social Information Processing theory. Child Abuse & Neglect, 51, 106-119. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.028
Roets, A., Soetens, B., Au, E. W. M., & Guan, Y. J. (2014). Personal choice: A blessing or a burden, or both? A cross-cultural investigation on need for closure effects in two Western and two East-Asian societies. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 216-221. doi:10.1002/ijop.12027
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships: As developed in the client-centered framework (Vol. 3): McGraw-Hill New York.
Ruisel, I. (2006). About the effect of rational, dialectical and critical thinking on wisdom. Studia Psychologica, 48(2), 81-93.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 224-253.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863-871. doi:10.1037/a0022625
Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of management journal, 46(6), 703-714.
Sidanius, J., Devereux, E., & Pratto, F. (1992). A comparison of symbolic racism theory and social dominance theory as explanations for racial policy attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(3), 377-395.
Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 338-366.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Martin, M., & Stallworth, L. M. (1991). Consensual racism and career track: Some implications of social dominance theory. Political Psychology, 691-721.
Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological review, 74(1), 29.
Stephens, J. P., & Carmeli, A. (2017). Relational leadership and creativity: The effects of respectful engagement and caring on meaningfulness and creative work involvement. In Handbook of Research on Leadership and Creativity: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 50-67. doi:10.1037/aca0000095
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity: Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3-15.
Stretton, S., Bramich, N. J., Keys, J. R., Monk, J. A., Ely, J. A., Haley, C., . . . Woolley, K. L. (2012). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 28(10), 1575-1583. doi:10.1185/03007995.2012.728131
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel psychology, 52(3), 591-620.
Torrance, E. P. (1969). Orientación del talento creativo: Troquel.
Torrance, E. P. (1984). The role of creativity in identification of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 153-156.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The nature of creativity, 43-75.
Tullett, A. D. (1995). The adaptive—innovative (A—I) cognitive styles of male and female project managers: Some implications for the management of change. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(4), 359-365.
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 199-206.
Vagos, P., Rijo, D., & Santos, I. M. (2016). Scenes for Social Information Processing in Adolescence: Item and factor analytic procedures for psychometric appraisal. Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 416-428. doi:10.1037/pas0000194
10.1037/pas0000194.supp (Supplemental)
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517-529. doi:10.1037/a0018867
Weigelt-Marom, H., & Weintraub, N. (2018). Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap? Computers & Education, 117, 132-140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.008
Wyer Jr, R. S. (2012). A theory of social information processing. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume One, 1, 156.
Yang, C. C., Wan, C. S., & Chiou, W. B. (2010). DIALECTICAL THINKING AND CREATIVITY AMONG YOUNG ADULTS: A POSTFORMAL OPERATIONS PERSPECTIVE. Psychological Reports, 106(1), 79-92. doi:10.2466/pr0.106.1.79-92
Yang, Q., China, W. L., Peng, J., & Qiu, C. F. (2008). The apprehension of implement: Moderating effect of the thinking manner Zhong Yong on relationship of creativity ability and innovation behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3-4), 705-705.
Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 53-57.
Yuan, L., Zhang, L. L., & Tu, Y. H. (2018). When a leader is seen as too humble: A curvilinear mediation model linking leader humility to employee creative process engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(4), 468-481. doi:10.1108/lodj-03-2017-0056
Zeng, K., & Wang, J.-w. (2017). Simple analysis on the embodiment of golden mean (Zhong Yong) thoughts in tuina. Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science, 15(1), 63-66.
Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 261.
Zhou, Z. J., Hu, L. X., Sun, C. C., Li, M. Z., Guo, F., & Zhao, Q. B. (2019). The Effect of Zhongyong Thinking on Remote Association Thinking: An EEG Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00207